Bill S-226 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-226 amends the Criminal Code to limit where provinces can lawfully operate lottery schemes using video lottery terminals and slot machines to casinos, race-courses, and betting theatres only.
Bill S-226 changes Canadian federal criminal law about lottery schemes. Currently, provinces can legally set up and run lotteries using video lottery terminals and slot machines in various locations. This bill would narrow that permission. After the bill becomes law, provinces would only be able to legally operate video lottery terminal and slot machine games in three specific types of locations: casinos, race-courses, and betting theatres. The bill amends section 207 of the Criminal Code, which defines what counts as a "lottery scheme" and what exemptions exist. The change would mean video lottery terminals and slot machines in other locations would no longer have a legal exemption from criminal law prohibitions on lottery schemes.
- Amends section 207(4) of the Criminal Code by adding a new exemption category (b.1)
- Creates an exemption specifically for games operated on or through video lottery terminals or slot machines, but only when those machines are located in casinos, race-courses, or betting theatres
- Removes the current broader exemption that allowed video lottery terminals and slot machines in other locations to operate legally
- Requires consultation with provincial and territorial governments before the bill comes into force
- Provincial governments and their gaming/lottery operations
- Video lottery terminal and slot machine operators
- Venues currently hosting video lottery terminals or slot machines outside of casinos, race-courses, or betting theatres
- Territorial governments (consulted but not directly regulated)
- The federal government (administers and enforces the Criminal Code)
- Provinces retain the right to operate video lottery terminals and slot machines legally, but only in casinos, race-courses, or betting theatres
- The federal government must consult with provincial and territorial governments before setting the commencement date
- Video lottery terminals and slot machines in locations other than the three permitted types would no longer have a Criminal Code exemption
- Bill received First Reading on February 11, 2009
- Bill is currently at committee stage in the Senate (status as of provided information)
- The bill will come into force no later than three years after receiving Royal Assent, on a date set by Governor in Council after consultation with provincial and territorial governments
- The bill does not specify direct financial costs or tax impacts
- Provincial and territorial governments may experience revenue changes if video lottery terminal and slot machine operations must relocate or cease outside permitted locations
- The bill does not explicitly state new penalties or enforcement mechanisms. However, removing the exemption for video lottery terminals and slot machines in non-permitted locations would mean those operations could potentially be prosecuted under existing Criminal Code prohibitions on lottery schemes
- The bill text does not specify what will happen to video lottery terminals and slot machines currently operating in locations other than casinos, race-courses, or betting theatres after the bill comes into force
- The bill does not define 'casino,' 'race-course,' or 'betting theatre' explicitly; these terms are referenced to existing Criminal Code sections (204(8)(e) for betting theatres) but full definitions are not provided in the bill text
- The exact commencement date is left to be determined by Governor in Council order after consultations, so the timing is not fixed
- The bill does not explain the policy rationale for limiting locations to these three types of venues
- The specific impact on current provincial gaming operations is not addressed in the bill
The definition of 'lottery scheme' and its exemptions are changed to limit where provinces can legally operate video lottery terminals and slot machines to three specific location types: casinos, race-courses, and betting theatres.
Source: Section 1 of Bill S-226
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-226, concerning lottery schemes, completed its first reading in the Senate on February 11, 2009, and was subsequently referred to a Senate committee.
Bill S-226, which aims to amend the Criminal Code concerning lottery schemes, completed its first reading in the Senate on February 11, 2009. It was later referred to a Senate committee on September 29, 2009. The bill was sponsored by Senator Jean Lapointe and received a response speech from Senator Bert Brown.
On February 11, 2009, the Senate held its first reading of Bill S-226 concerning lottery schemes, alongside tributes and discussions on various other matters.
This Senate sitting on February 11, 2009, included the first reading of Bill S-226, an Act to amend the Criminal Code regarding lottery schemes. The sitting also featured tributes to the late Honourable Gérald-A. Beaudoin, congratulations to Senator Marcel Prud'homme on his 45th anniversary as a Member of Parliament, discussions on pay equity, India's Republic Day, and official languages. Other proceedings included tabling of reports, notices of motions regarding committee meetings, and debates on the economy, Canada-U.S. relations, and Afghanistan. The primary procedural event related to Bill S-226 was its introduction and first reading, with its second reading scheduled for two days later.
Bill S-226, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code regarding lottery schemes, completed its second reading in the Senate and was then referred to committee.
This record details the progress of Bill S-226 in the Senate. The bill completed its second reading stage on March 10, 2009, after which it was referred to a committee on September 29, 2009. Major speeches related to the bill's second reading occurred on March 25, May 27, and September 29, 2009.
On March 10, 2009, the Senate held its regular sitting, including tributes, statements, question period, and debated or adjourned proceedings on various bills and reports, with the second reading debate of Bill S-226 concerning lottery schemes being adjourned.
On March 10, 2009, the Senate sat. The sitting included tributes, statements on various topics including Learning Disabilities Awareness Month, International Women's Day, and Afghanistan. Routine proceedings involved the presentation of committee reports and the first reading of several bills. Question Period addressed issues like disenfranchised Canadian citizens, pay equity, violence against Aboriginal women, and social responsibility overseas. The Senate then proceeded to Orders of the Day, where committee meetings were authorized, a report on Supplementary Estimates (C) was adopted, and debates on several bills continued or were adjourned. Notably, the second reading debate for Bill S-226, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes), was adjourned. Other debates and proceedings involved Bill S-224 (Canada Elections Act and Parliament of Canada Act), Bill S-202 (Canada Elections Act), Bill S-212 (Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999), Bill S-214 (securities regulation), and Bill S-217 (National Philanthropy Day Bill).
During Senate debates on March 10, 2009, Senator Jean Lapointe spoke in favour of Bill S-226, which aims to move video lottery terminals out of bars and restaurants, citing concerns about gambling addiction, and the debate was adjourned.
This artifact contains the Senate debates from March 10, 2009. It includes routine proceedings, question period, and a debate on Bill S-226, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes)." The sponsor of the bill, Senator Jean Lapointe, spoke in favour of the bill, advocating for the relocation of video lottery terminals (VLTs) from bars and restaurants to casinos and betting theatres. He cited research indicating the negative impact of VLTs on individuals, particularly youth and seniors, and highlighted the social costs associated with compulsive gambling. The debate on Bill S-226 was adjourned, and the bill was not voted on during this sitting. Other discussions included pay equity, violence against Aboriginal women, social and corporate responsibility overseas, and the setting of Employment Insurance rates. There was also a debate on Bill S-224 concerning vacancies in the House of Commons and Senate, which involved a motion in amendment to refer the bill to a committee for further study due to constitutional concerns.
This Senate sitting on March 25, 2009, included debates on various topics and the consideration of several bills, with a continued debate on Bill S-226 concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to lottery schemes, where concerns were raised about potential breaches of federal-provincial agreements.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on March 25, 2009. While the artifact is labeled as a "Debate at second reading debate record" for Bill S-226, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes), the provided text does not contain a debate specific to Bill S-226. Instead, the text details a full day of Senate proceedings including Senators' Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings, Question Period discussions on topics such as Access to Information, Government Accountability, and the Broadcasting Industry, and the tabling and debate of several other bills, including Appropriation Bills. The portion of the text that pertains to Bill S-226 itself is a continued debate at the second reading stage, where Senator Bert Brown expressed concerns that the bill would violate existing federal-provincial agreements regarding gaming and betting.
During a Senate debate on March 25, 2009, Senator Bert Brown argued that Bill S-226, concerning lottery schemes, would breach federal-provincial agreements on gaming and betting.
This document records a debate in the Senate on March 25, 2009. The primary focus of this specific artifact is a speech by Senator Bert Brown regarding Bill S-226, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes). Senator Brown argued that passing Bill S-226 would violate existing federal-provincial agreements concerning gaming and betting, specifically mentioning agreements from 1979 and 1985. He stated that these agreements recognized the provinces' primary role in regulating gaming and betting within their jurisdictions and that breaking these agreements would set a problematic precedent for future government contracts. Other senators engaged in a question-and-answer session with Senator Brown on this matter, exploring the implications of breaking such agreements. The rest of the document details other proceedings in the Senate on that day, including statements on various topics, tabling of reports, notices of motions, and debates on other bills (Appropriation Bill No. 5, 2008-09; Appropriation Bill No. 1, 2009-10; and Bill S-219 regarding student loans).
On May 27, 2009, the Senate held a sitting primarily focused on paying tribute to retiring Senator J. Trevor Eyton, O.C., while also conducting routine proceedings and continuing debate on several bills and inquiries, including Bill S-226.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on May 27, 2009. The primary business of the sitting was the "Tributes" to Senator J. Trevor Eyton, O.C., who was retiring. Many senators from different parties spoke to honour Senator Eyton's extensive career in business, law, and public service, highlighting his expertise, contributions to committees, and personal qualities. The sitting also included routine proceedings where various committee reports were tabled, and bills were introduced. The "Orders of the Day" section shows that Bill S-226, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (lottery schemes), was considered at second reading and its debate was adjourned. Other bills, such as Bill C-14 (organized crime) and Bill C-16 (environmental enforcement), were debated and referred to committee. The sitting concluded with the adoption of committee reports and ongoing debates on various inquiries and motions.
The Senate debated Bill S-226 at second reading, with one senator arguing it would revoke existing gaming agreements, before the bill was passed to committee.
On September 29, 2009, the Senate debated Bill S-226, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning lottery schemes. During the second reading debate, Senator Michael L. MacDonald argued against the bill, stating that it would revoke existing federal and provincial gaming agreements. He encouraged senators to defeat the initiative. Senator Joan Fraser questioned if there was legal evidence that the bill would abrogate these agreements, and Senator MacDonald stated he would check with colleagues and bring copies of the agreements to committee. The debate concluded, and the bill was read a second time on division. Subsequently, the bill was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced