Bill S-228 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-228 amends the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit advertising of unhealthy food and beverages directed primarily at children under 17 years of age, coming into force two years after royal assent.
Bill S-228, called the Child Health Protection Act, would change federal food and drug laws to stop companies from advertising unhealthy food and drinks to children under 17. The bill defines "children" as anyone under 17 years old. It would make it illegal for anyone to advertise unhealthy food in a way that is aimed mainly at children. The government would create rules to define what counts as unhealthy food and how to tell if an advertisement is primarily directed at children (such as when, where, and how it is shown). The bill also protects trade-marks from becoming invalid just because a company stopped using them to follow this new advertising rule. The law would not take effect immediately—it would start two years after it receives royal assent (approval from the Crown).
- Defines 'children' in the Food and Drugs Act as persons under 17 years of age
- Prohibits any person from advertising unhealthy food in a manner directed primarily at children, subject to regulations
- Allows the government to make regulations that define what unhealthy food is or set out the criteria for determining whether a food is unhealthy
- Allows the government to make regulations that set out factors for determining whether an advertisement is primarily directed at children, including how, when, and where it is communicated
- Protects trade-marks from being held invalid under the Trade-marks Act when they are not used due to compliance with this Act or its regulations
- States that not using a trade-mark because of compliance with this Act constitutes special circumstances that excuse non-use under trade-mark law
- Delays the coming into force of the Act to two years after royal assent
- Children under 17 years of age in Canada
- Food and beverage companies and advertisers who advertise unhealthy food or drinks in Canada
- Media platforms and outlets that broadcast, publish, or distribute advertisements
- Trade-mark owners whose marks would be affected by advertising restrictions
- Parents and caregivers of children
- The federal government (through enforcement and regulation-making)
- No person may advertise unhealthy food in a manner directed primarily at children, subject to regulations
- The government has the power to make regulations defining what unhealthy food is or establishing criteria to determine if a food is unhealthy
- The government has the power to make regulations setting out factors to consider when determining if an advertisement is primarily directed at children
- Trade-mark owners are protected from having their registrations declared invalid under the Trade-marks Act due to non-use resulting from compliance with this Act
- The Act comes into force on the second anniversary of the day on which it receives royal assent (no specific calendar date is provided in the bill text)
- The bill text does not specify what penalties or enforcement mechanisms will apply for breaching the advertising prohibition
- The bill text does not define what constitutes 'unhealthy food'—this will be determined by future regulations
- The bill text does not specify the exact factors or criteria for determining if an advertisement is 'directed primarily at children'—these will be set out in regulations
- The bill text does not specify what penalties or enforcement mechanisms will apply for violations
- The bill text does not specify which government agency will enforce this prohibition
- The bill's effectiveness depends on regulations that have not yet been drafted or published
- The phrase 'directed primarily at children' is not defined in the bill and could be interpreted in different ways until regulations clarify it
Adds a definition of 'children' meaning persons under 17 years of age
Source: Section 2
Creates a new section 7.1 that prohibits advertising of unhealthy food directed primarily at children, subject to regulations
Source: Section 4
Protects trade-mark registrations from becoming invalid under the Trade-marks Act when not used due to compliance with the advertising prohibition
Source: Section 4
Adds regulation-making authority to define unhealthy food and factors for determining if an advertisement is directed primarily at children
Source: Section 5
Trade-marks cannot be declared invalid under paragraphs 18(1)(b) or (c) if the absence of use results from compliance with the Food and Drugs Act advertising prohibition
Source: Section 4, subsection 7.2(1)
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
This record details the procedural path of Bill S-228 through the Senate, including its initial first reading and subsequent consideration of amendments made by the House of Commons.
This artifact outlines the procedural history of Bill S-228 in the Senate. It shows that the bill had its first reading on September 27, 2016. The bill later proceeded through various stages, including second reading, committee study, and third reading. After being passed by the Senate, it went to the House of Commons. The House of Commons made amendments, and the bill returned to the Senate for consideration of these amendments. The artifact lists multiple dates between September 2018 and May 2019 when the Senate considered the House of Commons' amendments.
In the Senate on September 27, 2016, Bill S-228, aiming to prohibit food and beverage marketing aimed at children, was introduced and given first reading, amidst other Senate business.
On September 27, 2016, in the Senate, there was a first reading of Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act concerning the prohibition of food and beverage marketing directed at children. The Senate record indicates that this was the introduction and first reading debate for this bill. The record also includes tributes to the late Mauril A. Bélanger, P.C. and the Honourable Senator Janis G. Johnson, a discussion on the leadership of Senate Liberals, congratulations to the Canadian Olympic and Paralympic teams, the tabling of several reports, and debates on various other government and Senate matters.
This artifact outlines the procedural journey of Bill S-228 through the Senate and House of Commons, culminating in the Senate's consideration of House of Commons amendments.
This record shows the procedural steps and dates related to Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children), as it moved through the Senate and the House of Commons. It details readings, committee considerations, and the process of dealing with amendments made by the House of Commons. The latest activity noted is the consideration of House of Commons amendments in the Senate on May 30, 2019.
This Senate sitting on October 5, 2016, included Senator statements, routine proceedings, question period, and debate on several bills, including Bill S-228 concerning marketing to children and Bill S-2 on motor vehicle safety, both of which had their debates adjourned.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on October 5, 2016. The sitting included Senator statements on various topics, routine proceedings where reports were tabled, question period addressing topics like carbon taxes and Supreme Court appointments, and the consideration of various bills. Notably, debate on Bill S-228, concerning the prohibition of food and beverage marketing directed at children, was adjourned. Debate on Bill S-2, concerning motor vehicle safety, was also adjourned. The sitting concluded with the adoption of a motion regarding the return of documents provided to the Auditor General.
During the second reading debate in the Senate, Senator Nancy Greene Raine spoke in favour of Bill S-228, which aims to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children under 13 to address rising obesity rates.
This Senate debate record from October 5, 2016, primarily concerns the second reading of Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act regarding the prohibition of food and beverage marketing directed at children. Senator Nancy Greene Raine, the sponsor, delivered a speech outlining the bill's purpose, which is to combat rising childhood obesity rates by preventing targeted marketing of unhealthy food and beverages to children under 13. The speech detailed the health risks associated with childhood obesity, the influence of advertising on children's food preferences, and proposed that the bill would provide a level playing field for food and beverage companies by prohibiting direct marketing to vulnerable children. Other discussions in the Senate on this date included a debate on Bill S-2 (Motor Vehicle Safety Act), a motion to urge government action on the South China Sea, and various other procedural matters and statements.
During a Senate sitting on October 25, 2016, senators debated and processed various bills and committee reports, including Bill S-228 concerning food and beverage marketing to children, while also addressing other policy issues during Question Period and ongoing debates.
This Senate sitting on October 25, 2016, included several procedural matters and debates on various bills and issues. The Senate Modernization committee presented its ninth report. A bill to amend the Indian Act received first reading. There were notices of motions regarding committee reports on dementia and crude oil transport. Question Period included discussions on RCMP post-traumatic stress injuries, the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, gun violence, a national youth strategy, emergency response support, the carbon tax, amendments to the Anti-Terrorism Act, and oversight of security agencies. Several bills proceeded through second reading, with some debates continuing, being suspended, or being referred to committee. These included bills on motor vehicle safety, citizenship, the Canada Border Services Agency Act, the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Act, linguistic plurality, and the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children). Senate committees were authorized to study automation in healthcare and to meet during Senate sittings. Inquiries on the relevance of full employment and the softwood lumber crisis were debated.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Response speech yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act, Senator Paul E. McIntyre spoke in favour of prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children, citing concerns about childhood obesity and the need for legislative action.
On November 2, 2016, the Senate continued its second reading debate on Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children). Senator Paul E. McIntyre spoke in support of the bill, highlighting its goal to protect children under 13 from marketing influence and its alignment with Quebec's existing legislation. He emphasized the rising rates of childhood obesity and the public's desire for government intervention. The debate was adjourned, meaning it will continue at a later date.
On November 3, 2016, the Senate debated and referred Bill S-228 concerning the prohibition of food and beverage marketing directed at children to committee, alongside other legislative and procedural business.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on November 3, 2016. It includes various proceedings such as Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, Question Period, and Orders of the Day. Of particular note, Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children), was at the second reading stage and was subsequently referred to committee. The sitting also included debates on other bills, including Bill C-4 (to amend the Canada Labour Code) and Bill C-13 (to amend several acts related to trade facilitation), as well as discussions on government business, committee reports, and motions. The debates and discussions touched upon topics ranging from genetic fairness and Remembrance Day to human trafficking, Arctic defence, veterans' support, and the modernization of the Senate. The record indicates that the Senate sat and conducted its business, including the debate and referral of Bill S-228.
The Senate began debating Bill S-228, an act to prohibit food and beverage marketing aimed at children, with senators raising concerns about its potential economic impacts on businesses and media companies before referring it to committee.
On December 5, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-228, which aims to amend the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children. During the second reading debate, senators discussed the bill's potential impacts. Concerns were raised about the effect on small businesses that use child-friendly branding, the potential loss of revenue for Canadian cable companies, and the possibility that children might still see such advertising through U.S. channels or the internet. The speaker also questioned the placement of the proposed amendment within the existing act. The bill was ultimately passed at second reading and referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology for further study.
This record details the Senate's procedural journey with Bill S-228, including committee review, report stage, third reading, and the subsequent consideration of amendments made by the House of Commons.
This artifact summarizes the procedural steps for Bill S-228 in the Senate, specifically detailing its progression through committee consideration, report stage, and third reading. It also outlines the subsequent process of considering amendments made by the House of Commons. The artifact lists dates of sittings where these procedural stages occurred, including committee meetings on various dates in June 2017, report stage in September 2017, and third reading in September 2018. It also shows multiple instances where the Senate considered amendments from the House of Commons, with the latest activity noted as May 30, 2019.
On June 21, 2017, the Senate debated and passed several bills, including the budget implementation bill (Bill C-44) which later saw its amendments disagreed with by the House of Commons, and adopted various committee reports, before adjourning.
This is a record of a Senate sitting on June 21, 2017. The Senate considered several bills and reports. Notably, the Senate debated and passed Bill C-44 (Budget Implementation Bill, 2017, No. 1) with amendments, but the House of Commons later disagreed with these amendments. The Senate also debated and passed Bill S-236 (Charlottetown as Birthplace of Confederation) and Bill C-233 (National Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias). Several committee reports were presented and adopted. Discussions also touched upon issues like the Energy East Pipeline, defence policy, physician-pharmaceutical company relationships, and the crisis in Churchill, Manitoba. The sitting concluded with the Senate adjourning.
This record details the procedural steps and dates for Bill S-228 through its various stages in the Senate and the House of Commons, including the consideration of amendments.
This artifact outlines the procedural history of Bill S-228 in the Senate. It shows the bill's progression through various stages, including first reading, second reading, committee consideration, report stage, and third reading. It also details the consideration of amendments made by the House of Commons, which occurred on multiple dates between September 2018 and May 2019. The artifact notes specific dates for these procedural steps and mentions major speeches given at the second reading stage in both the Senate and the House of Commons.
The Senate considered and adopted amendments to Bill S-228 at the report stage, which aims to prohibit the marketing of unhealthy food and beverages to children, after which the bill was ordered for third reading.
On September 19, 2017, the Senate convened for its report stage consideration of amendments made by the House of Commons to Bill S-228. The sitting included the introduction of a new senator, David Adams Richards, tributes to the late Honourable Allan J. MacEachen, and various routine proceedings and question period discussions on a range of topics. The main procedural event related to Bill S-228 was the Senate's consideration and adoption of amendments to the bill at the report stage, following committee study. The debate on these amendments involved discussions on the definition of 'unhealthy' food, the age range for protection against marketing, and the role of regulations. Following the adoption of amendments, the bill was ordered for third reading.
The Senate completed its Third Reading stage for Bill S-228, which involved considering amendments from the House of Commons on several occasions.
This record outlines the procedural steps for Bill S-228 in the Senate, specifically at the stage of Third Reading. It details the timeline of the bill's progression, including its first and second readings, committee work, and report stage. It also notes that the Senate considered amendments made by the House of Commons on multiple dates between September 2018 and May 2019. The last activity mentioned is the consideration of House of Commons amendments on May 30, 2019, after which the stage was completed.
During the Senate's third reading debate of Bill S-228 on September 27, 2017, the debate was adjourned, and no decision was made on the bill at that time.
This document records a sitting of the Senate on September 27, 2017. The Senate debated Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act, at the third reading stage. The debate was adjourned. The sitting also included various other proceedings, such as Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, Question Period, and debates on other matters, none of which directly relate to the procedural stage of Bill S-228 on this specific date beyond its mention as "Orders of the Day".
The Senate held the third reading debate for Bill S-228, with a senator highlighting the negative impacts of sugary drink marketing and consumption on children in Nunavut.
On September 28, 2017, the Senate proceeded to the third reading of Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children). During the debate, Senator Dennis Glen Patterson spoke about the prevalence of sugary drink marketing and consumption in Nunavut, highlighting issues such as high prices, limited availability, stale products, and the associated health impacts like diabetes and tooth decay among Inuit youth. He expressed strong support for the bill's prohibition of marketing food and beverages to children.
This record outlines the procedural progression of Bill S-228 through the House of Commons, including its first reading and subsequent stages, and notes its current status in the Senate.
This artifact details the procedural steps for Bill S-228 in the House of Commons. It shows the bill's first reading on October 6, 2017, and subsequent stages, including second reading, committee study, report stage, and third reading. It also lists dates when messages between the House and Senate were considered, and the current status of the bill being at the stage of consideration of House of Commons amendments in the Senate.
The House of Commons debated amendments to the Federal Sustainable Development Act (Bill C-57), alongside private members' business including bills on the Navigation Protection Act, child health protection, and the conservation of national historic sites.
The House of Commons debated Bill C-57, an Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act. The Minister of Environment and Climate Change introduced the bill, highlighting its aim to increase transparency and accountability in sustainable development practices across government departments. Opposition members raised concerns about the government's environmental performance and the bill's effectiveness, citing reports from the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development. The debate also touched on issues related to taxation and the impact of proposed tax changes on small businesses. Later in the sitting, private members' business was discussed, including Bill C-366, C-367, and C-368 concerning the Navigation Protection Act, and Bill S-228, the Child Health Protection Act, which aims to amend the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children. The debate concluded with the House adjourning.
This document outlines the procedural path of Bill S-228 through the House of Commons and the Senate, culminating in the Senate's consideration of House of Commons amendments.
This artifact details the procedural steps for Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children), as it moved through the House of Commons and then to the Senate. It shows the bill's progression through first reading, second reading, committee review, report stage, and third reading in the House of Commons. It also notes the bill's subsequent journey in the Senate, including the consideration of amendments made by the House of Commons. The artifact lists the dates of these stages and indicates when the bill was agreed to at second and third readings in the House of Commons.
Members of the House of Commons debated Bill C-24, a technical bill to formalize the government's one-tier ministry structure by adjusting ministerial positions and salaries, with significant debate from opposition parties questioning its necessity, cost, and impact on regional representation and gender equality.
During a House of Commons sitting on December 12, 2017, members debated Bill C-24, an act to amend the Salaries Act. The bill aimed to formalize the government's one-tier ministry structure by adding new ministerial positions and removing others. The debate focused on the appropriateness of equalizing ministerial salaries, the elimination of regional development minister positions, and the government's commitment to gender parity in cabinet. Opposition members raised concerns about the necessity of the bill, its cost, the potential for centralized power, and the government's handling of regional development and gender equality. Government members defended the bill as a technical update to reflect the current ministry structure, promote efficiency, and ensure all ministers have equal standing.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-228, members discussed the proposed prohibition of food and beverage marketing to children, with the sponsor highlighting health concerns and proposing amendments, while others debated the bill's effectiveness and potential impacts.
This artifact is a record of a debate at the second reading stage of Bill S-228 in the House of Commons on December 12, 2017. The debate focused on the bill's proposal to amend the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children. The sponsor of the bill, Mr. Doug Eyolfson, argued that the bill is necessary to protect children's health due to the prevalence of advertising for unhealthy foods and beverages, citing rising rates of childhood obesity and related health issues. He proposed amendments to change the definition of 'children' in the bill from under 17 to under 13, citing legal precedent, and to include a mandatory review of the legislation within five years. Other members of Parliament debated the bill, with some supporting the intent while raising concerns about the vagueness of definitions, potential unintended consequences for businesses, and the effectiveness of such legislation in reducing obesity, while others questioned the bill's necessity given existing practices.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-228, Members of Parliament discussed the proposed prohibition of food and beverage marketing directed at children, debating its effectiveness, potential legal challenges, and impact on various sectors.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on December 12, 2017, concerning Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children. The debate primarily focused on the proposed restrictions on advertising unhealthy foods and beverages to children. Members of Parliament from different parties discussed the bill's potential impact, the definition of "children" and "unhealthy food," the effectiveness of similar legislation in other jurisdictions, and concerns about unintended consequences for businesses and children's sports sponsorships. The overall discussion revolved around finding a balance between protecting children's health and respecting freedom of expression and economic realities.
On December 12, 2017, the House of Commons debated Bill S-228, an act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children, with members discussing its potential impact on obesity, business, and the need for clear definitions and evidence.
This artifact is a transcript of a debate in the House of Commons on December 12, 2017, concerning Bill S-228, an Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act to prohibit food and beverage marketing directed at children. The debate focused on the effectiveness of such restrictions in combating childhood obesity, the vagueness of the bill's definitions, potential unintended consequences for businesses, and concerns about the bill's scope and evidence base. Members also discussed amendments to the bill, including changing the age definition of children and the need for future reviews.
Members of the House of Commons debated Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act, focusing on proposed restrictions for marketing unhealthy food and beverages to children, including discussions on the age limit, definition of unhealthy foods, and potential economic and regulatory implications.
On February 12, 2018, the House of Commons debated Bill S-228, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children). The debate focused on the bill's proposed restrictions on marketing unhealthy food and beverages to children, with specific discussion around the age limit for these restrictions, the definition of unhealthy foods, and potential economic impacts on Canadian businesses. Concerns were also raised about the scope of Health Canada's regulatory power and potential inconsistencies in the bill's application, such as comparing it to the government's approach to marijuana and alcohol advertising.
The House of Commons sitting on February 14, 2018, included debates on various issues, oral question period, and the second reading and referral to committee of Bill S-228, the Child Health Protection Act.
This artifact is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on February 14, 2018. It details debates and proceedings, including statements by members, oral questions on various topics, private members' business, and government orders. Notably, it records the second reading of Bill S-228, the Child Health Protection Act, which was referred to committee.
This artifact documents the procedural progression of Bill S-228 through the House of Commons committee stage and subsequent amendment considerations with the Senate.
This record details the procedural steps for Bill S-228 in the House of Commons, specifically concerning its 'Consideration in committee' stage, which occurred on multiple dates in 2017 and 2018. This stage is part of the process where a bill is examined in detail by a parliamentary committee. The record also lists subsequent stages such as Report Stage and Third Reading in the House of Commons, and the process of considering amendments between the House of Commons and the Senate. The bill is currently at the stage of 'Consideration in the Senate of amendments made by the House of Commons'.
On May 1, 2018, the House of Commons debated an opposition motion demanding the release of uncensored documents on the cost of the federal carbon tax, with extensive discussion on transparency, economic impacts, and environmental policy.
This artifact is a record of a sitting in the House of Commons on May 1, 2018. It primarily contains debates related to an opposition motion concerning the "carbon tax cover-up," where the opposition sought to compel the government to release uncensored documents detailing the cost of the proposed federal carbon tax on Canadian families. The debate involved extensive discussion on the carbon tax, its economic and environmental impacts, the government's transparency regarding these costs, and comparisons to provincial approaches. The artifact also includes routine proceedings, statements by members on various topics, oral questions on government policy, and the beginning of private members' business and adjournment proceedings, but the core procedural event related to Bill S-228 is not explicitly detailed within this specific sitting record, which focuses on the carbon tax debate.
The House of Commons completed its Report stage for Bill S-228 on June 6, 2018, a procedural step where potential amendments are considered.
This artifact records the House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-228, which occurred on June 6, 2018, and was completed on that date. The report stage is a point in the legislative process where the House considers amendments that may have been proposed to a bill after it has been studied by a committee. Following this stage, the bill proceeded to third reading in the House of Commons.
During this House of Commons sitting, members debated and discussed various government and private members' bills, including legislation on impact assessments, budget implementation, and child health, alongside oral question period focused on trade, the economy, and environmental policies.
This House of Commons sitting on June 5, 2018, included routine proceedings such as the tabling of government responses to petitions and committee reports. It also featured debates on several government orders, including Bill C-69 concerning the impact assessment and Canadian energy regulator acts, and Bill C-74, the budget implementation act. Additionally, private members' business was addressed, with discussions on the Supporting New Parents Act and the Child Health Protection Act (Bill S-228). Oral questions covered international trade, natural resources, indigenous affairs, carbon pricing, taxation, and the economy, with significant debate surrounding the government's purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline and proposed environmental legislation.
The House of Commons sat on June 6, 2018, engaging in Question Period, debating and voting on several bills including Bill S-228, and discussing time allocation motions for other significant legislation.
This document is a record of a sitting of the House of Commons on June 6, 2018. The sitting included Question Period, where members of Parliament debated various government policies and bills with the Prime Minister. It also included the consideration of several private members' bills and government orders, with votes taken on some of these matters. Notably, Bill S-228 (Child Health Protection Act) was considered at report stage, and a motion concerning it was agreed to. The sitting also featured debates and votes on other bills, including time allocation motions for Bill C-69 (Impact Assessment Act) and Bill C-59 (National Security Act, 2017), and various points of order were raised by members.
This record outlines the House of Commons' completion of third reading for Bill S-228 and its subsequent consideration of Senate amendments, with the bill currently awaiting Senate action.
This artifact details the procedural history of Bill S-228 in the House of Commons, specifically focusing on its third reading stage. It indicates that the House of Commons completed its third reading of the bill on September 19, 2018, and subsequently sent a message to the Senate regarding its passage. The artifact also lists various dates when the House of Commons considered amendments sent from the Senate. The bill's status is currently 'At consideration in the Senate of amendments made by the House of Commons'.
On September 17, 2018, the House of Commons debated the Child Health Protection Act (Bill S-228), focusing on amendments to marketing restrictions for unhealthy foods aimed at children, with particular attention to the age definition and sports sponsorship exemptions.
On September 17, 2018, the House of Commons debated Bill S-228, the Child Health Protection Act. The bill aims to prohibit the marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children. The debate focused on proposed amendments, including changing the definition of a child from under 17 to under 13 for advertising restrictions to mitigate legal risks under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. A mandatory five-year review of the legislation was also discussed to assess its effectiveness and allow for potential broadening of restrictions. Concerns were raised by some members regarding the definition of "unhealthy" foods and the enforceability of the proposed regulations. The debate also included discussions on exempting children's sports sponsorships from the marketing prohibition. Following the debate, the motion to proceed to third reading was agreed to, with a deferred recorded division.
This House of Commons Hansard record from September 19, 2018, details a full day of parliamentary proceedings, including the third reading and passage of Bill S-228, debates on the Accessible Canada Act and Sikh Heritage Month Act, and oral question periods.
This artifact is a record of the House of Commons sitting on September 19, 2018. It details the proceedings of the day, including various statements by members, oral questions, routine proceedings, government orders, and private members' business. Of particular note, the House debated and passed Bill S-228, "An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (prohibiting food and beverage marketing directed at children)" at its third reading. The artifact also contains records of debates on Bill C-81, the "Accessible Canada Act," and Bill C-376, "Sikh Heritage Month Act," as well as adjournment proceedings on various topics.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Spadina—Fort York | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cowichan—Malahat—Langford | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Mill Woods | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Orléans | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Salaberry—Suroît | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margarets | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Lacolle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Burin—Trinity | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface—Saint Vital | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sackville—Preston—Chezzetcook | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | King—Vaughan | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lewvan | Co-operative Commonwealth Federation | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Coquitlam | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge Park | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Don Valley North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | La Prairie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Uxbridge | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Granville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Steveston—Richmond East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber River—Black Creek | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata—Carleton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Northumberland—Peterborough South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough—Kawartha | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montarville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville North—Burlington | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi—Grand Lake | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Burnaby | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Okanagan—West Kootenay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Ladysmith | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey—Newton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby North—Seymour | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Centre | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Lacombe | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Banff—Airdrie | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie—Mackenzie | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sturgeon River—Parkland | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Leamington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Mountain View | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Foothills | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Innisfil | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battle River—Crowfoot | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Grasswood | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley—Aldergrove | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Albert—Edmonton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Rocky Ridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brantford—Brant | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Midnapore | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Manning | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced