Bill S-203 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-203 prohibits keeping whales, dolphins, and porpoises in captivity in Canada, creates criminal offences for doing so, and restricts their import and export, with exceptions for injured animals and those already in captivity.
Bill S-203, called the "Ending the Captivity of Whales and Dolphins Act," makes it illegal in Canada to keep whales, dolphins, or porpoises (collectively called cetaceans) in captivity. The law applies to three main areas: **Criminal Code Changes**: The bill adds a new criminal offence making it illegal to own, have custody of, or control a cetacean that is kept in captivity. It also prohibits breeding cetaceans or possessing their reproductive materials (like sperm or embryos). A separate offence covers promoting, arranging, or participating in performances of captive cetaceans for entertainment purposes. Penalties for these offences are up to $200,000 in fines. **Fisheries Act Changes**: The bill prohibits moving a live cetacean from its natural area with the intent to capture it and put it in captivity. The exception is when the animal is injured or in distress and needs help. **Import and Export Rules**: The bill requires anyone who wants to import a living cetacean into Canada or export one from Canada to get a permit from the federal Minister. Permits may only be issued for scientific research or if keeping the cetacean in captivity would benefit its welfare. **Important Exceptions**: Animals that were already in captivity when this law came into force are allowed to remain in captivity. Similarly, cetaceans being cared for to help with injuries or rehabilitation are exempt. Provincial governments can also issue licenses allowing cetaceans to be kept in captivity or used in performances in certain circumstances, such as for scientific research or in the animal's best interests. **Aboriginal Rights**: The law explicitly states it does not affect the existing aboriginal or treaty rights of Indigenous peoples in Canada. The bill received Royal Assent in June 2019.
- Amends the Criminal Code to create a criminal offence for owning, having custody of, or controlling a cetacean (whale, dolphin, or porpoise) kept in captivity, with penalties up to $200,000
- Amends the Criminal Code to create a criminal offence for breeding cetaceans or possessing their reproductive materials (sperm, embryos, or tissue cultures)
- Amends the Criminal Code to create a criminal offence for promoting, arranging, conducting, assisting in, or participating in performances of captive cetaceans for entertainment purposes, with penalties up to $200,000
- Amends the Fisheries Act to prohibit moving a live cetacean from its immediate vicinity with intent to capture it for captivity, except when the animal is injured or in distress and needs assistance
- Amends the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act to require a federal permit to import or export a living cetacean, or its sperm, tissue culture, or embryo
- Authorizes the federal Minister to issue permits for cetacean import or export only for scientific research or to keep the cetacean in captivity if it is in the cetacean's best interests
- Provides exceptions to the offences for cetaceans already in captivity at the time the law comes into force, cetaceans being assisted or rehabilitated from injury or distress, and cetaceans authorized by provincial license for welfare or scientific research purposes
- Individuals and organizations that own or have custody of cetaceans in captivity in Canada
- Aquariums, marine parks, zoos, and similar facilities that keep cetaceans in captivity or display them for entertainment
- Anyone who breeds cetaceans or works with cetacean reproductive materials
- Anyone who promotes, arranges, or participates in captive cetacean performances for entertainment
- Businesses and individuals seeking to import cetaceans into Canada or export them from Canada
- Persons conducting scientific research involving cetaceans
- Persons providing care or rehabilitation to injured or distressed cetaceans
- Provincial governments that may issue licenses for cetacean captivity or performances in the best interests of the animal or for scientific research
- Aboriginal peoples of Canada, whose existing aboriginal and treaty rights are preserved by the bill
- It is illegal to own, have custody of, or control a cetacean kept in captivity (subject to exceptions)
- It is illegal to breed a cetacean or possess cetacean reproductive materials (subject to exceptions)
- It is illegal to promote, arrange, or participate in captive cetacean performances for entertainment (subject to exceptions)
- It is illegal to move a live cetacean from its immediate vicinity with intent to place it in captivity, except for injured or distressed animals needing assistance
- Anyone importing or exporting a living cetacean or its reproductive materials must obtain a federal permit
- The federal Minister may issue permits for cetacean import or export only for scientific research or if captivity is in the animal's best interests
- Provincial governments may issue licenses allowing cetaceans to be kept in captivity or used in performances if authorized by the Lieutenant Governor in Council
- Aboriginal peoples retain their existing aboriginal and treaty rights and are not affected by this legislation
- The bill received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019
- Offences under section 445.2(2) (owning or controlling captive cetaceans, breeding them, or possessing reproductive materials) are punishable on summary conviction with a fine not exceeding $200,000
- Offences under section 445.2(4) (promoting or participating in captive cetacean performances for entertainment) are punishable on summary conviction with a fine not exceeding $200,000
- Import or export of cetaceans or reproductive materials without a permit required under section 7.1 of the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act constitutes a violation (enforcement mechanism not specified in provided text)
- The bill text does not specify how the federal Minister will determine whether keeping a cetacean in captivity is 'in the best interests of the cetacean's welfare' when issuing import or export permits
- The bill text does not detail the process for provincial licenses or specify what standards provinces must apply when authorizing cetacean captivity or performances
- The bill text does not specify which government authority enforces the import and export restrictions or what penalties apply to violations of section 7.1
- The bill text does not clarify how provincial licenses interact with federal permit requirements for import and export
- The scope of 'scientific research' that qualifies for exemptions is not defined in the bill
- The definition of 'best interests of the cetacean's welfare' in section 10(1.1) is not detailed in the bill text
New section 445.2 added to define cetaceans and create criminal offences for owning or controlling captive cetaceans, breeding them, possessing their reproductive materials, or promoting captive cetacean performances for entertainment. Maximum penalty is $200,000 for summary conviction offences.
Source: Section 2, new section 445.2
New section 28.1 added to prohibit moving a live cetacean from its immediate vicinity with intent to take it into captivity, except when the cetacean is injured or in distress and needs assistance.
Source: Section 3, new section 28.1
New section 7.1 added to prohibit import or export of living cetaceans or their reproductive materials without a federal permit. New subsection 10(1.1) allows the federal Minister to issue permits for scientific research or captivity in the cetacean's best interests.
Source: Sections 4 and 5, new sections 7.1 and 10(1.1)
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, completed its first reading in the Senate on December 8, 2015, and later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019.
This record shows that Bill S-203, an act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, had its first reading in the Senate on December 8, 2015. The bill eventually received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada 2019.
On December 8, 2015, Bill S-203, concerning the end of whale and dolphin captivity, received its first reading in the Senate, initiating its legislative journey.
On December 8, 2015, in the Senate, Bill S-203, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins by amending the Criminal Code and other Acts, was introduced and received its first reading. This is the initial procedural step for a bill in the Senate, where it is formally presented. The record also includes debates and discussions on various other matters, including congratulatory remarks for the new Speaker, the anniversary of the École Polytechnique tragedy, terrorism, and reports from various commissioners and officers. Several other bills also received their first reading on this date.
Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, completed its second reading in the Senate on January 27, 2016, and subsequently went through various stages in both the Senate and House of Commons before receiving Royal Assent.
This record details the progression of Bill S-203 through the Senate. It indicates that the bill completed its second reading stage on January 27, 2016, with subsequent major speeches and committee considerations occurring over several months in both 2016 and 2017. The bill later moved to report stage and third reading in the Senate. It was then sent to the House of Commons, where it also underwent first reading, second reading, committee review, and third reading, receiving Royal Assent on June 21, 2019. The provided text focuses on the procedural steps and does not contain the full text of the bill or its debates.
During a Senate sitting on January 27, 2016, most of the time was spent on routine proceedings and committee business, with debates on second reading for Bill S-201 (Genetic Non-Discrimination) and Bill S-203 (Ending the Captivity of Whales and Dolphins), the latter's debate being adjourned.
On January 27, 2016, the Senate was in session. Most of the sitting was dedicated to routine proceedings, including tabling reports and giving notice of various motions for committees to study specific topics. Two bills were discussed at second reading: Bill S-201, concerning genetic non-discrimination, and Bill S-203, concerning the ending of captivity for whales and dolphins. The debate for Bill S-203 was adjourned, meaning it was not concluded during this sitting. Other discussions included congratulating a senator on their 25th anniversary, comments on the Energy East Pipeline, Bell Let's Talk Day, and tributes to René Angélil.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-203, the sponsor argued for phasing out the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada due to animal welfare concerns.
This record details a Senate debate on Bill S-203, an Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. Senator Wilfred P. Moore, the bill's sponsor, presented arguments for the bill's second reading. He explained that the bill aims to phase out keeping whales, dolphins, and porpoises in captivity in Canada, with exceptions for rescues and rehabilitation. He cited evidence of the cruelty and suffering these animals endure in captivity and highlighted concerns about specific facilities like Marineland and the Vancouver Aquarium. The debate also touched on the bill's proposed amendments to the Criminal Code, Fisheries Act, and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. Other discussions in the Senate on this day included debates on Bill S-201 (Genetic Non-Discrimination Act), Bill S-215 (sentencing for violent offences against Aboriginal women), and various committee business.
During a Senate sitting on March 22, 2016, a debate occurred regarding Bill S-203, which proposes to end the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada, with senators largely speaking in favour of the bill.
On March 22, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. Senators spoke in support of the bill, citing scientific evidence that captive cetaceans suffer and that their confinement in tanks is harmful. The debate highlighted concerns about the small living spaces of captive animals compared to their natural ocean habitats and discussed specific examples of whales and dolphins in Canadian aquariums. The bill aims to phase out captivity, with exceptions for rescue and rehabilitation. Senators mentioned that other countries have already implemented similar measures and that public opinion and scientific understanding have evolved. The debate also covered the gradual economic impact of the bill and noted support from various animal welfare organizations and individuals. The debate for Bill S-203 was adjourned, meaning it was not finalized on this date and would continue at a later sitting.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-203, Senator Janis G. Johnson spoke in strong support of ending the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada, citing scientific evidence of their suffering and the need for Canada to align with international trends.
On March 22, 2016, the Senate continued its debate on Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. Senator Janis G. Johnson spoke in strong support of the bill, highlighting scientific evidence that captive marine mammals suffer and that Canada should take action. She noted that other countries have already banned or are phasing out captivity and that Bill S-203 is a reasonable and balanced approach. The debate on this bill was adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on May 3, 2016, debate on Bill S-203, aiming to end whale and dolphin captivity, continued with strong opposition voiced due to constitutional, scientific, and economic concerns, alongside discussions on other timely topics and government financial matters.
On May 3, 2016, the Senate continued its debate on Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). During this sitting, Senators also discussed Asian Heritage Month, National Hospice Palliative Care Week, National Vision Health Month, and various government financial matters. The debate on Bill S-203 specifically involved a detailed discussion of the arguments for and against the bill, with one senator expressing strong opposition, citing constitutional concerns, scientific reasons, and economic impacts, while also defending the practices of Canadian zoos and aquariums. Another senator questioned the bill's impact on research and rescue efforts.
During a Senate debate on June 1, 2016, Ministers of Justice and Health testified on Bill C-14 concerning medical assistance in dying, addressing Senators' questions about its provisions, constitutionality, and safeguards.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the Senate on June 1, 2016, concerning Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical assistance in dying). The debate involved testimony from the Minister of Justice and Attorney General, Jody Wilson-Raybould, and the Minister of Health, Jane Philpott, who answered questions from Senators. The discussion focused on the bill's provisions related to medical assistance in dying, its constitutionality, its consistency with the Supreme Court's Carter decision, and its implications for vulnerable individuals, medical practitioners, and provincial healthcare laws. Senators raised concerns about the clarity of terms like "reasonably foreseeable death" and "irremediable," the exclusion of certain groups from eligibility, the protection of conscientious objectors, and the adequacy of safeguards. The ministers defended the bill as a balanced approach that respects individual autonomy while protecting vulnerable persons and upholding the value of life, emphasizing the need for federal legislation to provide a consistent national framework.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-203, Senator David M. Wells argued against ending whale and dolphin captivity, citing the importance of research in such facilities, while Senator Wilfred P. Moore questioned his reasoning and Senator Donald Neil Plett raised concerns about the bill's impact on the Criminal Code, leading to the adjournment of the debate.
On October 27, 2016, the Senate debated the second reading of Bill S-203, an Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). Senator David M. Wells spoke against the bill, arguing that ending the captivity of whales and dolphins would be detrimental to important research conducted in marine mammal facilities. He cited his experience in the fishing industry and his visit to the Vancouver Aquarium Marine Science Centre, highlighting the research being done on beluga whales and the support from scientists globally for research in marine mammal facilities. He also referred to the guidelines from the Canadian Council on Animal Care for the care and use of marine mammals. Senator Wells concluded that prohibiting cetacean captivity would be a mistake and urged senators to vote against the bill. Senator Wilfred P. Moore, the bill's sponsor, questioned Senator Wells's points, particularly regarding the impact on research and the notion of quality of life. Senator Donald Neil Plett raised a concern about the bill potentially creating a new offence under the Criminal Code and questioned whether it should be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee. Senator Moore indicated that a clause related to the Criminal Code penalty would be withdrawn, rendering the question moot, but Senator Plett stated he had not yet seen the proposed amendment. The debate on Bill S-203 was adjourned.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-203, the Senate discussed whether to proceed with the bill, ultimately defeating a motion to delay its consideration.
On November 22, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins. While the bill's sponsor, Senator Moore, argued for its importance and the need to send it to committee for study, Senator Tannas moved an amendment to delay the bill's second reading by six months, effectively seeking to kill it. Senator Tannas argued that there was insufficient scientific evidence to support the bill's premise as a major issue in Canadian aquariums and raised concerns about the impact on institutions like the Vancouver Aquarium. Senator McCoy argued against the "hoist motion" (the amendment to delay), stating that such a motion is a "killing motion" and that the Senate's tradition is to allow bills to be thoroughly discussed in committee. Senator Fraser also opposed the hoist motion, calling it an attempt to obstruct the bill. Senator Moore, the bill's sponsor, spoke against the hoist motion, urging senators to let the bill proceed to committee for expert testimony. Senator Dyck also opposed the hoist motion, suggesting it was a decision based on political process rather than the bill's merits. The Senate ultimately voted to defeat the hoist motion, indicating a willingness to continue debating the bill at second reading. The debate was then adjourned.
The Senate debated the second reading of Bill S-203, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, and subsequently referred it to committee, alongside other proceedings including the introduction of a new senator and a question period with the Minister of Health.
On November 23, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). The debate focused on the ethical and scientific arguments surrounding the captivity of whales and dolphins, with proponents arguing it is cruel and harmful to these intelligent creatures, while opponents raised concerns about its impact on scientific research. The Senate agreed to proceed with the bill, referring it to the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans. The sitting also included the introduction of a new senator, discussions on various other topics like military aircraft procurement, the opioid crisis, and mental illness, and the Minister of Health answering questions.
This record confirms the completion of the committee consideration stage for Bill S-203 in the Senate on October 31, 2017, a bill that later became law to end the captivity of whales and dolphins.
This artifact details the procedural steps of Bill S-203 in the Senate. Specifically, it marks the completion of the 'Senate Consideration in committee' stage on October 31, 2017. This stage is part of the legislative process where a bill is examined in detail by a committee. The overall bill, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, eventually received royal assent on June 21, 2019, becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada 2019. The provided text lists various dates when committee meetings occurred for this bill, but it does not contain the committee's findings or any amendments made.
During a Senate sitting on October 31, 2017, the Fisheries and Oceans Committee presented its report on Bill S-203, concerning the ending of whale and dolphin captivity, and tributes were paid to former Senator Michael Pitfield.
On October 31, 2017, the Senate convened. A significant portion of the sitting involved the presentation of committee reports. Notably, the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans presented its Seventh Report concerning Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). This report is now on the Orders of the Day for consideration at the next sitting. The Senate also observed tributes to the late Honourable P. Michael Pitfield, a former senator and public servant.
The Senate Report stage for Bill S-203, aimed at ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, was completed on April 26, 2018, and the bill eventually received Royal Assent in 2019.
This record indicates that the Senate Report stage for Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, was completed on April 26, 2018. The bill later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada, 2019. The provided text also outlines the bill's journey through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including readings, committee considerations, and report stages, across different parliamentary sessions.
On November 28, 2017, the Senate convened, with discussions including the report stage consideration of Bill S-203, which proposed amendments related to ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, before the debate was adjourned.
This record details a Senate sitting on November 28, 2017. While the sitting covered a wide range of topics including tributes to individuals, committee reports, and debates on various bills, Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, was discussed at the report stage. The Senate proceeded to consider the seventh report of the Fisheries and Oceans Committee, which included amendments to Bill S-203. The debate on this report was adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on December 14, 2017, various procedural matters were addressed, including the tabling of reports, first readings of bills, ongoing debates on legislation such as Bill C-45 and Bill S-203, and the reception of Royal Assent for enacted bills.
On December 14, 2017, the Senate sat and conducted various procedural business. This included tabling reports from parliamentary delegations and committees, presenting new bills for first reading, and continuing debates on other bills. The Senate also discussed and voted on various motions and concluded the day with expressions of good wishes for the holiday season. Notably, there was a debate and a vote on a motion to resolve into a Committee of the Whole to consider Bill C-45 (cannabis legalization) and an amendment to that motion. The Senate also continued debate on Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, and ultimately adjourned the debate. Royal Assent was also received for several bills, including Bill S-203.
On January 30, 2018, the Senate convened, heard tributes, dealt with routine proceedings and question period, and continued debate on Bill S-203 concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, ultimately adjourning the debate.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on January 30, 2018. The sitting included tributes to the late Honourable Tommy Banks, discussions on various commemorations, tabling of reports, question period on diverse topics, and debates on several bills. Specifically for Bill S-203, 'An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins)', the sitting record shows that the 'Debate at consideration of committee report' was continued. This indicates that senators were discussing the report from the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans concerning Bill S-203, but the debate was adjourned without a final decision being made on that day.
On April 18, 2018, the Senate convened, engaged in tributes, routine proceedings, and question period, and notably debated amendments to Bill S-203 concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, with arguments presented both for and against its adoption before a vote on adjourning the debate was negatived.
The Senate sat on April 18, 2018. The sitting included tributes to the late former Senator Douglas Everett, discussions on various topics including Autism, the Commonwealth Games, and child cybersex trafficking, and routine proceedings. Notably, the Senate debated the seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans concerning Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). The debate included arguments for and against the bill's passage, with concerns raised about the consultation process with government departments and provinces, the existing legal framework for animal welfare, and the potential economic and social impacts on institutions like Marineland and the surrounding region. A motion to adjourn the debate on Bill S-203 was ultimately put to a vote and negatived.
During a Senate sitting on April 26, 2018, the report and amendments concerning Bill S-203 (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins) were adopted, despite concerns raised about Indigenous rights and provincial jurisdiction, while other legislative and procedural matters were also addressed.
On April 26, 2018, the Senate convened for a sitting that included various procedural activities and debates. Key among these was the adoption of the seventh report of the Standing Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans concerning Bill S-203, an Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). While the report and amendments were adopted, Senator Dennis Glen Patterson raised significant concerns about the bill's potential impact on Indigenous harvesting rights, its potential encroachment on provincial jurisdiction, and the lack of scientific evidence to support the claim that captivity itself is cruel. The sitting also included debates on other matters, such as the Criminal Code and Department of Justice Act amendments (Bill C-51), constitutional amendments regarding senatorial qualifications, and inquiries on historical figures and Senate policies. Several committees received authorization to meet during Senate sittings or to extend reporting dates. Routine proceedings involved tabling of reports and first reading of a bill from the House of Commons.
The Senate's third reading of Bill S-203, concerning the ending of whale and dolphin captivity, was completed on October 23, 2018, with the bill eventually receiving Royal Assent in June 2019.
This artifact describes the Senate's third reading stage for Bill S-203, which occurred on October 23, 2018. The bill's full title is "An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins)". This stage was completed. The artifact also notes that the bill later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada 2019. The artifact provides a timeline of the bill's progression through both the Senate and the House of Commons, including dates for first reading, second reading, committee consideration, report stage, and third reading in both chambers. It also lists some major speeches given during the bill's passage.
During the Senate's third reading debate on Bill S-203, senators discussed the ethical and scientific implications of ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, with amendments proposed to refine the bill's scope and address stakeholder concerns before the debate was adjourned.
On May 29, 2018, the Senate debated Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins), at the third reading stage. The debate focused on the ethical considerations of cetacean captivity, the scientific evidence regarding their well-being in confinement, and the potential impact of the bill on conservation and education. Various senators spoke, with many supporting the bill and its proposed ban on captivity, citing changing societal attitudes and international trends. Amendments were discussed and adopted to address concerns raised by Indigenous groups and to allow for research and rescue exceptions. The debate also touched upon the potential role of Canada in establishing an open-water sanctuary for whales and dolphins. The debate was adjourned.
During the Senate's third reading debate on Bill S-203, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, Senator Dan Christmas shared his Indigenous perspective on the bill and its legislative journey, emphasizing the need for reconciliation and respect for all living creatures.
On June 11, 2018, the Senate held its third reading debate for Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). This debate record captures discussions on the bill, as well as other Senate business, including tributes, tabling of reports, notices of motions, and questions during Question Period. The primary focus related to Bill S-203 was a speech by Senator Dan Christmas, who spoke about the bill's significance from an Indigenous perspective, the legislative process for private members' bills, and the importance of reconciliation with Indigenous peoples and the natural world. He highlighted that the study of Bill S-203 involved a historically high number of meetings and witnesses for a Senate public bill.
On June 12, 2018, the Senate debated and advanced several pieces of legislation, including those concerning budget implementation, impaired driving, and the captivity of whales and dolphins, with Bill S-203 ultimately receiving Royal Assent.
This document is a record of the Senate's proceedings on June 12, 2018. It details various activities including tributes to departing pages, recognition of National Blood Donor Week, and statements on international affairs. Routine proceedings involved tabling reports and the first reading of a bill. Question period covered topics like NAFTA negotiations, foreign relations, and resource management. The Senate then proceeded to debate and vote on several bills. Specifically, Bill C-74, related to budget implementation, and Bill C-46, concerning impaired driving, were debated extensively, including amendments and procedural motions. Finally, the Senate engaged in the third reading debate of Bill S-203, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. This stage included proposed amendments and further debate, with the bill ultimately receiving Royal Assent.
On June 19, 2018, the Senate debated Bill S-203 at its third reading, with proposed amendments and subamendments leading to a deferred vote, as indicated in the "ORDERS OF THE DAY" section.
On June 19, 2018, the Senate debated Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins), at its third reading. While the official text provided does not detail the substance of this specific debate or any procedural votes that occurred, it lists Bill S-203 as an item under "ORDERS OF THE DAY" for "Third Reading—Motion in Amendment—Motion in Subamendment—Vote Deferred". This indicates that the debate on the bill's third reading, including proposed amendments and subamendments, was ongoing and a vote had not yet taken place at the time of this record.
During the third reading of Bill S-203, a subamendment was negatived, and the Senate then addressed other legislative and administrative matters before adjourning for the summer.
This record details the Senate's third reading debate on Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. During this stage, a subamendment to an amendment was proposed and subsequently negatived. Following this procedural step, the Senate proceeded with other business, including debates on various bills, reports from committees, and administrative motions. The sitting concluded with senators wishing each other a happy summer recess and thanking Senate staff.
On October 2, 2018, the Senate of Canada convened for a session that included statements on diverse topics, tabling of reports, debate on a motion to revoke honorary citizenship, continuation of debate on Bill S-203 regarding whales and dolphins, and Question Period with a government minister.
On October 2, 2018, the Senate of Canada was in session. The sitting included the usual proceedings such as Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, and Question Period. Several senators made statements on various topics, including the installation of a former colleague as Chancellor of a university, Latin American Heritage Month, the civil war in Yemen, Treaty Day, and the thirtieth anniversary of the Japanese Canadian Redress Agreement. Various reports were tabled, and notices of motions were given, including one to revoke the honorary citizenship of Aung San Suu Kyi. The Senate also debated and voted on motions related to this revocation and continued debate on Bill S-203, an Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. The Question Period involved a Minister of the Crown answering questions on topics such as trade agreements, housing, and social development. The sitting concluded with continued debate on inquiries regarding literacy and essential skills, beneficial ownership transparency, and the preservation of records related to Indian Residential School survivors.
On October 23, 2018, the Senate debated and passed Bill S-203, the act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, after rejecting a proposed amendment that would have exempted the Vancouver Aquarium under certain conditions.
On October 23, 2018, the Senate debated Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins) at its third reading. During the debate, a motion in amendment by Senator Tannas, seconded by Senator Batters, was proposed. This amendment aimed to exempt individuals listed in a schedule to the bill (specifically, the Ocean Wise Conservation Association, also known as the Vancouver Aquarium) from certain sections of the Criminal Code, the Fisheries Act, and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act, provided they conduct scientific research or provide care to cetaceans. The motion in amendment was ultimately negatived (not agreed to) by the Senate. Following this, the Senate proceeded to the third reading of Bill S-203, as amended. The Senate then passed the bill on division, meaning some senators did not agree but did not formally vote against it. Following the passage of Bill S-203, other legislative matters were debated and processed.
Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, completed its first reading in the House of Commons on October 29, 2018, and later received Royal Assent.
This record indicates that Bill S-203, an Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, completed its first reading in the House of Commons on October 29, 2018. This is an early procedural step in the legislative process. The bill later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019.
This record captures the first reading debate in the House of Commons for Bill S-203, with the discussion largely focused on environmental concerns and animal welfare legislation.
This record details the first reading debate in the House of Commons for Bill S-203, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins)". The debate, which took place on October 29, 2018, focused on environmental issues, particularly plastic pollution in waterways and oceans, and amendments to the Criminal Code concerning animal cruelty, including bestiality and animal fighting. While Bill S-203 itself was read for the first time and printed, the majority of the debate recorded in this sitting was dedicated to discussions on other matters, including the Canada Child Benefit, carbon pricing, and various other government orders and statements by members.
The House of Commons completed the second reading of Bill S-203, which aimed to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, before referring it to committee and its eventual passage into law.
This record details the House of Commons' completion of the second reading stage for Bill S-203. Following this stage, the bill was referred to a committee for further study. The bill, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, was eventually passed by the House and received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, becoming an Act. The provided text outlines the procedural steps and dates related to the bill's journey through Parliament, including its initial introduction, debates, committee work, and final passage.
During the second reading debate in the House of Commons on Bill S-203, members discussed the ethical and scientific arguments for ending the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada.
This document is a record of the House of Commons debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-203, an Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. The debate focused on the ethical implications of keeping whales and dolphins in captivity, scientific evidence of their suffering in such conditions, and the history of the bill, which aims to phase out the practice in Canada.
Ms. Elizabeth May spoke in favour of Bill S-203, an Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, arguing it would end cruel practices and align Canada with international standards.
During a House of Commons debate on November 29, 2018, Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP) spoke in support of Bill S-203, an Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. She explained that the bill would ban the keeping, breeding, import, and export of whales, dolphins, and porpoises in Canada, with exceptions for rescue, rehabilitation, or scientific research. She highlighted that many countries have already implemented similar bans and emphasized the cruelty of keeping these intelligent, social animals in confined environments. The debate also touched upon the history of human understanding of whales, citing the case of an orca named Moby Doll and the plight of endangered southern resident killer whales.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-203, Members of Parliament discussed the ethical implications and proposed phasing out of whale and dolphin captivity in Canada.
This document records a debate in the House of Commons on November 29, 2018, regarding Bill S-203, An Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. The debate included statements from Members of Parliament from various parties, discussing the ethical considerations of keeping whales and dolphins in captivity, the impact on animal welfare, and the history of the bill, which aims to phase out this practice in Canada.
During the House of Commons second reading debate on Bill S-203, members discussed ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, focusing on animal welfare, scientific understanding, and the proposed legislation's scope.
This House of Commons Hansard record details a debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-203. The debate focused on the proposed act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. Members discussed the ethical and scientific considerations of keeping cetaceans in captivity, referencing the history of such practices, the welfare of the animals, and international comparisons. There was also mention of how the Vancouver Aquarium is changing its practices and the role of Marineland. The discussion touched upon related legislation and the potential impact on tourism and conservation efforts.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-203, MPs discussed the ethical and scientific arguments for ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, alongside concerns about economic impacts and legislative details.
This record details a debate in the House of Commons on November 29, 2018, concerning Bill S-203, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada. Multiple Members of Parliament (MPs) spoke, primarily discussing the ethical implications of keeping these animals in captivity, the scientific understanding of their complex social needs, and the history of the bill's progression through Parliament. There was discussion on the proposed amendments, including exceptions for rescue, rehabilitation, and scientific research, as well as provisions for existing facilities like Marineland and the Vancouver Aquarium. Some MPs expressed concerns about the potential economic impacts on tourism and the availability of qualified interpreters for indigenous languages if the bill were to be implemented.
During the second reading debate in the House of Commons on February 1, 2019, Members of Parliament discussed Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, before it was referred to committee.
This artifact is a record of debate in the House of Commons on February 1, 2019, concerning Bill S-203, An Act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins. The House was debating the bill at the second reading stage. Members of Parliament from different parties spoke about the bill's provisions, which aim to prohibit the breeding, import, and export of whales and dolphins for captivity, with exceptions for rescue and rehabilitation purposes. The debate included discussions on the ethical considerations, scientific research, and the impact on existing facilities like the Vancouver Aquarium and Marineland. The bill was ultimately read the second time and referred to a committee for further study.
The House of Commons completed the committee stage for Bill S-203 on April 9, 2019, before it received royal assent on June 21, 2019.
This artifact indicates that the House of Commons completed its 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-203 on April 9, 2019. This stage involves reviewing the bill in detail, often in a committee setting, to discuss, amend, and scrutinize its contents. The bill ultimately received royal assent on June 21, 2019, becoming law as Statutes of Canada 2019, chapter 11.
The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans reported Bill S-203 back to the House of Commons without amendments.
On April 9, 2019, the House of Commons considered Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). The Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans reported the bill back to the House without amendments. This procedural step means the committee had reviewed the bill and proposed no changes before it moved to the next stage of parliamentary consideration.
The House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-203, an act to end the captivity of whales and dolphins, was completed on May 10, 2019, as part of its legislative journey that concluded with Royal Assent on June 21, 2019.
This artifact details the House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-203, which was completed on May 10, 2019. This bill, concerning the ending of whale and dolphin captivity, ultimately received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada 2019. The provided text outlines the procedural history of the bill through various stages in both the Senate and House of Commons, including readings, committee discussions, and report stages, spanning from December 2015 to June 2019. It also notes similar bills introduced in a previous Parliament.
On May 10, 2019, the House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-203, aimed at ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, following extensive discussion on its ethical and practical implications.
This artifact is a record of debate in the House of Commons on May 10, 2019. The House was discussing Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). The debate focused on the third reading of the bill, following its passage through various stages and amendments. Members from different parties discussed the ethical and scientific reasons for ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, as well as the potential impacts of the bill. The bill ultimately passed at this stage. The artifact also contains records of discussions on Bill C-55, regarding the Oceans Act, and other routine proceedings of the House.
Bill S-203, concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins, completed its third reading in the House of Commons on June 10, 2019, and subsequently received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019.
This artifact describes the completion of the third reading stage for Bill S-203 in the House of Commons on June 10, 2019. Following this stage, the bill proceeded through further parliamentary steps, ultimately receiving Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, and becoming chapter 11 of the Statutes of Canada, 2019. The bill's long title indicates it is an Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts concerning the captivity of whales and dolphins.
The House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-203 at third reading, which aims to end the captivity of whales and dolphins in Canada.
On May 10, 2019, the House of Commons considered Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins), at its third reading. The debate focused on the ethical considerations and scientific understanding of keeping cetaceans in captivity, as well as the bill's potential impact on research and international tourism. The bill ultimately passed at third reading.
During the third reading debate of Bill S-203 in the House of Commons, members discussed the ethical and scientific reasons for ending the captivity of whales and dolphins, alongside procedural matters and other legislative topics.
This document is a record of the House of Commons debate at the third reading of Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins). The debate focused on the bill's provisions to phase out the captivity of whales, dolphins, and porpoises, with speakers from various parties discussing the ethical considerations, scientific evidence of animal suffering in captivity, and the bill's specific measures such as banning live captures, imports/exports (except for scientific research), and breeding. There was also a discussion about the bill's language compatibility and potential constitutional challenges, as well as the grandfathering of existing animals and facilities. The sitting also included debates on other matters, including telecommunications policy and the Trans Mountain pipeline project.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Qu'Appelle | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Lacombe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Banff—Airdrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Heritage | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie—Mackenzie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sturgeon River—Parkland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Leamington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Forest Lawn | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Mountain View | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Abbotsford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Durham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Foothills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Innisfil | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battle River—Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Milton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley—Aldergrove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Albert—Edmonton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Rocky Ridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brantford—Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Midnapore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Shepard | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Manning | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Spadina—Fort York | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cowichan—Malahat—Langford | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Mill Woods | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Salaberry—Suroît | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margarets | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Lacolle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | University—Rosedale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Burin—Trinity | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface—Saint Vital | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Skyview | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vimy | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Coquitlam | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Don Valley North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nunavut | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Stouffville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | La Prairie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Uxbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Vancouver Granville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Steveston—Richmond East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber River—Black Creek | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata—Carleton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Northumberland—Peterborough South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Markham—Thornhill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Peterborough—Kawartha | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | People's Party | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic-Cartierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montarville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville North—Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi—Grand Lake | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Burnaby | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil—Soulanges | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Okanagan—West Kootenay | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Jean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon West | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey—Newton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby North—Seymour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—Rothesay | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | NDP | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Orléans | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Bloc Québécois | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced