Bill C-4 explained in plain English
A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Federal Bill C-4 is listed as passed at Royal assent received. We have not published a plain-English explanation for this bill yet, so PoliticalData.ca is showing the verified status, sponsor, votes, timeline, and official sources below without adding unsupported claims.
The official summary published alongside the bill, shown exactly as written.
Source: Parliament of Canada (LEGISinfo)
A Legislative Summary is currently being prepared for this bill by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service of the Library of Parliament. A pre-release version of this publication is available to parliamentarians and their staff, and can be obtained by submitting a request or contacting the Library of Parliament. Meanwhile, the following executive summary is available. On 22 October 2013, the Minister of Finance introduced Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures (Economic Action Plan 2013 Act, No. 2), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. Part 1 implements certain income tax measures proposed in the March 21, 2013 budget. Among other things, it • increases the lifetime capital gains exemption to $800,000 and indexes the new limit to inflation; • streamlines the process for pension plan administrators to refund a contribution made to a Registered Pension Plan as a result of a reasonable error; • extends the reassessment period for reportable tax avoidance transactions and tax shelters when information returns are not filed properly and on time; • phases out the federal Labour-Sponsored Venture Capital Corporations tax credit; • ensures that derivative transactions cannot be used to convert fully taxable ordinary income into capital gains taxed at a lower rate; • ensures that the tax consequences of disposing of a property cannot be avoided by entering into transactions that are economically equivalent to a disposition of the property; • ensures that the tax attributes of trusts cannot be inappropriately transferred among arm’s length persons; • responds to the Sommerer decision to restore the intended tax treatment with respect to non-resident trusts; • expands eligibility for the accelerated capital cost allowance for clean energy generation equipment to include a broader range of biogas production equipment and equipment used to treat gases from waste; • imposes a penalty in instances where information on tax preparers and billing arrangements is missing, incomplete or inaccurate on Scientific Research and Experimental Development tax incentive program claim forms; • phases out the accelerated capital cost allowance for capital assets used in new mines and certain mine expansions, and reduces the deduction rate for pre-production mine development expenses; • adjusts the five-year phase-out of the additional deduction for credit unions; • eliminates unintended tax benefits in respect of two types of leveraged life insurance arrangements; • clarifies the restricted farm loss rules and increases the restricted farm loss deduction limit; • enhances corporate anti-loss trading rules to address planning that avoids those rules; • extends, in certain circumstances, the reassessment period for taxpayers who have failed to correctly report income from a specified foreign property on their annual income tax return; • extends the application of Canada’s thin capitalization rules to Canadian resident trusts and non-resident entities; and • introduces new administrative monetary penalties and criminal offences to deter the use, possession, sale and development of electronic suppression of sales software that is designed to falsify records for the purpose of tax evasion. Part 1 also implements other selected income tax measures. Most notably, it (a) implements measures announced on July 25, 2012, including measures that • relate to the taxation of specified investment flow-through entities, real estate investment trusts and publicly-traded corporations, and • respond to the Lewin decision; (b) implements measures announced on December 21, 2012, including measures that relate to • the computation of adjusted taxable income for the purposes of the alternative minimum tax, • the prohibited investment and advantage rules for registered plans, and • the corporate reorganization rules; and (c) clarifies that information may be provided to the Department of Employment and Social Development for a program for temporary foreign workers. Part 2 implements certain goods and services tax and harmonized sales tax (GST/HST) measures proposed in the March 21, 2013 budget by • introducing new administrative monetary penalties and criminal offences to deter the use, possession, sale and development of electronic suppression of sales software that is designed to falsify records for the purpose of tax evasion; and • clarifying that the GST/HST provision, exempting supplies by a public sector body (PSB) of a property or a service if all or substantially all of the supplies of the property or service by the PSB are made for free, does not apply to supplies of paid parking. Part 3 enacts and amends several Acts in order to implement various measures. Division 1 of Part 3 amends the Employment Insurance Act to extend and expand a temporary measure to refund a portion of employer premiums for small businesses. It also amends that Act to modify the Employment Insurance premium rate-setting mechanism, including setting the 2015 and 2016 rates and requiring that the rate be set on a seven-year break-even basis by the Canada Employment Insurance Commission beginning with the 2017 rate. The Division repeals the Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board Act and related provisions of other Acts. Lastly, it makes technical amendments to the Employment Insurance (Fishing) Regulations. Division 2 of Part 3 amends the Trust and Loan Companies Act, the Bank Act and the Insurance Companies Act to remove the prohibition against federal and provincial Crown agents and federal and provincial government employees being directors of a federally regulated financial institution. It also amends the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Act and the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada Act to remove the obligation of certain persons to give the Minister of Finance notice of their intent to borrow money from a federally regulated financial institution or from a corporation that has deposit insurance under the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation Act. Division 3 of Part 3 amends the Trust and Loan Companies Act, the Bank Act, the Insurance Companies Act and the Cooperative Credit Associations Act to clarify the rules for certain indirect acquisitions of foreign financial institutions. Division 4 of Part 3 amends the Criminal Code to update the definition “passport” in subsection 57(5) and also amends the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act to update the reference to the Minister in paragraph 11(1)(a). Division 5 of Part 3 amends the Canada Labour Code to amend the definition of “danger” in subsection 122(1), to modify the refusal to work process, to remove all references to health and safety officers and to confer on the Minister of Labour their powers, duties and functions. It also makes consequential amendments to the National Energy Board Act, the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act and the Non-smokers’ Health Act. Division 6 of Part 3 amends the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development Act to change the name of the Department to the Department of Employment and Social Development and to reflect that name change in the title of that Act and of its responsible Minister. In addition, the Division amends Part 6 of that Act to extend that Minister’s powers with respect to certain Acts, programs and activities and to allow the Minister of Labour to administer or enforce electronically the Canada Labour Code. The Division also adds the title of a Minister to the Salaries Act. Finally, it makes consequential amendments to several other Acts to reflect the name change. Division 7 of Part 3 authorizes Her Majesty in right of Canada to hold, dispose of or otherwise deal with the Dominion Coal Blocks in any manner. Division 8 of Part 3 authorizes the amalgamation of four Crown corporations that own or operate international bridges and gives the resulting amalgamated corporation certain powers. It also makes consequential amendments and repeals certain Acts. Division 9 of Part 3 amends the Financial Administration Act to provide that agent corporations designated by the Minister of Finance may, subject to any terms and conditions of the designation, pledge any securities or cash that they hold, or give deposits, as security for the payment or performance of obligations arising out of derivatives that they enter into or guarantee for the management of financial risks. Division 10 of Part 3 amends the National Research Council Act to reduce the number of members of the National Research Council of Canada and to create the position of Chairperson of the Council. Division 11 of Part 3 amends the Veterans Review and Appeal Board Act to reduce the permanent number of members of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board. Division 12 of Part 3 amends the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act to allow for the appointment of up to three directors who are not residents of Canada. Division 13 of Part 3 amends the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act to extend to the whole Act the protection for communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and to provide that information disclosed by the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada under subsection 65(1) of that Act may be used by a law enforcement agency referred to in that subsection only as evidence of a contravention of Part 1 of that Act. Division 14 of Part 3 enacts the Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts Fund Act, which establishes the Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts Fund. The Division also repeals the Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts Act. Division 15 of Part 3 amends the Conflict of Interest Act to allow the Governor in Council to designate a person or class of persons as public office holders and to designate a person who is a public office holder or a class of persons who are public office holders as reporting public office holders, for the purposes of that Act. Division 16 of Part 3 amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to establish a new regime that provides that a foreign national who wishes to apply for permanent residence as a member of a certain economic class may do so only if they have submitted an expression of interest to the Minister and have subsequently been issued an invitation to apply. Division 17 of Part 3 modernizes the collective bargaining and recourse systems provided by the Public Service Labour Relations Act regime. It amends the dispute resolution process for collective bargaining by removing the choice of dispute resolution method and substituting conciliation, which involves the possibility of the use of a strike as the method by which the parties may resolve impasses. In those cases where 80% or more of the positions in a bargaining unit are considered necessary for providing an essential service, the dispute resolution mechanism is to be arbitration. The collective bargaining process is further streamlined through amendments to the provision dealing with essential services. The employer has the exclusive right to determine that a service is essential and the numbers of positions that will be required to provide that service. Bargaining agents are to be consulted as part of the essential services process. The collective bargaining process is also amended by extending the timeframe within which a notice to bargain collectively may be given before the expiry of a collective agreement or arbitral award. In addition, the Division amends the factors that arbitration boards and public interest commissions must take into account when making awards or reports, respectively. It also amends the processes for the making of those awards and reports and removes the compensation analysis and research function from the mandate of the Public Service Labour Relations Board. The Division streamlines the recourse process set out for grievances and complaints in Part 2 of the Public Service Labour Relations Act and for staffing complaints under the Public Service Employment Act. The Division also establishes a single forum for employees to challenge decisions relating to discrimination in the public service. Grievances and complaints are to be heard by the Public Service Labour Relations Board under the grievance process set out in the Public Service Labour Relations Act. The process for the review of those grievances or complaints is to be the same as the one that currently exists under the Canadian Human Rights Act. However, grievances and complaints related specifically to staffing complaints are to be heard by the Public Service Staffing Tribunal. Grievances relating to discrimination are required to be submitted within one year or any longer period that the Public Service Labour Relations Board considers appropriate, to reflect what currently exists under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Furthermore, the Division amends the grievance recourse process in several ways. With the sole exception of grievances relating to issues of discrimination, employees included in a bargaining unit may only present or refer an individual grievance to adjudication if they have the approval of and are represented by their bargaining agent. Also, the process as it relates to policy grievances is streamlined, including by defining more clearly an adjudicator’s remedial power when dealing with a policy grievance. In addition, the Division provides for a clearer apportionment of the expenses of adjudication relating to the interpretation of a collective agreement. They are to be borne in equal parts by the employer and the bargaining agent. If a grievance relates to a deputy head’s direct authority, such as with respect to discipline, termination of employment or demotion, the expenses are to be borne in equal parts by the deputy head and the bargaining agent. The expenses of adjudication for employees who are not represented by a bargaining agent are to be borne by the Public Service Labour Relations Board. Finally, the Division amends the recourse process for staffing complaints under the Public Service Employment Act by ensuring that the right to complain is triggered only in situations when more than one employee participates in an exercise to select employees that are to be laid off. And, candidates who are found not to meet the qualifications set by a deputy head may only complain with respect to their own assessment. Division 18 of Part 3 establishes the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board to replace the Public Service Labour Relations Board and the Public Service Staffing Tribunal. The new Board will deal with matters that were previously dealt with by those former Boards under the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Public Service Employment Act, respectively, which will permit proceedings under those Acts to be consolidated. Division 19 of Part 3 adds declaratory provisions to the Supreme Court Act, respecting the criteria for appointing judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
This is the official summary published by the Parliament of Canada, shown verbatim. Not legal advice. PoliticalData.ca did not write or edit this text.
View on LEGISinfoParliamentary Process
The Senate conducted a pre-study of Bill C-4, involving multiple committees examining its subject-matter in advance of its formal consideration, before the bill ultimately received royal assent.
The Senate engaged in a pre-study of Bill C-4, which aimed to implement budget provisions and other measures. This involved referring the subject-matter of the bill to multiple Senate committees for examination before the bill itself formally arrived in the Senate. The Standing Senate Committee on National Finance was assigned to study the entire bill's subject-matter, while other specific committees were tasked with examining particular sections. These committees were required to submit their reports by a specific date, and their findings were to be considered by the National Finance Committee. The pre-study process occurred from November 5, 2013, to December 3, 2013. The bill ultimately received royal assent on December 12, 2013.
During a Senate sitting on November 5, 2013, senators discussed various global and domestic issues, authorized committees to pre-study Bill C-4, debated amendments to the Official Languages Act, and voted on the suspension of three senators.
On November 5, 2013, the Senate of Canada convened for a sitting that included discussions on various topics, including the Micronutrient Initiative, the terrorist attack at Westgate Mall in Nairobi, the release of a political prisoner from Iran, and the adoption system in Canada. A significant procedural action was taken to authorize several Senate committees to study the subject matter of Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures," in advance of its formal consideration by the Senate. This pre-study motion involved assigning different parts of the bill to specific committees. Additionally, Senator Maria Chaput moved second reading of Bill S-205, an act to amend the Official Languages Act, which aimed to change the criteria for determining the need for services in official minority languages. The sitting also addressed a motion to suspend Senators Patrick Brazeau, Michael Duffy, and Pamela Wallin, which, after a debate on process and the division of the vote, resulted in the suspension of Senators Duffy and Wallin, while Senator Brazeau's suspension was also agreed to. Several senators explained their reasons for abstaining from these votes, citing concerns about due process and the nature of the proceedings.
This record details Bill C-4's progression through the Senate, including its First Reading, subsequent readings, committee work, and eventual Royal Assent, along with a pre-study on its subject matter.
This artifact details the procedural stages of Bill C-4 in the Senate, starting with its First Reading on December 10, 2013. It outlines the bill's journey through subsequent readings, committee considerations, and report stages, culminating in Third Reading and eventual Royal Assent on December 12, 2013. The record also includes details of a pre-study conducted by the Senate on the bill's subject matter before its formal introduction, involving multiple committees examining specific parts of the bill.
On December 9, 2013, the Senate held a sitting where Bill C-4 received its first reading, and various other legislative and committee-related matters were debated or introduced.
On December 9, 2013, the Senate convened for a sitting that included a First Reading debate for Bill C-4. The sitting also featured discussions and proceedings on various other matters, including tributes to Nelson Mandela, the issue of violence against women, the Lincoln Alexander Day Bill, victim fine surcharges, mental health services within the Correctional Service of Canada, the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, and amendments to the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act. Additionally, the Senate heard debates and motions related to aircraft procurement (F-35 fighter jets), changes to Senate rules and practices for due process, studies on fisheries and oceans management, aquaculture, grey seal populations, the lobster fishery, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's challenges, and the use of customer data by BCE Inc. (Bell Canada). Bill C-4 itself was formally introduced and placed on the Order of the Day for second reading. The sitting also included the first reading of Appropriation Bill No. 4, 2013-14, and Bill C-14 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act).
The Senate considered Bill C-4 in committee on December 10 and 11, 2013, as part of its process before the bill received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
This record indicates that the Senate Committee of the Whole considered Bill C-4 on December 10 and 11, 2013. This stage of the legislative process allows for a detailed examination of the bill's content by the Senate as a whole, rather than by a smaller committee. The provided text outlines the committee's examination process which included a pre-study phase and subsequent consideration in committee. It also notes that the bill received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming a statute.
The Senate considered Bill C-4, receiving a committee report on its subject matter and proceeding to second reading, while also authorizing a committee to meet during sittings for its study.
During this Senate sitting on December 10, 2013, the National Finance Committee tabled its third report on the subject matter of Bill C-4. A motion was also passed authorizing the National Finance Committee to meet during Senate sittings for its consideration of Bill C-4, should it be referred to the committee. Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures," was also moved for second reading in the Senate.
During a Senate sitting on December 10, 2013, Bill C-4, a budget implementation bill, was debated at second reading, with senators discussing its economic measures, tax provisions, and procedural aspects, before it was referred to committee.
On December 10, 2013, the Senate considered Bill C-4, a budget implementation bill. The Senate National Finance Committee tabled its third report on the subject matter of Bill C-4. A motion was passed to allow the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance to meet during Senate sittings to consider Bill C-4. Senator JoAnne Buth moved second reading of Bill C-4, discussing economic performance, tax relief for small businesses, and measures to close tax loopholes. Senator Joseph A. Day debated the bill, raising concerns about the deficit, the complexity of omnibus budget bills, and the inclusion of non-budgetary measures. Other senators also participated in the debate, raising various points on the bill's provisions, including those affecting public servants and banking. Following the second reading debate, Bill C-4 was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance.
The Senate completed the Second Reading of Bill C-4 on December 10, 2013, after a period of committee pre-study, and the bill subsequently received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
This record details the Senate's process for Bill C-4 at the Second Reading stage. The Senate considered the bill on December 10, 2013, following major speeches. The bill had previously undergone a pre-study by various Senate committees which began on November 5, 2013, and involved examining specific parts of the bill before its formal consideration. The Senate "Agreed to" the second reading. The bill received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
During a Senate sitting on December 10, 2013, senators debated Bill C-4, discussed various social and economic issues, and dealt with procedural matters including committee meetings and the tabling of reports, before Bill C-4 was referred to committee.
This Senate sitting on December 10, 2013, included discussions on various topics. A motion was passed to authorize the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance to meet during Senate sittings for its consideration of Bill C-4. The second reading debate for Bill C-4, the Economic Action Plan 2013 Bill, No. 2, proceeded, with speeches from Senator Buth and Senator Day. Several other Senate committee reports were tabled. The sitting also included discussions on housing affordability, the spirit of Christmas celebrations, the UNESCO Youth Forum on Social Inclusion, timely payments for trade contractors, volunteerism in Prince Edward Island, the National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, CBC/Radio-Canada's infrastructure investment, the Disability Tax Credit, the sale of ambassadors' residences, the employment of medically released veterans, and a question of privilege regarding alleged interference in an audit. Debate also continued on Bill C-7 concerning the Canadian Museum of History, the First Nations Elections Bill, and inquiries on the Canada Periodical Fund, the forestry industry's environmental practices, the proposed Quebec Charter of Values, and disparities in First Nations education.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill C-4, which implements budget provisions and other measures, Senators presented differing views on the nation's fiscal health and raised concerns about the bill's extensive scope, before the bill was referred to committee.
This artifact is a record of a debate held in the Senate on December 10, 2013, concerning Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures." The debate at the second reading stage included speeches from Senators Buth and Day. Senator Buth, the sponsor of the bill, highlighted Canada's positive economic performance and detailed key measures in Bill C-4 aimed at supporting jobs and growth, such as extending the Hiring Credit for Small Business and increasing the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption. Senator Day, while thanking Senator Buth and the committee for their work, offered a contrasting view on the fiscal situation, emphasizing the accumulated debt and questioning the practice of including numerous unrelated measures in budget implementation bills. He raised concerns about the scope and complexity of Bill C-4, which spanned 308 pages and 472 clauses. Other Senators participated in discussions on related topics such as housing affordability, Christmas traditions, social inclusion, trade contractor payments, volunteerism, and the closure of Veterans Affairs offices. A significant portion of the debate involved a question of privilege raised by Senator Cowan regarding alleged interference in an audit, which the Speaker ultimately ruled did not meet the criteria for privilege due to a delay in raising the issue. The Senate ultimately agreed to the motion for second reading of Bill C-4, "on division," and referred it to the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance.
The Senate considered Bill C-4 in committee on December 10 and 11, 2013, as part of its process before the bill received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
This record indicates that the Senate Committee of the Whole considered Bill C-4 on December 10 and 11, 2013. This stage of the legislative process allows for a detailed examination of the bill's content by the Senate as a whole, rather than by a smaller committee. The provided text outlines the committee's examination process which included a pre-study phase and subsequent consideration in committee. It also notes that the bill received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming a statute.
During a Senate sitting on December 11, 2013, Bill C-4 was reported from committee without amendment and scheduled for third reading, while other diverse topics were also discussed.
On December 11, 2013, the Senate met. During this sitting, the Senate considered Bill C-4, a bill related to budget implementation. The National Finance Committee reported that the bill had been examined and found to have no amendments. The bill was then scheduled for third reading. The sitting also included discussions and tabling of reports on various other matters, including international parliamentary associations, security and defence studies, child poverty, changes to Canada Post services, government advertising, and amendments to the Museums Act (Bill C-7).
On December 11, 2013, the Senate completed its Report stage for Bill C-4, a process that included pre-study by various committees authorized in November.
This artifact details the Senate Report stage for Bill C-4, which occurred on December 11, 2013. The Senate Report stage was completed on this date. This stage is part of the legislative process where the Senate reviews a bill after it has been studied by a committee. The record indicates that on November 5, 2013, the Senate authorized various committees to study specific parts of Bill C-4 in advance of its formal consideration. These committees were asked to report back by November 29, 2013. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming a statute.
During a Senate sitting on December 11, 2013, Bill C-4 was reported from committee without amendment and scheduled for third reading, alongside debates on budget implementation, government spending, and other policy issues.
This Senate sitting on December 11, 2013, included discussions and actions related to Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures." The National Finance Committee presented its fourth report, stating it had examined Bill C-4 and reported it without amendment. Following this, the bill was scheduled for third reading. The sitting also included debates on various other matters, such as the status of veterans' mental health services, government advertising spending, and the proposed changes to Canada Post's home delivery service. The Senate also adopted the second report of the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance regarding Supplementary Estimates (B) 2013-2014 and considered the subject matter of Bill C-4. A motion concerning the Statutes Repeal Act was also adopted, with the government providing further explanations for deferring the repeal of certain provisions.
The Senate completed the third reading of Bill C-4 on December 12, 2013, after which it received royal assent.
This artifact outlines the procedural stages of Bill C-4 in the Senate, culminating in its third reading and subsequent royal assent. It details the timeline of readings, committee considerations, and report stages. Notably, it includes information about a "pre-study" where Senate committees examined the subject matter of the bill in advance of its formal appearance in the Senate. The Senate completed its third reading on December 12, 2013, and the bill received royal assent on the same day, becoming Statutes of Canada 2013, c. 40.
On December 12, 2013, the Senate debated and passed Bill C-4, an act related to budget provisions, and engaged in other procedural matters before adjourning for the holidays.
This document records the Senate's proceedings on December 12, 2013. The Senate engaged in debate and other procedural matters, including committee reports and motions. Notably, the Senate debated and passed Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures," which then received Royal Assent. The proceedings also included discussions on various other topics, such as Canada Post's service changes, tax evasion, and committee studies. The sitting concluded with the Senate adjourning until January 28, 2014.
During the Senate's third reading of Bill C-4, various other matters were discussed, committee reports were adopted, and Royal Assent was given to the bill.
This record details the Senate's third reading debate and subsequent completion of Bill C-4. The Senate engaged in discussions on various topics beyond the bill itself, including congratulating Gladys Lethbridge on her 109th birthday, reflecting on the Year of the Korean War Veteran, acknowledging visitors, discussing concerns about Canada Post's elimination of home delivery, recognizing figure skater Kaetlyn Osmond, and addressing issues in post-secondary education. Several committee reports were presented and adopted, concerning budgets for studies on pharmaceuticals, cyberbullying, and agricultural research. A point of order was raised regarding the political nature of a "Senators' Statement." The debate on Bill C-4 itself involved extensive discussion on its various parts, including tax measures, changes to the labour relations process, amendments to the Supreme Court Act, and the elimination of tax credits for labour-sponsored funds. The debate also touched upon the implications of omnibus bills, the process of legislative review, and the government's fiscal management. The sitting concluded with Royal Assent being given to Bill C-4 and other bills. The Senate then adjourned until January 28, 2014.
Bill C-4, an act to implement budget provisions from March 2013 and other measures, successfully completed its first reading in the House of Commons on October 22, 2013, and subsequently received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, after progressing through both the House of Commons and Senate.
This artifact details the procedural steps for Bill C-4 in the House of Commons, starting with its first reading on October 22, 2013. It also outlines the bill's journey through the Senate, including a pre-study by various committees, before it received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013. The artifact notes that the bill implements provisions from a budget tabled on March 21, 2013, and includes other measures. It shows the bill passed through various stages in both the House of Commons and the Senate, including readings, committee studies, and report stages.
Bill C-4 was introduced and given first reading in the House of Commons on October 22, 2013.
On October 22, 2013, during the House of Commons sitting, Bill C-4, "A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures," was introduced and read for the first time. This marked the bill's initial presentation and printing.
The House of Commons completed the second reading of Bill C-4 on October 29, 2013, after which it was referred to a committee.
This record details the second reading stage of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons on October 29, 2013. This stage is where the House of Commons debated and approved the general principles of the bill. The artifact indicates that the second reading was completed, and the bill was then referred to a committee for further study. It also notes that the bill ultimately received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming a statute of Canada.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-4 on October 23, 2013, the House of Commons engaged in discussions on ethics, the economy, and various other matters, including the specific provisions of the bill.
On October 23, 2013, during the second reading debate for Bill C-4, Members of Parliament discussed various matters. The debate included statements by members on topics such as the aerospace industry, the repatriation of Canadians from Egypt, and trade agreements. Oral questions focused heavily on the ethics surrounding Senator Mike Duffy's expense claims and the Prime Minister's involvement. The House also debated other items, including a motion on Senate accountability (which was negatived), and a ways and means motion concerning petroleum resources and the Excise Tax Act (which was carried on division). Routine proceedings involved the tabling of reports, the introduction of a bill to amend the Navigable Waters Protection Act, and motions regarding private members' business and the composition of a special committee. Petitions were presented on various subjects, including national urban parks, nuclear weapons, cell towers, mining, genetically modified alfalfa, and the environment. A question of privilege was raised concerning alleged misleading statements by the Prime Minister regarding the Senator Duffy affair, and another concerning the use of official languages in a departmental briefing. Government orders included the debate on Bill C-4, the "Economic Action Plan 2013 Act No. 2", with several members speaking for and against it. A notice of a time allocation motion for Bill C-4 was also given. Adjournment proceedings covered topics such as international trade, intergovernmental relations, and questions about the government's consistent messaging. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of the House.
This House of Commons Hansard record details the second reading debate on Bill C-4, where discussions covered economic policies, government accountability in the 'Mike Duffy affair,' and various other legislative and procedural matters.
This artifact is a record of the debate that took place in the House of Commons on October 23, 2013, during the second reading stage of Bill C-4. The debate primarily focused on the bill itself, its implications, and broader economic and ethical issues. Members from various parties participated, with significant discussion surrounding the Prime Minister's office and its role in the 'Mike Duffy affair'. There was also debate on the Canada-Europe trade agreement, First Nations education, privacy concerns related to telecommunications companies, and the government's approach to job creation and the economy. Procedurally, the House also dealt with a motion regarding the business of supply, which was defeated, and a ways and means motion concerning various acts, which was carried on division. A notice of a time allocation motion for Bill C-4 was also given.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons, MPs discussed the bill's economic implications, debated the government's economic policies, and extensively questioned the Prime Minister regarding the Senate expenses scandal.
This artifact is a record of a debate that took place in the House of Commons on October 23, 2013, during the second reading stage of Bill C-4, an act to implement certain provisions of the budget. The debate primarily focused on the bill's contents, economic policies, and the government's actions. Members of Parliament from different parties raised concerns and supported various aspects of the bill and the government's economic plan. There was also significant discussion related to the Senate expenses scandal involving Senator Mike Duffy, with opposition members questioning the Prime Minister and the government's role and the Prime Minister defending his government's actions. Other topics discussed included international trade, particularly the Canada-Europe trade agreement, aboriginal affairs, privacy, justice, and finance.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons, members discussed economic policies, government actions, and procedural matters, with opposition members expressing concerns and introducing a motion to decline the bill's second reading.
This record details a debate in the House of Commons on Bill C-4, an act related to the 2013 budget. The discussion at the second reading stage focused heavily on various issues, including the economy, job creation, tax policies, and criticisms of the government's handling of specific matters like the Mike Duffy scandal and its legislative process. Members from different parties expressed their views, with the government defending its economic plans and fiscal management, while opposition members raised concerns about the bill's scope, its impact on workers' rights, and the government's overall approach to governance. There was also a procedural discussion regarding a question of privilege related to statements made by the Prime Minister and a separate discussion about a departmental briefing on the bill that lacked French translation. The debate included arguments for and against the bill's second reading, with one member introducing a motion to decline second reading.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-4, the government moved to limit debate using a time allocation motion, prompting criticism from the opposition about the process and the bill's scope.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 24, 2013, concerning Bill C-4, the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act, No. 2. The main procedural event was the introduction of a time allocation motion by the government to limit debate on the bill at the second reading stage. Members of various parties debated the merits of this motion, with the opposition criticizing the use of time allocation and the omnibus nature of the bill, arguing it limited meaningful debate and contained unrelated measures. The government defended the motion as necessary for scheduling and ensuring adequate debate. The record also includes other House business such as routine proceedings, statements by members, and oral questions on various topics.
During the second reading debate of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons, members discussed economic measures from the 2013 budget, with criticism focused on the bill's omnibus nature and potential impacts on workers and parliamentary process.
This document records the second reading debate for Bill C-4, which aims to implement provisions from the 2013 budget. The debate, held in the House of Commons on October 25, 2013, involved discussions on various economic measures, including support for small businesses, job creation, and fiscal management. Opposition members raised concerns about the bill's omnibus nature, arguing it bundled unrelated measures and limited parliamentary debate. There was also discussion on specific measures affecting veterans, public services, and the environment.
This House of Commons sitting on October 28, 2013, featured a debate on establishing an electronic petitioning system, alongside discussions on Bill C-4, the Senate scandal, and various other constituency and policy matters.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 28, 2013, during the second reading stage of Bill C-4. The primary focus of the debate was a motion to establish an electronic petitioning system for the House of Commons. Members of Parliament from various parties discussed the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a system, including public engagement, cost, technical feasibility, and the risk of frivolous petitions. The debate also touched upon other government business, including the main provisions of Bill C-4 related to the budget and economic action plan, with members discussing job creation, tax policies, infrastructure, and public service reforms. There was also significant discussion on the Senate scandal and its implications, as well as various statements by members on diverse topics.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-4, members discussed budget-related measures, proposed changes to labour laws, public service relations, and ethical concerns, with the bill ultimately being referred to committee.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 29, 2013, concerning Bill C-4, an act related to the 2013 budget and other measures. The debate focused on various aspects of the bill, including changes to the Mackenzie Gas Project Impacts Act, tax measures, amendments to the Canada Labour Code regarding workplace safety, and changes affecting public service labor relations. Members from different parties raised concerns about omnibus bills, the process of legislation, and the potential impacts of the bill's provisions on workers, veterans, and government services. The debate also included discussions on international trade agreements and ethical matters related to senators' expenses.
Bill C-4 completed its committee consideration stage in the House of Commons between November 18 and November 28, 2013, before eventually receiving Royal Assent.
This record details the 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill C-4 in the House of Commons. This stage involved multiple sittings from November 18 to November 28, 2013, where the bill was examined by a committee. The provided text indicates the bill later received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming chapter 40 of the Statutes of Canada 2013. The Senate also conducted a pre-study of the bill's subject matter before it arrived there, involving various Senate committees examining different parts of the bill.
On December 11, 2013, the Senate of Canada held a sitting that included tabling committee reports, discussions on various bills including Bill C-4, and debates on social and economic issues.
This record from the Senate of Canada on December 11, 2013, details various proceedings and debates. It includes tributes to individuals, the tabling of committee reports, and discussions on bills and policy matters. Notably, the Senate considered the "Economic Action Plan 2013 Bill, No. 2" (Bill C-4), with the National Finance Committee presenting its fourth report without amendments. The Senate also debated other bills and discussed issues such as child poverty, Canada Post services, government advertising, and mental health services for veterans. The proceedings reflect the Senate's role in reviewing legislation and discussing matters of public interest.
The House of Commons completed its Report Stage for Bill C-4 on December 3, 2013, a procedural step before Third Reading, and the bill later received Royal Assent.
This record details the Report Stage of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons, which occurred on December 2 and 3, 2013. This stage is a procedural step where the House reviews the bill after it has been studied and potentially amended by a committee. The official text indicates that this stage was completed. Following this, the bill moved to Third Reading. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on December 12, 2013, becoming a statute. The Senate also conducted a pre-study of the bill's subject matter prior to its formal consideration, involving multiple Senate committees examining specific parts of the bill.
In the House of Commons on December 2, 2013, members debated Bill C-4 at report stage, focusing on numerous proposed amendments and expressing concerns about the omnibus nature of the bill and its impact on various sectors, while also touching on unrelated constituency and national issues.
On December 2, 2013, the House of Commons debated Bill C-4, the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act No. 2. The report stage of the bill involved numerous proposed amendments, primarily deletions, introduced by opposition parties, including the New Democratic Party (NDP) and the Green Party. These amendments aimed to remove various clauses from the bill, reflecting concerns about the omnibus nature of budget implementation acts and their potential impact on different sectors. The debate also touched upon the process of legislative scrutiny, with several members expressing dissatisfaction with the limited time for debate and the inclusion of unrelated measures within the budget bill. During the debate, specific areas of concern included changes to the Canada Labour Code, the phasing out of tax credits for labour-sponsored venture capital corporations, and the process for appointing Supreme Court justices. There was also discussion regarding the use of omnibus bills to enact significant legislative changes without sufficient parliamentary review. Additionally, various statements by members covered a range of topics unrelated to Bill C-4, such as international development, national defence, and constituency matters.
On December 3, 2013, the House of Commons debated and passed a time allocation motion for Bill C-4, the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act No. 2, before proceeding through a series of failed opposition amendments and ultimately concurring in the bill.
During this sitting of the House of Commons on December 3, 2013, the report stage of Bill C-4, the Economic Action Plan 2013 Act No. 2, was the main item of government business. A time allocation motion was debated and passed, which limited the time for further debate and voting on the bill at report and third reading stages. Following this, various opposition members raised concerns about the omnibus nature of the bill, the government's use of time allocation, and specific measures within the bill related to job creation, small businesses, social housing, workers' rights, and the National Research Council. Several divisions (votes) were taken on proposed amendments, all of which were defeated. The sitting concluded with a motion to concur in the bill being passed.
Bill C-4 completed its third reading in the House of Commons on December 10, 2013, prior to receiving Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
The House of Commons completed the third reading of Bill C-4 on December 10, 2013. This is a late stage in the legislative process. Following this, the bill proceeded to the Senate, where it also underwent readings and committee study before receiving Royal Assent on December 12, 2013.
On December 6, 2013, the House of Commons debated Bill C-4 at its third reading, with discussions covering economic action plan measures, tax policies, job creation, and concerns about the bill's omnibus nature.
This record details the debate at the third reading stage of Bill C-4 in the House of Commons on December 6, 2013. The debate included discussions on economic measures, job creation, tax policies, and various other government initiatives included in the bill. Members from different parties expressed their views on these topics, with some supporting the bill and others raising concerns about its content and the process by which it was being considered.
The House of Commons debated and passed Bill C-4 on December 9, 2013, following discussions on budget implementation and other matters.
The House of Commons debated and passed Bill C-4, a bill to implement budget provisions and other measures. The sitting included debates on various topics including the Criminal Code, pension plans, foreign affairs, and ethics. Members also presented petitions on issues such as education, sex selection, Lyme disease, and the Senate.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Royal assent yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jim FlahertySponsor MP | MP | Whitby—Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Richmond | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bramalea—Gore—Malton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wild Rose | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erindale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Humboldt | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Athabasca | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westlock—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax—Pickering | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Scarborough East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Coquihalla | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Edward—Hastings | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough | Conservative Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Northeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary—Nose Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Durham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Brampton South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margaret's | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton—Mississippi Mills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Alberni | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Leduc | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Island North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta—Richmond East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vegreville—Wainwright | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nunavut | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Blackstrap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Wanuskewin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre-North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton—Springdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oak Ridges—Markham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean—Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Palliser | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northumberland—Quinte West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Orléans | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Bellechasse | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Sherwood Park | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | British Columbia Southern Interior | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauharnois—Salaberry | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Paul's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne—Blainville | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Coquitlam | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—La Prairie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil-Soulanges | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey North | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Cowichan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newton—North Delta | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Random—Burin—St. George's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—Douglas | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Strathcona | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Welland | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westmount—Ville-Marie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chambly—Borduas | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trinity—Spadina | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—New Westminster | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wascana | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge River | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Lambert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent—Cartierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Saint-Constant | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Jeanne-Le Ber | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced