Bill S-9 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
This bill amends the Criminal Code to create new offences related to nuclear terrorism, aligning Canadian law with international conventions and defining terms related to nuclear materials and facilities.
Bill S-9, also known as the Nuclear Terrorism Act, amends the Criminal Code to introduce four new criminal offences related to nuclear terrorism. These amendments aim to align Canada's laws with international conventions on nuclear material protection and the suppression of nuclear terrorism acts. The bill defines key terms like 'environment,' 'nuclear facility,' 'nuclear material,' and 'radioactive material.' It clarifies when acts committed outside Canada can be considered offences within Canada, and it creates new indictable offences for possessing, using, transferring, exporting, importing, altering, or disposing of nuclear or radioactive material or devices with intent to cause harm or disruption. It also creates an offence for threatening to commit these acts. The bill specifies that these new provisions do not apply to actions taken during armed conflict or by military forces acting within international law.
- Amends the Criminal Code to create four new offences related to nuclear terrorism.
- Defines 'environment,' 'nuclear facility,' 'nuclear material,' and 'radioactive material' within the Criminal Code.
- Establishes that certain acts committed outside Canada related to nuclear terrorism are deemed to have been committed in Canada under specific conditions.
- Creates indictable offences for acts such as possessing, using, transferring, exporting, importing, altering, or disposing of nuclear or radioactive material or devices with intent to cause harm or disruption.
- Creates an indictable offence for threatening to commit nuclear terrorism offences.
- Clarifies that the new nuclear terrorism offences do not apply to acts committed during armed conflict or by military forces in accordance with international law.
- Individuals engaging in acts related to nuclear terrorism.
- Canadian citizens and residents.
- Operators of nuclear facilities.
- Individuals involved in the production, storage, processing, or transport of nuclear or radioactive material.
- Law enforcement agencies.
- The justice system.
- The Attorney General of Canada and provincial Attorneys General.
- Individuals are obligated not to commit acts of nuclear terrorism, including possessing, using, or threatening to use nuclear materials or devices.
- Individuals have the right to legal defence if charged with an offence under these new provisions.
- Assented to on June 19, 2013.
- The Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council.
- Individuals found guilty of offences related to nuclear terrorism (sections 82.3, 82.4, 82.5) are liable to imprisonment for life.
- Individuals found guilty of threatening to commit a nuclear terrorism offence (section 82.6) are liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years.
- The specific date the Act comes into force is not detailed in the provided text and is to be proclaimed by the Governor in Council.
- The application of these new offences to activities undertaken by military forces during armed conflict is limited to instances where such activities are governed by other rules of international law.
Adds new offences related to nuclear terrorism, defines key terms, and modifies existing definitions and sections related to the jurisdiction and application of criminal law.
Source: Sections 2, 7, 82.3-82.7
Modifies the definition of 'Attorney General' to include the Attorney General of Canada or the Attorney General or Solicitor General of a province in relation to specific offences under the Criminal Code, including those related to nuclear terrorism.
Source: Section 2(1)
Adds a definition for 'environment' to the Criminal Code.
Source: Section 2(2)
Adds new provisions regarding when acts committed outside Canada are deemed to have been committed in Canada, specifically in relation to nuclear terrorism offences, and repeals existing subsections related to criminal procedure.
Source: Section 3
Replaces the heading before Section 79 to relate to 'Dangerous Materials and Devices'.
Source: Section 4
Updates the definition of 'terrorist activity' to include offences related to nuclear terrorism that implement specific international conventions.
Source: Section 6
Adds references to the new nuclear terrorism offences created by this bill to the definition of 'offence' for the purposes of wiretapping provisions.
Source: Section 7
Adds references to the new nuclear terrorism offences to the list of 'primary designated offences' which relate to search warrants and other investigative powers.
Source: Section 8
Amends provisions related to the defence of 'autrefois convict' (pleading a previous conviction) in the context of foreign trials for certain offences, including those that implement international conventions.
Source: Section 9
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-9, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code, completed its first reading in the Senate on March 27, 2012, and later received Royal Assent on June 19, 2013.
The artifact indicates that Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, completed its first reading in the Senate on March 27, 2012. This is a procedural step where a bill is formally introduced. The bill eventually received Royal Assent on June 19, 2013, becoming chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada, 2013. The provided text outlines the progression of the bill through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including readings, committee considerations, and report stages.
The Senate introduced Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, at first reading and engaged in other routine parliamentary business.
On March 27, 2012, the Senate conducted routine proceedings. During this time, Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, was introduced and received first reading. The bill was then placed on the Order of the Day for second reading two days hence. Other Senate business included the tabling of various reports and the introduction of several notices of motion for committee studies. Question Period addressed issues such as Air Canada's maintenance centres, the F-35 aircraft procurement, and the power cable project for Prince Edward Island. The Senate also debated and considered several appropriation bills.
Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, successfully passed through the Senate's second reading stage on May 17, 2012, and subsequently completed its parliamentary journey to receive royal assent.
This record shows the progress of Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, through the Senate. It details the second reading stage, which involves major speeches about the bill. The bill was first read on March 27, 2012, and the second reading took place on April 2, 2012, with further major speeches on May 17, 2012. The process continued through committee review, report stage, and third reading in the Senate. The bill later moved to the House of Commons, where it also underwent first reading, second reading, committee review, report stage, and third reading. Finally, the bill received royal assent on June 19, 2013, becoming chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada 2013.
This Senate sitting on April 2, 2012, featured various debates and discussions, including the second reading debate on Bill S-9 concerning nuclear terrorism, and the third reading debate on Bill C-19 regarding the long-gun registry, alongside other routine proceedings and question period exchanges.
This Senate sitting on April 2, 2012, included discussions on various topics unrelated to Bill S-9, such as a cancer fundraiser, World Autism Awareness Day, and the tabling of budget reports. The Senate also heard notices of inquiries regarding electoral boundary redistribution and the 2012 budget. The sitting included Question Period where Senators asked questions on topics including the F-35 aircraft purchase, small business hiring credits, an immigration case, the closure of the National Council of Welfare, the release of Henk Tepper from Lebanon, climate change, and advertising spending on the Economic Action Plan. The Senate also debated Bill C-19 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act) concerning the long-gun registry, with the debate adjourned. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of debate on Bill S-9, the nuclear terrorism bill, which had its second reading.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-9, the sponsor detailed its provisions to combat nuclear terrorism by implementing international treaties, while other discussions covered unrelated matters and a separate bill to eliminate the long-gun registry.
This Senate debate record from April 2, 2012, primarily focuses on the second reading of Bill S-9, an act to amend the Criminal Code related to nuclear terrorism. The sponsor of the bill, Senator Andreychuk, explained that the bill aims to implement two international treaties: the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM) and the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (ICSANT). The proposed amendments would create new criminal offences related to possessing, trafficking, or using nuclear material or devices, and acts against nuclear facilities, with severe penalties, including life imprisonment. The debate also touched upon unrelated topics, including statements on a "Fight for the Cure" boxing event, World Autism Awareness Day, the release of Henk Tepper from custody in Lebanon, various committee reports on budget studies, and discussions on the F-35 aircraft purchase, small business hiring credits, immigration, the National Council of Welfare, climate change, and body scanners at airports. A separate debate also occurred regarding Bill C-19, an act to amend the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act, concerning the elimination of the long-gun registry.
During a Senate sitting on May 17, 2012, Bill S-9 concerning nuclear terrorism was debated at second reading and referred to committee, alongside other Senate business including statements, tabling of reports, and procedural discussions.
On May 17, 2012, the Senate convened for a sitting that included routine proceedings, question period, and orders of the day. A key item was the second reading debate on Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, which was subsequently referred to the Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism. The sitting also featured several statements by senators on various topics, tabling of reports, and discussions on government spending and specific policy issues. Additionally, a point of order was raised and a Speaker's ruling was given regarding a motion to refer a report to a Committee of the Whole.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-9, Senator Dallaire expressed support for the bill's measures against nuclear terrorism and highlighted its role in international cooperation, after which the bill was referred to committee.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the Senate concerning Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code. The debate occurred during the second reading stage of the bill. Senator Roméo Antonius Dallaire spoke in support of the bill, highlighting its importance in combating nuclear terrorism and aligning Canada with international agreements. He also raised concerns about Canada's broader anti-nuclear efforts and identified areas for further study. The Senate proceeded to adopt the motion for the second reading of the bill, referring it to the Special Senate Committee on Anti-terrorism. The rest of the artifact details other proceedings in the Senate on the same day, including tabling of reports, tabling of bills, and debates on other matters, which are not directly related to Bill S-9.
Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, completed its committee consideration stage in the Senate through several sittings between June 2012 and February 2013.
This artifact details the 'Senate Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code. The records show multiple sittings where the bill was considered by a Senate committee, spanning from June 2012 to February 2013. This stage is part of the legislative process where a bill is examined in detail by a committee.
The Senate received a committee report with amendments to Bill S-9, debated its own rules and procedures, and heard tributes to a retiring senator.
On June 19, 2012, the Senate met. The sitting included tributes to Senator Ethel Cochrane, who was retiring. The Senate also presented the third report of the Special Committee on Anti-Terrorism concerning Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code. This report included proposed amendments to the bill. The Senate also debated and considered changes to its own rules, procedures, and the rights of Parliament, with several senators speaking on these matters. Other discussions included the CBC/Radio Canada's services, the F-35 aircraft purchase, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The Senate also authorized a committee to extend the date for its final report on the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act.
The Senate completed the Report stage for Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, on June 21, 2012, as part of its legislative journey that concluded with Royal Assent in 2013.
The Senate Report stage for Bill S-9, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code," was completed on June 21, 2012. This artifact shows the procedural steps and dates of the bill's progression through the Senate. It indicates that the bill went through First Reading, Second Reading, Consideration in Committee, Report Stage, and Third Reading at different dates in 2012 and 2013. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 19, 2013, becoming chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada 2013. The provided text does not detail the specific amendments or discussions that occurred during the Report stage itself, only that the stage was completed.
The Senate adopted a report on Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, following a debate at the report stage.
On June 21, 2012, the Senate met for a sitting that included a debate on a report concerning Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code. The report was adopted, moving the bill forward in the legislative process. Other matters discussed included statements on National Aboriginal Day and World Refugee Day, the tabling of various reports, question period, and debates on other bills.
This artifact documents the completion of the third reading of Bill S-9 in the Senate on June 26, 2012, as part of its legislative journey which concluded with royal assent on June 19, 2013.
This record shows the procedural steps for Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, within the Senate. It indicates that the Senate completed its third reading of the bill on Tuesday, June 26, 2012. The bill later received royal assent on June 19, 2013. The artifact outlines the timeline of the bill's progression through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including readings, committee considerations, and report stages.
On June 22, 2012, the Senate debated and advanced several bills, including those related to criminal law, immigration, pensions, and human trafficking, while also concluding debate on an inquiry into mass atrocities and adjourning debate on inquiries concerning democratic reform and suicide prevention.
On June 22, 2012, the Senate met. The sitting included Senators' Statements where tributes were paid to the Valcartier Family Centre and Honourable Gilles Lamontagne, and Senator Mobina Jaffer marked her eleventh anniversary in the Senate. Question Period included a delayed answer regarding the Giant Mine remediation. The Senate then proceeded to Orders of the Day. Several bills were discussed at the third reading stage, with debate adjourned on Bill C-25 (Pooled Registered Pension Plans), Bill C-31 (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Balanced Refugee Reform Act, Marine Transportation Security Act, Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act), and Bill S-9 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code). Senator Jaffer moved an amendment to Bill C-31. A notice of motion was given regarding the allotment of time for debate on Bill C-31. Bill S-10 (Convention on Cluster Munitions) was read a second time and referred to committee. Bill S-209 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights)) was read a third time and passed. Bill C-310 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code (trafficking in persons)) was read a third time and passed. Debate was adjourned on Bill C-300 (Federal Framework for Suicide Prevention) and Bill C-314 (Breast Density Awareness Bill). The seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples regarding a study on Métis identity was adopted, as was the seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Security and Defence regarding a study on navy and air force bases. Debate on an inquiry by Senator Dallaire concerning the prevention and elimination of mass atrocities was concluded. Debate on an inquiry by Senator Segal concerning democratic reform of the Senate was adjourned. The date for the final report of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans on the study of the management of the grey seal population was extended. Finally, a motion was adopted to adjourn the Senate until June 26, 2012.
On June 26, 2012, the Senate convened to discuss various matters including the Elliot Lake tragedy and Bomber Command recognition, and proceeded with the third reading of multiple bills, notably Bill S-9 concerning the Criminal Code, alongside extensive debate on immigration and pension reform bills.
This Senate sitting on June 26, 2012, included several items on its agenda. Key discussions involved expressing sympathy for the victims of the Elliot Lake mall roof collapse, recognizing the contributions of Bomber Command, and paying tribute to departing Senate pages. Procedurally, the Senate dealt with tabling reports, presenting committee findings, and addressing questions during Question Period. The main focus of the 'Orders of the Day' section was the third reading of several bills. Specifically, Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, was debated at its third reading. Other bills like Bill C-31 (related to immigration and refugee protection) and Bill C-25 (related to pooled registered pension plans) were also discussed and voted on, with considerable debate surrounding Bill C-31. Motions to allocate time for debate on certain bills were also adopted and debated.
Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, underwent its first reading in the House of Commons on September 25, 2012, as a procedural step before eventually receiving royal assent.
This artifact details the first reading of Bill S-9 in the House of Commons on September 25, 2012. First reading is a procedural step where a bill is formally introduced to the House. The provided text does not describe any debate or discussion that occurred during this stage. It notes that the bill ultimately received royal assent on June 19, 2013, becoming chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada 2013.
On September 25, 2012, the House of Commons held its first reading of the Nuclear Terrorism Act, debated income inequality, and addressed numerous other petitions and statements by members.
On September 25, 2012, during the First Reading stage in the House of Commons, the Nuclear Terrorism Act was introduced. The sitting also included the presentation of various petitions by Members of Parliament on topics such as the rights of the unborn, Katimavik, the environment, foreign affairs, abortion, public transit, and the House of Commons itself. Following routine proceedings, the House debated the Business of Supply concerning an opposition motion on income inequality. Additionally, Members made statements on various matters and participated in oral question period on topics including foreign investment, foreign affairs, the economy, human rights, employment insurance, food safety, and national defence. The sitting concluded with discussions on private members' business and adjournment proceedings.
The House of Commons completed the second reading stage of Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, on November 30, 2012, agreeing to the bill's principle before it moved to further parliamentary consideration.
The House of Commons reached the completion of its second reading stage for Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, on November 30, 2012. This stage involves a general debate on the principle of the bill. Following this, the bill proceeded to committee for detailed examination. The artifact indicates that at the end of this stage, the House agreed to the bill, which then continued through further stages in both the House of Commons and the Senate, eventually receiving royal assent on June 19, 2013.
On October 15, 2012, the House of Commons debated a motion on bullying prevention and the second reading of Bills S-7 and S-9 concerning anti-terrorism measures, with multiple members discussing these topics and other government business.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 15, 2012, during the second reading stage of Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code. The debate focused on two main topics: a private member's motion regarding a national bullying prevention strategy and government orders concerning the Combating Terrorism Act and the Nuclear Terrorism Act (Bill S-7 and Bill S-9). Several members from different parties spoke on these matters, expressing support for addressing bullying and terrorism, while also raising concerns about the government's approach, the scope of proposed legislation, and the balance between security and civil liberties. The record also includes various statements by members on unrelated topics and oral questions directed to ministers on issues such as food safety, employment insurance, foreign affairs, and national defence.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill S-7, Members discussed the re-enactment of anti-terrorism measures, new offenses related to leaving Canada for terrorism, and the balance between security and rights.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 15, 2012, regarding Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act. The debate focused on the re-enactment of investigative hearing and recognizance with conditions provisions in the Criminal Code, which had previously expired. The bill also proposed new offenses related to leaving Canada to engage in terrorism and amendments to other acts. Discussions covered the balance between security and civil liberties, the necessity of these provisions, potential overreach, and the role of committees in reviewing such legislation.
During a House of Commons debate on October 15, 2012, members discussed Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act, focusing on the re-enactment of certain investigative powers and the introduction of new offences related to terrorism, while debating the balance between security and civil liberties.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 15, 2012, concerning Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act. The debate focused on proposed amendments to the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act, and the Security of Information Act. Key discussions included re-enacting provisions related to investigative hearings and recognizances with conditions, which had previously expired, and introducing new offences related to leaving Canada to engage in terrorism. Members from various parties debated the balance between security measures and civil liberties, the necessity of the proposed measures given their previous lack of use, and the potential for overreach. Concerns were also raised about the process of introducing such legislation, particularly its origin in the Senate.
During the second reading debate in the House of Commons, members discussed Bill S-9, aimed at establishing new criminal offences related to nuclear terrorism to implement international treaty obligations, with concerns raised about the bill's delay, scope, and potential impact on civil liberties.
The House of Commons debated Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, which aims to implement Canada's obligations under two international treaties concerning nuclear terrorism. The bill proposes new offences related to nuclear materials, devices, and facilities, with penalties up to life imprisonment. The debate focused on the necessity of these measures, the potential for over-breadth in the legislation, and the prolonged delay in introducing the bill, which was seen by some as a missed opportunity to strengthen Canada's international reputation.
During a House of Commons sitting on November 5, 2012, members debated Bill S-9, the Nuclear Terrorism Act, which aimed to implement international treaties by creating new criminal offences related to nuclear materials and terrorism, and discussed Canada's role in nuclear non-proliferation.
On November 5, 2012, the House of Commons debated Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning nuclear terrorism. The bill aimed to implement international counterterrorism treaties by introducing new indictable offences related to nuclear material and facilities. Members discussed the urgency of ratifying these conventions and the potential implications of the bill's provisions on civil liberties. The debate also touched upon Canada's international role in nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, with various parties expressing support for the bill's move to committee for further study.
During the House of Commons' second reading debate on Bill S-9, members discussed its role in implementing international nuclear terrorism conventions, with a focus on its procedural progression to committee.
This record details the House of Commons' second reading debate on Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, concerning nuclear terrorism. Members from various parties discussed the bill's purpose to implement international counterterrorism conventions, noting the long delay in its ratification. Concerns were raised about the bill's scope, potential overreach, and the need for thorough committee review. The debate concluded with the bill being referred to committee.
Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, completed its committee review in the House of Commons on February 25, 2013, and later received Royal Assent.
This record indicates that Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, completed its 'Consideration in committee' stage in the House of Commons on February 25, 2013. This stage involves detailed examination of the bill by a parliamentary committee. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 19, 2013, becoming chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada, 2013.
On February 25, 2013, the House of Commons debated Bill C-55, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, addressing the Supreme Court's ruling on emergency wiretaps, with discussions focusing on privacy safeguards, legislative process, and accountability.
On February 25, 2013, the House of Commons considered Bill C-55, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, in relation to the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in *R. v. Tse*. This stage was the 'Consideration in committee' stage, which is part of the House of Commons' legislative process. The debate focused on the bill's proposed amendments to section 184.4 of the Criminal Code, which deals with intercepting private communications in exceptional circumstances. Several members expressed concerns about the timing of the bill's introduction, the clarity of certain definitions, and the need for robust oversight and accountability mechanisms to protect Canadians' privacy rights, while acknowledging the necessity of such powers in emergency situations. The debate also touched upon the government's previous attempt with Bill C-30 and broader issues of government legislative process and respect for parliamentary debate.
The House of Commons completed the report stage and third reading of Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, on March 7, 2013.
This artifact describes the House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code. This stage was completed on March 7, 2013. The report stage is a point in the legislative process where Members of Parliament can propose and debate amendments to a bill after it has been considered by a committee. The artifact notes that third reading also occurred on March 7, 2013, and was agreed to by a vote (Vote 684). The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 19, 2013.
During the House of Commons report stage debate on Bill S-9, members discussed its measures to implement international anti-terrorism treaties concerning nuclear materials and the procedural aspects of the bill's passage.
The House of Commons debated Bill S-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Nuclear Terrorism Act). The debate focused on the bill's provisions to implement international treaties aimed at combating nuclear terrorism. Members discussed the creation of new criminal offences related to nuclear materials and facilities, the penalties for these offences, and the need for Canada to ratify international conventions. There was also considerable discussion about the timeliness of the bill's introduction and the process by which it came before the House, originating in the Senate.
The House of Commons completed the third reading stage for Bill S-9 on May 21, 2013, after which it proceeded to receive royal assent.
This artifact describes the completion of the third reading stage for Bill S-9 in the House of Commons on May 21, 2013. This stage is a procedural step before a bill can proceed further. The bill ultimately received royal assent on June 19, 2013, and is now law as chapter 13 of the Statutes of Canada, 2013.
During the third reading debate on Bill S-9, Members of Parliament discussed the bill's role in implementing international nuclear terrorism conventions, the proposed penalties, and Canada's international standing, with differing views expressed on the timing and process of the legislation.
This record details the House of Commons debate on Bill S-9, the Nuclear Terrorism Act, at its third reading stage. The debate included discussions on the bill's provisions to implement international treaties against nuclear terrorism, the penalties associated with new offences, and Canada's international cooperation and leadership in nuclear security. Various members from different parties participated, raising points about the bill's origins in the Senate, the perceived delays in its progression, and the broader context of nuclear proliferation and terrorism threats.
This House of Commons sitting on March 18, 2013, featured debates on private members' business, government orders including Bill S-9 (Nuclear Terrorism Act), and oral questions on various government actions and policies.
This artifact is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on March 18, 2013, during which the House debated and considered various matters, including Private Members' Business and Government Orders. Notably, the House debated Bill S-9, an Act to amend the Criminal Code, concerning nuclear terrorism. The sitting also included Oral Questions and Routine Proceedings, where various members raised issues related to the economy, ethics, public safety, and other government actions. The artifact indicates that Bill S-9 was at its third reading stage and that various amendments were proposed and voted upon.
During the House of Commons sitting on March 28, 2013, members debated Bill S-7 (Combating Terrorism Act) at third reading, raising concerns about its impact on civil liberties and human rights, while also discussing other matters through statements by members, oral questions, and points of privilege.
This record details the House of Commons proceedings on March 28, 2013. The primary focus was the third reading debate of Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act. The debate included discussions on the re-enactment of investigative hearings and recognizance with conditions, as well as the creation of new offences related to leaving Canada for terrorist purposes. Members from different parties expressed concerns about human rights, civil liberties, and the potential for misuse of these powers, while government members argued for their necessity in combating terrorism and highlighted the safeguards included in the bill. The sitting also included routine proceedings, statements by members on various topics, and oral questions concerning taxation, elections, international co-operation, and aboriginal affairs. Notably, there was a point of privilege raised regarding the questioning of committee witnesses, and a discussion on Standing Order 31 concerning members' statements.
During the third reading debate in the House of Commons, members discussed Bill S-9, which aims to align Canadian law with international conventions on nuclear terrorism, emphasizing the need for international cooperation and Canada's role in global security.
This record details the third reading debate in the House of Commons for Bill S-9, an act to amend the Criminal Code. Members of Parliament from the New Democratic Party (NDP) spoke, generally supporting the bill while raising concerns about the government's approach to international agreements and the use of the Senate for introducing legislation. The debate focused on Canada's international obligations related to nuclear terrorism and the need to align domestic laws with international conventions to combat it. The discussions highlighted the real threat of nuclear terrorism, the importance of international cooperation, and Canada's role in global security efforts.
This House of Commons Hansard record from May 21, 2013, captures the third reading debate on Bill S-9 concerning amendments to the Criminal Code, alongside procedural discussions on extended sitting hours and other government business.
This record details the third reading debate in the House of Commons on Bill S-9, an act to amend the Criminal Code. While the bill itself is not summarized, the debate touches on proposed amendments to restrict offenders' contact with victims and their locations. The debate also includes discussions on extending sitting hours, points of order, statements by members on various issues, and oral questions on ethics, government appointments, and other matters. The record concludes with votes on various procedural motions and government orders, including the third reading and passing of Bill S-9.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | British Columbia Southern Interior | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauharnois—Salaberry | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bramalea—Gore—Malton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wild Rose | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erindale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Humboldt | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Athabasca | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westlock—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Paul's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne—Blainville | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax—Pickering | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière—Alma | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Scarborough East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Coquihalla | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Edward—Hastings | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Northeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Durham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Brampton South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Coquitlam | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margaret's | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton—Mississippi Mills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—La Prairie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Alberni | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Leduc | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil-Soulanges | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey North | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Cowichan | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby—Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newton—North Delta | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Island North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Random—Burin—St. George's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—Douglas | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta—Richmond East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vegreville—Wainwright | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Blackstrap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Welland | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westmount—Ville-Marie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chambly—Borduas | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Wanuskewin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre-North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trinity—Spadina | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton—Springdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oak Ridges—Markham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton East | Independent Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—New Westminster | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean—Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wascana | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Palliser | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Spruce Grove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Orléans | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Lambert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent—Cartierville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Bellechasse | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Saint-Constant | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Macleod | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Sherwood Park | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced