Bill S-206 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-206 would remove the legal justification in the Criminal Code that currently allows schoolteachers, parents, and guardians to use reasonable force to correct a child under their care.
Bill S-206 proposes to amend the Criminal Code by repealing section 43, which currently allows schoolteachers, parents, and people acting as parents to use force as a means of correction toward children and students under their care, as long as the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances. If passed, this change would remove this legal justification, meaning that using physical force to correct or discipline a child would no longer have automatic legal protection under federal criminal law. The bill provides for up to one year between the date the law receives royal assent (becomes official) and when it actually comes into force. This delay would allow the federal government time to educate Canadians about the change and coordinate with provincial governments, which also have child protection laws.
- Repeals section 43 of the Criminal Code, which currently justifies the use of reasonable force by schoolteachers, parents, and guardians for the purpose of correcting children under their care
- Removes the legal defence available to schoolteachers, parents, and persons standing in the place of parents who use physical force to discipline children
- Provides a commencement period of up to one year after royal assent to allow for public education and coordination with provinces before the change takes effect
- Schoolteachers
- Parents
- Persons standing in the place of parents or guardians
- Children and students under the care of these individuals
- Canadians generally, as this affects criminal law across the country
- Removal of the legal justification to use physical force for child discipline and correction
- The Act would come into force one year after royal assent, or on an earlier date fixed by order of the Governor in Council
- First reading occurred on October 29, 2013
- Removal of the legal justification means that conduct previously protected under section 43 could potentially be prosecuted under other criminal provisions applicable to assault or causing bodily harm
- The bill does not define what alternative discipline methods should be used after the repeal
- The bill does not specify what the Governor in Council might consider for an earlier commencement date
- The bill does not detail how provinces will coordinate on this matter or what their separate laws might provide
- The bill does not clarify how law enforcement or courts would treat conduct that would have been covered under section 43
- The practical scope and application of the change depends on how courts and law enforcement interpret it after coming into force
Removes the current legal justification allowing schoolteachers, parents, and guardians to use reasonable force to correct children under their care
Source: Section 1 of Bill S-206
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-206, concerning the protection of children against standard child-rearing violence, completed its first reading in the Senate on October 29, 2013, before being referred to committee.
This artifact details the first reading of Bill S-206 in the Senate on October 29, 2013. The bill, titled "An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence)", was completed at this stage. The bill was later referred to a committee on May 8, 2014, and had its second reading speeches on May 1 and May 8, 2014. This specific record marks the initial introduction of the bill in the Senate.
Bill S-206, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence), received first reading in the Senate.
On October 29, 2013, the Senate proceeded with the first reading of Bill S-206, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning the protection of children against standard child-rearing violence. This procedural step involved introducing the bill, and it was then placed on the Order Paper for second reading at a future date. The rest of the sitting was occupied by other Senate business, including discussions on various topics and procedural matters related to the suspension of three senators.
Bill S-206 completed its second reading in the Senate and was referred to committee.
This record outlines the procedural steps for Bill S-206 in the Senate. The bill completed its second reading stage on May 8, 2014, and was then referred to a Senate committee for further consideration. The second reading process involved multiple sittings where speeches were made.
During a Senate sitting on December 12, 2013, the debate on Bill S-206 at second reading was adjourned by Senator Hervieux-Payette to allow for further preparation, with the rest of the sitting occupied by routine procedural matters and discussions on other legislative items.
This Senate sitting on December 12, 2013, included a debate on Bill S-206, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence). Senator Hervieux-Payette initiated the second reading debate by referencing recent cases involving children and stated her intention to elaborate on the bill's necessity after the Christmas break, leading to the adjournment of the debate. The rest of the sitting involved various procedural matters, committee report presentations and adoptions, and discussions on other bills and topics, including Canada Post service changes, executive travel expenses, the disability tax credit, and budget implementation bills.
On February 13, 2014, the Senate debated various issues, with Senator Hervieux-Payette speaking in favour of Bill S-206 to amend the Criminal Code regarding child-rearing violence, arguing for the protection of children and providing support for parents.
This artifact is a record of a Senate debate that occurred on February 13, 2014. The debate included discussions on various topics unrelated to Bill S-206. One senator, Céline Hervieux-Payette, spoke in favour of Bill S-206, which aims to amend the Criminal Code to protect children from standard child-rearing violence. She explained the bill's purpose, addressed public confusion, and cited legal and scientific arguments against corporal punishment, referencing Supreme Court rulings and international examples. She stated the bill is not intended to criminalize parents but to protect children and provide parents with better tools. Other senators also spoke on unrelated matters, including suicide prevention, energy costs in the Northwest Territories, social housing, Budget 2014, Senate reform, a bill to establish a national day for health and fitness, and a bill to create a commission on mental health and justice.
During a Senate sitting on February 13, 2014, Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette delivered the sponsor's speech for Bill S-206, advocating for its passage to protect children from violence in child-rearing, citing legal, scientific, and international examples, while other senators discussed various other topics and bills.
This artifact is a record of a Senate debate on February 13, 2014. It includes speeches on various topics, including the "Hooked on School Days" initiative, recognizing an athlete, international parliamentary associations, mental health, social housing, budget matters, Senate reform, and several bills. Specifically, it records the sponsor's speech for Bill S-206, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (protection of children against standard child-rearing violence). The sponsor of Bill S-206, Senator Céline Hervieux-Payette, argued for its passage, explaining that it aims to protect children from violence within child-rearing practices. She discussed the Supreme Court's interpretation of Section 43 of the Criminal Code, scientific evidence on the harmful effects of violence on child development, and examples from other countries that have banned corporal punishment without criminalizing parents. She emphasized that the bill seeks to protect children and support parents with non-violent disciplinary methods. Other senators also spoke on different matters during the sitting.
On May 1, 2014, the Senate held a sitting that included tributes, recognition of visitors, and debates on multiple bills and policy issues, including child protection, digital privacy, trade, and healthcare.
This document summarizes a Senate sitting on May 1, 2014. The sitting included several discussions and debates on various matters, including tributes to journalists lost in the line of duty, recognition of visitors, and discussions on several bills. Notably, there was a debate on Bill S-206, concerning the protection of children against standard child-rearing violence, with Senator Donald Plett expressing strong opposition. There was also a debate on Bill S-4, the Digital Privacy Bill, concerning amendments to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. Other discussions involved the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, the closure of Mirabel Airport, and the need for federal collaboration on healthcare.
On May 1, 2014, the Senate debated various matters, including acknowledging journalists lost in service, welcoming guests, and discussing several bills and committee reports, with the debate on Bill S-206 being adjourned and a senator voicing strong opposition to its provisions.
This record details a debate that took place in the Senate on May 1, 2014. While the Senate was scheduled to discuss various bills, including Bill S-206 concerning child protection, the majority of the debate in this specific record focused on other matters. These included recognizing journalists lost in the line of duty, welcoming visitors, celebrating achievements of Miss World Canada and young farmers, discussing the Trinity Western University School of Law, honouring Noel Knockwood, launching National Vision Health Month, presenting a committee report on Asia-Pacific security and economic developments, and debating various other bills and inquiries on topics ranging from privacy and corporate board diversity to health care and foreign affairs. The debate on Bill S-206 itself was adjourned, with a senator expressing strong opposition to its proposed changes to the Criminal Code.
During a Senate sitting on May 6, 2014, the second reading debate for Bill S-206, concerning the protection of children against child-rearing violence, continued with Senator A. Raynell Andreychuk raising concerns about its potential legal implications, and the debate was subsequently adjourned.
This record details a Senate sitting on May 6, 2014. The sitting included tributes to a retiring Law Clerk, discussions on various bills and inquiries, and debates on subjects ranging from intellectual property to Supreme Court appointments and the role of CBC/Radio-Canada. Notably, Bill S-206, concerning the protection of children against child-rearing violence, was debated at its second reading. Senator A. Raynell Andreychuk expressed concerns about the bill, arguing that repealing section 43 of the Criminal Code would create confusion and that the existing section provides a necessary, narrowly defined defence. The debate on Bill S-206 was adjourned.
On May 8, 2014, the Senate held a sitting that included debates on various bills, including Bill S-206, alongside statements on diverse topics and the tabling of committee reports, before concluding with a motion to adjourn.
This record details a Senate sitting on May 8, 2014. The sitting included various discussions and proceedings, including statements on Canadian innovations in diabetes care, the closure of the Health Council of Canada, a visitor in the gallery, remembrances of historical events and individuals, discussions on international affairs like the "Talibanization" of Brunei, and the tabling of committee reports. Several bills were also at various stages of the legislative process. Notably, Bill S-206, concerning the protection of children against standard child-rearing violence, was read a second time and referred to committee. The sitting also featured debates on Bill S-4 (Digital Privacy Act), Bill C-30 (fair rail for grain farmers), Bill C-25 (Qalipu Mi'kmaq First Nation), Bill C-462 (Disability Tax Credit Promoters Restrictions), Bill S-207 (Conflict of Interest Act amendments), and Bill C-428 (Indian Act by-laws). The sitting concluded with a motion to adjourn.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced