Bill C-6 explained in plain English
An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill C-6 requires Canada Post and postal workers to resume work, bans strikes and lockouts, and establishes an arbitration process with preset wage increases to resolve a labour dispute.
Bill C-6, the Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians Act, was passed in June 2011 to end a labour dispute between Canada Post Corporation and the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. The bill requires Canada Post to immediately resume or continue postal services, and requires employees to return to work when asked. It bans strikes and lockouts during an extended collective agreement period that runs from February 1, 2011 until a new collective agreement takes effect. The bill establishes a "final offer selection" process where an arbitrator appointed by the Minister of Labour chooses between the employer's or union's final offer on disputed contract issues (excluding wages and contract length). The arbitrator must consider factors like comparability to other postal industries, Canada Post's economic viability, worker health and safety, and pension plan sustainability. Wages are predetermined by the law with increases of 1.75% (February 2011), 1.5% (February 2012), 2% (February 2013), and 2% (February 2014). The new collective agreement created by the arbitrator's decision will be binding until January 31, 2015. The union and employer can still negotiate their own agreement before the arbitrator decides, which would end the arbitration process. The bill prohibits imprisonment for failing to pay fines and sets maximum penalties of $50,000 for officers or representatives and $1,000 for others who violate the act, with maximum penalties of $100,000 for the employer or union as entities.
- Requires Canada Post Corporation to immediately resume or continue postal services when the act comes into force
- Requires employees to return to work when asked
- Prohibits Canada Post and its officers/representatives from preventing employees from returning to work or disciplining employees for participating in the strike
- Requires the Canadian Union of Postal Workers to notify employees that they must return to work and to take reasonable steps to ensure compliance
- Extends the collective agreement that expired on January 31, 2011 from February 1, 2011 until a new collective agreement takes effect
- Bans lockouts by the employer during the extended agreement period
- Bans strikes and strike participation by the union and employees during the extended agreement period
- Establishes a final offer selection arbitration process where the Minister of Labour appoints an arbitrator
- Requires both parties to submit lists of agreed matters, disputed matters, and final offers on disputes to the arbitrator
- Requires the arbitrator to decide within 90 days (or longer if the Minister allows) which party's final offer to select on disputed contract matters
- Establishes that arbitrator's decision serves as the new collective agreement, binding both parties until January 31, 2015
- Preset salary increases in the new collective agreement: 1.75% effective February 1, 2011; 1.5% effective February 1, 2012; 2% effective February 1, 2013; 2% effective February 1, 2014
- Allows the parties to negotiate their own agreement before the arbitrator decides, which would end the arbitration
- Allows the parties to amend the new collective agreement except for its term (ending January 31, 2015) and the preset wage increases
- Establishes that arbitration costs are split equally between Canada Post and the union
- Creates offences with fines of up to $50,000 for officers or representatives violating the act, up to $1,000 for others, and up to $100,000 for the employer or union as entities
- Prohibits imprisonment as a penalty for failure to pay fines
- Allows fines to be recovered through civil court judgment if not paid
- Canada Post Corporation (employer)
- Canadian Union of Postal Workers (union)
- Canada Post employees bound by the collective agreement
- Canada Post officers and representatives
- Union officers and representatives
- The Minister of Labour
- The arbitrator appointed under the act
- Canada Post must immediately resume or continue postal services
- Employees must return to work when asked
- Canada Post cannot prevent employees from returning to work or discipline them for past strike participation
- The union must notify employees to return to work and take reasonable steps to ensure they do so
- The union cannot encourage employees not to comply with return-to-work requirements
- Both parties are prohibited from declaring or participating in strikes or lockouts during the extended agreement period
- Both parties must submit final offers and relevant lists to the arbitrator within deadlines set by the arbitrator
- The arbitrator must select one party's final offer on all disputed matters (except wages and contract term)
- The arbitrator's decision becomes a binding new collective agreement
- Parties can negotiate their own agreement to replace the arbitrator's decision before the arbitrator decides
- The new collective agreement contains preset wage increases set out in the law
- Act comes into force 24 hours after Royal Assent on June 26, 2011
- Extended collective agreement runs from February 1, 2011 to when new collective agreement takes effect
- Arbitrator has 90 days from appointment to decide (or longer if Minister allows)
- Preset wage increases: 1.75% effective February 1, 2011; 1.5% effective February 1, 2012; 2% effective February 1, 2013; 2% effective February 1, 2014
- New collective agreement binds parties until January 31, 2015
- Preset salary increases for employees: 1.75% (Feb 2011), 1.5% (Feb 2012), 2% (Feb 2013), 2% (Feb 2014)
- Arbitration costs split equally between Canada Post and the union
- The bill does not specify total cost amounts
- Individual who violates the act: fine of up to $50,000 if acting as officer or representative of employer or union; up to $1,000 otherwise (per day or part of day offence continues)
- Employer or union that violates the act: fine of up to $100,000 (per day or part of day offence continues)
- Fines are punishable by summary conviction
- No imprisonment for failure to pay fines
- Unpaid fines can be recovered as judgment debt in superior court through civil process
- The bill does not specify which specific contract matters are in dispute between the parties
- The bill does not provide details about what aspects the arbitrator will consider beyond those listed in section 11(2)
- The bill text does not indicate whether employees will be compensated for time on strike before the act came into force
- The bill does not specify how long the arbitrator's appointment process will take before the 90-day decision period begins
- The actual arbitration outcomes and the final terms of employment beyond wages and contract length are not predetermined
- The bill does not detail procedures for recovery of arbitration costs from the parties
The Canada Labour Code Part I rules apply to the extended collective agreement and the new collective agreement created by this act, as if they had been entered into under that part, except where this act specifically provides otherwise.
Source: Section 2(2), Section 6(2), Section 14(1)
Despite the Criminal Code's default rule, imprisonment cannot be imposed for failing to pay fines issued under this act.
Source: Section 19
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textThe official summary published alongside the bill, shown exactly as written.
Source: Parliament of Canada (LEGISinfo)
The Library of Parliament does not prepare Legislative Summaries for bills debated under urgency and emergency. The following is a short summary: On 20 June 2011, the Minister of Labour introduced Bill C-6, Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians Act, in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. Bill C-6 provides for the resumption and continuation of postal services, prohibits strikes and lockouts and imposes a final offer selection process to resolve matters remaining in dispute between the parties. The arbitrator’s decision will be used as the new collective agreement.
This is the official summary published by the Parliament of Canada, shown verbatim. Not legal advice. PoliticalData.ca did not write or edit this text.
View on LEGISinfoParliamentary Process
Bill C-6, an act to resume postal services, completed its legislative stages in the Senate and received Royal Assent.
This artifact describes the legislative process of Bill C-6 in the Senate. It indicates that the bill went through First Reading, Second Reading, Consideration in Committee, Report Stage, and Third Reading, all on June 23, 2011. The bill then received Royal Assent on June 26, 2011, becoming a statute. The artifact also notes that speeches were made during the Second Reading stage in both the Senate and the House of Commons, with specific members identified as sponsors and respondents.
The Senate began the process for Bill C-6, an act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, hearing initial debates and speeches before referring it to committee and proceeding to second reading and passage.
This record details the first reading of Bill C-6, an act to resume postal services, in the Senate. The sitting included debates on various topics like international film awards, a detained Canadian citizen, climate change, and RCMP use of law enforcement provisions. The main event was the tabling and initial debate on Bill C-6, with senators discussing its necessity, potential economic impacts, and proposed contract terms. Following this, the bill was referred to a Committee of the Whole, where ministers answered questions from senators. The Senate then proceeded to second reading of the bill, which was adopted 'on division'. Finally, amendments were proposed and defeated, and the bill was read a third time and passed, also 'on division'. The sitting also included other routine proceedings and tributes.
The Senate debated and passed Bill C-6, an act to end the postal service work stoppage, which then received Royal Assent.
This record details the Senate's first reading and subsequent debate of Bill C-6, an act to end the postal service work stoppage. The Senate debated the bill, heard from ministers and union representatives, and ultimately passed it. The bill received Royal Assent later that day. The discussion highlighted the government's reasoning for introducing the legislation to end the work stoppage and the union's concerns about the bill's impact on labour rights and collective bargaining.
Senators debated Bill C-6, aiming to end a postal service work stoppage, with discussions focusing on government intervention, contract terms, arbitration, and the bill's fairness and constitutional implications.
During this Senate debate on Bill C-6, which aimed to end a postal service work stoppage, senators discussed the details of the proposed legislation. Key themes included the reasons for government intervention, the specifics of the mandated contract terms, the role of arbitration, and the potential impact on labour relations and the economy. Senators expressed differing views on whether the legislation was necessary, fair, and constitutionally sound, particularly concerning the government's wage and pension stipulations and the final offer selection process.
The Senate completed its second reading of Bill C-6 on June 23, 2011, after which the bill moved to the House of Commons and eventually received Royal Assent on June 26, 2011.
This artifact describes the Senate's second reading stage for Bill C-6, An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The Senate agreed to the bill at second reading on Thursday, June 23, 2011, and subsequently agreed to it at third reading. The bill then proceeded to the House of Commons on Thursday, June 23, 2011. Following further proceedings, the bill received royal assent on Sunday, June 26, 2011, becoming Statutes of Canada 2011, c. 17. The provided text indicates major speeches were delivered at the second reading stage in both the Senate and House of Commons, with sponsor and response speeches noted.
During the second reading debate and subsequent committee review of Bill C-6, senators and stakeholders discussed the legislation's impact on postal services, labour relations, and the economy, ultimately leading to the bill's passage.
This Senate sitting included the second reading debate for Bill C-6, "An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services." Senators discussed the bill's necessity, its potential impact on labour relations, and specific clauses concerning wages, pensions, and arbitration. The Senate also heard statements on other matters, including international film awards, a Canadian citizen detained in Lebanon, and climate change. The Senate later proceeded to Committee of the Whole to examine the bill, hearing testimony from the Minister of Labour, the Minister of State for Transport, Canada Post's CEO and COO, and the President of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. Following the Committee of the Whole, amendments were proposed but ultimately defeated, and the bill proceeded to third reading and was passed.
The Senate debated and passed Bill C-6, which aimed to end the postal service work stoppage by imposing a contract and arbitration process, with senators raising concerns about its fairness and impact on labour rights.
On June 26, 2011, the Senate debated the second reading of Bill C-6, an act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. Senators discussed the reasons for the legislation, including the work stoppage at Canada Post and its impact on the economy. Key topics of debate included the terms of the proposed contract, the process of final offer selection for arbitration, and concerns about the bill's potential impact on labour relations and constitutional rights. The Senate ultimately passed the bill, with some senators voting "on division."
During the Senate's second reading debate, senators discussed Bill C-6, an act to end the postal service work stoppage, with significant debate on its labour relations provisions, before the bill was referred to a Committee of the Whole.
This artifact is a record of the Senate's second reading debate on Bill C-6, an act to end the postal service work stoppage. Senators discussed the bill's provisions, including the imposed contract terms, wage increases, and the final offer selection process for resolving the dispute. Opposition senators raised concerns about the bill's impact on collective bargaining rights and its potential to set a precedent for future labour relations. The bill was ultimately referred to a Committee of the Whole for further consideration. The artifact also includes discussions on unrelated topics such as international film awards, a Canadian detained in Lebanon, and climate change.
The Senate completed its committee consideration of Bill C-6, which provided for the resumption of postal services, and the bill subsequently received royal assent.
This artifact describes the Senate's "Consideration in committee" stage for Bill C-6, an act to resume and continue postal services. This stage was completed on Thursday, June 23, 2011, and the bill subsequently received royal assent on Sunday, June 26, 2011, becoming chapter 17 of the Statutes of Canada 2011. The records indicate that the bill moved through second reading and referral to committee, report stage, and third reading on June 23, 2011, all of which were agreed to. There is also a record of first reading, second reading, consideration in committee, and third reading occurring on Sunday, June 26, 2011, in the Senate. The House of Commons also had a sponsor's speech and a response speech on Thursday, June 23, 2011. The Senate also had a sponsor's speech and a response speech on Sunday, June 26, 2011. The source text does not detail the specific discussions or amendments made during the committee consideration.
During the Senate's committee consideration of Bill C-6, senators debated the bill's provisions, heard from stakeholders, proposed and defeated amendments, and ultimately passed the bill, which then received Royal Assent.
This Senate sitting record details the "Consideration in committee" stage for Bill C-6, "An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services." The Senate discussed and debated the bill, including hearing testimony from the Minister of Labour, the Minister of State for Transport, Canada Post Corporation's CEO and COO, and the President of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. Amendments to the bill were proposed and defeated. The bill was ultimately read the third time and passed "on division," meaning some senators did not agree with the final decision. Royal Assent was subsequently received for the bill.
During the Senate's consideration in committee, senators debated Bill C-6 to end the postal service work stoppage, hearing from both Canada Post and the union, with significant discussion on the bill's procedural aspects and impact on labour relations.
This record details a Senate debate on Bill C-6, aimed at ending the postal service work stoppage. Senators discussed the bill's provisions, including mandatory contract terms and wage increases. Various senators expressed concerns about the bill's impact on collective bargaining rights, the fairness of imposed terms, and the potential for creating a two-tiered workforce. The Senate also heard testimony from Canada Post management and union representatives regarding the dispute and the proposed legislation.
The Senate debated and passed Bill C-6, an act to resume postal services during a labour dispute, hearing arguments from ministers, Canada Post management, and the postal workers' union.
This document details a Senate debate on Bill C-6, an act to end a postal service work stoppage. Senators discussed the bill's provisions, including the imposition of a four-year contract with specific wage increases and the process for resolving outstanding issues through final offer selection. Opposition senators raised concerns about the bill's impact on collective bargaining rights and the fairness of the imposed terms, drawing comparisons to previous back-to-work legislation. The Senate then heard testimony from the Minister of Labour, the Minister of State for Transport, the CEO of Canada Post, and representatives from the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. These testimonies provided various perspectives on the dispute, the bill's details, and the future of Canada Post. The bill was ultimately passed by the Senate, and subsequently received Royal Assent.
The Senate completed the third reading of Bill C-6 on June 26, 2011, after which it received royal assent.
The Senate completed the third reading of Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, on Sunday, June 26, 2011. The bill subsequently received royal assent on the same day, becoming Statutes of Canada 2011, c. 17. The provided text indicates the bill went through various stages in the Senate, including first reading on June 20, 2011, and second reading, consideration in committee, and third reading on June 23, 2011. The House of Commons also had proceedings on June 23, 2011, and the Senate held further proceedings on June 26, 2011, including second and third readings. The artifact does not contain the full text of the bill, only records of its procedural steps. The exact content of the major speeches at second reading is not provided.
Senators debated Bill C-6, an act to resume postal services, focusing on its labour provisions and potential impact on collective bargaining rights, before passing it.
During the third reading debate of Bill C-6 in the Senate, senators discussed the bill's provisions for ending the postal service work stoppage. The debate included speeches on various topics, such as international film awards, a Canadian citizen detained in Lebanon, and climate change. The main focus was Bill C-6, with extensive discussion on its labour relations implications, including the imposition of a contract, wage rates, and the role of arbitration. Senators debated the bill's impact on collective bargaining rights and its potential precedent for future labour disputes. The bill proceeded through various stages of Senate consideration, including referral to a Committee of the Whole, and was eventually passed.
In the Senate's third reading debate on Bill C-6, senators discussed the government's intervention to end a postal service work stoppage, with significant debate on the bill's labour provisions and their potential impact on collective bargaining rights.
During the third reading debate of Bill C-6, senators discussed the resumption of postal services after a lockout. The debate focused on the bill's provisions for ending the work stoppage, including a mandated four-year contract with specific wage increases and a final offer selection process for unresolved issues. Senators raised concerns about the bill's impact on collective bargaining rights, the fairness of the imposed terms, and the potential precedent it sets for future labour disputes. The bill was ultimately passed.
During the Senate's third reading of Bill C-6, senators debated the necessity, fairness, and potential consequences of the legislation, which aimed to end the postal service work stoppage and impose a new contract.
During the Senate's third reading debate on Bill C-6, senators discussed the implications of the legislation for postal services and labour relations. Key themes included the government's justification for intervening in the labour dispute, the potential impact on the economy, the fairness of the imposed contract terms, and the government's role in setting a precedent for future public sector negotiations. Senators also questioned the specific provisions of the bill, such as the final offer selection process, the handling of pensions, and the definition of comparable postal industries. The debate also involved a discussion on the role and rights of unions, the rights of workers, and the historical context of back-to-work legislation. The bill was ultimately passed at third reading.
Bill C-6, an act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, underwent its first reading in the House of Commons on June 20, 2011, and later received royal assent.
This artifact describes the first reading of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 20, 2011. First reading is a procedural step where a bill is introduced to the House. The official text indicates that this bill later received royal assent on June 26, 2011, becoming chapter 17 of the Statutes of Canada 2011.
On June 20, 2011, the House of Commons debated a motion to increase the Guaranteed Income Supplement to combat seniors' poverty, with opposition parties arguing for a larger increase and the government defending its existing measures and budget proposals.
This document is a record of the House of Commons proceedings on June 20, 2011. The main debate revolved around an opposition motion to address seniors' poverty by increasing the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS). Members from various parties discussed the financial feasibility of such measures, the current financial situation of seniors, and the government's existing programs and proposed budget actions. The debate included personal anecdotes, statistical data on senior poverty rates, and differing views on the adequacy of government support and the allocation of public funds.
Bill C-6, concerning the resumption and continuation of postal services, completed all legislative stages in both the House of Commons and the Senate, receiving Royal Assent.
This record shows the procedural steps taken in the House of Commons and the Senate for Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The bill proceeded through first, second, and third readings, as well as committee consideration, in both chambers. Speeches were made at the second reading stage in both the House of Commons and the Senate.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons, a Member of Parliament spoke about the need to resume postal services, highlighting concerns from small business owners and postal workers.
This artifact is a record of a debate that took place in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, during the second reading stage of Bill C-6. The debate focused on the need to resume and continue postal services. A Member of Parliament spoke about concerns raised by small business owners who wanted postal workers to return to work. The speaker also highlighted the importance of collective bargaining rights, good-paying jobs, and the worries of postal workers regarding their pensions and wages. The provided text also includes lists of Members of Parliament, but does not detail any specific procedural actions or votes.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-6, MP Jasbir Sandhu spoke about the need to resume postal services, concerns over potential wage reductions, and the importance of good-paying jobs and collective bargaining.
This artifact contains a speech given by Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, the Member of Parliament for Surrey North, during the second reading debate of Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. Mr. Sandhu began by thanking his constituents and acknowledging the national day for Quebec. He commended his colleagues for their work and stated that he had heard from both government members and small business owners who want postal services to resume. As a small business owner himself and a believer in collective bargaining rights, he expressed concern that lowering wages would lead to a 'race to the bottom' that would hurt everyone in the long run. He shared a personal anecdote about his brother's well-paying unionized job enabling him to attend university, and noted that he has spoken to many people working in sawmills who have similar experiences. He also mentioned hearing from postal workers who were worried about their pensions and wages being clawed back.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-6, an MP expressed support for resuming postal services while also highlighting concerns about the impact of wage reductions on workers and the economy.
This artifact is a record of a debate at the second reading stage of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. A Member of Parliament (MP) from Surrey North, Jasbir Sandhu, spoke about the bill. He began by thanking his constituents and acknowledging Quebec's national day. He commended his colleagues for their hard work and mentioned hearing from small business owners who want postal services to resume. The MP, who is also a small business owner, stated his belief in collective bargaining and good-paying jobs. He shared personal anecdotes about how good wages helped him and his family, expressing concern that lowering wages could harm everyone in the long run. He also mentioned that postal workers he met during the election were worried about their pensions and wages.
During the second reading debate on Bill C-6, an MP expressed concerns about the impact of potential wage reductions on postal workers, small businesses, and the overall economy, while also advocating for collective bargaining rights.
This document records a debate in the House of Commons on Bill C-6, An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. A Member of Parliament spoke about the concerns of small business owners and postal workers regarding wages, pensions, and the right to collective bargaining. The speaker also reflected on the importance of good-paying jobs for local economies, referencing personal experience and discussions with constituents. The context indicates this debate occurred during the second reading stage of the bill and that the bill later received Royal Assent.
The House of Commons completed its committee consideration of Bill C-6, an act to resume postal services, on June 23, 2011, before it received royal assent on June 26, 2011.
This artifact documents the stage where the House of Commons considered Bill C-6, "An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services," in committee. This stage was completed on Thursday, June 23, 2011. Following this, the bill proceeded through report stage and third reading on the same day. The bill ultimately received royal assent on Sunday, June 26, 2011, becoming Statutes of Canada 2011, chapter 17. The provided text also includes details about the bill's progression through the Senate.
A debate in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, discussed concerns about Bill C-6's potential impact on small businesses, worker wages, and pensions.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, concerning Bill C-6, an act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The debate focused on the impact of the bill on small businesses, workers' wages, pensions, and the right to collective bargaining. A Member of Parliament expressed concerns that lowering wages would harm the economy in the long run and highlighted the importance of good-paying jobs supported by collective bargaining.
During House of Commons committee consideration of Bill C-6, MP Jasbir Sandhu spoke in favour of resuming postal services, emphasizing the importance of collective bargaining and good-paying jobs, while also noting concerns raised by postal workers and small business owners.
This artifact is a record of a speech given by MP Jasbir Sandhu during the House of Commons consideration of Bill C-6. The bill aimed to resume and continue postal services. In his speech, MP Sandhu acknowledged the hard work of his colleagues and stated that small business owners had contacted him expressing a desire for postal services to resume so workers could return to their jobs. He also spoke about his belief in collective bargaining and good-paying jobs, sharing personal anecdotes about how such jobs supported his family and community. He mentioned hearing concerns from postal workers about their pensions and wages. The artifact also includes lists of Members of Parliament, presumably indicating participation or presence during the proceedings.
During a House of Commons debate on June 23, 2011, Mr. Jasbir Sandhu discussed the impact of postal service disruptions on small businesses and workers, emphasizing concerns about wages and pensions.
This artifact is a record of a speech made in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, regarding Bill C-6. The speaker, Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, representing Surrey North, used his time to thank his constituents and acknowledge national celebrations. He also commented on the ongoing efforts of his colleagues in the House. A significant portion of his speech focused on the concerns of small business owners, who he stated want postal services to resume so workers can return to their jobs. Mr. Sandhu also shared his personal belief in collective bargaining, good-paying jobs, and the importance of protecting workers' pensions and wages, referencing personal experiences and the concerns of postal workers he met. He expressed worry that lowering wages would harm everyone in the long run and mentioned his awareness of the government's and the B.C. government's actions, although the text cuts off before detailing these.
During a House of Commons debate on June 23, 2011, a Member of Parliament raised concerns about Bill C-6, focusing on its potential effects on small businesses and workers' rights.
This artifact is a record of a speech given in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, regarding Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The speech, delivered by Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, expresses concerns about the impact of the bill on small businesses, postal workers' pensions and wages, and the broader economy. The speaker highlights the importance of collective bargaining and good-paying jobs, drawing on personal experience and conversations with constituents. The artifact also contains lists of Members of Parliament, seemingly indicating participation or positions related to the bill's passage, but the specific actions or votes associated with these lists are not detailed in the provided text.
The House of Commons completed the Report stage and Third Reading for Bill C-6 on June 23, 2011, after which it received Royal Assent on June 26, 2011.
This artifact describes the completion of the Report stage for Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. The bill was then moved to third reading, which was also completed on the same day. The bill ultimately received royal assent on June 26, 2011, becoming Statutes of Canada 2011, chapter 17.
During the report stage debate for Bill C-6 in the House of Commons, a Member of Parliament discussed the impact of postal services on small businesses and workers, noting concerns about wages and pensions.
This record documents a debate in the House of Commons during the report stage of Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. Although the bill has since received Royal Assent, this debate occurred before that point. A Member of Parliament spoke about the importance of postal services to small businesses and workers, referencing concerns about pensions and wages. The text also includes lists of Members of Parliament. The overall status of the bill as having received Royal Assent means it is now law, but this specific artifact captures a discussion during its legislative process.
During the report stage debate on Bill C-6, a Member of Parliament spoke about the dual concerns of small business owners wanting postal services back and postal workers fearing wage and pension cuts.
This record contains a speech from Mr. Jasbir Sandhu during the report stage debate of Bill C-6, an act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The speech was given in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. Mr. Sandhu spoke about the concerns of small business owners who want postal services to resume, and also highlighted the worries of postal workers regarding their pensions and wages. He shared a personal anecdote about how a unionized job helped him afford his education and stated his belief in collective bargaining and good-paying jobs.
During the report stage debate on Bill C-6, an MP discussed the impact of the postal service disruption on small businesses and the concerns of postal workers regarding wages and pensions.
This document is a record of a debate that occurred during the report stage of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. A Member of Parliament (MP) spoke about the bill, expressing gratitude to their constituents and colleagues. The MP shared concerns heard from small business owners who want postal services to resume, and from postal workers worried about their pensions and wages. The MP also reflected on the importance of good-paying unionized jobs.
During the report stage debate on Bill C-6, an MP expressed concerns about wages and pensions while acknowledging the desire of small business owners for the resumption of postal services.
This artifact is a record of a debate that took place in the House of Commons during the report stage of Bill C-6. A Member of Parliament (MP) for Surrey North, Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, spoke about the bill. He mentioned hearing from small business owners who wanted postal services to resume, as well as from postal workers concerned about their pensions and wages. The MP also shared a personal anecdote about the importance of good-paying unionized jobs. The debate occurred on June 23, 2011, after the bill had already received Royal Assent.
Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, completed its third reading in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011, and received royal assent on June 26, 2011.
The House of Commons completed the third reading stage of Bill C-6 on Thursday, June 23, 2011. This bill was an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The bill later received royal assent on Sunday, June 26, 2011, and became chapter 17 of the Statutes of Canada, 2011.
During the third reading debate of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons, a Member of Parliament discussed the importance of fair wages and collective bargaining for workers and the economy, while also referencing the need to resume postal services.
This record details the debate during the third reading stage of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. The debate focused on the resumption and continuation of postal services. A Member of Parliament expressed concerns about the impact of wage reductions on workers and small businesses, highlighting the importance of good-paying jobs and collective bargaining. The member also shared a personal anecdote about how a unionized job provided financial stability. The provided text also includes a list of Members of Parliament, indicating their presence in the House, though it does not specify their votes on the bill.
During the third reading debate of Bill C-6, MP Jasbir Sandhu spoke about the importance of postal services and good-paying jobs to the economy and workers, expressing concerns about potential wage reductions.
This artifact is a transcript of a speech given by MP Jasbir Sandhu during the third reading debate of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. The speech discusses the importance of postal services to the economy and to workers. MP Sandhu shares personal anecdotes about how good-paying, unionized jobs have supported families and communities. He also expresses concern that lowering wages could lead to a 'race to the bottom' and negatively impact the long term. The speech mentions that small business owners are also looking for the government to resolve the postal service issue so that workers can return to work.
During the third reading debate of Bill C-6, a Member of Parliament spoke about the need to resume postal services, the concerns of postal workers, and the importance of good-paying jobs.
This record documents a debate speech given at the third reading stage of Bill C-6 in the House of Commons on June 23, 2011. The speech was delivered by Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, who began by thanking his constituents and acknowledging a national day for Quebec. He commended his colleagues for their work and noted that small business owners, like his constituents, were urging the government to allow postal workers to return to work to resume postal services. Mr. Sandhu, identifying himself as a new Member of Parliament, a small business owner, and a believer in collective bargaining rights, shared concerns he heard from postal workers during the election regarding their pensions and wages. He argued that lowering wages could harm the economy in the long run and shared a personal anecdote about how a good-paying unionized job enabled him to pursue higher education. The provided text does not contain information about the bill's passage or any votes.
During the third reading debate for Bill C-6, MP Jasbir Sandhu spoke about the impact of the postal service issue on small businesses and workers, expressing support for collective bargaining and concern over potential wage reductions.
This artifact is a record of a speech given during the third reading debate of Bill C-6, an Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services. The speech was delivered by Mr. Jasbir Sandhu, Member of Parliament for Surrey North. He began by thanking his constituents and acknowledging a national day for Quebec. He commended his colleagues for their work and mentioned that small business owners are also concerned about the postal service disruptions and want workers to return to work. Mr. Sandhu stated his belief in collective bargaining rights, good-paying jobs, and expressed concern that lowering wages would negatively impact everyone in the long run, citing his brother's past experience with a well-paying unionized job. He also mentioned speaking with postal workers who were worried about their pensions and wages. The speech concludes mid-thought.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Royal assent yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Response speech yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lisa RaittSponsor MP | MP | Halton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauharnois—Salaberry | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne—Blainville | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière—Alma | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Coquitlam | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—La Prairie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil-Soulanges | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey North | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Cowichan | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newton—North Delta | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—Douglas | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chambly—Borduas | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trinity—Spadina | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—New Westminster | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sackville—Eastern Shore | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Saint-Constant | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bramalea—Gore—Malton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Durham | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wetaskiwin | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wild Rose | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erindale | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Humboldt | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—St. Albert | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Athabasca | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westlock—St. Paul | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax—Pickering | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Scarborough East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Coquihalla | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Edward—Hastings | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Essex | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West—Glanbrook | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Northeast | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary—Nose Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Brampton South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margaret's | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton—Mississippi Mills | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Alberni | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Leduc | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southeast | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby—Oshawa | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Island North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta—Richmond East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Crowfoot | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Blackstrap | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Wanuskewin | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre-North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton—Springdale | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oak Ridges—Markham | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Waterloo | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brant | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean—Carleton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Palliser | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northumberland—Quinte West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Spruce Grove | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Orléans | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southwest | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Macleod | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Sherwood Park | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced