Bill S-210 explained in plain English
An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-210 repeals the short title of a 2015 federal law that amended the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code.
Bill S-210 is a very brief legislative measure that repeals Section 1 of an earlier federal law passed in 2015 (chapter 29 of the Statutes of Canada, 2015). That earlier law was titled "An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts." Bill S-210 removes only the short title (the name) of that 2015 law. The bill text does not explain why this change is being made or what practical effect it has beyond removing the title designation.
- Repeals Section 1 of chapter 29 of the Statutes of Canada, 2015, which contained the short title of an earlier amending act
- The specific text of Section 1 being repealed is the short title provision of the law titled 'An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts'
- The practical effect of removing a short title is unclear from the bill text alone; affected parties may include individuals and organizations subject to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Civil Marriage Act, or Criminal Code provisions amended by the 2015 law, but the bill does not specify how removal of the short title affects them
- The bill text does not explain the reason for repealing the short title
- The bill does not clarify what practical or legal effect removing a short title has on the underlying 2015 law or its amendments
- The bill does not specify a commencement or coming-into-force date in the text provided
- The term 'short title' in legislative context typically refers to the brief name of an act, but the bill provides no definition or detail
- The underlying 2015 law made amendments to three major federal statutes (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Civil Marriage Act, Criminal Code) and made consequential amendments to other acts, but this bill does not detail which provisions of those laws remain in force or are affected
Section 1 of this law, which provides its short title, is removed
Source: Bill S-210, section 1
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, had its first reading in the Senate on December 8, 2015, and eventually received royal assent on June 21, 2018.
This record shows the first reading of Bill S-210 in the Senate on December 8, 2015. First reading is a preliminary step where a bill is introduced and formally presented to the chamber. The bill later received royal assent on June 21, 2018, becoming chapter 15 of the Statutes of Canada 2018. The artifact details the bill's progression through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including readings, committee considerations, and third readings, culminating in royal assent.
The Senate's sitting on December 8, 2015, included the first reading of Bill S-210, discussions on various topics, the tabling of reports, and the Speaker taking under advisement two questions of privilege.
On December 8, 2015, the Senate convened for a sitting that included the introduction and first reading of Bill S-210. The sitting also involved various procedural matters, including the tabling of reports and notices of motions. Several senators delivered speeches, some offering congratulations on the appointment of the new Speaker, George J. Furey, while others addressed issues such as the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women, terrorism, and the work of the Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research. Two questions of privilege were raised and taken under advisement by the Speaker: one concerning media leaks of the Auditor General's report on senators' expenses, and another regarding the government's failure to appoint a Leader of the Government in the Senate. The debate on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne was adjourned.
Bill S-210 completed its second reading in the Senate on February 18, 2016.
This record shows that Bill S-210 completed its second reading stage in the Senate on February 18, 2016. This is a procedural step where a bill is generally debated and then moved forward to the next stage.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-210, Senator Jaffer argued for repealing the bill's short title, citing concerns about its divisive language, while other proceedings included committee reports, motions, and Question Period with the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
This Senate sitting on February 18, 2016, included a debate on Bill S-210 at its second reading stage. The debate focused on the bill's short title, "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," with Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer arguing for its repeal. Other Senate business included tabling reports from various committees, introducing a new bill, and presenting notices of motions for future committee studies. The sitting also included a Question Period where the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Stéphane Dion, addressed various international issues, including Canada-Russia relations, child soldiers, Iran's state sponsorship of terrorism, the conflict in Ukraine, women's issues in Syria, clean energy, religious freedom, the sale of armoured vehicles to Saudi Arabia, the detention of a Canadian pastor in North Korea, and assistance for Francophone countries, as well as the fight against ISIS. The sitting concluded with a motion to adjourn until Tuesday, February 23, 2016.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-210, Senator Jaffer argued for the repeal of the bill's short title, "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," stating it was divisive and stigmatized minority communities.
On February 18, 2016, during the Senate's second reading debate for Bill S-210, Senator Mobina S. B. Jaffer delivered a speech. She explained that her purpose was to propose the repeal of the bill's short title, "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." Senator Jaffer argued that the title was divisive and misleading, implying that certain cultural groups inherently promote harmful practices. She cited the historical context of the word 'barbaric' and provided quotes from various experts and organizations who also expressed concerns that the title stigmatized minority communities and created an 'us vs. them' mentality. She emphasized that the bill's content, which deals with acts that are already illegal in Canada, was not the focus of her speech, but rather the problematic nature of the short title itself. The debate was adjourned after her speech.
During a Senate sitting on May 4, 2016, senators discussed the Fort McMurray wildfires, mental health, and bladder cancer awareness, addressed routine proceedings and question period topics ranging from foreign affairs to economic support, debated ongoing legislation concerning cruelty-free cosmetics and barbaric cultural practices, and reserved a ruling on a point of order.
On May 4, 2016, the Senate of Canada held a sitting where various matters were addressed. This included statements on the wildfires in Fort McMurray, Mental Health Week, and Bladder Cancer Awareness Month. Routine proceedings included notices of motions and the first reading of a bill. Question Period covered topics such as federal assistance for Fort McMurray fire victims, human rights in Iran, restrictive regulations in China, the establishment of a national commission on children and youth, financial support for combatting tax evasion, and support for Bombardier. The Senate also addressed a point of order where a ruling was reserved. Debate continued on amendments to the Food and Drugs Act concerning cruelty-free cosmetics (Bill S-214) and on amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act, and the Criminal Code related to barbaric cultural practices (Bill S-210). The sitting concluded with the adjournment of the Senate.
During a Senate debate on May 4, 2016, Senators discussed Bill S-210, specifically focusing on amending the short title of the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" to avoid labeling entire cultures as barbaric, while reaffirming support for the act's original intent to uphold Canadian values.
This document records a Senate debate on May 4, 2016. The debate focused on Bill S-210, an act to amend several existing laws, including those related to immigration, marriage, and the criminal code. A key point of discussion was the proposed change to the short title of the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" (Bill S-7). Senator Salma Ataullahjan supported the amendment to change the short title, agreeing that while specific acts can be called barbaric, an entire culture cannot. She affirmed support for the original bill's provisions aimed at upholding Canadian values like gender equality and consensual marriage, and stated the importance of clearly communicating the intent of laws to new Canadians. The debate also touched on broader themes like Canada's multiculturalism and the need to uphold Canadian values. The record also includes discussions on other unrelated matters, such as wildfires in Fort McMurray, mental health, bladder cancer awareness, and various foreign affairs and domestic policy issues raised during Question Period, as well as a debate on a different bill (Bill S-214) concerning cruelty-free cosmetics.
During a Senate sitting on September 28, 2016, Senators made statements on various topics, engaged in Question Period on diverse government issues, and continued debate on several bills, including Bill S-210, before adjourning for the day.
The Senate convened on September 28, 2016. The sitting included Senators' Statements where various senators spoke on topics such as the leadership of Senate Liberals, the rebuilding of Fort McMurray, the achievements of Paralympic swimmer Katarina Roxon, the induction of Senator Jacques Demers into the Quebec Sports Hall of Fame, and the twentieth anniversary of the Arctic Council. Routine Proceedings included the tabling of reports and notices of inquiries. Question Period covered a range of government policy areas, including health transfer payments, the closure of western feedlots, consultation on natural resource development, the appointment process for Supreme Court justices, and the softwood lumber agreement. The Orders of the Day saw several bills at various stages of reading, including Bill S-210, which is an Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. Debate on Bill S-210 was continued and then adjourned. Several committee activities were also authorized. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of debate on a motion regarding the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization.
On November 22, 2016, the Senate continued its debate on Bill S-210, with the debate being adjourned by Senator Percy Mockler, and also addressed other routine proceedings and legislative matters.
This document records the proceedings of the Senate on November 22, 2016. The Senate discussed various matters including tabling of reports, introducing new bills, and debating ongoing legislation. Notably, a debate continued on Bill S-210, "An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts." Senator Percy Mockler moved to adjourn the debate on Bill S-210, which was agreed to, meaning the debate on this bill was postponed to a later date. The document also includes discussions on other bills, committee reports, and questions raised by senators to the government representative.
On January 31, 2017, the Senate began with a tribute to victims of the Quebec City mosque attack, honoured a retiring senator, debated and adjourned proceedings on several bills, held a Question Period with the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, and adopted motions on a commemorative medal and basic income pilot projects.
This is a record of a Senate sitting on January 31, 2017. The sitting began with a silent tribute to the victims of the attack at the Centre Islamique de Québec. Senators then held tributes for Senator John D. Wallace, who was retiring, and heard statements on other topics. The Senate also adopted a motion to adjust the timing of Question Period. During Orders of the Day, the Senate adopted the fifth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications concerning Bill S-2, and debate continued on Bill S-210 (An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts), with the debate being adjourned. Debate also adjourned on other bills and committee reports. Question Period included discussions on a military technology review, internal trade, innovation centres, support for former Nortel employees, remote digital connectivity, access to security resources for places of worship, the auto industry, and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency. Following Question Period, the Senate adopted a motion concerning a commemorative medal for the 150th anniversary of Confederation and a motion to encourage the evaluation of a national basic income program. Debates also continued on the softwood lumber crisis and the human rights implications of climate change.
On February 1, 2017, the Senate heard statements on various topics, held Question Period on multiple government issues, and advanced Bill S-210 to the second reading stage, referring it to committee.
This document records the proceedings of the Senate on February 1, 2017. The sitting included Senators' Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings where notices of motions and first readings of bills were presented, and Question Period where senators asked questions of the Government Representative on diverse issues including electoral reform, census data, lobbying, agricultural concerns, family reunification, energy projects, internal trade, and drug decriminalization. The 'Orders of the Day' section details the progress of several bills and committee reports, including the second reading and referral to committee of Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. The sitting concluded with a motion to adjourn.
This record marks the completion of the Senate's committee consideration stage for Bill S-210 on October 5, 2017, a step in its path to eventually receiving Royal Assent.
This artifact describes the "Senate Consideration in committee" stage for Bill S-210, which occurred on October 5, 2017. This stage is now completed. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018, becoming Chapter 15 of the Statutes of Canada, 2018. The provided text also lists various other procedural stages and dates for the bill in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including first and second readings, speeches, committee work, report stage, and third reading.
The Senate received a committee report on Bill S-210, stating it was examined and reported without amendment, and the bill was scheduled for third reading.
On October 5, 2017, the Senate of Canada met. During this sitting, the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology presented its seventeenth report regarding Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. The committee reported that the bill had been examined and was presented without amendment. The Senate then placed the bill on the Orders of the Day for third reading at the next sitting. The sitting also included discussions on various other matters, including tributes to late senators, parliamentary budget officer reports, and debates on other bills and motions.
The Senate completed the Third Reading stage for Bill S-210 on December 12, 2017, a step towards the bill receiving Royal Assent.
This artifact details the completion of the Third Reading stage for Bill S-210 in the Senate on December 12, 2017. This stage is part of the legislative process where a bill is considered for final approval in the Senate before potentially moving to the House of Commons or receiving Royal Assent. The provided text indicates that this specific stage, Senate Third reading, was completed on this date. It also notes that the bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018, and became Statutes of Canada 2018, chapter 15.
On October 31, 2017, the Senate sat, conducting routine business, question period with the Minister of National Defence, and continuing debate on various bills and inquiries, including a discussion on Bill S-210 at third reading.
On October 31, 2017, the Senate sat, with the Speaker in the chair. The sitting included Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, Question Period, and Orders of the Day. During Senators' Statements, tributes were paid to the late Honourable P. Michael Pitfield, and other topics like Patient Safety Week, the Indian Act, legalization of cannabis, and achievements in sports and history were discussed. Routine Proceedings involved the tabling of various committee reports and the first reading of a bill to amend the Criminal Code and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Question Period saw the Minister of National Defence answer questions on a range of topics including aircraft procurement, peacekeeping operations, and sexual misconduct within the Canadian Armed Forces. The Orders of the Day included continued debates on several bills, including Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, which was at third reading. The debate on Bill S-210 focused on repealing the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" to remove potentially stigmatizing language. Other debates included Bill S-219 concerning sanctions against Iran, and various committee reports and inquiries.
On November 7, 2017, the Senate commemorated its 150th anniversary, debated amendments to the Indian Act (Bill S-3) and other legislative matters, and addressed various government and committee reports.
On November 7, 2017, the Senate held a sitting that included a moment of silence for the victims of a shooting in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Senators also commemorated the 150th anniversary of the Senate's first sitting, with several senators reflecting on the institution's role in Canadian democracy, its history of representing minorities and regions, and the importance of independent deliberation. The sitting also involved routine proceedings where various reports were tabled, including those from the Parliamentary Budget Officer and the Ombudsman for National Defence. Question Period addressed topics such as cybersecurity, military justice, advance directives, and amendments to the Indian Act. The Senate then moved to Orders of the Day, where debate continued on amendments to the Indian Act (Bill S-3), the Criminal Code, and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Civil Marriage Act, and Criminal Code (Bill S-210). Debates on other bills and inquiries were also adjourned or continued. The sitting concluded with the adoption of a motion concerning committee membership.
During the third reading debate on Bill S-210, Senators discussed removing the problematic short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" due to concerns about its divisive language and cultural implications.
On November 8, 2017, the Senate continued its debate on Bill S-210. The bill aims to amend previous legislation concerning immigration, marriage, and the criminal code. The debate focused on the potential repeal of the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." Senators discussed concerns that the short title might unfairly target specific cultures and create a division between "us" and "them." They argued that the language used in the title could imply that certain crimes are less serious than others and that it unfairly places blame on entire cultures rather than individuals. The debate also touched on the importance of carefully chosen words in legislation and their power to either unite or divide people. The Senators supporting the bill argued that removing the short title would not change the content or enforcement of the Act, but would address problematic and divisive language.
On November 28, 2017, the Senate debated Bill S-210 concerning the repeal of a controversial act title, Bill C-277 on palliative care, and other legislative matters, while also holding Question Period with a government minister.
On November 28, 2017, the Senate met. The day's proceedings included statements honouring individuals, tabling committee reports, introducing new bills, continuing debates on ongoing legislation, and a period for questions directed to a government minister. A significant portion of the debate focused on Bill S-210, which aimed to repeal the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." Senators discussed concerns that the original title was divisive and targeted specific cultural groups, while the substance of the bill aimed to address issues like polygamy and forced marriage. The government expressed support for Bill S-210 to remove the inflammatory language. Another substantial debate involved Bill C-277, concerning a framework for palliative care in Canada. Senators discussed the importance of equitable access, the role of hospices, and the need for public awareness and education on palliative care. An amendment was proposed to explicitly include public education and awareness measures in the bill. Additionally, there was discussion and debate on Bill S-203 (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins), Bill S-243 (reporting on unpaid income tax), Bill C-311 (Remembrance Day as a legal holiday), and a report on integrating automation in healthcare. Question Period involved discussions on the Prime Minister's travel and ethics, a report by the Parliamentary Budget Officer, budget implementation, support for artists, small business tax regimes, the foreign convention and tour incentive program, policy communication for newcomers, support for Indigenous and racialized women entrepreneurs, and tourism with China.
During the Senate's third reading debate on Bill S-210, a senator spoke in support of changing the bill's short title to remove divisive language and focus on individual responsibility for abhorrent acts, rather than cultural groups.
On November 30, 2017, the Senate debated Bill S-210, an act to amend previous legislation concerning immigration, marriage, and criminal law. The debate occurred during the third reading stage of the bill. A senator spoke in support of the bill, noting that it is a symbolic amendment to change the short title of a previous bill (Bill S-7, the "zero tolerance for barbaric cultural practices act"). The senator explained that while the original bill aimed to protect vulnerable individuals and promote Canadian values, its short title was divisive and stigmatizing to minority communities. The proposed change in the short title aims to remove this divisiveness and ensure that the focus remains on individual responsibility rather than cultural groups. The debate was adjourned after this speech.
On December 11, 2017, the Senate debated and passed Bill S-210 at third reading, heard testimony from the nominee for Senate Ethics Officer, and dealt with procedural matters including the Statutes Repeal Act.
On December 11, 2017, the Senate convened for its third reading debate on Bill S-210. The sitting included routine proceedings such as tabling of reports, notices of motions, and adoption of motions regarding committee sittings and media coverage. A significant portion of the sitting involved a Committee of the Whole hearing to receive testimony from Pierre Legault regarding his appointment as Senate Ethics Officer. The Senate also debated and adopted a motion concerning the Statutes Repeal Act, which involved discussing numerous acts and provisions that would not be repealed. Finally, the Senate proceeded with the third reading of Bill S-210, which involved a debate on removing the short title of the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." The bill was ultimately passed, on division.
Bill S-210, concerning amendments to immigration, marriage, and criminal laws, completed its first reading in the House of Commons on January 31, 2018, before eventually receiving Royal Assent.
The House of Commons held its first reading of Bill S-210 on January 31, 2018. This is a procedural step where the bill is formally introduced to the House. The artifact indicates that this stage is completed. The bill ultimately received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018, becoming chapter 15 of the Statutes of Canada 2018.
During a House of Commons sitting on January 31, 2018, Bill S-210 was introduced at first reading to remove the phrase "barbaric cultural practices" from statutes, with the introducer arguing it unfairly associates crimes with culture.
On January 31, 2018, during a sitting of the House of Commons, Bill S-210, an Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced and read for the first time. The member who introduced the bill explained that the purpose of the bill was to remove the phrase "barbaric cultural practices" from Canada's statutes, arguing that this phrasing is socially irresponsible and repugnant because it associates crimes with a culture or community rather than holding individuals responsible. The sitting also included various statements by members on different topics, oral questions where the government and opposition debated ethics and other issues, routine proceedings including the tabling of reports and petitions, and government orders where a debate occurred on the Strengthening Motor Vehicle Safety for Canadians Act (Bill S-2).
The House of Commons completed its second reading of Bill S-210 on April 18, 2018, agreeing to refer it to committee, before it later received Royal Assent.
This record details the House of Commons' second reading stage for Bill S-210, which occurred on April 18, 2018. Following debate, the House agreed to the second reading of the bill and referred it to committee. The bill eventually received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018, becoming chapter 15 of the Statutes of Canada 2018.
On February 28, 2018, the House of Commons debated Bill S-210, concerning the repeal of a controversial short title from previous legislation, alongside discussions on the federal budget, the Phoenix pay system, and Indigenous issues.
On February 28, 2018, the House of Commons debated Bill S-210. This bill proposed to repeal the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" from a previous bill (Bill S-7). Proponents argued the original title was divisive and targeted specific communities, while opponents felt the original bill's measures against forced marriage and other practices were important. The debate also touched upon the federal budget tabled the previous day, with various MPs discussing its impacts on different sectors and populations, as well as ongoing issues like the Phoenix pay system and Indigenous affairs. The sitting also included routine proceedings such as the tabling of committee reports and petitions, and private members' business, including a debate on homelessness and a bill related to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
During the House of Commons second reading debate on Bill S-210, members discussed the procedural step of repealing the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" short title, with differing views on its impact on inclusivity and the effectiveness of the original legislation.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on February 28, 2018, concerning Bill S-210. The debate focused on the proposed repeal of the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" from a previous bill (Bill S-7). Speakers from various parties debated the impact of this title, with many arguing it was divisive, promoted harmful stereotypes, and unfairly targeted certain cultural communities. The primary procedural action discussed was the second reading of Bill S-210, which aimed to remove this short title, with proponents arguing it was an opportunity to foster a more inclusive and accepting Canada. Opponents, primarily from the Conservative Party, argued that Bill S-7, despite its title, contained important measures to protect vulnerable individuals and that changing the title would detract from the seriousness of the issues addressed. The debate also touched upon broader issues such as the budget, foreign policy, and Indigenous relations, but the core of this specific artifact revolves around the procedural step of debating Bill S-210.
During a House of Commons debate, members discussed Bill S-210, which proposed to repeal the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" from a previous bill, with widespread agreement that the title was divisive and harmful, while affirming the importance of the bill's underlying protections.
During a House of Commons debate on February 28, 2018, members discussed Bill S-210, an act to repeal the short title of a previous act (Bill S-7, the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act"). The debate focused on the problematic nature of the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act," with many members arguing it was divisive, targeted specific communities, and perpetuated harmful stereotypes. The core purpose of Bill S-7, which aimed to strengthen protections against forced marriage and other issues, was not in dispute, but the title itself was widely criticized as inflammatory and unnecessary. The debate also touched upon other government business, including the budget, the Phoenix pay system, and various committee reports and petitions.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-210, members discussed the procedural impact of removing a controversial short title from a previous act, arguing it was divisive and misrepresentative.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on February 28, 2018, concerning Bill S-210. The bill aims to remove the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" from a previous piece of legislation (Bill S-7). The debate focused on the concerns that the original short title was divisive, promoted harmful stereotypes, and targeted specific cultural communities, rather than focusing on the individual acts of harm. Proponents argued that removing the title would better reflect Canadian values of openness and inclusivity. The debate also touched upon related issues such as the budget, Indigenous affairs, and international relations, but the primary procedural focus was on the short title of Bill S-210.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill S-210 at second reading, members discussed the divisive nature of the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" title and the Liberal government's support for repealing it to promote inclusivity.
This document is a record of a debate that took place in the House of Commons on April 17, 2018, during the second reading stage of Bill S-210. The debate focused on the title of a previous bill, Bill S-7, also known as the "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act." Members of Parliament discussed concerns that the title was divisive and inflammatory, potentially fostering xenophobia and distracting from the bill's actual purpose of protecting women and girls from practices like forced marriage. The Liberal government expressed support for repealing the title, viewing it as a symbolic but meaningful step towards promoting openness, acceptance, and inclusivity in Canada. Opposition members also largely supported removing the title, seeing it as a correction to a divisive practice from the previous Conservative government. The debate also touched on other parliamentary procedures, including points of order and privilege related to the premature disclosure of legislation and alleged contradictions in government statements.
During a House of Commons sitting on April 18, 2018, Bill S-210, concerning amendments to immigration, marriage, and criminal laws, was debated and referred to a committee.
This artifact is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on April 18, 2018. During this sitting, the House debated and referred Bill S-210, An Act to amend An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Civil Marriage Act and the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, to a committee. The sitting also included statements by members on various topics, oral questions, and discussions on other government and private members' business. The current bill status is Royal Assent Received, meaning the bill has completed all stages of the legislative process and has become law.
The House of Commons completed its committee review stage for Bill S-210 on May 10, 2018, before the bill received Royal Assent later that year.
This artifact indicates that the House of Commons completed its 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-210 on May 10, 2018. This is a procedural step where a committee examines a bill in detail. The bill later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018.
On May 10, 2018, the House of Commons received a committee report on Bill S-210 without amendments.
This artifact is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on May 10, 2018. During this sitting, the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights presented its 19th report concerning Bill S-210. The committee reported the bill back to the House without any amendments. The rest of the Hansard record for this sitting details statements by members, oral questions on various topics, and debates on other bills.
The House of Commons completed the report stage for Bill S-210 on June 13, 2018.
This record indicates that the House of Commons completed its report stage for Bill S-210 on June 13, 2018. The report stage is a point in the legislative process where the bill is considered clause by clause, and amendments can be proposed and voted on. The completion of this stage means the House of Commons has finished its detailed review and any proposed changes at this stage.
On June 7, 2018, the House of Commons debated key legislation including national security, environmental assessment, and criminal justice reform bills, alongside private members' business, with considerable discussion on the balance between security, economic interests, and civil liberties.
This document is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on June 7, 2018. It details routine proceedings, government orders where Bills C-59 (National Security Act, 2017), C-69 (Impact Assessment Act), and C-75 (Criminal Code amendments) were debated, and private members' business related to Bill S-210 (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act amendments). The sitting included numerous speeches from Members of Parliament from various parties discussing the provisions and potential impacts of these bills, with significant debate on national security measures, environmental and energy project assessments, and criminal justice reforms.
On June 13, 2018, the House of Commons sat to debate and vote on various legislative matters, including the Cannabis Act and the Latin American Heritage Month Act, with numerous members speaking on the latter.
This document is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on June 13, 2018. The sitting included Statements by Members on various topics, Oral Questions related to government performance and policy, and proceedings on Private Members' Business and Government Orders. Specifically, it details votes on various bills and motions, including divisions on Bill S-210, Bill C-344, Bill C-68, and debates and decisions concerning the Cannabis Act (Bill C-45) and the Latin American Heritage Month Act (Bill S-218). The record shows that the House completed report stage concurrence for Bill S-210, defeated an opposition motion on global climate change, passed Bill C-344 and Bill C-68 (with a recorded division), and advanced discussions and made decisions on amendments to the Cannabis Act. A significant portion of the sitting was dedicated to debating and ultimately agreeing to proceed with Bill S-218, the Latin American Heritage Month Act.
Bill S-210 completed Third Reading in the House of Commons on June 18, 2018, and later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018.
This artifact indicates that Bill S-210 completed its Third Reading stage in the House of Commons on June 18, 2018. This is a procedural step in the legislative process. The bill later received Royal Assent on June 21, 2018, becoming a statute of Canada.
On June 18, 2018, the House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-210 at third reading, focusing on removing potentially divisive language from an Act's title.
The House of Commons debated and passed Bill S-210 at its third reading on June 18, 2018. This stage of the legislative process involved discussion and a vote on the bill. The debate focused on the bill's aim to remove the short title "Zero Tolerance for Barbaric Cultural Practices Act" from existing legislation, with speakers emphasizing the importance of language in law and its impact on inclusivity. The bill was passed, meaning it moved to the next stage of the legislative process (Royal Assent, as noted in the bill's status).
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Spadina—Fort York | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cowichan—Malahat—Langford | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Mill Woods | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Orléans | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Qu'Appelle | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Salaberry—Suroît | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Lacombe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Banff—Airdrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Heritage | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Lacolle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie—Mackenzie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Burin—Trinity | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface—Saint Vital | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sturgeon River—Parkland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Skyview | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | King—Vaughan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Mountain View | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Abbotsford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Durham | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vimy | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | Québec debout | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge Park | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Don Valley North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Stouffville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | La Prairie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Uxbridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Steveston—Richmond East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Foothills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Innisfil | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber River—Black Creek | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata—Carleton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby South | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battle River—Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Grasswood | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Northumberland—Peterborough South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Milton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel | Québec debout | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Québec debout | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley—Aldergrove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Markham—Thornhill | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Peterborough—Kawartha | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic-Cartierville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Albert—Edmonton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montarville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Nose Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Québec debout | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill—Keewatinook Aski | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville North—Burlington | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Rocky Ridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil—Soulanges | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | Québec debout | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Jean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Ladysmith | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Midnapore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey—Newton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Shepard | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—Rothesay | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Manning | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced