Skip to main content
Back to Bills
FederalDid not become law (session ended)42nd Parliament, 1st Session

Bill S-209 explained in plain English

An Act to amend the Official Languages Act (communications with and services to the public)

Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.

At a glance

Jurisdiction
Federal Parliament
Legislature / Parliament
Parliament of Canada
Session
42nd Parliament, 1st Session
Bill number
Bill S-209
Full title
An Act to amend the Official Languages Act (communications with and services to the public)
Current status
Did not become law (session ended)
Latest event
At consideration in committee in the Senate
Last updated
Nov 17, 2016

Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.

Chamber
Parliament of Canada
Current Stage
At consideration in committee in the Senate
Latest Activity
Nov 17, 2016
Plain-language explanation
In plain English (our explanation)

Our plain-language take, written for civic education.

Source: By PoliticalData.ca

AI-assisted, reviewed before publishing
Short Version

Bill S-209 proposes amendments to the Official Languages Act to enhance the quality of federal communications and services in both official languages and to specify locations where these services must be offered.

What It Means

This bill proposes changes to the Official Languages Act. It aims to ensure that federal institutions offer communications and services of equal quality in both English and French. The bill also clarifies specific locations where federal institutions must provide services in both official languages, such as airports and railway stations serving metropolitan areas. Additionally, it introduces a requirement for regular reviews of regulations related to official languages, to be conducted after every decennial census.

What This Bill Does
  • Amends the Official Languages Act.
  • Introduces the concept of "equal quality" for communications and services provided by federal institutions in both official languages.
  • Specifies locations where federal institutions must provide communications and services in both official languages.
  • Establishes a requirement for a review of regulations under Part IV of the Act after every decennial census.
  • Modifies provisions related to the consultation process with linguistic minority communities regarding the quality of services.
  • Clarifies circumstances under which exceptions to providing services in both official languages may be made.
Who Is Affected
  • Federal institutions
  • Members of the public
  • English and French linguistic minority communities
Rights, Duties, Or Obligations
  • Federal institutions have a duty to ensure communications and services are of equal quality in both official languages.
  • Federal institutions must provide communications and services in both official languages at specific locations, including railway stations and airports serving metropolitan areas, and airports serving the national capital or provincial/territorial capitals.
  • Federal institutions must seek the views of linguistic minority communities on the quality of services provided.
  • Members of the public have the right to communicate with and receive services from federal institutions in either official language at specified locations.
Important Dates
  • The Act comes into force 180 days after receiving royal assent.
Uncertainties Or Limits
  • The bill does not specify the exact number of federal institutions or offices that will be directly affected by the new requirements.
  • The bill references regulations to be made by the Governor in Council, the details of which are not provided in the bill text.
  • The bill does not detail the specific measures federal institutions must take to ensure 'equal quality' beyond seeking community views.
Laws Or Regulations Affected
Official Languages Act
amends

Modifies sections concerning communications and services to the public, including defining 'metropolitan area', establishing duties for federal institutions in specific locations, and ensuring equal quality of services in both official languages.

Source: Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7

Official Languages Act, Part IV
amends

Requires a review of regulations made under this part after every decennial census, and outlines the process for tabling and publishing proposed regulations.

Source: Section 6 and 7

Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.

Official text

Parliamentary Process

Step 1
First reading
Dec 8, 2015
Completed

Bill S-209, concerning amendments to the Official Languages Act regarding communications and services, completed its First Reading in the Senate on December 8, 2015, and was subsequently referred to a committee.

Introduction and first reading, Dec 8, 2015
End of stage activity, Dec 8, 2015
Chamber sittings
Introduction and first reading - Dec 8, 2015

Bill S-209 received first reading in the Senate, following which the sitting proceeded with tabling of reports, introduction of other bills, and extensive debate on multiple issues, including two questions of privilege.

Step 2
Second reading
Nov 17, 2016
Completed

Bill S-209 completed its second reading in the Senate on November 17, 2016, and was sent to committee, following debates and speeches on various dates.

Second reading, Nov 17, 2016
Referral to committee, Nov 17, 2016
End of stage activity, Nov 17, 2016
Chamber sittings
Debate at second reading - Feb 3, 2016

On February 3, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-209 at second reading, concerning amendments to the Official Languages Act regarding communications with and services to the public, before adjourning the debate.

During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-209, the sponsor argued for updating the criteria used to determine the need for official language services to be more inclusive and reflective of community vitality.

Debate at second reading - Mar 9, 2016

The Senate held a debate on Bill S-209 at second reading, discussing the sponsor's dedication and the challenges of implementing language laws, before adjourning the debate for committee study.

During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-209, Senator Maltais discussed the complexities of language legislation and the practical challenges of enforcing the Official Languages Act.

Debate at second reading - May 5, 2016

This Senate sitting on May 5, 2016, involved Senators' Statements, Question Period on diverse topics, and continued debates on several bills, including Bill S-209 concerning official languages, and other committee reports and inquiries.

Debate at second reading - Jun 21, 2016

On June 21, 2016, the Senate held tributes, heard committee reports, debated several bills including those concerning official languages, copyright, and budget implementation, and engaged in Question Period with the Minister of Agriculture.

Debate at second reading - Nov 3, 2016

This Senate debate record from November 3, 2016, includes discussions on various matters and notes that debate on Bill S-209, an Act to amend the Official Languages Act, was adjourned.

Second reading - Nov 17, 2016

The Senate debated and passed the second reading of Bill S-209, an act to amend the Official Languages Act, referring it to committee, and also addressed numerous other government and private member's business.

Step 3
Consideration in committee
Date not listed
No activity

Bill S-209 is currently at the consideration in committee stage in the Senate, with no specific committee activity detailed in this artifact.

Step 4
Report stage
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209 is currently awaiting consideration at the Report stage in the Senate, having previously completed second reading and been referred to a committee.

Step 5
Third reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209, concerning amendments to the Official Languages Act, has reached the third reading stage in the Senate, but this stage has not yet occurred, with its referral to committee being the latest activity.

Step 1
First reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209 had its First Reading in the House of Commons on December 8, 2015, but this stage was marked as 'Not reached' in this artifact, while the bill is currently under consideration in a Senate committee.

Step 2
Second reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209 has not yet undergone second reading in the House of Commons, but has completed second reading in the Senate and is currently at the committee stage there.

Step 3
Consideration in committee
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209, concerning amendments to the Official Languages Act, is currently awaiting the 'Consideration in committee' stage in the House of Commons, a stage that has not yet been reached.

Step 4
Report stage
Not reached yet
Not reached

The House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-209 has not yet occurred, and the bill is currently under consideration by a Senate committee.

Step 5
Third reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

Bill S-209 has not reached the third reading stage in the House of Commons and is currently under consideration by a Senate committee.

Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.

Vote Summary

No published recorded division

This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.

Sponsor
Maria Chaput
Senator | Details not listed in current Senate roster
Jurisdiction
Federal Parliament

No published representative vote breakdown

This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.

Official sources

Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.

How this data is sourced