Bill S-7 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-7 amends immigration, marriage, and criminal laws to establish grounds for immigration inadmissibility based on polygamy, set minimum marriage age and consent requirements federally, and create new criminal offences related to forced marriage and child marriage.
Bill S-7, known as the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," makes changes to federal laws across three main areas: immigration, marriage, and criminal law. Under immigration law, permanent residents and foreign nationals can be found inadmissible to Canada if they are practising or will practise polygamy with someone who is or will be physically present in Canada at the same time. The bill amends the Civil Marriage Act to establish that marriage requires the free and enlightened consent of both persons, sets a minimum age of 16 years for marriage, and requires that any previous marriage must be dissolved or declared null before a new marriage can be contracted. These requirements were previously only codified in Quebec law or applied through common law in other provinces. In criminal law, the bill creates new offences: celebrating, aiding, or participating in a forced marriage (marriage against someone's will) is punishable by up to five years in prison; celebrating, aiding, or participating in a marriage when one person is under 16 years old is also punishable by up to five years in prison; removing a child from Canada with the intention of having a forced or underage marriage occur outside Canada becomes an offence; and knowingly solemnizing a marriage in violation of federal law is punishable by up to two years in prison. The bill also allows judges to order people to enter into recognizances (promises to keep the peace with conditions) if there are reasonable grounds to fear they will commit forced marriage or underage marriage offences, with conditions that may include prohibiting communication with certain people, requiring surrender of passports, or participation in counselling. The bill restricts the legal defence of provocation to situations where the victim engaged in conduct that would constitute an indictable offence punishable by five years or more in prison. Finally, the bill makes consequential amendments to the Prisons and Reformatories Act and the Youth Criminal Justice Act to reflect these new offences.
- Amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to make permanent residents and foreign nationals inadmissible to Canada on grounds of practising or planning to practise polygamy with someone physically present in Canada
- Amends the Civil Marriage Act to establish that marriage requires free and enlightened consent of both persons
- Establishes a minimum age of 16 years for marriage under federal law (applying across all provinces and territories)
- Requires that all previous marriages be dissolved by death, divorce, or declared null by court order before a new marriage can be contracted
- Creates new Criminal Code offence of celebrating, aiding, or participating in a forced marriage (marriage against someone's will), with penalty up to 5 years imprisonment
- Creates new Criminal Code offence of celebrating, aiding, or participating in a marriage when one person is under 16 years old, with penalty up to 5 years imprisonment
- Creates new Criminal Code offence of removing a child from Canada with intent that a forced or underage marriage occur outside Canada
- Clarifies that it is an offence for an authorized marriage officiant to knowingly solemnize a marriage in contravention of federal law, with penalty up to 2 years imprisonment
- Enables judges to order persons to enter into recognizances (promises with conditions) to prevent offences related to forced marriage, underage marriage, or child removal when there are reasonable grounds for fear
- Allows recognizance conditions including prohibitions on communication, requirements to surrender passports or travel documents, participation in treatment programs, and restrictions on firearm possession
- Restricts the legal defence of provocation to circumstances where the victim engaged in conduct constituting an indictable offence punishable by 5 or more years imprisonment
- Makes consequential amendments to the Prisons and Reformatories Act to update the definition of 'prisoner' to include those committed for failure to enter recognizances under the new provisions
- Makes consequential amendments to the Youth Criminal Justice Act to give youth courts jurisdiction to make recognizance orders under the new forced and underage marriage provisions
- Permanent residents and foreign nationals who practise or plan to practise polygamy in Canada
- Persons seeking to marry, including requirements for free and enlightened consent and minimum age of 16 years
- Persons who perform or participate in marriage rites or ceremonies, including officiants
- Persons convicted or at risk of committing forced marriage, underage marriage, or related child removal offences, who may be subject to recognizance orders
- Young persons (youth) under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, who may be subject to recognizance orders related to forced or underage marriage
- Persons required to surrender travel documents or firearms as conditions of recognizances
- Immigration officers and courts making determinations about admissibility and immigration status
- Provincial court judges who receive information about feared forced or underage marriage offences
- Marriage officiants and persons involved in religious or customary marriage ceremonies
- Permanent residents and foreign nationals must not practise polygamy with a person physically present in Canada or they face inadmissibility
- Persons seeking to marry must have free and enlightened consent and must be at least 16 years old
- Persons must ensure all previous marriages are dissolved by death, divorce, or court order declaring the marriage null before contracting a new marriage
- Marriage officiants must solemnize marriages in accordance with federal law and applicable provincial laws
- It is unlawful to celebrate, aid, or participate in a marriage when either person is doing so against their will or is under 16 years old
- It is unlawful to remove a child from Canada with the intention that a forced or underage marriage occur outside Canada
- Judges have authority to order a person to enter into a recognizance if there are reasonable grounds to fear an offence related to forced marriage, underage marriage, or child removal
- Recognizance conditions may include prohibitions on contacting specified persons, requirements to deposit travel documents or passports, prohibition on firearm possession, and participation in treatment programs
- Persons bound by a recognizance must comply with its conditions or face further criminal charges for breach of recognizance
- The defence of provocation is no longer available in circumstances where the victim's conduct was not an indictable offence punishable by five or more years imprisonment
- Bill received Royal Assent on 18 June 2015
- Part 1 (immigration provisions regarding polygamy inadmissibility) comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council
- Part 3 (criminal law provisions) comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council
- Part 2 (Civil Marriage Act amendments regarding consent, age, and previous marriage requirements) appears to have commenced upon Royal Assent on 18 June 2015, as no separate commencement provision is stated for this Part
- Celebrating, aiding, or participating in a forced marriage (marriage against someone's will): indictable offence, imprisonment up to 5 years (Criminal Code section 293.1)
- Celebrating, aiding, or participating in a marriage when a person is under 16 years old: indictable offence, imprisonment up to 5 years (Criminal Code section 293.2)
- Knowingly solemnizing a marriage in contravention of federal law or provincial law: indictable offence, imprisonment up to 2 years (Criminal Code section 295)
- Removing a child from Canada with intention that a forced or underage marriage occur outside Canada: offence under Criminal Code section 273.3(1)(d), with penalties to be determined by that section
- Failure or refusal to enter into a recognizance ordered by a judge: commitment to prison for a term not exceeding 12 months (Criminal Code section 810.02(5))
- Breach of recognizance: offence under Criminal Code section 811
- Permanent residents and foreign nationals practising or planning to practise polygamy in Canada: inadmissible on grounds of practising polygamy (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act section 41.1)
- The bill does not specify the date on which Part 1 (immigration provisions) comes into force; it states this will be set by order of the Governor in Council (Section 3)
- The bill does not specify the date on which Part 3 (criminal law provisions) comes into force; it states this will be set by order of the Governor in Council (Section 16)
- The bill does not detail procedures for determining whether someone is 'practising polygamy' or whether previous marriages have been properly dissolved in all jurisdictions
- The bill does not provide guidance on how immigration authorities will verify whether a permanent resident or foreign national meets the conditions for inadmissibility on polygamy grounds
- The definition of 'free and enlightened consent' is not elaborated beyond the stated requirement in the Civil Marriage Act
- The bill states that polygamy is to be 'interpreted in a manner consistent with' Criminal Code section 293(1)(a) but does not reproduce or fully explain that definition in the text provided
- The mechanisms for enforcement of the minimum age requirement and the requirement that previous marriages be dissolved are not detailed
- The bill does not specify what factors a court must consider when determining whether conditions in a recognizance are 'reasonable' beyond the general principle of securing good conduct
- The transitional provision in section 6(2.3) of the Criminal Code (Defence—Married Persons) applies only to accused persons who were married to the complainant immediately before the section came into force, but the effect and scope of this exception are not further elaborated
- The bill does not clarify how its provisions interact with provincial and territorial marriage laws, particularly regarding age of consent and common-law marriage recognition
New section 41.1 added to make permanent residents and foreign nationals inadmissible on grounds of practising polygamy in Canada. Polygamy is defined consistently with Criminal Code section 293(1)(a).
Source: Section 2 adds section 41.1
Three new sections added: section 2.1 requires marriage to have free and enlightened consent of both persons; section 2.2 sets minimum marriage age at 16 years; section 2.3 requires all previous marriages to be dissolved or declared null before a new marriage can be contracted.
Source: Section 4 adds sections 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3
Multiple amendments including new sections 293.1 (forced marriage offence), 293.2 (underage marriage offence), revised section 295 (unlawful solemnization of marriage), and new section 810.02 (recognizance for forced or underage marriage). Section 232 regarding provocation defence is narrowed. Section 273.3 amended to include child removal offences.
Source: Sections 6-12
Definition of 'prisoner' updated to include persons committed for failure or refusal to enter into recognizances under Criminal Code sections 810, 810.02, 810.1, and 810.2.
Source: Section 13
Section 14(2) replaced to give youth justice courts jurisdiction to make recognizance orders under Criminal Code sections 810, 810.01, 810.02, and 810.2, including the new forced and underage marriage provisions. Section 142(1)(a) amended to include these orders in provisions regarding youth court jurisdiction and offences.
Source: Sections 14 and 15
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textThe official summary published alongside the bill, shown exactly as written.
Source: Parliament of Canada (LEGISinfo)
The pre-release version of this Legislative Summary is now available. Parliamentarians and their staff can obtain a copy by submitting a request or contacting the Library of Parliament. Members of the public can obtain a copy by the contacting the Information Service at the Library of Parliament. On 5 November 2014, the Leader of the Government in the Senate introduced Bill S-7, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts (Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act) in the Senate and it was given first reading. Part 1 amends the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to specify that a permanent resident or foreign national is inadmissible on grounds of practising polygamy in Canada. Part 2 amends the Civil Marriage Act to provide for the legal requirements for a free and enlightened consent to marriage and for any previous marriage to be dissolved or declared null before a new marriage is contracted. Those requirements are currently provided for in the Federal Law—Civil Law Harmonization Act, No. 1 only in respect of Quebec and under the common law in the other provinces. It also amends the Civil Marriage Act to provide for the requirement of a minimum age of 16 years for marriage. This requirement is currently provided for in the Federal Law—Civil Law Harmonization Act, No. 1 only in respect of Quebec. Part 3 amends the Criminal Code to (a) clarify that it is an offence for an officiant to knowingly solemnize a marriage in contravention of federal law; (b) provide that it is an offence to celebrate, aid or participate in a marriage rite or ceremony knowing that one of the persons being married is doing so against their will or is under the age of 16 years; (c) provide that it is an offence to remove a child from Canada with the intention that an act be committed outside Canada that, if it were committed in Canada, would constitute the offence of celebrating, aiding or participating in a marriage rite or ceremony knowing that the child is doing so against their will or is under the age of 16 years; (d) provide that a judge may order a person to enter into a recognizance with conditions to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for the purpose of preventing the person from committing an offence relating to the marriage of a person against their will or the marriage of a person under the age of 16 years or relating to the removal of a child from Canada with the intention of committing an act that, if it were committed in Canada, would be such an offence; and (e) provide that the defence of provocation is restricted to circumstances in which the victim engaged in conduct that would constitute an indictable offence under the Criminal Code that is punishable by five years or more in prison. Finally, the enactment also makes consequential amendments to other Acts.
This is the official summary published by the Parliament of Canada, shown verbatim. Not legal advice. PoliticalData.ca did not write or edit this text.
View on LEGISinfoParliamentary Process
This record marks the procedural completion of the Senate's first reading of Bill S-7 on November 5, 2014, detailing its subsequent journey through Parliament to receiving Royal Assent on June 18, 2015.
This artifact describes the Senate's first reading of Bill S-7 on November 5, 2014. First reading is a procedural step where a bill is introduced in Parliament. The artifact also lists subsequent procedural stages the bill went through in the Senate and House of Commons, including second reading, committee study, report stage, and third reading. It notes that the bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 18, 2015, becoming law as chapter 29 of the Statutes of Canada, 2015. The artifact provides dates for these stages and mentions some of the Senators and Members of Parliament who sponsored or responded to the bill during second reading debates.
On November 5, 2014, the Senate introduced and gave first reading to Bill S-7, an act to amend several existing laws, and then proceeded with other Senate business.
This document records the proceedings of the Senate on November 5, 2014. The Senate officially introduced and gave first reading to Bill S-7, which aims to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. Following this procedural step, the bill was scheduled for second reading debate on a future date. The sitting also included discussions on other matters, such as a report on food banks, the Energy East Pipeline project, the role of women in world wars, and various legislative items at different stages of the parliamentary process.
The Senate conducted the second reading of Bill S-7, which involved speeches and referral to committee, moving the bill through further stages towards Royal Assent.
The Senate proceeded to the second reading of Bill S-7. This stage involved speeches from senators, including the sponsor and other members. Following these speeches, the bill was considered and referred to a committee for detailed examination. The process continued through committee study, report stage, and third reading, before eventually receiving Royal Assent.
During a Senate sitting on November 18, 2014, Bill S-7, aimed at protecting vulnerable individuals from practices like underage and forced marriage, was debated at second reading before the debate was adjourned, alongside discussions on other parliamentary business and legislative processes.
On November 18, 2014, the Senate held a sitting that included a debate on Bill S-7. Senator Salma Ataullahjan moved for the second reading of Bill S-7, an Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code. She spoke in favour of the bill, stating its purpose is to provide more protection and support for vulnerable individuals, particularly women and girls, by reinforcing that Canada does not permit underage, forced, or polygamous marriages, or other practices that deny gender equality. The debate on Bill S-7 was adjourned. The sitting also included discussions on other matters, such as the Joint Parliamentary Symposia in Canada and France, the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize, the role of women in the Second World War, and the practice of introducing legislative changes through large budget bills, with a discussion on time allocation and public debate. Additionally, there were updates on on-reserve housing fires and fire prevention, and debates on other bills, including one concerning copyright and trademarks, and another related to equalization and fiscal federalism. The Senate also adopted an address in reply to the Speech from the Throne and debated a motion to authorize a committee to meet during a Senate sitting.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-7, its sponsor explained how amendments to immigration, marriage, and criminal laws would protect vulnerable individuals from forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings.
This record details a debate in the Senate regarding Bill S-7, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code. The bill's sponsor, Senator Salma Ataullahjan, delivered a speech in favour of the bill, explaining its purpose to protect vulnerable individuals, primarily women and girls, from practices such as underage and forced marriage, polygamy, and "honour killings." She highlighted that the bill aims to reinforce Canadian values by not tolerating these practices and introduced specific amendments to existing acts to achieve this. Other senators asked clarifying questions about the bill's provisions, particularly concerning the defence of provocation in honour killings and the process for amending the Criminal Code.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-7, senators paid tribute to Speaker Noël A. Kinsella, discussed various national issues, and ultimately adjourned the debate on the bill, with Royal Assent being received for a different bill (Bill C-41) on the same day.
On November 26, 2014, the Senate held a debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-7, titled the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." The debate primarily focused on the procedural aspects of the bill and featured extended tributes to retiring Speaker Noël A. Kinsella. While the debate for Bill S-7 was initiated, it was adjourned before a decision was made on its second reading. The sitting also included discussions on other matters, such as the CBC/Radio-Canada, liquefied natural gas development, and support for veterans, and concluded with the notification that Bill C-41 (An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Korea) had received Royal Assent.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-7 in the Senate, Senator Jaffer raised concerns about the bill's provisions on polygamy, marriage age, forced marriage, and criminal provocation, while other senators discussed unrelated topics and paid tribute to the retiring Speaker.
This record details a debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-7 in the Senate on November 26, 2014. The primary focus of the discussion was the bill itself, which aims to address "barbaric cultural practices" by amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer spoke at length about the bill's provisions concerning polygamy, the national age of marriage, forced marriages, and changes to the definition of "provocation." She expressed significant concerns that the bill's language and approach might marginalize certain communities and misrepresent issues like violence against women as solely cultural problems. She also highlighted that the bill would not address polygamy within Canada (referencing Bountiful, B.C.) but would apply to foreign nationals, and questioned the inclusion of changes to the "provocation" defence in a bill focused on "barbaric cultural practices." Other senators spoke about various topics, including tributes to the retiring Speaker, Senator Noël A. Kinsella, and discussions on CBC/Radio-Canada funding, sports, Down Syndrome Awareness Week, and liquefied natural gas development. The debate on Bill S-7 was eventually adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on November 27, 2014, the new Speaker was appointed, and debates continued on various matters including Bill S-7, which was read a second time and referred to committee, alongside discussions on homelessness, international business, pension plans, and foreign worker programs.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting that took place on November 27, 2014. The sitting included the formal appointment of the Honourable Pierre Claude Nolin as Speaker of the Senate, followed by congratulations from the government and opposition leaders. The Senate then proceeded to various committee report presentations and debates on several topics, including homelessness, international business challenges, budget matters, pension plans, First Nations financial transparency, and issues related to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code (Bill S-7). Specifically concerning Bill S-7, the debate at second reading continued, with Senator Elaine McCoy raising concerns about the bill's title and substance. The bill was then read a second time, "on division," and referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights. Other proceedings included adopting committee reports, debating motions on recognizing specific weeks, and discussing the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and the case of Asia Bibi. The sitting concluded with arrangements for the next sitting.
The Senate completed its committee stage review of Bill S-7 on December 11, 2014, and the bill later received royal assent on June 18, 2015.
This artifact details the Senate's consideration of Bill S-7 in committee. This stage involved multiple sittings dedicated to examining the bill. The process for this bill concluded with royal assent on June 18, 2015.
On December 11, 2014, the Senate considered committee reports, debated several bills including Bill S-7 which was reported without amendment, and heard tributes and inquiries on various social and legal matters.
On December 11, 2014, the Senate convened and engaged in various procedural activities and debates. A key procedural event was the presentation of the Tenth Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights, which had examined Bill S-7, an Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. The committee reported the bill without amendment, but with observations. The bill was then placed on the Orders of the Day for third reading. The Senate also heard tributes to the late journalist Bruce Phillips, O.C., and discussed the charitable and not-for-profit sector. Other proceedings included the tabling of various committee reports, motions to authorize committees to sit during Senate sittings, and debates on several other bills, including Bill C-442 (Federal Framework on Lyme Disease), Bill C-47 (Miscellaneous Statute Law Amendment Act, 2014), Bill C-27 (Public Service Employment Act amendments), Bill C-428 (Indian Act amendments), Bill C-483 (Corrections and Conditional Release Act amendments), and Bill C-520 (Supporting Non-Partisan Offices of Agents of Parliament). Inquiries on sickle cell disease, the persecution of Rohingya Muslims, and the genocide in Rwanda and the Central African Republic were also continued, with debates adjourned to a later date. Motions to extend committee report deadlines were adopted.
Bill S-7 completed its Third Reading in the Senate on December 16, 2014, as part of its legislative journey which concluded with Royal Assent on June 18, 2015.
This artifact details the process of Bill S-7 through the Senate, specifically at the Third Reading stage. It indicates that the Third Reading in the Senate was completed on December 16, 2014. The overall bill eventually received royal assent on June 18, 2015. The provided text also outlines the bill's journey through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including first and second readings, committee considerations, and report stages, along with key dates and sitting numbers.
During a Senate sitting on December 12, 2014, the debate on Bill S-7 at third reading was adjourned, while other significant procedural matters, including a point of order on omnibus bills and the completion of third reading for a Lyme disease framework bill, were addressed.
This artifact documents a Senate sitting on December 12, 2014, where the third reading debate of Bill S-7, concerning amendments to immigration, marriage, and criminal laws, was adjourned. The sitting also included discussions on various other matters, such as the Temporary Foreign Worker Program, solitary confinement in federal prisons, economic conditions, and the regulation of agricultural supply management systems. Additionally, there was a point of order raised concerning the procedural validity of omnibus bills like Bill C-43, and the third reading of a bill concerning a federal framework on Lyme disease (Bill C-442) was completed.
During the Senate's third reading debate of Bill S-7 on December 15, 2014, Senators discussed the bill's title, its impact on various communities, and proposed amendments, ultimately deferring the vote.
On December 15, 2014, the Senate debated Bill S-7, "An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts," at its third reading. The debate included discussions on the bill's short title, "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," and its implications for marginalized communities. Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer raised concerns about the title's potentially racist framework and its targeting of specific groups. She also discussed issues related to polygamy, the national age of marriage, forced marriage, and provocation, proposing amendments to raise the national age of marriage to 18 and alter the definition of provocation. Senator Anne C. Cools and Senator Nicole Eaton also participated in the debate, questioning the bill's scope and title. Senator Eggleton spoke about the bill's focus on law and order over support services and the potential for re-victimization. An amendment to remove the short title was proposed but negatived. The main motion for third reading was then debated, with a vote deferred to the next sitting. The sitting also included other business, such as the presentation of committee reports and notices of motions.
On December 16, 2014, the Senate debated and voted on Bill S-7 at its third reading, alongside discussions on other pressing national and international issues and several other bills, ultimately passing Bill S-7 and receiving Royal Assent.
On December 16, 2014, the Senate held its third reading debate for Bill S-7. During this sitting, senators also discussed other matters, including a terrorist attack in Peshawar, physician-assisted death, and the North Pole and Arctic continental shelf. The Senate also debated and voted on amendments to Bill C-43, the Economic Action Plan Act, No. 2, and adopted a report on underground infrastructure safety. After several debates and votes on other bills and amendments, the Senate adjourned until January 27, 2015. Royal Assent was received for Bill S-7 and other bills on December 16, 2014.
Bill S-7 completed its First Reading in the House of Commons on January 29, 2015, as part of its legislative journey which concluded with Royal Assent on June 18, 2015.
This artifact marks the completion of the First Reading stage for Bill S-7 in the House of Commons on January 29, 2015. First Reading is the initial introduction of a bill into the House. The bill would later receive Royal Assent on June 18, 2015. The provided text outlines the bill's progression through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including readings, committee considerations, and report stage.
On January 29, 2015, the House of Commons debated the importance of First Ministers' Conferences, alongside the introduction of Bill S-7 and other procedural matters.
On January 29, 2015, during the First Reading stage of Bill S-7, a debate occurred in the House of Commons. This record primarily details discussions on the frequency and importance of First Ministers' Conferences, where the Prime Minister meets with provincial and territorial leaders. Various members debated whether such meetings are necessary for effective governance and problem-solving, particularly concerning economic issues, infrastructure, and social programs. The discussion also touched upon other House business, including the introduction of Bill S-7 itself and the tabling of committee reports. A point of order regarding the use of electronic devices in the House was also addressed.
The House of Commons completed the second reading of Bill S-7 on March 23, 2015, and referred it to committee.
This record indicates that on Monday, March 23, 2015, the House of Commons agreed to the second reading of Bill S-7, which had previously been introduced in the Senate. Following this agreement, the bill was referred to the Committee on Citizenship and Immigration (CIMM) for further study. The provided text details the legislative journey of the bill, including its first and second readings in both the Senate and the House of Commons, committee considerations, report stage, and third readings, concluding with the bill receiving royal assent on June 18, 2015.
During the second reading debate on Bill S-7 in the House of Commons on February 17, 2015, members discussed provisions related to forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings, with various viewpoints expressed regarding the bill's intent, wording, and potential impact.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on February 17, 2015, concerning Bill S-7, "An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts." This debate occurred during the second reading stage of the bill. It included discussions on various aspects of the bill, such as prohibiting polygamy, establishing a national minimum age for marriage, criminalizing certain conduct related to underage and forced marriage ceremonies, and restricting the provocation defence in honour killings. Members from different parties expressed their views, with some supporting the bill's intentions while raising concerns about its wording, potential unintended consequences, and the need for further consultation. The debate also touched upon related issues like violence against women, cultural practices, and the effectiveness of existing laws.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-7, Members of Parliament discussed proposed amendments to combat forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings, with varying views expressed on the bill's effectiveness and title.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on February 17, 2015, concerning Bill S-7, the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act. The debate included speeches from the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, other Members of Parliament from various parties, and parliamentary secretaries. Key discussions revolved around the bill's aim to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code to address forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings. Concerns were raised by some MPs regarding the bill's title, potential unintended consequences for victims and vulnerable communities, and whether the proposed measures were already covered by existing legislation. The debate also touched upon unrelated matters, including petitions on various topics, a Speaker's ruling on privilege, and other government orders and statements by members.
During the second reading debate on Bill S-7, the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," the government minister explained its purpose to combat forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings, while opposition members debated the merits and potential unintended consequences of the bill, particularly concerning the use of the term "cultural" in its title.
During the second reading debate on Bill S-7, the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration introduced the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." He outlined the bill's aims to prevent forced and early marriage (under 18), polygamy, and the use of "honour" as a defence in violent acts. The bill proposed amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. Various members from opposition parties expressed agreement with the bill's intent to combat violence against women and girls but raised concerns about the use of the word "cultural" in the title, suggesting it could be divisive and target specific communities. They also questioned whether the bill's measures were sufficiently distinct from existing laws and whether the proposed changes might inadvertently harm victims or reduce reporting. Specific concerns were raised about the impact of immigration-related measures on women in polygamous relationships and the potential for criminalizing family members involved in forced marriages to silence victims. The debate highlighted differing views on the necessity and effectiveness of the bill's approach.
In a House of Commons debate on Bill S-7, members discussed proposed amendments to immigration, marriage, and criminal laws aimed at addressing forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings, with significant debate focused on the bill's title and its potential impact on victims and cultural communities.
During the House of Commons debate at second reading of Bill S-7, the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act", members discussed various aspects of the bill, including its proposed changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. The bill aimed to address issues such as forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings. Key discussions revolved around the definition of "barbaric cultural practices" in the bill's title, with some members expressing concern that the term "cultural" could be divisive or misconstrued, while others argued it was necessary to identify specific practices. Concerns were also raised about potential unintended consequences for victims and the effectiveness of criminalizing certain behaviours versus providing support services. The debate included differing views on whether existing laws adequately covered the issues addressed by the bill.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-7, the government moved to limit further discussion, sparking exchanges about the bill's title, the definition of "barbaric cultural practices," and the government's use of time allocation.
This document is a record of a debate that took place in the House of Commons on March 12, 2015, concerning Bill S-7, also known as the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." The debate primarily focused on the government's motion to allocate a limited amount of time for further discussion of the bill at its second reading stage. Members from various parties expressed differing views on the bill's title, its proposed measures, and the government's use of time allocation to limit debate.
During the second reading debate in the House of Commons on Bill S-7, Members of Parliament discussed the proposed "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act", focusing on its title, its potential effectiveness in combating certain harmful practices, and its impact on vulnerable individuals.
This document is a record of the House of Commons debate on Bill S-7, titled the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act". The debate occurred during the second reading stage of the bill. Members of Parliament from various parties shared their views on the bill's proposed amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. Key discussion points included the bill's title, its impact on victims of violence and abuse, and whether it adequately addresses issues like forced marriage, polygamy, and honour killings. The debate concluded with the bill being read the second time and referred to a committee.
The House of Commons completed its committee consideration of Bill S-7 on May 13, 2015, prior to the bill receiving Royal Assent.
This artifact details the 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-7 in the House of Commons, which took place on May 13, 2015, and was completed on that date. This stage involved examining the bill in detail within a committee. The bill ultimately received royal assent on June 18, 2015.
The Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration reported Bill S-7 back to the House of Commons without amendments.
On May 13, 2015, during a sitting of the House of Commons, the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration presented its fifth report regarding Bill S-7, an act to amend various laws including the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code. The committee reported the bill back to the House without amendments.
The House of Commons completed report stage for Bill S-7 on June 15, 2015, leading to its third reading and agreement on June 16, 2015.
On June 15, 2015, the House of Commons completed its report stage for Bill S-7. This stage involved reviewing and potentially amending the bill. Following this, the bill proceeded to third reading on June 16, 2015, where it was agreed to.
On May 28, 2015, the House of Commons debated and advanced bills including the Port State Measures Agreement Implementation Act and the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act, alongside discussions on a range of other government and private member's business.
This record details a sitting of the House of Commons on May 28, 2015, during the report stage of Bill S-7. The sitting included routine proceedings like the tabling of government responses to petitions and reports from committees, as well as the introduction of new private member's bills. The main focus of the day's government orders was the Port State Measures Agreement Implementation Act (Bill S-3), which passed its third reading. A significant portion of the sitting also involved a time allocation motion related to the Digital Privacy Act (Bill S-4) and a lengthy debate and votes on the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act (Bill S-7). The latter part of the sitting included statements by members on various topics and oral questions on ethics, aboriginal affairs, employment, seniors, national defence, infrastructure, CBC/Radio-Canada, agriculture, and citizenship and immigration, followed by adjournment proceedings on consumer protection and the environment.
During the report stage debate of Bill S-7 on June 12, 2015, Members of Parliament discussed the bill's provisions and potential impacts, with differing views on its effectiveness and unintended consequences.
On June 12, 2015, the House of Commons was at the report stage of Bill S-7, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code. Members debated the bill, with the NDP and Liberal parties expressing concerns about the bill's potential unintended consequences and the effectiveness of its approach, while the Conservative Party members emphasized its role in protecting vulnerable individuals, particularly women and children. The debate touched upon issues such as the definition of polygamy, the minimum age for marriage, and the impact of proposed measures on victims and families. Several motions were voted on and defeated at this stage.
During the June 15, 2015 sitting, the House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-7, among other routine proceedings and legislative matters.
On June 15, 2015, the House of Commons convened for a sitting that included debates on Private Members' Business and Government Orders. The debate on Bill S-7, an Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and other related acts, concluded with the bill being read the third time and passed. Other legislative items and routine proceedings, including the tabling of government responses to petitions and the introduction of new bills, also occurred.
The House of Commons completed the Third Reading stage for Bill S-7 on June 16, 2015, after which it received Royal Assent.
On June 16, 2015, the House of Commons completed the Third Reading stage for Bill S-7. This stage involves a final debate and vote on the bill before it can be sent for Royal Assent. The artifact indicates that the stage was completed, meaning the House of Commons approved the bill at this point.
The House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-7, aiming to combat forced marriage, polygamy, and other harmful cultural practices.
On June 16, 2015, the House of Commons held its third reading debate on Bill S-7, the Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act. The bill passed third reading.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Richmond | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bramalea—Gore—Malton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wild Rose | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erindale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Humboldt | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—St. Albert | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westlock—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Paul's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax—Pickering | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Scarborough East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan—Coquihalla | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Edward—Hastings | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Athabasca | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Northeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary—Nose Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Abbotsford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | London West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Durham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margaret's | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton—Mississippi Mills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Alberni | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Leduc | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southeast | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Macleod | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Island North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Random—Burin—St. George's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta—Richmond East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nunavut | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Blackstrap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Westmount—Ville-Marie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Fraser Canyon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Wanuskewin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre-North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton—Springdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby—Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oak Ridges—Markham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Waterloo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton East | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean—Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wascana | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Palliser | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northumberland—Quinte West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Spruce Grove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Orléans | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock—Cloverdale | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent—Cartierville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Southwest | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Bellechasse | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Oakville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Sherwood Park | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | British Columbia Southern Interior | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauharnois—Salaberry | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Green Party | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne—Blainville | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Coquitlam | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—La Prairie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey North | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Cowichan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newton—North Delta | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—Douglas | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Strathcona | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Welland | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chambly—Borduas | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby—New Westminster | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sackville—Eastern Shore | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Lambert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Saint-Constant | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jeanne-Le Ber | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced