Bill S-202 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (repeal of fixed election dates)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
This bill would repeal the provisions in the Canada Elections Act that set fixed dates for federal general elections.
Bill S-202 proposes to remove the fixed election dates from the Canada Elections Act. Currently, federal general elections are set to occur on the third Monday in October of the fourth calendar year after the previous election. This bill would repeal those provisions, meaning election timing would revert to the Governor General's discretion, as it was before fixed dates were introduced.
- Removes the current requirement for federal general elections to be held on a fixed date.
- Repeals the sections of the Canada Elections Act that establish a fixed election date.
- Reverts the timing of federal general elections to be at the discretion of the Governor General.
- Modifies how polling days are determined, particularly when they fall on a Monday.
- Federal political parties
- Electoral officers
- The Governor General
- Members of Parliament
- Canadian voters
- The current right to have a federal election occur on a fixed date would be removed.
- The power of the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and set election dates would be restored.
- Rules for calculating election timelines if the polling day is a Tuesday are retained and adjusted.
- The bill repeals the provision that set the first fixed election date as Monday, October 19, 2009.
- The bill does not specify a new framework for determining election timing, returning this to the discretion of the Governor General.
- The precise circumstances or considerations the Governor General will use to set election dates are not detailed in the bill.
Removes the provisions that mandate fixed dates for general elections and modifies rules related to polling day calculations when elections fall on a Monday or Tuesday.
Source: Sections 1, 2, and 3 of Bill S-202
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-202, concerning the repeal of fixed election dates, completed its first reading in the Senate on January 27, 2009, and began its second reading on January 29, 2009, with subsequent debate occurring over several months.
This record shows the procedural steps for Bill S-202 in the Senate. The bill had its first reading on January 27, 2009, and its second reading on January 29, 2009. The record also indicates that debate at second reading occurred on various dates, with the latest being November 5, 2009. The bill's sponsor gave a speech on January 29, 2009, and another senator responded on the same day.
During a Senate sitting on January 27, 2009, Bill S-202, concerning the repeal of fixed election dates in the Canada Elections Act, was introduced and received first reading.
This document is a record of a Senate sitting on January 27, 2009. During this sitting, several bills were introduced and received first reading, including Bill S-202, which aims to amend the Canada Elections Act by repealing fixed election dates. The Senate also heard statements on various topics, including the inauguration of U.S. President Barack Obama and the 40th anniversary of the Official Languages Act. Additionally, notices of motions were given regarding committee studies and changes to Senate sitting times, and a debate on the Speech from the Throne was adjourned.
As of November 5, 2009, Bill S-202 was undergoing debate at the second reading stage in the Senate, a procedural step for discussing the bill's core ideas.
This artifact describes the procedural status of Bill S-202 in the Senate as of November 5, 2009. The bill was at the second reading stage, meaning senators were debating its general principles. The record indicates that debate occurred on this date, following earlier readings and major speeches. The stage was not yet completed.
In the Senate, debate began on Bill S-202, which aims to repeal fixed election date legislation, with proponents arguing the existing law is ineffective and a "facade."
On January 29, 2009, the Senate proceeded with second reading debate on Bill S-202, an act to amend the Canada Elections Act to repeal fixed election dates. Senator Lowell Murray moved the second reading of the bill, arguing that the previous legislation establishing fixed election dates was ineffective and a "facade" because it did not prevent the Prime Minister from advising the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and call an election earlier than the fixed date. He cited the Prime Minister's decision to call an election in 2008, which was 12 months earlier than the date supposedly set by law, as evidence of the law's ineffectiveness. Senator Murray argued that the previous law, Bill C-16, was a "nullity" and an "embarrassment" and should be repealed. Senator Joan Fraser spoke in favour of the bill, agreeing that the previous legislation was hypocritical and ineffective. Senator Eggleton raised concerns about the Employment Insurance Act, and Senator Brazeau spoke about Aboriginal affairs. Other senators discussed the federal budget, the visit of the U.S. President, pay equity, recognition of foreign credentials, securities regulation, and matters related to Senate procedure and the Constitution. The debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned.
During the Senate's second reading debate, Senator Murray argued for the repeal of fixed election dates, stating the existing law was ineffective and had been bypassed, leading to the adjournment of the debate.
This record details a debate in the Senate on January 29, 2009, concerning Bill S-202, which aims to repeal fixed election dates. Senator Lowell Murray sponsored the bill, arguing that the previous law establishing fixed election dates (Bill C-16) was ineffective and a "nullity" because it did not prevent the Prime Minister from advising the Governor General to dissolve Parliament at an earlier date. He cited the recent election called in 2008 as evidence. The debate also touched on the process of passing legislation, the role of the Senate in scrutinizing bills from the House of Commons, and the historical context of election laws. The debate was adjourned, meaning it was not concluded on this day.
During a Senate sitting on March 10, 2009, debate on Bill S-202 concerning the repeal of fixed election dates continued but was adjourned.
On March 10, 2009, the Senate convened for a sitting that included tributes, statements by senators on various topics, routine proceedings, question period, and the consideration of various "Orders of the Day." The primary procedural focus related to Bill S-202, "An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (repeal of fixed election dates)" was the continuation of debate at the second reading stage. The debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned. Other notable procedural activities included the tabling of committee reports, the first reading of several bills, and ongoing debates on other legislative items. Question period saw discussions on topics such as pay equity, violence against Aboriginal women, and the social and corporate responsibility of Canadian companies abroad.
In the Senate on April 23, 2009, debate on Bill S-202, which proposes to repeal fixed election dates, continued with a Senator arguing against its passage, while others raised procedural questions.
On April 23, 2009, the Senate continued its second reading debate on Bill S-202, an act to repeal fixed election dates in Canada. Senator Consiglio Di Nino spoke against the bill, arguing that fixed election dates, as established by Bill C-16 in 2007, were beneficial for the democratic system. He highlighted that Bill C-16 preserved the Governor General's power to dissolve Parliament, respecting constitutional traditions and responsible government, and allowed for elections in situations of national importance or parliamentary deadlock. He stated that Bill S-202 would revert to a system of unchecked prime ministerial discretion over election timing. The debate continued with Senator Jane Cordy raising a point about a potential election date in October 2009 due to a lack of a transition clause in the current legislation, and Senator Lowell Murray also wished to speak. The debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned.
In a Senate debate on Bill S-202, Senator Di Nino argued against repealing fixed election dates, emphasizing the importance of flexibility for responsible government and democratic recourse, while Senator Cordy raised concerns about the bill's transitional provisions.
This Senate debate from April 23, 2009, primarily concerns Bill S-202, which aims to repeal fixed election dates in Canada. Senator Consiglio Di Nino argued against the bill, stating that the previous legislation (Bill C-16) established a balanced "made-in-Canada" approach to fixed election dates that respected Canada's parliamentary system by retaining the Governor General's power to dissolve Parliament. He emphasized that this flexibility was crucial for responsible government and allowing elections in cases of national importance or parliamentary deadlock. Senator Di Nino also highlighted the practical benefits of fixed election dates, such as promoting impartiality among political parties and improving election administration. Senator Jane Cordy raised a point of concern regarding the lack of a transition clause in Bill S-202, which could lead to confusion about when the next election would be held. The debate also touched upon other legislative matters, including bills related to the Customs Act, the Indian Oil and Gas Act, the Patent Act, and reports from various Senate committees.
On June 16, 2009, the Senate sat and conducted various procedural business, including tributes, tabling of documents, question period, and debates on multiple other bills and committee reports, with Bill S-202 listed for second reading debate but not debated in this specific record.
This document is a record of a Senate sitting on June 16, 2009. While the bill "An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (repeal of fixed election dates)" is listed on the Senate's Orders of the Day for second reading debate, this specific sitting record does not contain the debate for Bill S-202. Instead, it details numerous other proceedings including tributes, tabling of reports, questions and answers, and debates on various other bills and committee reports. The sitting included a silent tribute to Corporal Martin Dubé, statements on various topics like World Elder Abuse Awareness Day and Senate Reform, tabling of draft referendum regulations and RCMP reports, committee reports on workplace harassment and the Parliamentary Budget Officer, and motions to authorize committees to meet. Question Period covered topics such as economic stimulus, Aboriginal schools funding, H1N1 virus, linguistic duality, and the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Orders of the Day listed several bills at various stages, including debates on amendments to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act, the Environmental Enforcement Act, the Criminal Code, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Canada Elections Act, and the National Capital Act.
During a Senate sitting on September 16, 2009, the chamber appointed a new Clerk, continued debates on several bills including Bill S-202 (repeal of fixed election dates), and addressed various other parliamentary and societal matters.
On September 16, 2009, the Senate convened for a sitting that included routine proceedings, question period, and the continuation of debates on several bills. A significant portion of the sitting was dedicated to the appointment of Dr. Gary William O’Brien as the new Clerk of the Senate and Clerk of the Parliaments, and to honouring the service of the outgoing Clerk, Paul C. Bélisle. Senators also spoke on various matters during "Senators' Statements," including the Alzheimer Society's "Coffee Break" fundraising event, the Economic Action Plan for Yukon, tributes to retiring senators, the treatment of Canadian citizens abroad, and cultural exchanges. During "Orders of the Day," debate continued on Bill C-6 (Canada Consumer Product Safety Act), Bill C-32 (Tobacco Act), Bill S-201 (Library and Archives of Canada Act - National Portrait Gallery), Bill S-202 (Canada Elections Act - repeal of fixed election dates), Bill S-230 (Bank of Canada Act - credit rating agency), and Bill S-234 (Canada Pension Plan - retroactivity of pensions). The debate on Bill S-202, concerning the repeal of fixed election dates, was adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on November 5, 2009, the debate on Bill S-202, concerning the repeal of fixed election dates, continued at the second reading stage but was adjourned without completion.
On November 5, 2009, the Senate of Canada was in session. During the sitting, the Senate proceeded with "Orders of the Day," which is a part of the parliamentary process where specific items of business are addressed. One of these items was the continuation of the debate on Bill S-202, "An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (repeal of fixed election dates)," at the second reading stage. The debate on this specific bill was adjourned to a later date. The sitting also included other proceedings such as Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, Question Period, and debates on other bills and inquiries. The record indicates that the debate on Bill S-202 was not completed during this sitting.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced