Bill S-224 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act (vacancies)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-224 establishes time limits for filling parliamentary vacancies: 120 days for the Prime Minister to recommend Senate appointees, and 60 days for by-election writs in the House of Commons with voting within 60 days of the writ.
Bill S-224 amends the rules for how quickly parliament fills empty seats when members leave, die, or resign. For the Senate: The Prime Minister must recommend a qualified person to the Governor General to fill a Senate vacancy within 120 days after the vacancy occurs. This applies to any vacancy that exists when the bill becomes law. For the House of Commons: When a House seat becomes empty and a by-election is needed, the Chief Electoral Officer must issue a by-election writ (official notice) between the 11th and 60th day after receiving the warrant to hold the election. The voting date must be at least 36 days but no more than 60 days after the writ is issued. If multiple vacancies occur at the same time, by-elections are called in the order the Chief Electoral Officer receives the warrants. For general elections (not by-elections), the voting date must still be at least 36 days after the writ is issued, with no upper time limit.
- Requires the Prime Minister to recommend a qualified person for Senate appointment within 120 days of a vacancy
- Establishes a 60-day time limit (between days 11 and 60) for issuing a by-election writ in the House of Commons after the Chief Electoral Officer receives the warrant
- Sets the voting date for by-elections at least 36 days but not more than 60 days after the writ is issued
- Maintains the requirement that general election voting dates be at least 36 days after writ issuance
- Specifies that when multiple House of Commons vacancies occur, by-election writs are issued in the order the Chief Electoral Officer receives the official warrants
- Applies the 120-day Senate vacancy rule to any vacancies existing at the time the bill receives royal assent
- The Prime Minister (required to recommend Senate appointees within a set timeframe)
- The Governor General (receives Senate appointment recommendations)
- The Chief Electoral Officer (responsible for managing the timeline and order of by-election writs)
- Voters in electoral districts with House of Commons vacancies (by-elections must be held within defined time limits)
- Members of Parliament and Senators (vacancies in their positions are governed by these rules)
- The Prime Minister is obligated to recommend a qualified Senate appointee to the Governor General within 120 days of any Senate vacancy
- The Chief Electoral Officer must issue a by-election writ between days 11 and 60 after receiving the warrant
- The Chief Electoral Officer must issue writs in the order warrants are received when multiple vacancies occur
- Voting in a by-election must occur between 36 and 60 days after the writ is issued
- The bill was first read in the Senate on February 5, 2009
- 120 days is the deadline for the Prime Minister to recommend a Senate appointee after a vacancy occurs
- For House of Commons by-elections, writs must be issued between day 11 and day 60 after the Chief Electoral Officer receives the warrant
- Voting in by-elections must occur between day 36 and day 60 after writ issuance
- The bill text does not specify what happens if the Prime Minister does not recommend a Senate appointee within the 120-day deadline or what consequences may apply
- The bill does not define what qualifies as 'fit and qualified' for Senate appointment
- The bill does not address vacancies in the Senate caused by reasons other than death or resignation
- The explanatory notes indicate this bill was from 2009; the current status and whether it has been passed into law are not provided in the source material
- No enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or remedies are specified in the bill text for failure to meet the stated timelines
Voting dates for by-elections are now required to be between 36 and 60 days after the writ is issued, creating an upper limit where none existed before
Source: Clause 1, replacing paragraph 57(1.2)(c)
New section 13.1 requires the Prime Minister to recommend a Senate appointee within 120 days of a vacancy; Subsection 29(2) adds a 60-day time limit for issuing writs after a vacancy; Subsection 31(1) tightens the by-election writ issuance window from 11–180 days to 11–60 days; New subsection 31(1.1) establishes the order of by-election calls when multiple vacancies occur
Source: Clauses 2, 3, and 4
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-224, concerning vacancies, completed its first reading in the Senate on February 5, 2009, proceeded to second reading and committee referral thereafter.
This record outlines the procedural steps for Bill S-224 in the Senate. It indicates that the bill had its first reading on February 5, 2009. Later, on February 10, 2009, it proceeded to second reading, with speeches from Senator Wilfred P. Moore and Senator Hugh Segal. The bill was then referred to a Senate committee on May 14, 2009, and is currently at the consideration in committee stage.
In a Senate sitting on February 5, 2009, Bill S-224 received first reading, and senators also paid tribute to retiring Senator Marilyn Trenholme Counsell.
This artifact details a Senate sitting on February 5, 2009, where Bill S-224, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act (vacancies), was introduced and received first reading. The sitting also included routine proceedings, question period regarding Arctic patrol ships and Budget 2009, and debates on other bills. A significant portion of the sitting was dedicated to tributes for retiring Senator Marilyn Trenholme Counsell, acknowledging her extensive career and contributions.
Bill S-224, concerning vacancies in Parliament, completed its second reading in the Senate and was then referred to a committee.
This record shows the procedural steps for Bill S-224 in the Senate. The bill completed its second reading stage on February 10, 2009. Following this, major speeches related to the bill were presented on March 10, May 12, and May 14, 2009. On May 14, 2009, the bill was referred to a Senate committee for further consideration. The bill is currently at the committee stage.
On February 10, 2009, the Senate debated several matters, including Bill S-224 concerning parliamentary vacancies, alongside other routine proceedings, question period, and tributes to Senator Marcel Prud'homme.
This artifact is a record of proceedings in the Senate on February 10, 2009. The primary purpose of this sitting was to discuss Bill S-224, an act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act concerning vacancies. The debate on Bill S-224 was adjourned. The sitting also included other routine proceedings, question period discussions on various topics like the economy, job losses, and foreign affairs, and debates on other bills and inquiries. A significant portion of the sitting was dedicated to congratulating Senator Marcel Prud'homme on his 45th anniversary in Parliament.
In the Senate, Bill S-224, aiming to limit the Prime Minister's discretion in filling parliamentary vacancies, was presented and debated at second reading, with further debate adjourned.
On February 10, 2009, the Senate debated Bill S-224, an Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act concerning vacancies. Senator Wilfred P. Moore presented the bill, explaining that it aims to limit the Prime Minister's discretion in filling Senate and House of Commons vacancies by establishing timeframes for issuing writs of election and holding by-elections. He argued this is necessary to ensure timely representation for citizens and provinces, and to protect the independence of the legislative branch from executive influence. The debate included discussions on past practices regarding vacancies, the role of the Prime Minister's office, and potential challenges with the bill's enforceability and timing in relation to general elections. The bill was adjourned for further debate.
During a Senate sitting on March 10, 2009, the second reading debate on Bill S-224, concerning election act and Parliament act amendments regarding vacancies, was suspended and resumed, featuring a debate on its constitutional implications and a proposed referral to committee for further study before the debate was adjourned.
On March 10, 2009, the Senate convened for a sitting that included various procedural activities and debates. The second reading debate for Bill S-224, "An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act (vacancies)," was suspended and later resumed. During the resumed debate, Senator Hugh Segal raised concerns about the bill's potential constitutional implications and its impact on the parliamentary system, suggesting it might be an "unwitting reform of the Constitution by the back door" and a "creeping Americanization" of Canadian governance. He proposed referring the bill's subject matter to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs for further study. This motion in amendment was debated, with senators discussing the constitutionality of the bill and the role of ministerial opinion. The debate on Bill S-224, including Senator Segal's motion in amendment, was ultimately adjourned.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-224, senators discussed the constitutional propriety of legislating the Prime Minister's advice to the Crown on filling vacancies, leading to a proposed amendment for further committee review.
This artifact documents a debate in the Senate regarding Bill S-224, which aims to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act concerning vacancies. The debate focused on the constitutional implications of prescribing the Prime Minister's advice to the Crown regarding appointments. Concerns were raised about potentially overstepping into areas of constitutional convention and adopting practices similar to the United States, which could infringe upon the parliamentary tradition of the first minister's advice. An amendment was proposed to refer the bill's subject matter to a committee for further study.
The Senate sitting on May 12, 2009, included debates on various bills and reports, notably Bill S-224 concerning vacancies in the Canada Elections Act and Parliament of Canada Act, with discussion focusing on Senate appointments and the bill's referral to committee.
This document is a record of a Senate sitting that took place on May 12, 2009. The sitting included "Senators' Statements" on various topics, "Routine Proceedings" where documents were tabled and bills were introduced, "Question Period" where senators asked questions of the government, and "Orders of the Day" where various bills and committee reports were debated or considered. Bill S-224, "An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act (vacancies)," was at the "Second reading—Motion in Amendment—Debate Continued" stage. The debate on this bill involved a motion to refer the bill's subject matter to a committee, with discussion focusing on the timing of Senate appointments and the process of filling Senate vacancies. Other bills and committee reports were also discussed, including legislation related to pollution prevention in Arctic waters, human pathogens and toxins, dangerous goods transportation, the National Portrait Gallery, and the broadcasting of the 2010 Paralympic Games. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of several debates.
During a Senate sitting on May 14, 2009, Bill S-224, concerning vacancies in the Canada Elections Act and Parliament of Canada Act, proceeded through second reading, with an amendment to refer it to committee ultimately being defeated, and the bill subsequently passing second reading and being referred to committee.
On May 14, 2009, the Senate held a sitting that included proceedings related to Bill S-224. During the "Orders of the Day" section, the Senate resumed debate on the second reading of Bill S-224, which aims to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act concerning vacancies. An amendment was proposed to refer the bill's subject matter to a Senate committee, with a proposed deadline for the committee's report. A sub-amendment was also introduced to change this deadline. After debate and a vote, the sub-amendment was defeated. Subsequently, the main amendment was also defeated. The Senate then proceeded to a second reading of Bill S-224 itself, which was agreed to on division. Following this, the bill was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, also on division. Additionally, a motion concerning the allotment of time for the third reading of Bill S-224 was withdrawn.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced