Bill S-225 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (physician-assisted death)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
This bill proposes amendments to the Criminal Code to permit physician-assisted death under strict conditions for individuals experiencing intolerable suffering or irreversible decline.
Bill S-225 proposes to amend the Criminal Code to allow a physician, under specific conditions, to assist a person in ending their life if they are experiencing intolerable suffering from an illness, disease, or disability, or have no chance of improvement in their weakening capacities. The bill outlines requirements for the person making the request, the physicians involved, the request process, and reporting. It specifies that physician-assisted death, when performed according to these rules, would not be considered culpable homicide. The bill also sets out penalties for those who provide false information or improperly handle requests.
- Amends the Criminal Code to create exceptions for physician-assisted death.
- Establishes conditions for individuals to request physician-assisted death.
- Defines roles and responsibilities for physicians involved in assisted death.
- Outlines the process for making and revoking requests for assisted death.
- Creates new reporting requirements for physicians.
- Introduces penalties for certain violations related to assisted death.
- Individuals seeking physician-assisted death.
- Physicians (referred to as 'assisting physicians' and 'consulting physicians').
- Witnesses to the request for physician-assisted death.
- The Minister of Health.
- Individuals requesting physician-assisted death must be at least 18 years old, a Canadian citizen or permanent resident, have a diagnosed incurable illness, disease, or disability causing intolerable suffering or irreversible decline, be of sound mind, and act voluntarily.
- Assisting physicians must inform the individual of their diagnosis, prognosis, consequences of the request, alternative treatments, and the right to revoke the request.
- Assisting physicians and consulting physicians must examine the individual to ensure eligibility criteria are met.
- Requests for physician-assisted death must be in writing, signed by the individual (or by witnesses if unable to sign), and witnessed by two individuals who are not related to the medical team or beneficiaries of the estate.
- A minimum of 14 days must pass between the request and the procedure, with an opportunity to revoke the request immediately before.
- Assisting physicians must document the procedure, the examination, the opportunity to revoke, and the final confirmation of eligibility.
- Assisting physicians must report details of each assisted death to the Minister of Health within 30 days.
- Witnesses and physicians must not have certain professional or personal relationships with the patient or each other.
- Information reported to the Minister of Health is confidential.
- The bill was given first reading on December 2, 2014.
- A minimum of 14 days must elapse between the signing of the request and the carrying out of the procedure.
- Reports to the Minister of Health must be submitted no later than 30 days after the death.
- Physicians or consultants who provide assistance or advice knowing they will receive a financial or material benefit from the person's death are guilty of an indictable offence.
- Providing false statements as a witness is an indictable offence, punishable by up to five years imprisonment.
- Wilfully concealing or destroying a request or revocation is an indictable offence, punishable by up to five years imprisonment.
- Providing assistance or advice for financial or material benefit as a physician is an indictable offence, punishable by up to five years imprisonment.
- The bill does not specify which medical treatments are considered 'acceptable' to the patient.
- The specific 'form prescribed by the regulations' for the report to the Minister of Health is not detailed in the provided text.
- The bill does not detail the process for appointing a Minister of Health or the specific regulations for reporting.
- The bill states that it prevails over other conflicting laws, but the extent of this prevalence is not fully detailed.
This bill proposes changes to allow physician-assisted death under specific circumstances, which would not be considered culpable homicide. It also adds new definitions and procedures related to this process. A new section (241.1) will be added and an existing section (14) and heading will be replaced.
Source: Section 1, 2, and 3 of the Bill
The bill references the definition of 'permanent resident' from this Act for determining eligibility for physician-assisted death.
Source: Section 241.1(3)(b) of the Bill
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, completed its first reading in the Senate on December 2, 2014, and moved to second reading on December 4, 2014.
This artifact describes the first reading stage for Bill S-225 in the Senate. This procedural step occurred on December 2, 2014, and was completed. The bill's title indicates it aims to amend the Criminal Code concerning physician-assisted death. Following this, the bill proceeded to second reading on December 4, 2014.
The Senate introduced Bill S-225, an Act to amend the Criminal Code regarding physician-assisted death, and debated other matters during its sitting on December 2, 2014.
On December 2, 2014, the Senate proceeded with its first reading of Bill S-225, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning physician-assisted death. The bill was introduced by Senator Nancy Ruth and placed on the Order of the Day for second reading two days later. The sitting also included discussions on various other matters, such as the Grey Cup, the election of Michaëlle Jean as Secretary-General of La Francophonie, tabled committee reports, a question regarding the representation of women on corporate boards, and a discussion on the Supreme Court appointment process.
Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, is undergoing debate at the second reading stage in the Senate, with discussions having started in December 2014 and not yet concluded.
The Senate is currently in the process of debating Bill S-225 at the second reading stage. This stage involves discussions about the bill's purpose and principles. The bill was introduced in the Senate and has had several speeches delivered on it since its first reading in December 2014. The debate at second reading, which began in December 2014, was not yet completed as of June 2, 2015.
In a Senate sitting on December 4, 2014, senators commemorated the l'École Polytechnique tragedy, debated violence against women, discussed the Ebola outbreak, and initiated second reading debate on Bill S-225 concerning physician-assisted death, alongside other legislative matters.
During this Senate sitting on December 4, 2014, senators observed a moment of silence for the victims of the l'École Polytechnique tragedy. Several senators spoke about the 25th anniversary of the tragedy and the ongoing issue of violence against women. The sitting also included discussions on Canada's response to the Ebola outbreak, updates on francophone initiatives in Manitoba, and the tabling and presentation of various committee reports and bills. Notably, Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, was introduced for second reading and debate was adjourned. The sitting addressed numerous other legislative items and motions.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-225, Senator Nancy Ruth argued for the legalization of physician-assisted death in Canada, citing public support, existing legal precedents, and proposed safeguards within the bill.
This artifact is a record of a speech given by Senator Nancy Ruth during the second reading debate of Bill S-225 in the Senate. The bill, titled 'An Act to amend the Criminal Code (physician-assisted death),' proposes to allow physician-assisted death (PAD) in Canada. Senator Ruth stated that 84% of Canadians support the right to physician-assisted death and that the current laws cause unnecessary suffering. She argued that the bill, which she has carefully crafted, would provide a legal framework and options for Canadians considering PAD, similar to practices in other countries. She highlighted safeguards in the bill, including requirements for the patient to be 18 or older, a Canadian citizen or permanent resident, diagnosed with a qualifying illness or disability causing intolerable suffering, and for the request to be voluntary. The bill also requires two physicians to examine the patient, provides information on alternatives like palliative care, includes a 14-day waiting period, and requires documentation and reporting. Senator Ruth also addressed concerns about psychological suffering being included, the comparison to capital punishment, and the spiritual perspective on end-of-life choices.
On December 10, 2014, the Senate debated various issues including economic policy and First Nations education, continued debate on Bill S-225 (physician-assisted death), adopted committee reports, passed a supply bill, and discussed a bill concerning non-partisan offices.
This document details a sitting of the Senate on December 10, 2014. The sitting included tributes to the late Wilfred "Wilf" Arthur Charles Carter and William "Bill" George Brewster, the tabling of several annual reports, and debates on various topics including economic diversification, overseas detention facilities, and First Nations education. The debate on Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, was continued. The Senate also adopted the fourteenth report of the National Finance Committee regarding the subject matter of certain parts of Bill C-43, and passed Bill C-45 at third reading. Additionally, there was a discussion on Bill C-520, an act to support non-partisan offices of agents of Parliament, and a continued debate on a motion to authorize a committee to study trade between Canada and the United States. The Senate also received a message from the House of Commons concerning Bill S-211 and introduced Bill C-43.
A Senate sitting on December 10, 2014, included speeches, tabled reports, and debates on various topics including economic diversification and First Nations education, with a placeholder indicating the scheduled debate on Bill S-225 (physician-assisted death) was adjourned without discussion.
This document is a record of a Senate debate on December 10, 2014. While Bill S-225, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (physician-assisted death), was listed on the agenda for second reading debate, the provided text does not contain the debate specifically on that bill. Instead, the text records speeches honouring deceased individuals (Wilfred "Wilf" Arthur Charles Carter and William "Bill" George Brewster), discussions on food banks, tabled reports on various agreements, a debate on economic diversification and oil dependency, a discussion on overseas detention facilities, the third reading of an appropriation bill (Bill C-45), the adoption of a report on the subject matter of a budget implementation bill (Bill C-43), and continued debates on a bill supporting non-partisan offices of agents of Parliament and on an inquiry about disparities in First Nations education and lighthouses as maritime heritage. The section titled "Bill to Amend—Second Reading—Debate Continued" is the only part directly related to Bill S-225, but the actual debate text for it is missing and replaced with a placeholder "(On motion of Senator Verner, debate adjourned.)". The text does not describe the proceedings of the second reading of Bill S-225.
During a Senate sitting on February 18, 2015, Senators debated a motion to centralize parliamentary security under the RCMP and began the second reading debate on Bill S-225, which proposes to amend the Criminal Code to allow for physician-assisted death.
This Senate sitting on February 18, 2015, included debate on several items. The main focus of the provided text is the debate on a motion to integrate parliamentary security under the leadership of the RCMP and a second reading debate on Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death. Other proceedings included the presentation of a committee report on agriculture, first reading of a bill concerning marine mammal regulations, a Speaker's ruling on a point of order regarding the security motion, and debates on bills related to First Nations housing and a single point of contact for death notifications. The debate on Bill S-225 discussed the principle of physician-assisted death as part of end-of-life care, referencing Quebec's Bill 52 and a Supreme Court ruling.
The Senate convened for a sitting that included debate on Bill S-225 concerning physician-assisted death, alongside various procedural matters, committee reports, and other discussions.
This record details a Senate sitting on March 24, 2015. While the primary purpose of the sitting was to debate Bill S-225, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code (physician-assisted death)" at its second reading, the sitting also included various procedural matters, committee reports, and discussions on other topics. The debate on Bill S-225 involved expressions of concern regarding the bill's provisions, safeguards, and potential interpretations, drawing comparisons to other jurisdictions. The sitting also included procedural actions such as presenting committee reports, tabling documents, and motions regarding the business of the Senate and committee meetings. Additionally, several senators rose to offer congratulations and mark observances, including World Down Syndrome Day.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-225 concerning physician-assisted death, Senators expressed differing views, with one opposing it due to moral and safety concerns, and another supporting it based on public opinion and legal directives, before the debate was adjourned.
On April 23, 2015, the Senate met for a debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-225, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (physician-assisted death). During this sitting, Senators Don Meredith and Diane Bellemare spoke about the bill. Senator Meredith expressed concerns about the bill, citing religious beliefs and potential risks to vulnerable populations, and stated he would not support it moving forward. Senator Bellemare spoke in support of the bill, referencing public opinion, Quebec's legislation, and the Supreme Court's request for legislative change, and indicated her support for its principle. The debate was adjourned, and the bill has not yet completed its second reading stage. The sitting also included other procedural matters and debates on different bills and reports.
During a Senate sitting on May 7, 2015, debate on Bill S-225 (physician-assisted death) continued with significant concerns raised, alongside discussions on lapsed program funding, financial regulations, and Atlantic salmon conservation, with various reports also being tabled.
On May 7, 2015, the Senate met and engaged in various discussions and procedural matters. The debate on Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, was continued, with Senator Denise Batters expressing significant concerns about the bill's inclusion of psychological suffering as a criterion and questioning its safeguards. The Senate also heard updates on other matters, including lapsed funding for programs, financial institution regulations, and the declining population of Atlantic salmon. Several reports were tabled, and visitors were welcomed.
On June 2, 2015, the Senate sat, hearing tributes, tabling reports, and debating Bill C-51 (Anti-terrorism Act) and Bill S-225 (physician-assisted death), alongside discussions on Auditor General powers and parliamentary audits.
This record details a sitting of the Senate on June 2, 2015. The sitting included discussions on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's final report, tributes to former Quebec Premier Jacques Parizeau and Justice Minister Peter MacKay, and the recognition of diplomatic relations with Ethiopia. Several reports were tabled, including those related to parliamentary privilege and amendments to the Canada Elections Act. Notices of motions were given concerning committees meeting during adjournments. A significant portion of the debate focused on Bill C-51, the Anti-terrorism Act, with senators expressing concerns about the balance between security measures and civil liberties, and debating proposed amendments to the bill. Another debate continued on Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, exploring ethical, legal, and palliative care considerations. There was also a debate on a motion calling for an audit of House of Commons expenses and extended inquiries into the role and powers of the Auditor General of Canada.
Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, has not yet reached the third reading stage in the Senate, with the latest activity being debate at second reading.
The artifact indicates that Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, has not yet reached the Senate's third reading stage. The latest activity recorded was a debate at the second reading stage on June 2, 2015. The bill had its first reading on December 2, 2014, and its second reading on December 4, 2014. Several major speeches related to the second reading occurred between December 2014 and June 2015, including speeches by Senator Nancy Ruth (Sponsor) and Senator Larry W. Campbell (Response).
Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, reached its first reading in the House of Commons on December 2, 2014, and second reading on December 4, 2014, with subsequent debate speeches in the Senate.
This artifact details the legislative process for Bill S-225 in the House of Commons. The bill was introduced for its first reading on December 2, 2014. Following this, it proceeded to second reading on December 4, 2014, with speeches from sponsors and responses occurring on various dates in late 2014 and early 2015. However, the artifact indicates that the 'House of Commons First reading' stage has not yet been reached, suggesting a potential discrepancy or that this artifact focuses on the bill's history rather than its current progression in the House of Commons.
The 'House of Commons Second reading' stage for Bill S-225 has not yet occurred, with the bill currently under consideration at second reading in the Senate.
This record indicates that the 'House of Commons Second reading' stage for Bill S-225 has not yet been reached. The bill is currently at the second reading stage in the Senate. The provided text lists dates for the first reading, second reading in the Senate, and subsequent speeches related to the bill's second reading in the Senate.
This document details the legislative progress of Bill S-225, showing it has reached the Senate second reading stage, with subsequent committee consideration in the House of Commons yet to occur.
This artifact describes the legislative process for Bill S-225. It indicates that the bill is currently at the 'Consideration in committee' stage in the House of Commons, but this stage has not yet been reached. The bill has gone through first and second reading in the Senate, with several speeches noted from December 2014 to June 2015. The current overall status of the bill is 'At second reading in the Senate'.
Bill S-225, concerning physician-assisted death, has progressed to the Report stage in the House of Commons, though this stage has not yet been reached, and is currently at second reading in the Senate.
The provided artifact indicates that Bill S-225 has reached the Report stage in the House of Commons, but this stage has not yet occurred. The artifact details the bill's progression, noting its current status at second reading in the Senate and listing various dates for speeches and readings in both the Senate and the House of Commons.
The House of Commons Third reading stage for Bill S-225 has not been reached, with the bill currently at Second Reading in the Senate.
This artifact indicates that the 'House of Commons Third reading' stage for Bill S-225 has not yet been reached. The bill is currently at the 'Second reading' stage in the Senate. The provided text outlines the bill's progression, including its first and second readings in the Senate and lists dates where major speeches were made during the second reading debate.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced