Bill S-210 explained in plain English
An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 44th Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
This is a transcript of Canadian Senate debates from November 30, 2021, recording Senators' discussions of multiple bills and motions on topics including Senate reform, women and gender equality, public works, criminal records, and healthcare equity.
This document is a record of Senate debates from November 30, 2021. It is not a single bill, but rather a parliamentary debate transcript containing discussions of multiple bills and motions. The transcript records Senators' statements and debate on several pieces of legislation, including Bill S-2 (which would change how non-partisan Senate groups receive funding and representation), Bill S-4 (which would amend the Parliament of Canada Act), Bill S-202 (which would amend the Parliament of Canada Act regarding a Parliamentary Visual Artist Laureate), Bill S-212 (regarding record suspension costs), Bill S-218 (which would amend the Department for Women and Gender Equality Act), and Bill S-222 (which would amend the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act regarding the use of wood). The document also records motions, such as one proposing anti-racism be adopted as a sixth pillar of the Canada Health Act, and Senators' Question Period remarks on various government matters.
- Members of the Senate of Canada, particularly non-partisan Senate groups seeking official recognition and leadership allowances
- People seeking record suspensions (formerly known as pardons) under the Criminal Records Act
- Government of Canada employees and departments responsible for public works, including those managing federal buildings
- Healthcare institutions and workers, particularly regarding systemic racism and equity
- Indigenous communities affected by resource extraction and development projects
- Canadian taxpayers who fund government operations
- Non-partisan Senate groups, if Bill S-2 passes, would receive official status and leadership allowances beginning July 1, 2022, with the largest such group receiving allowances equivalent to the opposition
- At least one senator from each recognized Senate group would have representation on parliamentary committees formed under the Emergencies Act, if Bill S-2 passes
- Individuals seeking record suspensions would be affected by changes to fees and processing procedures if Bill S-212 passes
- Federal government would be required to consider using wood in public works projects if Bill S-222 passes
- Healthcare system would be required to address anti-racism as a guiding principle if the Canada Health Act motion passes
- July 1, 2022 - Bill S-2 leadership allowances would commence
- December 31, 2022 - Deadline for Senate Committee study on cumulative impacts of resource extraction and development to submit its report
- November 20, 2021 - Senate chamber returned to full capacity with mask requirements at all times except for those with medical exemptions
- Bill S-2 would provide leadership allowances to non-partisan Senate groups beginning July 1, 2022, with the largest group receiving allowances equivalent to the opposition, and next two largest groups receiving approximately half of opposition allowances
- Record suspension fees have increased from $50 in 1995 to $657.77, creating financial barriers for individuals seeking suspensions
- The document is a debate transcript, not final legislative text, so specific amendments to each bill are not fully detailed
- Bill S-4 is referenced as a bill to amend the Parliament of Canada Act and related Acts, but specific amendments are not described in the debate excerpt
- The exact nature of amendments to the Department for Women and Gender Equality Act in Bill S-218 is not specified in the debate
- The specific provisions of Bill S-222 regarding wood use in government services are not detailed in the debate
- The motion to add anti-racism as a sixth pillar of the Canada Health Act is recorded as a motion but its status (passed, defeated, or pending) is not specified in the document
- The motion authorizing a Senate Committee study on resource extraction impacts was recorded as a motion, but its status is not specified
- Processing times and detailed impacts of Bill S-212 on record suspensions are mentioned but specific legislative changes are not fully detailed
- This draft was normalized from a partial local-model response and must be reviewed before publication.
Multiple bills discussed in the debate would amend this Act, including Bill S-4 and Bill S-202 (regarding Parliamentary Visual Artist Laureate)
Source: Senate Debates, November 30, 2021
Bill S-2 would amend this Act to ensure representation of at least one senator from each recognized Senate group on parliamentary committees formed under the Act
Source: Bill S-2 second reading debate
Bill S-212 would address record suspension costs and processing delays, as costs have increased from $50 in 1995 to $657.77 and wait times have doubled
Source: Bill S-212 second reading debate
Bill S-218 would amend this Act
Source: Senate Debates, November 30, 2021
Bill S-222 would amend this Act regarding the use of wood in government buildings and projects
Source: Senate Debates, November 30, 2021
A motion was raised proposing anti-racism be adopted as the sixth pillar of the Canada Health Act to address systemic discrimination in healthcare institutions
Source: Motion by Senator McCallum, Senate Debates, November 30, 2021
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-210, an act to restrict young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, had its first reading in the Senate on November 24, 2021, and has since proceeded through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons.
This artifact details the first reading of Bill S-210 in the Senate on November 24, 2021. This is a procedural step where a bill is formally introduced to the chamber. The bill's long title is "An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material." The artifact also notes the bill's current status as being at the report stage in the House of Commons and its latest activity there, which was being "deemed reported without amendment on Friday, June 7, 2024". It also lists subsequent procedural stages the bill has gone through in both the Senate and the House of Commons.
On November 24, 2021, the Senate held a sitting primarily to honor the late Senator Judith Keating, followed by the first reading of multiple bills, including Bill S-210 concerning online access to sexually explicit material for young persons, and a debate on hybrid sittings.
This artifact documents the proceedings of the Senate on November 24, 2021. The majority of the sitting was dedicated to tributes to the late Honourable Senator Judith Keating, who passed away on July 15, 2021. Senators from different parties shared personal reflections and professional achievements of Senator Keating, highlighting her dedication to public service, her work on legal and Indigenous reconciliation issues, and her role as a mentor. Following the tributes, the Senate proceeded with Routine Proceedings, which included a motion to extend the time for Routine Proceedings and the first reading of several bills. Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, was among the bills introduced at first reading. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of the debate on a motion to authorize hybrid sittings.
This artifact details the procedural progression of Bill S-210 through the Senate's second reading and subsequent stages, including its move to the House of Commons.
This record outlines the procedural steps for Bill S-210 in the Senate, specifically its second reading. It lists the dates of key events like the first reading, second reading, committee study, report stage, and third reading. It also notes that the bill later moved to the House of Commons for its first reading, second reading, and consideration by a committee, and was eventually deemed reported without amendment. Speeches by sponsors and respondents at the second reading stage in both the Senate and House of Commons are also noted.
On November 30, 2021, the Senate sat to discuss procedural guidelines, hear senators' statements on various issues, hold Question Period on economic and social matters, and debate second readings of several bills, including Bill S-210 concerning online access to explicit material for young persons.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on November 30, 2021. It includes procedural matters regarding how the Senate would operate with members attending virtually, statements by senators on various topics including Indigenous Veterans Day, National Child Day, and congratulations to Senator Rob Black, Question Period where senators asked questions on topics like inflation, flooding in B.C., firearms control, international aid, Canada-China relations, Afghan refugees, Arctic sovereignty, public accounts, and labour shortages, and discussions on various bills at the second reading stage. Notably, Bill S-210, concerning restricting young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, was debated at second reading, with Senator Miville-Dechêne introducing the revised bill. The sitting concluded with several debates adjourned.
Senator Miville-Dechêne presented Bill S-210 at second reading in the Senate, proposing to protect minors from online pornography by requiring age verification for commercial sites and imposing penalties on organizations that fail to comply, while acknowledging potential impacts on privacy and freedom of expression.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, Senator Miville-Dechêne introduced the bill. She explained that the bill aims to protect minors by restricting their online access to pornography, noting that many young people are exposed to it at an early age. The Senator highlighted concerns about the impact of pornography on the developing brain, citing research and expert testimony on issues such as unrealistic sexual expectations, anxiety, and distorted body image. The bill proposes to criminalize making sexually explicit material available to minors for commercial purposes, with a maximum fine for organizations on first offense. It explicitly excludes material with legitimate scientific, medical, educational, or artistic purposes. The Senator addressed potential concerns about censorship, privacy, and parental responsibility, arguing that the bill's proposed age verification measures, to be implemented by third-party providers, are necessary and feasible, and that self-regulation has failed. Other senators asked questions regarding the technology for age verification, the role of digital identity, the bill's inclusion in political platforms, the use of VPNs, and the bill's potential impact on unaffiliated senators.
During a Senate sitting on December 2, 2021, senators debated Bill S-210, presented committee reports, introduced new bills, and questioned the government on various issues, while also continuing debates on motions concerning international relations, constitutional language rights, climate change, suicide prevention, municipal governance, and the future of the RCMP.
This Senate sitting on December 2, 2021, included routine proceedings, question period, and the consideration of various bills and motions. Notably, the Senate continued the debate on Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material. Senators also presented reports from the Committee of Selection regarding committee memberships and the scheduling of hybrid meetings. Several bills were introduced or received first reading. During Question Period, senators raised issues concerning the Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments, greenhouse gas emissions, the Canada Disability Benefit, COVID-19 travel restrictions, employment equity at Correctional Service Canada, official bilingualism, rights of victims of criminal acts, Afghan refugees, and funding for equitable library access. The Senate also authorized the Standing Committee on National Finance to study Supplementary Estimates (B) and authorized committees to study the subject matter of Bill C-3 in advance. The sitting concluded with adjourned debates on motions concerning the International Conference on Viet-Nam, Section 55 of the Constitution Act, 1982, climate change, suicide prevention, the role of municipalities, and the RCMP.
The Senate sitting on December 7, 2021, featured candidate remarks for Speaker pro tempore, tributes, Question Period on diverse national issues, and debates on multiple bills, including those concerning conversion therapy, judges' conduct, autism, and online access to explicit material, with some bills passing and others being adjourned.
This document is a record of a Senate sitting on December 7, 2021. The sitting included remarks from candidates for the position of Speaker pro tempore, tributes to individuals, tabling of committee reports, Question Period on various topics including Huawei's 5G technology, the vacancy of the Ombudsman for Victims of Crime position, COVID-19 response, Sikh refugees, Canadian railways, support for farmers, Canada-China relations, Indigenous Community Support Fund, assistance for flood victims, and the Haiti International Commission of Inquiry. It also included debates on several bills: Bill S-2, concerning amendments to the Parliament of Canada Act, which was passed; Bill S-3, to amend the Judges Act, which was adjourned; Bill C-4, to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), which was passed; Bill S-203, concerning a federal framework on autism spectrum disorder, which was adjourned; Bill S-207, to change the name of the electoral district of Châteauguay—Lacolle, which was adjourned; Bill S-210, to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, which was adjourned; Bill S-213, to amend the Criminal Code (independence of the judiciary), which was adjourned; Bill S-217, respecting the repurposing of certain seized, frozen or sequestrated assets, which was adjourned; Bill S-223, to amend the Criminal Code and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (trafficking in human organs), which was adjourned; Bill S-230, to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, which was adjourned. The sitting also included a motion to invite ministers to participate in Question Period, which was adopted, and a debate on a motion to recognize climate change as an urgent crisis.
On December 8, 2021, the Senate debated and advanced several bills, including Bill S-210 concerning online access to explicit material for young persons and Bill S-211 on fighting forced labour, alongside discussions on various societal issues and government operations.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on December 8, 2021. The sitting included discussions on various topics such as food security, sex trafficking of youth, firearms control, and Canada's multiculturalism policy. Several bills were also discussed, including one to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy), one to amend the Parliament of Canada Act, one to establish a federal framework on autism spectrum disorder, and one to restrict young persons' online access to sexually explicit material (Bill S-210). The sitting also addressed the Statutes Repeal Act, which ensures that certain provisions of acts that have not come into force are not repealed. Additionally, there was debate on Bill S-211, concerning fighting forced labour and child labour in supply chains. The Senate also held Question Period, where senators asked the Government Representative questions on topics like Canada-China relations, veterans' affairs, shipping delays, and the opioid crisis.
On December 8, 2021, the Senate debated food security, sex trafficking, firearms control, and multiculturalism, advanced several bills, and engaged in Question Period on diverse governmental issues.
This artifact is a record of debate in the Senate on December 8, 2021. During this sitting, senators discussed various topics including food security, sex trafficking of youth, firearms control, and Canada's multiculturalism policy. Several bills were also advanced: Bill S-202, concerning a Parliamentary Visual Artist Laureate, passed third reading. Bill S-203, related to federal framework on autism, was referred to committee. Bill S-206, amending the Criminal Code regarding juror disclosure, passed third reading. Bill S-210, aimed at restricting young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, was referred to committee. Bill S-211, regarding the fighting of forced labour and child labour in supply chains, began second reading debate. The record also includes Question Period where senators questioned the Government Representative on various issues such as Canada-China relations, veterans' affairs, digital identity, Afghan refugees, the opioid crisis, fish harvester benefits, pandemic travel restrictions, and shipping delays.
This artifact details the Senate committee's consideration of Bill S-210, an Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, and its subsequent progression through parliamentary stages.
This record shows that Bill S-210, an Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, underwent consideration in a Senate committee. Several dates are listed for committee meetings related to this bill. The process details indicate that the bill was later deemed reported without amendment in the House of Commons on June 7, 2024, and is currently at the report stage there. It also notes the bill's progress through various stages in both the Senate and the House of Commons, including first reading, second reading, consideration in committee, report stage, and third reading, across different dates.
The Senate sat on November 15, 2022, hearing statements on various awareness days, tabling reports, debating amendments to Bill C-5, and beginning deliberations on several other bills and an inquiry related to climate change.
On November 15, 2022, the Senate convened. The sitting included statements on National Philanthropy Day, Financial Literacy Month, Diabetes Awareness Month, and Remembrance Day. Routine proceedings saw the tabling of various reports, including the Auditor General's Fall Reports and the Fall Economic Statement. Notably, the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee presented its Eighth Report on Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, with amendments. The Senate then engaged in Question Period, addressing topics like Canada-China relations, research funding, immigration, and pediatric health care. The Orders of the Day included continued debate on several bills, including a motion in amendment to Bill C-5 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act) which was debated and ultimately negatived. The Senate also began debate on Bill S-218 (An Act to amend the Department for Women and Gender Equality Act), Bill S-248 (An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)), Bill S-251 (An Act to repeal section 43 of the Criminal Code), and Bill S-253 (An Act respecting a national framework for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder). Finally, debate continued on an inquiry regarding solutions for a net-zero emissions future.
Bill S-210, aimed at restricting young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, has completed its Senate report stage and is now at the report stage in the House of Commons.
This record shows the parliamentary journey of Bill S-210 up to the Senate report stage. It details when the bill was introduced, debated, and considered in committee in the Senate. It also indicates that the bill was reported without amendment in the House of Commons on June 7, 2024, and is currently at the report stage in the House of Commons.
On November 29, 2022, the Senate introduced a new senator, paid tribute to a former senator, and debated various bills and inquiries, including Bill S-210 concerning online access to explicit material for young persons.
This Senate sitting on November 29, 2022, included the introduction of a new senator, Andrew Cardozo. Senators paid tribute to the late former senator Jean Lapointe. Several other matters were discussed, including the FIFA World Cup and migrant workers in Qatar, Canada's participation in COP 27, the International Day for the Abolition of Slavery, and support for science funding. Several bills were at various stages of debate, including Bill S-210, an act to restrict young persons' online access to sexually explicit material, which was at the report stage of consideration of the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee's eighth report. The sitting also included Question Period, where senators raised issues such as election integrity, illegal immigration, climate change, cryptocurrency regulation, alcohol excise tax, drug shortages, access to information requests, inflation, and Canada's Indo-Pacific Strategy.
The Senate adopted a committee report on Bill S-210, advancing the bill to third reading, and conducted other Senate business including the introduction of a new senator and Question Period.
On December 1, 2022, the Senate met and adopted the eighth report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs concerning Bill S-210, An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material. Following this adoption, the bill, as amended, was placed on the Orders of the Day for third reading at the next sitting. The Senate also welcomed a new senator, Margo Greenwood, and heard statements and participated in Question Period on various rural development issues.
The Senate completed its third reading of Bill S-210 on April 19, 2023, agreeing to the bill and advancing it to the House of Commons for report stage.
The Senate completed its third reading of Bill S-210 on April 19, 2023, agreeing to the bill (Vote 609). This procedural step marked the Senate's final review of the legislation before it proceeds to the House of Commons for report stage. The bill, which aims to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, had previously passed second reading in the House of Commons on November 23, 2023. The Senate's third reading was part of the bill's journey through the legislative process, with the next step being its report stage in the House of Commons. The official text confirms the Senate's completion of this stage but does not provide details on debates or amendments during the third reading.
On March 28, 2023, the Senate paid tribute to former Senator Landon Pearson, debated and adjourned debate on multiple bills, and discussed various government and foreign affairs issues.
This document is a record of a Senate sitting on March 28, 2023. The main focus was paying tribute to the late Honourable Landon Pearson, a former senator known as "the Children's Senator" for her advocacy for children's rights. Several senators shared personal memories and highlighted her extensive work and legacy in this area. The sitting also included routine proceedings such as tabling reports, first reading of a bill, and a motion regarding printing an address as an appendix. Question Period covered topics like Canada-China relations, the RCMP, international students, health research funding, and government contract disclosures. Several bills were debated at various stages, including those related to online news, appropriation bills, protecting young persons from online pornography, pension protection, health-centred approaches to substance use, criminal code amendments, and climate-aligned finance. The sitting concluded with adjourned debates on several inquiries and bills.
This dataset includes 63 Senate debate entries with HTML content discussing various policy topics, along with metadata about their format and source.
The provided data contains 63 debate entries from the Canadian Senate, each with HTML-formatted content. The entries include metadata such as URLs, text formats, and chamber information. The debates cover various topics, including environmental racism, tax evasion, and firefighter health. Each debate entry includes speaker names, speech content, and procedural context. The data does not include specific dates or full legislative outcomes, and the HTML content requires parsing to extract text.
Bill S-210's first reading in the House of Commons on May 17, 2023, was a formal procedural step to introduce the bill, with no debate or amendments at this stage.
Bill S-210, titled 'An Act to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material,' underwent its first reading in the House of Commons on Wednesday, May 17, 2023. This procedural step formally introduced the bill to the chamber and referred it to a committee for further review. No debate or amendments occurred during this stage. The bill was later reported without amendment on June 7, 2024, during the report stage in the House of Commons. The first reading is a routine procedural step that does not establish the bill's legal content or final outcome.
The debate on Bill C-21 centered on stricter gun control measures to address illegal firearms, with supporters emphasizing public safety and critics warning of overreach, while the Bloc raised concerns about sport shooting exemptions and regulatory independence.
The debate on Bill C-21, a firearms legislation bill, focused on balancing public safety with individual rights. Liberal and NDP members emphasized the need to target illegal firearms, citing statistics that 80% of firearms used in violent crimes are unregistered. They supported measures like banning certain firearms and expanding the advisory committee's role, while acknowledging concerns about legal gun owners. Conservatives criticized the bill as overreaching, arguing it unfairly targets law-abiding citizens and that past Liberal policies (e.g., C-68, C-5) failed. They called for more transparency and questioned the effectiveness of new measures. Bloc members highlighted sport shooting exemptions, stressing the importance of preserving recreational firearms use and criticizing the advisory committee's potential politicization. The debate underscored tensions between regulatory control, legal rights, and the effectiveness of past legislation, with no consensus on the bill's final impact.
Bill S-210 completed its second reading in the House of Commons on December 13, 2023, advancing to the report stage without amendments, following speeches and debates from multiple parliamentary parties.
Bill S-210, which aims to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, reached the second reading stage in the House of Commons on December 13, 2023. This stage involved procedural debate and speeches from various parliamentary parties, including Conservative, Liberal, Bloc Québécois, and NDP members. The bill was subsequently referred to a committee for further consideration. The second reading was completed without amendments, and the bill progressed to the report stage in the House of Commons. This stage does not alter the law directly but marks a procedural step in the legislative process.
The Affordable Housing and Groceries Act (Bill C-56) was debated in the House of Commons, with focus on reducing costs for low-income Canadians through GST exemptions for rental housing, addressing housing affordability crises, and criticizing government delays in housing projects.
The Affordable Housing and Groceries Act (Bill C-56) was debated in the House of Commons, focusing on measures to reduce costs for low-income Canadians. Key provisions include removing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on materials for rental housing construction, with specific rent thresholds mentioned (e.g., $1,200/month in Toronto, $900 in Vancouver). Critics, including NDP MP Rachel Blaney, highlighted the financial strain on seniors and low-income individuals facing rent increases, while also criticizing the government for delays in housing projects that could take up to seven years to complete. The debate also addressed the exclusion of disability benefits from the fall economic statement, with Bonita Zarrillo emphasizing the impact on women and Indigenous communities. Concerns about housing affordability were tied to broader systemic issues, including the role of real estate trusts and the 15:1 ratio of affordable units lost to market-rate housing. Indigenous leaders like Lori Idlout from Nunavut linked the bill to infrastructure gaps affecting First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities. The discussion underscored the need for immediate action on affordability, disability support, and long-term housing solutions.
The debate on Bill C-56 centered on addressing housing and grocery affordability, with MPs highlighting impacts on low-income families, Indigenous communities, and the need for immediate government action, while critics questioned the bill's scope and effectiveness.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill C-56 (the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act), members discussed measures to address rising housing costs and grocery prices. Rachel Blaney (NDP) highlighted the impact on low-income families, noting that rent increases have outpaced income growth, with some households spending over 30% of their income on housing. She cited a 15:1 ratio of affordable housing loss in certain regions. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) emphasized the need for immediate action, referencing the Canada disability benefit not being included in the fall economic statement. Lori Idlout (NDP) focused on Indigenous communities, noting a $350 billion infrastructure gap for First Nations housing. Critics, including Conservative members, questioned the bill's scope, with John Vanthof (Conservative) arguing it lacks concrete measures to address affordability. The debate underscored concerns about vulnerable populations, including seniors and Indigenous communities, and the urgency of implementing support mechanisms. No formal vote or legislative outcome was recorded in this stage.
The debate on Bill C-56 centered on addressing housing and grocery affordability, with MPs highlighting impacts on low-income families, Indigenous communities, and the need for immediate government action, while critics questioned the bill's scope and effectiveness.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill C-56 (the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act), members discussed measures to address rising housing costs and grocery prices. Rachel Blaney (NDP) highlighted the impact on low-income families, noting that rent increases have outpaced income growth, with some households spending over 30% of their income on housing. She cited a 15:1 ratio of affordable housing loss in certain regions. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) emphasized the need for immediate action, referencing the Canada disability benefit not being included in the fall economic statement. Lori Idlout (NDP) focused on Indigenous communities, noting a $350 billion infrastructure gap for First Nations housing. Critics, including Conservative members, questioned the bill's scope, with John Vanthof (Conservative) arguing it lacks concrete measures to address affordability. The debate underscored concerns about vulnerable populations, including seniors and Indigenous communities, and the urgency of implementing support mechanisms. No formal vote or legislative outcome was recorded in this stage.
The debate on Bill C-56 centered on addressing housing and grocery affordability, with MPs highlighting impacts on low-income families, Indigenous communities, and the need for immediate government action, while critics questioned the bill's scope and effectiveness.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill C-56 (the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act), members discussed measures to address rising housing costs and grocery prices. Rachel Blaney (NDP) highlighted the impact on low-income families, noting that rent increases have outpaced income growth, with some households spending over 30% of their income on housing. She cited a 15:1 ratio of affordable housing loss in certain regions. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) emphasized the need for immediate action, referencing the Canada disability benefit not being included in the fall economic statement. Lori Idlout (NDP) focused on Indigenous communities, noting a $350 billion infrastructure gap for First Nations housing. Critics, including Conservative members, questioned the bill's scope, with John Vanthof (Conservative) arguing it lacks concrete measures to address affordability. The debate underscored concerns about vulnerable populations, including seniors and Indigenous communities, and the urgency of implementing support mechanisms. No formal vote or legislative outcome was recorded in this stage.
The debate on Bill C-56 centered on addressing housing and grocery affordability, with MPs highlighting impacts on low-income families, Indigenous communities, and the need for immediate government action, while critics questioned the bill's scope and effectiveness.
During the House of Commons debate on Bill C-56 (the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act), members discussed measures to address rising housing costs and grocery prices. Rachel Blaney (NDP) highlighted the impact on low-income families, noting that rent increases have outpaced income growth, with some households spending over 30% of their income on housing. She cited a 15:1 ratio of affordable housing loss in certain regions. Bonita Zarrillo (NDP) emphasized the need for immediate action, referencing the Canada disability benefit not being included in the fall economic statement. Lori Idlout (NDP) focused on Indigenous communities, noting a $350 billion infrastructure gap for First Nations housing. Critics, including Conservative members, questioned the bill's scope, with John Vanthof (Conservative) arguing it lacks concrete measures to address affordability. The debate underscored concerns about vulnerable populations, including seniors and Indigenous communities, and the urgency of implementing support mechanisms. No formal vote or legislative outcome was recorded in this stage.
The debate underscored persistent systemic challenges facing Indigenous communities, including historical trauma, delayed legislative action, and current disparities in health, housing, and water access, with calls for meaningful reconciliation and accountability.
The debate focused on systemic issues affecting Indigenous communities in Canada, with speakers highlighting historical injustices such as the Indian Act and residential schools, which have had lasting impacts on health, education, and housing. Concerns were raised about delayed legislative action on bills like C-29, C-38, and C-53, with critics arguing these measures lack genuine commitment. Current challenges included clean water advisories, tuberculosis deaths in Nunavut, and disparities in government funding for Indigenous housing. Speakers emphasized the need for accountability, reconciliation, and immediate policy changes to address ongoing systemic inequities.
The text contains a parliamentary debate on bills affecting Indigenous communities and environmental policies, alongside a satirical poem comparing political parties to Christmas traditions.
The text includes a parliamentary debate transcript discussing bills related to Indigenous services and environmental policies. Key topics include Bill C-234 (Farmers and Greenhouse Gas Emissions) and Bill C-61 (First Nations Water Infrastructure). There is also a satirical poem at the end comparing political parties to Christmas traditions. The debate focuses on policy implications, not legal effects, and includes procedural discussions about bill amendments and committee references.
Bill S-210 was reported without amendment at the House of Commons report stage on June 7, 2024, after undergoing committee review and prior legislative stages.
Bill S-210, which aims to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material, was at the report stage in the House of Commons as of June 7, 2024. During this stage, the bill was deemed reported without amendment, meaning no changes were made to the bill’s text. The consideration in committee phase, which involved reviewing the bill’s details, occurred between February and November 2022. The report stage followed in November 2022 and December 2022, leading to its advancement without modifications. This stage is part of the legislative process but does not alter the law itself. The bill’s current status is pending further stages in the House of Commons.
The debate on Bill C-323 focused on exempting mental health services from GST to improve affordability, with support from the NDP and concerns about implementation and funding from other members.
During the debate on Bill C-323, members of the House of Commons discussed the proposed exemption of mental health services from the Goods and Services Tax (GST). The bill aims to reduce financial barriers for individuals accessing mental health care by removing the 5% GST applied to these services. Key points included: 1. Support for the bill: The New Democratic Party (NDP) and other members emphasized the importance of making mental health care more affordable, particularly for low-income individuals. They highlighted the need for parity between mental and physical health services, as mental health care is often underfunded compared to physical health services. 2. Concerns about implementation: Some members, including from the Bloc Québécois (BQ), raised questions about how the exemption would be administered. They noted that mental health services are provided by a wide range of professionals (e.g., psychologists, social workers, counselors) and expressed concerns about ensuring the exemption applies consistently across all providers. 3. Funding and accessibility: Several speakers called for increased federal funding to support mental health services, arguing that the GST exemption alone would not address systemic underfunding. They also mentioned the need to improve access to services, particularly in rural and Indigenous communities. 4. Mention of specific programs: The debate referenced the 988 suicide hotline and the importance of expanding mental health resources to reduce stigma and improve outcomes. The official text of the debate is available at: https://www.ourcommons.ca/committees/data/44-1/44-1011/44-1011-0001-e.html
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Prairie | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Jean | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cowichan—Malahat—Langford | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Qu'Appelle | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | King—Vaughan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Lacombe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Banff—Airdrie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Coquitlam | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Timmins—James Bay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Nova | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie—Mackenzie | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Salaberry—Suroît | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battle River—Crowfoot | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Sturgeon River—Parkland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Chatham-Kent—Leamington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer—Mountain View | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Abbotsford | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Louis | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby South | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi—Grand Lake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Forest Lawn | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cypress Hills—Grasslands | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Foothills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Innisfil | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Brunswick Southwest | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—Middlesex—London | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Spadina—Fort York | Independent | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—Grasswood | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brantford—Brant | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lambton—Kent—Middlesex | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Ladysmith | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nunavut | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Manicouagan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Okanagan—Shuswap | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Albert—Edmonton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough—Kawartha | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Nose Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill—Keewatinook Aski | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Steveston—Richmond East | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Rocky Ridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Burnaby | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil—Soulanges | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northumberland—Peterborough South | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Okanagan—West Kootenay | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margarets | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kootenay—Columbia | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Simcoe | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Heritage | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montarville | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Midnapore | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley—Aldergrove | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Mill Woods | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Shepard | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna—Lake Country | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lewvan | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Manning | Conservative | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Milton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vimy | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Lacolle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | University—Rosedale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bonavista—Burin—Trinity | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint Boniface—Saint Vital | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Glengarry—Prescott—Russell | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Rouge Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Skyview | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Don Valley North | Independent | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Vancouver South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Markham—Stouffville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Victoria | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Québec | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata—Carleton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Uxbridge | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Markham—Thornhill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Ahuntsic-Cartierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville North—Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London North Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's South—Mount Pearl | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey—Newton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Granville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby North—Seymour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—Rothesay | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent | Conservative | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. |
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced