Bill S-230 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-230 amends the Bank of Canada Act to authorize the Bank of Canada to establish a federally incorporated credit rating agency corporation.
Bill S-230 proposes to amend the Bank of Canada Act to allow the Bank of Canada to establish a credit rating agency. Under the bill, the Bank would be required to create a new corporation within six months of the law coming into force. This corporation would operate as a separate legal entity under the Canada Business Corporations Act and would conduct credit rating activities. The corporation's shares would be owned entirely by the Bank of Canada. While the corporation would not be considered a Crown corporation or a subsidiary of the Bank for most purposes, it would be treated as a Crown corporation for audit purposes under the Auditor General Act. The auditors who examine the Bank of Canada's accounts would also audit the new corporation. The bill cannot come into force until Parliament has appropriated funds for its implementation.
- Amends the Bank of Canada Act by adding new section 36
- Requires the Bank of Canada to incorporate a corporation under the Canada Business Corporations Act within six months after the section comes into force
- Specifies that the corporation will operate as a credit rating agency
- Requires the Bank of Canada to hold all shares of the new corporation
- Clarifies that the corporation is not an agent of the Crown, a branch of the Bank, or a branch/agent of the Bank
- Specifies that the corporation is not a Crown corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary for purposes of the Financial Administration Act
- Deems the corporation to be a Crown corporation for audit purposes under the Auditor General Act
- Requires the same auditors who audit the Bank of Canada to also audit the new corporation
- Makes the coming into force of the bill conditional on Parliament appropriating funds for its implementation
- The Bank of Canada, which would be required to establish and hold all shares in the new corporation
- The audit firms currently auditing the Bank of Canada, which would also be required to audit the new corporation
- Parties who may use credit rating services provided by the new agency (though the bill does not specify details)
- Parliament, which must appropriate funds before the law can come into force
- The Bank of Canada is required to incorporate a corporation under the Canada Business Corporations Act within six months of the section coming into force
- The Bank of Canada must hold all shares of the corporation
- The corporation must carry on the business of a credit rating agency
- The auditors of the Bank of Canada are obligated to also audit the corporation
- The corporation is not to be treated as an agent or branch of the Bank of Canada or the Crown (except for audit purposes)
- First reading occurred on March 10, 2009
- The bill was at second reading in the Senate at the time of this summary
- The provisions of the bill come into force on a date or dates to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council (not yet set)
- The Bank of Canada has six months after the section comes into force to incorporate the corporation
- The bill requires Parliament to appropriate funds before it can come into force; the amount is not specified in the bill
- The bill may create ongoing financial costs associated with operating the credit rating agency, though specific costs are not detailed
- The bill text does not specify enforcement mechanisms or penalties for failure to comply with the requirement to establish the corporation
- The specific date when the bill's provisions will come into force is not set; it requires a future order from the Governor in Council
- The bill does not specify the amount of funding that will be required
- The bill does not detail what credit rating services the corporation will provide or who will be eligible to receive them
- The bill does not specify the corporate structure, governance, or operational details of the credit rating agency beyond basic organizational requirements
- The bill does not specify the relationship or potential conflicts of interest between the Bank of Canada's monetary policy functions and the credit rating agency's operations
- As of the information provided, the bill is still at second reading in the Senate and has not received final approval
New section 36 is added to establish the framework for the Bank of Canada to create and operate a credit rating agency corporation
Source: Section 1 of Bill S-230; section 36 added to Bank of Canada Act
The new credit rating agency corporation would be incorporated under this Act
Source: Section 36(1) of proposed Bank of Canada Act amendment
The corporation is excluded from the definition of Crown corporation for purposes of section 83, meaning it is not subject to section 83 requirements
Source: Section 36(2)(c) of proposed Bank of Canada Act amendment
The corporation is deemed to be a Crown corporation for audit purposes under section 14, meaning it must be audited according to that section
Source: Section 36(2)(d) of proposed Bank of Canada Act amendment
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-230 completed its first reading in the Senate on March 10, 2009, followed by procedural points of order and debates at the second reading stage.
This artifact details the procedural steps of Bill S-230 at its first reading in the Senate on March 10, 2009. It also notes that a point of order was raised regarding the bill's acceptability and lists the dates of subsequent debates and rulings at the second reading stage, including speeches by Senator Jerahmiel Grafstein and Senator Donald H. Oliver.
The Senate introduced Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act, at its first reading and conducted other routine parliamentary business.
On March 10, 2009, the Senate conducted routine proceedings. During this time, Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency), was introduced and received its first reading. This marked the initial procedural step for the bill in the Senate. The Senate also addressed other matters, including committee reports, motions for committees to meet during sittings, and various other bills at different stages of the legislative process. The sitting also included Senators' Statements on various topics and Question Period where senators asked questions of the government.
Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Bank of Canada Act related to credit rating agencies, was at the second reading stage in the Senate, where a point of order was raised and debated.
This artifact describes the status of Bill S-230 at its second reading stage in the Senate. It notes that the bill was at second reading on December 1, 2009, and this stage was not completed. The record indicates that a point of order was raised regarding the bill's acceptability, and the Speaker made several rulings on this matter on different dates. The artifact also lists the sponsor's speech and a response speech that occurred on March 31, 2009.
During a Senate sitting on March 31, 2009, Bill S-230 regarding the Bank of Canada Act was introduced for second reading, leading to a procedural point of order, while other legislative and policy matters were also addressed.
The Senate met on March 31, 2009. The sitting included Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings where various reports were tabled and bills were introduced for first reading, Question Period, and Orders of the Day. Notably, under Orders of the Day, Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency), was put forward for second reading. A point of order was raised concerning the bill's financial appropriation requirements. Other bills were also discussed, and various inquiries and motions were debated or adjourned. The sitting covered a wide range of topics beyond Bill S-230, including discussions on the CBC, international affairs, and specific committee reports.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-230, Senator Grafstein proposed giving the Bank of Canada a new tool to assess financial instrument risks, while Senator Nolin questioned the bill's procedural readiness due to appropriation concerns.
This artifact is a record of the Senate's proceedings on March 31, 2009. It details various discussions, reports tabled, and bills introduced or debated. Specifically for Bill S-230, Senator Jerahmiel S. Grafstein moved for its second reading, proposing an amendment to the Bank of Canada Act concerning credit rating agencies. He explained that the bill aims to provide the Bank of Canada with a new tool to assess the financial risks associated with credit instruments. Senator Pierre Claude Nolin raised a point of order regarding the necessity of a Royal Recommendation for the bill's implementation, which the Speaker took under advisement.
In a Senate sitting on May 5, 2009, debate occurred on various legislative matters, including Bill S-230 concerning the Bank of Canada Act, alongside discussions on broader policy issues and committee reports.
This Senate sitting on May 5, 2009, included debates on various topics, including the Vancouver Canucks hockey team, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's coverage of Atlantic Canada, and remarks by visiting dignitary Dr. Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada. The Senate also proceeded with routine proceedings such as tabling committee reports and presenting petitions. A significant portion of the sitting involved Question Period, where senators asked questions on topics ranging from science and technology funding to international trade and human resources. The Senate then moved to "Orders of the Day" where several bills were discussed, including Bill S-230, concerning amendments to the Bank of Canada Act regarding credit rating agencies. Debate on Bill S-230 continued after a point of order was addressed by the Speaker regarding the need for a Royal Recommendation. Other bills discussed included amendments to the Criminal Code, the Canada Elections Act, and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. The Senate also debated motions on expanding trade between North America and Europe, the discontinuance of the Interdepartmental Partnership with the Official-Language Communities, the environmental and financial costs of bottled water, and a motion urging the European Union to rescind its ban on commercial seal hunt products. The sitting concluded with debate adjourned on several items.
During a Senate sitting on May 7, 2009, debate continued on Bill S-230, concerning the Bank of Canada's role in credit rating agency oversight, alongside tributes to a retiring Senator and other routine parliamentary business.
This Senate sitting on May 7, 2009, included routine proceedings, question period, and orders of the day. Notably, debate on Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency), continued at the second reading stage. Several Senators spoke, with Senator Jerahmiel S. Grafstein explaining the bill's purpose to give the Bank of Canada new tools for financial surveillance and oversight, emphasizing the need for transparency and parliamentary oversight in financial reforms. Senators Hugh Segal and Wilfred P. Moore also participated in the debate, raising questions about the bill's implementation and the need for committee review. The sitting also featured tributes to Senator Yoine Goldstein, who was retiring.
This Senate sitting on September 16, 2009, focused on procedural matters, including appointments and tributes, followed by discussions on various issues during Question Period and the continuation of debate on several bills at the second reading stage, including Bill S-230.
This artifact is a record of a Senate sitting on September 16, 2009. It details procedural matters at the beginning of the sitting, including the appointment of a new Clerk of the Senate and tributes to the retiring Clerk. The sitting also included Senators' Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings where reports were tabled and notices of motions were given, and Question Period where Senators asked questions on topics such as consular services, the treatment of Canadian citizens abroad, and the status of Omar Khadr. The Orders of the Day indicate that several bills were at the second reading stage, including Bill S-230, the Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency). Debate on Bill S-230 was adjourned to a later date.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-230, senators discussed the potential for the Bank of Canada to operate a credit rating agency, expressing concerns about oversight, conflicts of interest, and the effectiveness of existing regulations, and ultimately agreed to allow the bill to proceed to committee.
On October 6, 2009, the Senate continued its debate on Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency). Senator Donald H. Oliver spoke about the bill, noting that it proposes the Bank of Canada create a subsidiary to act as a credit rating agency. He discussed the role of credit rating agencies, the lack of formal regulatory oversight in Canada, and concerns about conflicts of interest and the accuracy of ratings, particularly in light of the global financial crisis. He also discussed international perspectives and proposals from various bodies, including the G20, regarding the oversight of credit rating agencies. Senator Oliver expressed reservations about the Bank of Canada operating a credit rating agency, suggesting that a better regulatory framework for existing private agencies might be a more appropriate solution. Senator Jerahmiel S. Grafstein responded, agreeing that there is a lack of oversight for credit rating agencies and that their role was a fundamental flaw in the economic system. He inquired about Canada's progress in fulfilling a G20 commitment to have an oversight mechanism in place by the end of the year. Senator Lowell Murray questioned Senator Oliver and the government's intention regarding the bill, asking if it would be allowed to proceed to committee for further study. Senator Oliver stated he would not impede the bill from going to committee. The debate was then adjourned.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-230, senators discussed the Bank of Canada's potential role in credit rating and the broader need for regulation and oversight of credit rating agencies.
The Senate is currently debating Bill S-230, which proposes to amend the Bank of Canada Act to establish a credit rating agency managed by the Bank of Canada. During the second reading debate, Senator Donald H. Oliver spoke, acknowledging the need for oversight and transparency in credit rating agencies, particularly in light of the recent financial crisis. He discussed the role and function of credit rating agencies, the lack of formal regulatory oversight in Canada, and various proposals for a regulatory framework. Senator Oliver expressed concern that operating a credit rating agency would fall outside the Bank of Canada's core mandate and could potentially create conflicts of interest and expose the government to financial risk. He suggested that strengthening the regulation of existing private-sector agencies might be a better approach than creating a new public entity. Senator Jerahmiel S. Grafstein, the bill's sponsor, and Senator Lowell Murray also participated in the discussion, with Senator Murray inquiring about the government's intentions regarding the bill and Senator Oliver assuring it would not be blocked at second reading. The debate was subsequently adjourned.
On December 1, 2009, the Senate debated various issues and bills, including adjourning the debate on Bill S-230 concerning the Bank of Canada Act.
This record details a Senate sitting on December 1, 2009. The sitting included Senators' Statements on various topics, Routine Proceedings such as notices of motions and the first reading of a bill, and Question Period covering topics like violence against women, the long-gun registry, and elder abuse. The Orders of the Day show ongoing debates on several bills and inquiries, including Bill S-230, an Act to amend the Bank of Canada Act (credit rating agency), which was at the second reading stage and had its debate adjourned. Other significant procedural events included a Speaker's ruling on a point of order regarding Bill S-241 and the adoption of committee reports.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced