Bill S-203 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code (mental health treatment)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-203 would allow courts to delay sentencing for drug offenders to complete mental health treatment, potentially avoiding minimum sentences, and clarifies the Criminal Code's provisions for court-supervised treatment programs.
Bill S-203 proposes to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code to allow courts to delay sentencing for individuals convicted of certain drug offences. This delay would permit the offender to participate in a mental health treatment program. If the offender successfully completes the program, the court would not be required to impose the minimum sentence for the offence. The bill also clarifies that mental health treatment programs can be included under existing provisions in the Criminal Code that allow courts to delay sentencing for offenders to attend provincial-approved treatment programs.
- Amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to allow courts to delay sentencing for offenders convicted of certain offences.
- Amends the Criminal Code to explicitly include mental health treatment programs as a type of program that can be attended by offenders when sentencing is delayed.
- Specifies that if an offender successfully completes a mental health treatment program approved by the Attorney General or under court supervision, the court is not required to impose the minimum punishment for the offence.
- Clarifies that mental health treatment programs are included within the scope of provincial-approved treatment programs for which a court may delay sentencing under the Criminal Code.
- Individuals convicted of offences under Part I of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
- Courts (judges)
- Attorneys General
- Victims of offences
- Courts may delay sentencing for offenders to participate in mental health treatment.
- Courts are not required to impose minimum punishment if an offender successfully completes mental health treatment.
- Courts must consider the interests of justice and any victim when delaying sentencing.
- Delaying sentencing requires the consent of the Attorney General and the offender.
- Failure to successfully complete a mental health treatment program could result in the court imposing the minimum punishment for the offence.
- The bill does not specify which offences under Part I of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act are eligible for sentencing delays.
- The bill does not define 'successful completion' of a mental health treatment program.
- The bill does not specify the criteria for Attorney General approval of mental health court treatment programs.
- The bill's provisions requiring the Attorney General's consent for court-supervised treatment may introduce variability in application.
- The bill does not detail the process or standards for court supervision of mental health treatment.
- The bill does not specify how the 'interests of justice' or the 'interests of any victim' are to be considered when delaying sentencing.
Allows a court, when sentencing a person convicted of an offence under Part I of the Act, to delay sentencing to enable the offender to participate in a mental health court treatment program approved by the Attorney General, attend a mental health treatment program under subsection 720(2) of the Criminal Code, or receive mental health treatment under the court's supervision with the Attorney General's consent. If the offender successfully completes the program or treatment, the court is not required to impose the minimum punishment for the offence.
Source: Section 10
Replaces subsection 720(2) to explicitly include mental health treatment programs as an example of a provincial-approved treatment program that a court may allow an offender to attend while delaying sentencing. This is done with the consent of the Attorney General and the offender, and after considering the interests of justice and any victim.
Source: Section 720(2)
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-203, concerning amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code for mental health treatment, completed its First Reading in the Senate on October 22, 2013.
This record shows the procedural steps for Bill S-203 in the Senate as of October 22, 2013. The bill, which aims to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code regarding mental health treatment, completed its First Reading on this date. Later, it was referred to a committee for consideration.
During a Senate sitting on October 22, 2013, Bill S-203 received first reading, alongside other debates on various national and international issues, and a motion concerning Senator Patrick Brazeau.
On October 22, 2013, the Senate convened. The sitting included tributes to the late Paul Desmarais and the people of Lac-Mégantic, a congratulatory address on a nomination for the U.S. Federal Reserve chair, and discussions on the proposed Quebec Charter of Values. During the sitting, Bill S-203, "An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code (mental health treatment)", was introduced and received first reading. The Senate also debated and adjourned a motion to suspend Senator Patrick Brazeau, and discussed allegations concerning Nigel Wright and Senator Michael Duffy, budget deficit and procurement, the appointment of Mr. Justice Marc Nadon to the Supreme Court, and public service reductions. A message from the House of Commons regarding the birth of Prince George was adopted.
Bill S-203, concerning amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code regarding mental health treatment, completed its second reading in the Senate and was referred to a committee.
This record details the second reading stage of Bill S-203 in the Senate. The second reading stage, which allows for debate on the bill's principles, was completed. Following this, the bill was referred to a Senate committee for further examination. The record also notes the dates of first and second reading, and lists major speeches delivered during the second reading period, including those by Senator Mobina S.B. Jaffer and Senator Jean-Guy Dagenais.
During a Senate sitting on December 3, 2013, the second reading debate for Bill S-203 was adjourned, with further discussion planned for February.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on December 3, 2013, which included a debate at the second reading stage for Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code (mental health treatment). During this sitting, the debate on Bill S-203 was adjourned. The sitting also included discussions on various other topics, such as international treaties, anniversaries, government reports, policy matters, and issues related to military suicides and expense claims. The debate for Bill S-203 was adjourned to a later date, with Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer indicating she would speak in more detail in February.
In a Senate sitting on February 11, 2014, senators debated Bill S-203, which aims to provide similar legal provisions for mental health treatment of offenders as those already in place for drug treatment, and the bill was referred to committee after its second reading.
During this Senate sitting on February 11, 2014, the primary legislative business discussed was Bill S-203, concerning mental health treatment for offenders. Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer spoke extensively in favour of the bill, explaining its aim to align mental health treatment provisions with existing drug treatment provisions within the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code. She highlighted that the bill seeks to allow for delays in sentencing for mental health treatment and potentially waive mandatory minimum sentences upon successful completion of treatment, emphasizing the goal of addressing root causes of criminal behavior rather than solely punishing. Senator Paul E. McIntyre also spoke on the bill, acknowledging its focus on public safety and victim rights, but suggested that the core changes pertained mainly to a 'high-risk' designation for offenders, while low-risk offenders would see minimal change. The debate also touched upon other Senate business, including reports from the Standing Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament on proposed rule changes, a notice of motion regarding hydrocarbon transportation safety, and discussions on employment insurance and the closure of departmental libraries. Bill S-203 was ultimately read a second time and referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-203, Senator Jaffer advocated for its passage, arguing it would improve mental health treatment access for offenders by aligning it with drug treatment provisions, while also voicing concerns about the bill's focus on public safety over rehabilitation.
This artifact is a record of a Senate debate on February 11, 2014, focusing on Bill S-203, an act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code regarding mental health treatment. Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer, the sponsor of the bill, spoke in favour of its second reading. She argued that the bill would align how the criminal justice system handles mental health treatment with how it handles drug treatment, allowing for delays in sentencing for mental health treatment and potential waivers of mandatory minimum sentences upon successful completion. She highlighted that similar provisions already exist for drug treatment and that mental health courts across Canada aim to address the root causes of criminal behaviour rather than just punishing symptoms. Senator Jaffer expressed concerns about the bill's emphasis on public safety over the accused's treatment needs and the proposed 'high-risk' designation, suggesting it could lead to punishment rather than rehabilitation and stigmatize individuals with mental illness. Senator Paul E. McIntyre, who had extensive experience with review boards, questioned some of Senator Jaffer's concerns, particularly regarding the impact on low-risk offenders and the existing mechanisms for public safety. The debate also touched upon various other Senate business, including committee reports, notices of motions, and discussions on topics like biofuels, Senate reform, departmental libraries, employment insurance, and the Winter Olympics. The bill was ultimately referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
During a Senate sitting on April 30, 2014, senators held debates on various matters including foreign policy, the recognition of Vietnamese refugees, and a bill to establish Pope John Paul II Day, while also adjourning debate on Bill S-203 concerning mental health treatment.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on April 30, 2014. The sitting included tributes to several deceased individuals, discussions on various topics including research and development, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), and human rights in Burma. A significant portion of the debate involved a motion regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which was questioned on procedural grounds. Another debate concerned Bill S-219, an act to recognize a national day of commemoration for Vietnamese refugees. The sitting also included debate on Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code (mental health treatment), which was adjourned. Finally, Bill C-266, an Act to establish Pope John Paul II Day, was debated and referred to committee.
During a Senate sitting on May 6, 2014, a debate on Bill S-203 at second reading revealed the government's opposition, citing the need for a comprehensive, coordinated approach to mental health treatment within the criminal justice system rather than a bill focused on a single piece of legislation.
The Senate met on May 6, 2014. The sitting included tributes to a retiring Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel, discussions on various topics including World Intellectual Property Day, reports on the Auditor General's spring report, and debates on several bills. Specifically, Bill S-203, concerning mental health treatment in relation to drug offenses, had its second reading debate. The debate focused on the differences between drug treatment courts and mental health treatment, and the government's inability to support the bill due to its scope and the need for a broader, coordinated approach involving federal, provincial, and territorial governments.
During a Senate debate on Bill S-203, Senator Dagenais explained the government's opposition to the bill, citing complexities in mental health treatment and the need for a broader review of related justice system issues.
This is a record of a debate in the Senate on May 6, 2014, concerning Bill S-203, which aims to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and the Criminal Code to allow for mental health treatment to be considered during sentencing. During the debate, Senator Jean-Guy Dagenais spoke about the bill, explaining its purpose and outlining the government's reasons for not supporting it at that time. He highlighted differences between drug treatment programs and mental health treatment, and noted the complexities of addressing mental health issues within the criminal justice system, suggesting that a broader examination beyond a single bill was necessary.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced