Bill S-217 explained in plain English
An Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-217 would establish a national registry of medical devices to track implantable and prescribed home-use medical devices and notify users of health or safety risks.
Bill S-217 proposes to create a national Medical Devices Registry managed by a Registrar appointed by the Minister of Health. The registry would collect information about people who use implantable medical devices (like pacemakers or artificial joints inserted into the body) and prescribed home-use medical devices, with the person's written consent. Doctors who insert or supply these devices would be required to submit information to the registry, including the patient's name, date of birth, address, device details, and the healthcare facility involved. Manufacturers, importers, and distributors of these devices would be required to notify the Registrar immediately if they become aware that a device may pose a health or safety risk. When the Registrar learns of a potential risk, they must contact affected users or their doctors to inform them. Personal information in the registry would be kept confidential and cannot be shared without written consent from the person involved. The Act would come into force no later than two years after receiving royal assent, and regulations would be created to fill in details about which home-use devices are covered and other operational matters.
- This draft was normalized from a partial local-model response and must be reviewed before publication.
Bill S-217 defines 'medical device' by reference to the Food and Drugs Act definition
Source: Section 2, definition of 'medical device'
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-217, aiming to create a national medical device registry, completed its first reading in the Senate on April 14, 2010, and was later referred to a committee.
This record indicates that Bill S-217, concerning the establishment and maintenance of a national registry for medical devices, underwent its first reading in the Senate on April 14, 2010. Following this, it proceeded to second reading on April 21, 2010, and was subsequently referred to a Senate committee on June 15, 2010. The bill is currently at the consideration in committee stage in the Senate.
On April 14, 2010, the Senate held its first reading of Bill S-217 concerning a national medical devices registry, alongside other routine proceedings, debates on the budget, and discussions on various societal issues.
This record details the proceedings of the Senate on April 14, 2010. The Senate first read Bill S-217, an Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices. The sitting also included senators' statements on various topics including cancer awareness and tributes to deceased individuals, routine proceedings such as tabling reports and giving notice of motions, and question period addressing issues like correctional service funding, CBC/Radio-Canada funding, student employment, and the snow crab quota. The Senate also adopted the motion for an Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne, debated Budget 2010, and discussed other bills and inquiries.
Bill S-217, aimed at creating a national medical device registry, has passed second reading in the Senate and has been sent to a committee.
Bill S-217, concerning the establishment and maintenance of a national registry for medical devices, has completed its second reading stage in the Senate. Following this, the bill was referred to a Senate committee for further consideration. The record indicates that second reading speeches occurred on April 21, 2010, with a referral to committee on June 15, 2010. Several similar bills have been introduced in previous parliamentary sessions.
This Senate sitting on April 21, 2010, featured adjourned debate on a medical devices registry bill (S-217) and a debate and referral of a bill on child trafficking (C-268) to committee, alongside other government business and discussions.
This artifact documents a sitting of the Senate on April 21, 2010. The sitting included Senators' Statements, Routine Proceedings, Question Period, and Orders of the Day. Notably, debate on Bill S-217, "An Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices," was adjourned. The sitting also included discussions on various other topics, including a book review, National Volunteer Week, international curling championships, the Auditor General's Spring Report, a new bill (Bill S-7) introduced for first reading, questions regarding funding for the First Nations University of Canada, missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls, victims of crime, and the resolution of international conflicts. The sitting also addressed Bill C-268, "An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years)," which was debated at second reading and referred to committee.
During Senate proceedings on April 21, 2010, the debate on Bill S-217 to create a medical device registry was adjourned after the sponsor's speech, while other senators discussed various unrelated matters and debated the referral of Bill C-268 to a committee.
This document records a debate in the Senate concerning Bill S-217, which aims to create a national registry for medical devices. The bill's sponsor, Senator Mac Harb, explained the necessity of such a registry due to the increasing use of medical devices and the rise in reported defects. He highlighted cases where patients were not adequately notified of faulty devices, leading to prolonged suffering and increased costs. Senator Harb argued that a registry, where users can voluntarily provide their information, would allow for more timely and direct notification of risks associated with medical devices, similar to systems already in place in other countries. The debate on this bill was adjourned, meaning it was paused to be continued at a later time. The document also includes discussions on other unrelated topics, such as a book by Dr. Gary W. O'Brien, National Volunteer Week, the World Curling Championships, funding for the First Nations University of Canada, missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls, victims of crime, and international conflicts. Additionally, there is a detailed discussion and a vote related to Bill C-268, which proposes amendments to the Criminal Code concerning the trafficking of persons under 18 years of age. Senator Anne C. Cools raised significant concerns about the drafting of Bill C-268, arguing it does not effectively address sexual exploitation and that its mandatory minimum sentencing provisions may infringe upon judicial discretion.
During the Senate sitting on June 3, 2010, the debate on Bill S-217 regarding a national registry of medical devices was adjourned, with other parliamentary business occupying the majority of the sitting.
On June 3, 2010, the Senate met to continue the second reading debate on Bill S-217, an Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices. While the bill was listed on the Order of the Day for debate to continue, the proceedings of this sitting primarily consisted of Senators' Statements on various topics, the tabling of reports, Question Period, and other legislative business. Specifically concerning Bill S-217, a motion was made to adjourn the debate, which was agreed to. This means the debate on Bill S-217 was not concluded during this sitting and was carried over to a future sitting.
During a Senate sitting on June 15, 2010, Bill S-217 concerning a national medical device registry was debated at second reading, with concerns raised about its necessity and privacy, before being referred to committee, alongside other legislative and procedural matters.
On June 15, 2010, the Senate held a sitting where several items were discussed and debated. The Senate considered Bill S-217, an Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices. During the debate at second reading, Senator Nicole Eaton expressed concerns about the bill, questioning its necessity given existing regulations and highlighting issues related to patient privacy, cost, and jurisdiction. Senator Mac Harb responded by emphasizing the need for a better system to inform patients about potential issues with medical devices and suggested that these concerns could be further examined in committee. The bill was subsequently referred to committee. Other business included debates on safe drinking water for First Nations, amendments to the Official Languages Act, and various reports from Senate committees.
In a Senate debate on Bill S-217 concerning a national medical device registry, Senator Eaton argued against its necessity due to existing regulations, citing privacy and cost concerns, while Senator Harb advocated for it as a way to better inform patients, after which the bill was referred to committee.
This artifact details a Senate debate on Bill S-217, an Act to establish and maintain a national registry of medical devices. Senator Nicole Eaton spoke against the bill, arguing that existing regulations under Health Canada are sufficient for ensuring the safety and quality of medical devices. She raised concerns about the bill's proposed voluntary registry, its potential impact on patient privacy, the significant financial and logistical challenges of implementation, and the jurisdictional boundaries between federal and provincial responsibilities. Senator Mac Harb, the bill's sponsor, responded by highlighting the limitations of the current system, particularly regarding patient notification in cases of defective devices and the reliance on a government website for information. He argued that the bill's proposed registry would ensure a more direct way of informing patients. The Senate ultimately voted to refer the bill to the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology for further study.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced