Bill S-211 explained in plain English
An Act to require the Minister of the Environment to establish, in co-operation with the provinces, an agency with the power to identify and protect Canada's watersheds that will constitute sources of drinking water in the future
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-211 requires the federal Minister of the Environment to negotiate an agreement with the provinces to establish a federal-provincial agency that identifies and protects watersheds essential for Canada's future drinking water supply.
Bill S-211 is a Senate bill that sets out requirements for the federal government to work with the provinces to create a new agency focused on protecting Canada's drinking water sources. The bill says Canada's drinking water sources are under threat from land development and changing water needs, and that both federal and provincial governments have responsibility for watershed protection. Under this bill, the Minister of the Environment must: 1. Consult with provincial ministers and other federal ministers (Health and Natural Resources) to create a federal-provincial agreement 2. The agreement must establish how to define "protected watersheds" (water sources for future drinking water) and set up a new agency to regulate land use in those areas 3. The agency would have power to issue permits and enforce federal and provincial laws related to land use in protected watersheds 4. The agreement must include a process for identifying and planning for drinking water needs of Canadian municipalities until the year 2050 5. The agreement must outline what laws need to be passed in Parliament and in provincial legislatures to make this work The bill sets deadlines: the Minister must conclude the agreement by December 31 of the year after the bill receives royal assent (or explain why not). After the agreement is signed, the Minister must introduce a bill in Parliament within 90 days to establish the agency and implement the agreement. This bill does not itself create the agency or change existing laws. Instead, it requires the government to negotiate an agreement and then introduce separate legislation to make that agreement law.
- Requires the Minister of the Environment to consult with every provincial minister to negotiate a federal-provincial agreement on watershed protection
- Requires the Minister to also consult with the Minister of Health and the Minister of Natural Resources on the principles governing the agreement
- Specifies that the agreement must establish a process for defining and designating protected watersheds (watersheds that are sources of drinking water)
- Specifies that the agreement must establish a federal-provincial agency with power to regulate land use within protected watersheds
- Specifies that the agreement must give the agency authority to issue permits governing land use in protected watersheds and to enforce federal and provincial laws
- Specifies that the agreement must include a process for the agency to define drinking water needs of Canadian municipalities through the year 2050 and identify which watersheds will supply those needs
- Specifies that the agreement must outline legislation needed in Parliament and provincial legislatures to authorize these steps and allow the Minister to issue protection orders for identified watersheds
- Sets a deadline of December 31 of the year after royal assent for the Minister to conclude the agreement or present Parliament with reasons why it has not been concluded
- Requires the Minister to introduce a bill in Parliament within 90 days after the agreement is concluded to establish the agency and implement the agreement
- The federal Minister of the Environment
- Provincial ministers responsible for public lands and drinking water quality
- The federal Minister of Health
- The federal Minister of Natural Resources
- Canadian municipalities (which would need to define their drinking water needs through the agency process)
- Property owners and land users within protected watersheds (who would be subject to permits and regulations issued by the new agency once it is established)
- The general public relying on drinking water from protected watersheds
- The Minister of the Environment must consult with every provincial minister about the federal-provincial agreement (Section 3(1))
- The Minister must consult with the Minister of Health and Minister of Natural Resources about principles governing the agreement (Section 3(2))
- The agreement must establish a process for defining protected watersheds by agreement between the federal government and the province where the watershed is located (Section 3(3)(a))
- The agreement must specify how a federal-provincial agency will regulate existing or proposed land use in protected watersheds (Section 3(3)(b) and (c))
- The agency must be authorized to issue permits governing land use in protected watersheds and enforce federal and provincial laws (Section 3(3)(d))
- The agreement must establish a process for the agency to define drinking water needs of municipalities until 2050 and identify watersheds that will supply that water (Section 3(3)(e))
- The agreement must outline legislation needed to authorize the Minister, with provincial agreement, to issue protection orders for identified watersheds (Section 3(3)(f))
- The Minister must conclude the agreement by December 31 of the year after royal assent, or present Parliament with reasons and a timeline if it cannot be concluded (Section 4(1))
- The Minister must introduce a bill in Parliament within 90 days of concluding the agreement to establish the agency and implement its provisions (Section 4(2))
- The bill will receive royal assent on an unspecified date
- The Minister must conclude the federal-provincial agreement by December 31 of the year following royal assent, or explain why not (Section 4(1))
- The Minister must introduce legislation in Parliament within 90 days after the agreement is concluded, by the first five sitting days of Parliament after that 90-day period expires (Section 4(2))
- The agency process for identifying drinking water needs must extend to the year 2050 (Section 3(3)(e))
- The bill does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance with its requirements
- The bill does not specify which provinces must participate in the agreement, only that the Minister must consult with 'every provincial minister'
- The bill does not specify what happens if the provincial ministers do not agree to conclude an agreement
- The bill does not specify the structure, governance, or operations of the future agency, only that an agreement must define these matters
- The bill does not specify what criteria will be used to determine which watersheds are 'essential' to drinking water needs
- The bill does not specify what enforcement powers the agency will have or what penalties apply to violations of permits
- The bill does not specify what lands or activities will be restricted in protected watersheds
- The bill does not specify how the agency will balance drinking water protection with other land uses or economic activities
- The bill was introduced in January 2009 and remains at the committee stage in the Senate; it is unclear if it has proceeded further
This bill does not repeal, amend, or directly change any existing laws. It is a directive to the Minister to negotiate an agreement that will later require separate legislation. The bill text indicates that legislation will need to be introduced in Parliament and provincial legislatures, but it does not identify which existing laws would be affected.
Source: Section 3(3)(f)
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-211, concerning the identification and protection of future drinking water sources through watershed management, completed its first reading in the Senate on January 27, 2009, and was subsequently referred to committee.
This artifact describes the first reading stage of Bill S-211 in the Senate, which occurred on January 27, 2009. The bill was later referred to a committee on June 10, 2009, and is currently at that stage. The bill aims to establish an agency to identify and protect Canadian watersheds that could serve as future drinking water sources.
On January 27, 2009, Bill S-211, concerning the protection of Canada's drinking water sources, received its first reading in the Senate.
This artifact documents the first reading of Bill S-211 in the Senate on January 27, 2009. The Senate proceedings included tributes, statements on international events and domestic issues, tabling of documents, adoption of motions, and the first reading of several bills. Bill S-211, titled 'An Act to require the Minister of the Environment to establish, in co-operation with the provinces, an agency with the power to identify and protect Canada's watersheds that will constitute sources of drinking water in the future,' was introduced by Senator Jerahmiel S. Grafstein and read for the first time. Following its first reading, the bill was scheduled for second reading at a later date.
Bill S-211, concerning the identification and protection of Canada's future drinking water sources through a new agency, completed its second reading in the Senate and was referred to committee.
This artifact shows the procedural history of Bill S-211 in the Senate. The bill completed its second reading stage on March 11, 2009, and was referred to committee on June 10, 2009. It is currently at the consideration in committee stage. The artifact also lists similar bills, S-207 and S-208, introduced in the same or previous Parliaments.
During a Senate sitting on March 11, 2009, the second reading debate for Bill S-211 was adjourned, meaning no substantial progress was made on the bill during this session.
This record details a Senate sitting on March 11, 2009. The primary procedural activity of note related to Bill S-211 was that its second reading debate was adjourned. This means the Senate did not proceed with a full debate or vote on the bill at this time. The rest of the sitting included Senators' Statements, routine proceedings, question period, and debate on various other bills and motions.
During a Senate sitting on April 29, 2009, debate continued on Bill S-211, an act to establish an agency to protect future drinking water sources, with Senator Grafstein advocating for its passage by emphasizing the declining availability and growing importance of freshwater resources in Canada.
This Senate sitting on April 29, 2009, included debate on Bill S-211, which aims to establish an agency to identify and protect Canada's future drinking water sources. Senator Grafstein spoke in favour of the bill, highlighting the decreasing availability and increasing importance of fresh water in Canada. He emphasized the need for a national inventory of watersheds and argued that the bill provides a cost-effective way to achieve this. The debate also touched upon the history of the bill, previous committee discussions, and concerns about constitutional aspects. The sitting also included discussions on other matters such as the Canada Excellence Research Chairs program, support for military families, a landmark artificial heart transplant, hospice palliative care, community initiatives, financial system declarations, petitions regarding the seal hunt, employment insurance benefits, consultancy fees, the automotive sector, the 2010 Winter Olympic Games, airport infrastructure funding, Indigenous rights, literacy programs, and motions to authorize committee studies on national security, defence, veterans' services, and post-secondary education accessibility. Other bills discussed included those concerning tax relief for Nunavik and amendments to the Food and Drugs Act regarding clean drinking water.
The Senate debated Bill S-211, aimed at protecting future drinking water sources, with the sponsor emphasizing the need for action on water resource management, alongside other Senate business including reports, questions, and debates on different legislative matters.
This document contains the Senate debates from April 29, 2009. A significant portion of the debate focused on Bill S-211, concerning the identification and protection of Canada's future drinking water sources. The sponsor of the bill, Senator Grafstein, argued for its necessity due to diminishing water resources and the lack of a comprehensive national water policy. He highlighted concerns about pollution, decreased water levels, and the need for facts before policy. Other discussions in the Senate included various reports being tabled, questions raised during Question Period on topics like employment insurance, consultancy fees, and automotive sector job losses, and debates on other bills, including one concerning tax relief for Nunavik and another on amending the Food and Drugs Act for clean drinking water. The debate on Bill S-211 was adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on June 10, 2009, Bill S-211, concerning the protection of Canada's future drinking water sources through watershed identification and protection, was read a second time and referred to committee, following a brief debate and extensive tributes to a retiring senator.
On June 10, 2009, the Senate held a debate at the second reading stage for Bill S-211. Following the debate, the bill was referred to a Senate committee for further study. The debate primarily focused on tributes to Senator Willie Adams, who was retiring from the Senate after 32 years of service. There was also discussion on other matters before the Senate, including other bills and reports being tabled. The actual legislative discussion of Bill S-211 was brief, with the debate concluding and the bill being referred to committee.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced