Bill S-230 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-230 proposed to amend the Criminal Code to authorize roadside drug screening devices and the collection of bodily fluid samples for drug-impaired driving investigations.
Bill S-230, also known as the Drug-Impaired Driving Detection Act, proposed to change the Criminal Code of Canada. It aimed to allow police officers to use approved screening devices to test for drugs in a driver's body at the roadside. If a driver failed this initial screening or showed signs of impairment, the bill would have allowed officers to demand samples of breath, oral fluid, urine, or blood for further testing to determine the concentration of drugs. This was intended to improve the investigation of drug-impaired driving.
- Amend the definition of "approved screening device" in the Criminal Code to include devices that can detect drugs in a person's body.
- Allow peace officers to demand that a person suspected of having consumed alcohol or drugs perform physical coordination tests and provide a breath or oral fluid sample for roadside screening.
- Allow peace officers or evaluating officers to demand samples of oral fluid, urine, or blood to test for the presence of drugs if impairment is suspected based on initial tests or evaluations.
- Specify that the Act would come into force six months after receiving royal assent.
- Drivers suspected of operating a vehicle while impaired by drugs or a combination of alcohol and drugs
- Peace officers (police officers)
- Individuals providing bodily fluid samples for testing
- Drivers would be obligated to comply with demands from peace officers to perform physical coordination tests.
- Drivers would be obligated to provide breath or oral fluid samples for approved screening devices.
- Drivers would be obligated to provide oral fluid, urine, or blood samples for further analysis if drug impairment is suspected.
- Peace officers would have the authority to demand such tests and samples under specific conditions.
- The bill was set to come into force six months after receiving royal assent.
- The specific "physical coordination tests" and the criteria for "approved screening devices" would be prescribed by regulation, and are not detailed in the bill text.
- The bill does not specify the penalties for failing to comply with demands or for operating a vehicle while impaired by drugs.
- The bill text does not indicate the specific drug concentrations that would constitute impairment.
The definition of "approved screening device" would be expanded to include devices for detecting drugs, not just alcohol. New provisions would be added to allow for roadside drug screening and the subsequent demand for bodily fluid samples (breath, oral fluid, urine, blood) if impairment is suspected. These changes would enhance the tools available to law enforcement for investigating drug-impaired driving.
Source: Section 2
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), completed first reading in the Senate on October 4, 2016, and was subsequently defeated at second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017.
This record indicates that Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving, completed its first reading in the Senate on October 4, 2016. The bill was later defeated at its second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017.
Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), was introduced in the Senate at its first reading stage on October 4, 2016.
On October 4, 2016, during the first reading stage in the Senate, Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug-impaired driving, was introduced. This artifact is a record of the Senate sitting, which included various other proceedings such as tabling reports, ongoing debates on other bills, and Question Period with the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship. The introduction of Bill S-230 was a procedural step and did not involve debate on its substance at this stage.
Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, underwent second reading in the Senate in October 2016 before ultimately being defeated at the second reading stage in the House of Commons in October 2017.
This record indicates that Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving, reached the second reading stage in the Senate on October 20, 2016, and again on October 26, 2016. It also shows that the bill was later defeated at the second reading stage in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017. The provided text does not detail the specific discussions or outcomes of the Senate second reading itself, only that it occurred.
During the Senate's second reading debate on October 20, 2016, senators discussed Bill S-230, which aimed to introduce new tools for detecting drug-impaired drivers, with the debate ultimately being adjourned.
On October 20, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-230, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving). The debate focused on the need for new tools to detect drug-impaired drivers, as current methods are primarily for alcohol. Senators discussed the dangers of drug-impaired driving, particularly among young people, and cited statistics showing a significant number of road fatalities linked to drug use. The bill proposed introducing approved screening devices, similar to those used in other countries, to allow police to better identify drug-impaired drivers. Support was expressed by police associations and victim advocacy groups. Concerns were raised about the accuracy and legal challenges of such devices, and the timeline for their implementation and the potential impact of drug legalization on impaired driving rates. The debate was adjourned, meaning the bill did not proceed to the next stage at this time.
During Senate proceedings on October 20, 2016, Bill S-230, aimed at addressing drug-impaired driving, was debated at the second reading stage, with the debate being adjourned.
On October 20, 2016, the Senate debated Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug-impaired driving. The debate focused on the need for better tools to detect drug-impaired drivers, the statistics surrounding drug-impaired driving incidents, and the potential impact of such legislation. While the sponsor of the bill argued for its necessity to address a growing problem, the debate was ultimately adjourned, meaning the bill did not proceed further at this stage. The artifact also includes other Senate proceedings such as statements, routine proceedings, questions, and debates on other bills.
On October 26, 2016, the Senate held a sitting that included statements, routine proceedings, question period, and ongoing debates on multiple bills, including Bill S-230 concerning drug-impaired driving.
This document records a Senate sitting on October 26, 2016. The sitting included Senators' Statements on various topics including the Republic of Turkey, the late Shirley Ryan, a book titled "A Tale of Two Countries," sugar consumption, and the late Bryan Pearson. Routine Proceedings saw the tabling of the Public Accounts of Canada for 2015-16 and a report from the Special Senate Committee on Senate Modernization. Question Period addressed international trade (CETA), children in immigration detention, judicial vacancies, and security of rail passengers. The sitting also included debate and proceedings on several bills, including the Citizenship Act, the Justice for Victims of Corrupt Foreign Officials Bill, the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), the Canada Prompt Payment Bill, and amendments to the Constitution Act, 1867. The record indicates that Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), was read a second time and referred to committee.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, senators discussed procedural challenges, constitutional questions about random testing, and the bill's incompatibility with a similar government-supported bill in the House of Commons.
This document is a record of a Senate debate on October 26, 2016, concerning Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving. The debate focused on the procedural and legal aspects of the bill. Senator George Baker raised concerns about the bill's constitutionality, particularly regarding random testing for drug impairment and its potential conflict with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He also highlighted that Bill S-230 would amend specific sections of the Criminal Code that were proposed to be removed or replaced by a different bill, Bill C-226, introduced in the House of Commons with government support. Senator Baker noted that Bill S-230 was less problematic in terms of rights than Bill C-226, but the two bills were incompatible, creating a procedural challenge. He suggested that the Senate, known for its thorough committee work, would need to address these issues.
Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code regarding drug-impaired driving, had its consideration in committee completed in the Senate on December 8, 2016, but was later defeated at second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017.
This record indicates that Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving, completed its 'Consideration in committee' stage in the Senate on December 8, 2016. However, the bill was ultimately defeated at its second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017.
During this Senate sitting, committee reports were presented, including one for Bill S-230 without amendment, and debates occurred on other legislative matters.
This document details a Senate sitting on December 8, 2016. Key procedural events included the presentation of committee reports on various bills and studies, including Bill S-230, which was reported back without amendment. The sitting also featured debates on other bills, including Bill C-29 (a budget implementation bill) and Bill C-6 (amendments to the Citizenship Act), as well as various notices of motion and inquiries. The sitting concluded with the adoption of a motion for adjournment.
Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code for drug-impaired driving, completed its Third Reading stage in the Senate but was subsequently defeated at Second Reading in the House of Commons.
This artifact marks the completion of the Senate Third Reading stage for Bill S-230, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving). However, the bill was later defeated at second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017. The provided text details the bill's progression through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including first reading, second reading, committee consideration, and third reading, along with dates and sitting numbers for these events.
During a Senate sitting on December 12, 2016, a debate took place at the third reading stage for Bill S-230 (drug-impaired driving), which was ultimately defeated, alongside other routine proceedings and the Royal Assent ceremony.
This Senate sitting on December 12, 2016, included routine proceedings, question period, and orders of the day. Notably, there was a debate on Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug-impaired driving. While the debate occurred, the bill's ultimate status at this stage (third reading) was that it was defeated. Other proceedings included the adoption of reports from committees, the introduction of new bills, and debates on various other matters before the Senate. The sitting also marked the Royal Assent ceremony for Bill C-13.
On December 13, 2016, the Senate held a sitting primarily to honour retiring Senator Wilfred P. Moore, alongside routine proceedings, question period, and ongoing debates on various bills, including Bill S-230 related to drug-impaired driving.
This document details a sitting of the Senate on December 13, 2016. The primary focus of the sitting was to pay tribute to Senator Wilfred P. Moore, who was retiring. Several senators delivered speeches acknowledging his career, contributions to Nova Scotia, and advocacy on various issues, including whale protection and the Arts. The sitting also included routine proceedings, question period on various topics such as softwood lumber negotiations and the Trudeau Foundation, and debates on several bills, including the Canada Pension Plan, Budget Implementation Bill, and the Tobacco Act. The debate record for Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, is also mentioned as continuing, with a motion in amendment being adopted.
On December 14, 2016, the Senate introduced new members, paid tribute to a retiring senator, debated various legislative matters including drug-impaired driving and journalistic source protection, and held Question Period with the Minister of Environment and Climate Change.
This document details a sitting of the Senate on December 14, 2016. The Senate heard the introduction of two new senators, Daniel Christmas and Rosa Galvez. There were also tributes paid to Senator Nancy Ruth, who was retiring. Several committee reports were presented, and notices of motions were given on various topics. A significant portion of the sitting involved Question Period, where the Minister of Environment and Climate Change answered questions on climate change initiatives, carbon pricing, and energy alternatives. The Senate also debated and amended Bill S-230, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), specifically concerning the requirement for blood samples. The debate on Bill S-230 was adjourned. Other bills discussed included Bill C-26 (Canada Pension Plan amendments), Bill S-215 (sentencing for violent offences against Aboriginal women), and Bill S-231 (protection of journalistic sources). The bill mentioned in the prompt, Bill S-230, ultimately had its third reading debate adjourned.
On December 15, 2016, the Senate held its third reading debate for Bill S-230 concerning drug-impaired driving, which resulted in the bill's defeat, and also engaged in other procedural activities including tabling reports, questioning ministers, and granting Royal Assent to other bills.
This document records a Senate sitting on December 15, 2016. The primary procedural event related to Bill S-230, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), was its third reading. However, the bill was defeated during this stage. The sitting also included Senator Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings where committee reports were tabled and bills were introduced, and Question Period where senators asked questions on a range of issues. The sitting concluded with Royal Assent being given to several bills, and debate on various other bills and committee reports.
Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving, completed its first reading in the House of Commons on February 9, 2017, but was ultimately defeated at second reading on October 25, 2017.
This record details the procedural stages of Bill S-230 in the House of Commons. The bill was introduced and went through first reading on February 9, 2017. It later reached second reading on April 4, 2017, with related speeches occurring in October 2017. Ultimately, the bill was defeated at second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017. The process also includes steps taken in the Senate.
Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, was formally introduced in the House of Commons at first reading on February 9, 2017.
On February 9, 2017, during the House of Commons sitting, Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug-impaired driving, was introduced at first reading. The introduction was part of the Routine Proceedings section of the sitting, and the record indicates that the motion to introduce the bill was deemed adopted, and the bill was read the first time and ordered printed. The debate on Bill S-230 itself is not detailed in this specific sitting record, as this artifact focuses on the procedural steps of introduction.
Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, was defeated at the second reading stage in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017.
This record indicates that Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug-impaired driving, did not proceed past second reading in the House of Commons. Specifically, the bill was defeated at this stage on October 25, 2017. The artifact lists various procedural steps the bill went through, including readings and committee considerations in both the Senate and the House of Commons, but concludes with its defeat at second reading in the House.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill S-230, members discussed the challenges of drug-impaired driving and the need for roadside screening devices, with the government stating its intention to introduce its own comprehensive legislation.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on April 4, 2017, concerning Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving). The debate focused on the need for roadside screening devices for drug-impaired driving, similar to those used for alcohol. Members from various parties discussed the current complex procedures for detecting drug impairment, the lack of readily available testing equipment, and the potential impact of marijuana legalization on drug-impaired driving incidents. While the bill aimed to address these issues, the government indicated it would introduce its own comprehensive legislation on the matter.
A Member of Parliament spoke in favour of Bill S-230, advocating for the implementation of roadside screening devices to combat drug-impaired driving, highlighting the inadequacy of current methods and the urgency due to potential marijuana legalization.
This record details a speech given by a Member of Parliament during the second reading debate of Bill S-230. The speech focused on the issue of drug-impaired driving and the need for roadside screening devices. The Member argued that current legislation is inadequate for detecting drug-impaired drivers, leading to fewer arrests compared to alcohol-impaired driving. They highlighted statistics showing the prevalence of drug-impaired driving and pointed to other countries that have implemented similar screening technologies. The speech also emphasized the urgency of addressing this issue in light of potential marijuana legalization.
During the second reading debate of Bill S-230, Members of Parliament discussed the need for roadside drug screening devices to combat drug-impaired driving, with some highlighting the challenges in current detection methods and the potential impact of marijuana legalization.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on April 4, 2017, concerning the second reading of Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving). The debate included various Members of Parliament discussing the bill's implications and the broader issue of drug-impaired driving.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill S-230, Members of Parliament discussed the challenges of drug-impaired driving, the need for roadside screening devices, and the implications of upcoming cannabis legalization.
This artifact is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on April 4, 2017, during the second reading stage of Bill S-230. The debate focused on amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving. Several Members of Parliament from different parties spoke, discussing the current challenges in detecting drug-impaired drivers due to the lack of roadside screening devices and comparing the situation to alcohol impairment. The upcoming legalization of cannabis was frequently mentioned as a factor increasing the urgency of this issue. The discussion also touched on the effectiveness of current laws, the complexity of the existing procedures for detecting drug impairment, and the need for better tools and training for law enforcement.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-46 concerning drug-impaired driving, Members discussed the bill's provisions to modernize impaired driving laws, with significant debate focusing on the effectiveness and constitutionality of new testing methods and the implications of cannabis legalization on road safety.
This document is a record of a debate in the House of Commons on October 24, 2017, regarding Bill C-46, which aimed to amend the Criminal Code concerning drug- and alcohol-impaired driving. The debate focused on the proposed changes to modernize and strengthen laws related to impaired driving, including new offenses for driving with prohibited blood drug concentrations and authorizing police to demand bodily substance samples for analysis. Several members raised concerns about the scientific validity of proposed drug testing methods, the potential for racial profiling with mandatory screening, the readiness of law enforcement for new technologies, and the link between these measures and the impending legalization of cannabis.
During a House of Commons sitting on October 25, 2017, following statements and routine proceedings, extensive debates occurred on transportation legislation and private members' bills, culminating in the defeat of Bill S-230 at second reading.
This record details a sitting of the House of Commons on October 25, 2017, where the main focus was Question Period. The sitting included statements by Members on various topics and routine proceedings, such as tabling reports and petitions. A significant portion of the sitting involved debate and votes on government bills related to transportation and private members' bills on subjects like the Supreme Court Act and the Excise Tax Act. The record also indicates that Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving, was debated but ultimately defeated at the second reading stage. The sitting concluded with adjournment proceedings on immigration, health, and infrastructure.
On October 25, 2017, the House of Commons debated various issues, including ethics and transportation, and Bill S-230, proposing amendments to the Criminal Code regarding drug-impaired driving, was defeated at second reading.
This artifact is a record of House of Commons debates that occurred on October 25, 2017. During this sitting, discussions covered various topics including ethical concerns related to the Minister of Finance, government spending, Indigenous affairs, trade, and transportation. Bill S-230, concerning drug-impaired driving amendments to the Criminal Code, was discussed and ultimately defeated at the second reading stage. The bulk of the debate focused on other matters, rather than Bill S-230 itself.
The 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-230 in the House of Commons was never reached because the bill was defeated at second reading.
This artifact describes the 'Consideration in committee' stage for Bill S-230 in the House of Commons. However, this stage was not reached because the bill was defeated at its second reading in the House of Commons on October 25, 2017. The provided text lists the dates when this stage was scheduled but ultimately not entered.
The Report stage for Bill S-230 in the House of Commons was not reached as the bill was defeated at its second reading.
This artifact describes the House of Commons Report stage for Bill S-230. However, the report stage was not reached because the bill was defeated at the second reading on October 25, 2017. The record shows the progression of the bill through various stages, including first reading, second reading debates and speeches, consideration in committee, and third reading in both the House of Commons and the Senate, prior to its defeat.
Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Criminal Code (drug-impaired driving), did not proceed to third reading in the House of Commons because it was defeated at the second reading stage.
The artifact indicates that Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Criminal Code related to drug-impaired driving, was not advanced to the third reading stage in the House of Commons. The bill was defeated at its second reading.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Salaberry—Suroît | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Lacombe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Banff—Airdrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Heritage | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie—Mackenzie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chatham-Kent—Leamington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Forest Lawn | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Mountain View | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Abbotsford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Regina—Lewvan | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Innisfil | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby South | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battle River—Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Grasswood | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley—Aldergrove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Albert—Edmonton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Rocky Ridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Burnaby | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brantford—Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Okanagan—West Kootenay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Outremont | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Shepard | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Orléans | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margarets | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Lacolle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface—Saint Vital | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | King—Vaughan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vimy | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Don Valley North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Nunavut | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Stouffville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Prairie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Québec | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Uxbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Vancouver Granville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Steveston—Richmond East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata—Carleton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Northumberland—Peterborough South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nickel Belt | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Markham—Thornhill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Peterborough—Kawartha | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic-Cartierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montarville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville North—Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi—Grand Lake | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil—Soulanges | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey—Newton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby North—Seymour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—Rothesay | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Bloc Québécois | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced