Bill S-210 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (commercial seal fishing)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-210 proposed to amend the Fisheries Act to prohibit commercial seal fishing in Canada, with exceptions for Indigenous organizations and specific land claim beneficiaries, but it was defeated.
Bill S-210 proposed to amend the Fisheries Act to prohibit commercial fishing for seals in Canadian waters. It also aimed to stop the issuance of commercial licences for seal fishing. However, it included exceptions for commercial fishing conducted under a licence issued to an Indigenous organization, or by certain individuals exercising harvesting rights under land claims agreements. The bill was defeated.
- It would have amended the Fisheries Act to prohibit commercial fishing for seals in Canadian fisheries waters.
- It would have prevented the issuance of commercial licences for seal fishing.
- It would have created exceptions for commercial seal fishing carried out under a licence issued to an Indigenous organization.
- It would have created exceptions for commercial seal fishing carried out by individuals exercising harvesting rights under specific land claims agreements.
- It would have added a definition for 'aboriginal organization' to the Fisheries Act.
- It would have stated that the Act does not affect existing Aboriginal or treaty rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
- Individuals or organizations involved in commercial seal fishing.
- Indigenous organizations.
- Individuals who are beneficiaries under specific land claims agreements (Western Arctic (Inuvialuit) Claims Settlement Act or James Bay and Northern Quebec Native Claims Settlement Act).
- Individuals exercising harvesting rights under specific land claims agreements.
- The Minister responsible for the Fisheries Act.
- Prohibition on commercial fishing for, taking, catching, or killing seals in Canadian fisheries waters for commercial purposes.
- Right to obtain a commercial seal fishing licence for an Indigenous organization.
- Right to fish for seals for commercial purposes for beneficiaries exercising rights under specific land claims agreements.
- Right to fish for seals for commercial purposes for Inuk individuals exercising rights under the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement.
- Confirmation that existing Aboriginal or treaty rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, are not abrogated or derogated from.
- The bill would have come into force 60 days after receiving royal assent.
- The bill text does not specify penalties for violating the proposed prohibitions on commercial seal fishing.
- The bill was defeated and therefore did not come into force.
Adds a new section that prohibits commercial fishing for seals in Canadian waters, with specific exceptions for Indigenous organizations and individuals with harvesting rights under land claims agreements. It also amends section 2 to define 'aboriginal organization' and amends section 7 to limit the issuance of licences for commercial seal fishing. It adds a section clarifying that existing Aboriginal or treaty rights are not affected.
Source: Section 2, 3, and 4 of Bill S-210
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-210, concerning amendments to the Fisheries Act related to commercial seal fishing, completed its first reading in the Senate on May 2, 2012, before being defeated at second reading on February 27, 2013.
This artifact describes the first reading stage of Bill S-210, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (commercial seal fishing), in the Senate on May 2, 2012. This procedural step marks the formal introduction of the bill. The artifact also notes that the bill was ultimately defeated at the second reading stage on February 27, 2013. It also references similar bills with the same purpose introduced in a previous parliamentary session.
The Senate proceeded with the first reading of Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act (commercial seal fishing), alongside other routine proceedings, statements, and debates on various matters.
This document records the Senate's sitting on May 2, 2012. It details the introduction of Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The sitting also included various other proceedings such as Senators' Statements on diverse topics, tabling of committee reports, and questions raised during Question Period concerning issues like the Canada Periodical Fund, Veterans Independence Program, the financial system, and Parks Canada. Additionally, debates continued on other bills, including Bill S-207 regarding aboriginal treaty rights and an inquiry on the 30th anniversary of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Bill S-210 was presented for its first reading and placed on the order paper for second reading at a future date.
Bill S-210, which aimed to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing, was defeated at the second reading stage in the Senate on February 27, 2013.
This artifact concerns Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act regarding commercial seal fishing. The bill was defeated at the second reading stage in the Senate on February 27, 2013. The provided text lists the progression of the bill through different stages, including first reading and second reading, with associated dates and sitting numbers. It also notes that major speeches related to the second reading occurred on several dates in 2012 and early 2013. The artifact also references similar bills (S-207 and S-229) from a previous Parliament that also dealt with commercial seal fishing and were not proceeded with.
During a Senate sitting on June 14, 2012, debate on Bill S-210 concerning commercial seal fishing was opened and adjourned.
This document records a sitting of the Senate on June 14, 2012. The sitting included Senator statements recognizing individuals, tabling of committee reports, question period on various topics, and debates on several bills and motions. Specifically, the debate on Bill S-210, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (commercial seal fishing), was opened and then adjourned.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-210, the sponsor argued for prohibiting commercial seal fishing due to market decline and public opinion, advocating for government assistance to sealers and improved economic opportunities for Indigenous hunters.
This artifact documents the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The debate was initiated by Senator Mac Harb, who spoke about the declining viability of the commercial seal hunt, the lack of international markets for seal products, and the majority of Canadians' desire to end the practice. He also discussed the need for government assistance for sealers and the relationship between seals and cod stocks. Senator Harb also highlighted the potential economic benefits for Inuit and First Nations hunters through existing exemptions in international bans on seal products, suggesting government support for processing, training, and marketing. The debate was adjourned after his initial remarks, and the bill was ultimately defeated.
The Senate sat on October 16, 2012, to honour former Senator Herb Sparrow, discuss other matters including Bill S-210 on commercial seal fishing, and adopt committee reports.
On October 16, 2012, the Senate convened a sitting where discussions took place regarding the Honourable Herb Sparrow, the Honourable Dalton McGuinty, and recipients of the Diamond Jubilee Medal. The Senate also tabled annual reports from the Commissioner of Official Languages. During Question Period, delayed answers were provided on international cooperation, the RADARSAT Satellite and Communication Projects, the Experimental Lakes Area research facility closure, Statistics Canada data, and women's rights in Afghanistan. The Senate also proceeded with orders of the day, including the adoption of the seventh report of the Agriculture and Forestry Committee concerning Bill S-11 (Safe Food for Canadians Act), and continued debate on Bill S-210 (An Act to amend the Fisheries Act regarding commercial seal fishing) and Bill S-211 (An Act to amend the Official Languages Act). Debate on Bill C-293 (An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act concerning vexatious complainants) was adjourned. The fourth report of the Committee on Conflict of Interest for Senators was adopted, and the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources was authorized to study emerging issues. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of the Senate.
On October 31, 2012, the Senate debated Bill S-210 regarding commercial seal fishing, alongside other topics, but the provided record does not show the conclusion of the debate for this bill.
This artifact is a record of debate in the Senate on October 31, 2012, concerning Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act (commercial seal fishing). While the bill was on the agenda for second reading debate, the provided text does not detail the conclusion of this debate or the bill's ultimate fate at this stage. Instead, the sitting included discussions on various other matters such as the Special Olympics, tributes to the late Lincoln M. Alexander, job cuts affecting Prince Edward Island, the anniversary of Canada-Greece diplomatic relations, and the results of the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations election. Procedural matters such as notices of motion for committee meetings and the tabling of a delayed answer to a question were also addressed. The sitting also saw debates on other bills, including Bill C-46 (Members of Parliament Retiring Allowances Act), Bill C-300 (Federal Framework for Suicide Prevention Bill), and the first reading of three other bills (C-309, C-350, C-217). The debate on Bill S-210 specifically featured arguments for and against the commercial seal hunt, with one senator highlighting its cultural and economic importance to coastal communities, while another questioned the sustainability of the market for seal products and suggested alternative support for sealers.
This Senate debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-210 discusses the commercial seal fishing industry, its economic and cultural importance, and its relationship with fish stocks, alongside other unrelated Senate business.
This record details a Senate debate on Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act regarding commercial seal fishing. While the bill itself is not summarized here, the debate includes arguments about the sustainability of seal hunting, its importance to coastal communities, the management of seal populations, and the marketability of seal products. The debate also touches on the impact of seal populations on fish stocks and research into the health benefits of seal oil. It also includes discussions on unrelated topics such as Special Olympics, the passing of Lincoln Alexander, job cuts, Canada-Greece relations, the Federation of Saskatchewan Indian Nations election, and various other legislative matters before the Senate.
During a Senate sitting on November 1, 2012, debate continued on Bill S-210 concerning commercial seal fishing, alongside discussions on various other legislative and procedural matters.
This Senate sitting on November 1, 2012, included a debate on Bill S-210, which aimed to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The debate at the second reading stage continued, with Senator Ghislain Maltais speaking in opposition to the bill and Senator Mac Harb questioning his arguments. The sitting also featured discussions on various other matters, including Mothers Against Drunk Driving, food bank usage, international parliamentary assemblies, National Down Syndrome Awareness Week, Veterans' Week, Filipino Canadians, visitors in the gallery, Royal Assent to previously passed bills, tabling of committee reports on sockeye salmon, internal economy, and prescription pharmaceuticals, first reading of a bill on First Nations self-government, a notice of inquiry regarding the Royal Air Force Bomber Command Memorial, questions during Question Period on public service hiring of veterans, mental health services, EI financing, and public accounts, and continued debates on the Official Languages Act, a Federal Framework for Suicide Prevention Bill, and inquiries regarding First Nations self-government and the RCMP. The sitting concluded with a motion to adjourn.
During a Senate sitting on November 8, 2012, the second reading debate on Bill S-210, concerning amendments to the Fisheries Act for commercial seal fishing, continued with Senator Hervieux-Payette discussing seal population management and industry potential, before the debate was adjourned.
This document records a Senate sitting on November 8, 2012, during the second reading debate of Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The sitting included Senators' Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings where reports were tabled and bills were introduced, Question Period addressing government decisions, and Orders of the Day where bills were debated or adjourned. The debate on Bill S-210 was continued, featuring a speech by Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette discussing the challenges of declining fish stocks, the growing seal population, and the potential for a regulated seal harvest and associated industries. The debate was ultimately adjourned.
On November 20, 2012, the Senate debated Bill S-210, an act to amend the Fisheries Act regarding commercial seal fishing, with discussion highlighting concerns about its impact on Indigenous communities and cultural practices.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on November 20, 2012. During this sitting, the Senate debated Bill S-210, which aimed to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The debate focused on the impact of such a ban on Indigenous communities, particularly the Inuit, and raised concerns about animal rights rhetoric, economic consequences, and cultural preservation. The Senate also discussed other matters, including National Child Day, Diabetes Awareness, bilingual services in the Coast Guard, the status of a committee on official languages, and various other bills and inquiries. The record shows that Bill S-210 was part of the 'Orders of the Day' for debate, indicating it was under consideration at that stage.
The Senate debated Bill S-210 at second reading, discussing the economic issues surrounding commercial seal fishing, before ultimately defeating the bill.
On February 27, 2013, the Senate debated Bill S-210, an Act to amend the Fisheries Act concerning commercial seal fishing. The debate at the second reading stage focused on the economic viability of the commercial seal hunt, the number of people involved, the impact on fish stocks, and the use of taxpayer money to support the industry. Arguments were made that markets for seal products have disappeared, that the number of sealers is much lower than claimed, and that seals are not the primary cause of declining fish stocks. The debate also touched upon the difference between commercial sealing and Indigenous sealing, and the government's approach to international trade bans. Ultimately, the motion for the second reading of Bill S-210 was defeated.
On February 27, 2013, the Senate debated Bill S-210 regarding commercial seal fishing, ultimately defeating it at second reading, and also discussed other matters including a question of privilege.
This artifact is a record of the Senate debate on February 27, 2013. The primary procedural event related to Bill S-210 was the Senate's second reading of the bill, where the motion for second reading was defeated, thus ending the bill's progression. The debate itself focused on the commercial seal hunt, with proponents arguing for its economic importance and opponents highlighting its decline and the government's support for it. Other discussions in the Senate included tributes to notable individuals, government reports, notices of motions for committee studies, and questions about government programs and the military budget. A significant portion of the debate involved a question of privilege raised by Senator Cools concerning the Parliamentary Budget Officer, which was ultimately taken under advisement by the Speaker.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill does not have a published recorded division in the current official sources, so representative-by-representative vote counts are not shown.
No published representative vote breakdown
The current official sources do not publish a recorded division breakdown for this bill, so there is no representative-by-representative table to show.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced