Bill S-219 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act (rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
This bill proposes to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act to re-establish rural postal delivery, require consultation on service changes, and create a Canada Post Ombudsman.
This bill proposes changes to the Canada Post Corporation Act. It aims to re-establish mail delivery to rural mailboxes that were serviced as of September 1, 2005. It would also require Canada Post to notify and consult with residents in rural areas before making changes to mail delivery or other postal services. Additionally, the bill proposes establishing the position of a Canada Post Ombudsman to investigate complaints about administrative fairness, reasonableness, and promptness in dealings with Canada Post. The Ombudsman would have the power to review policies and practices, make reports, and recommend changes. The bill also outlines the appointment, term, removal, and responsibilities of the Ombudsman. Finally, it includes provisions for a mandatory review of the new sections five years after they come into force.
- Requires Canada Post to provide mail delivery service to rural mailboxes that were serviced on September 1, 2005, with exceptions for undue health or safety risks or mutual agreement.
- Mandates that Canada Post notify rural residents at least six months in advance and consult with them at least four months before implementing changes to mail delivery or other postal services.
- Establishes the office of the Canada Post Ombudsman.
- Grants the Ombudsman the function to investigate administrative difficulties concerning fairness, reasonableness, and promptness in dealings with Canada Post.
- Empowers the Ombudsman to review Canada Post's policies and practices.
- Requires the Ombudsman to report on unresolved difficulties or unaddressed policy issues.
- Specifies the process for appointing the Ombudsman, including nomination by a Standing Committee and recommendation by the Minister.
- Defines the term of office for the Ombudsman (five years) and conditions for removal or suspension.
- Requires Canada Post to post notices about the Ombudsman's function and contact information.
- Allows individuals to file complaints with the Ombudsman regarding administrative difficulties with Canada Post.
- Mandates that Canada Post provide requested information to the Ombudsman during investigations.
- Outlines procedures for the Ombudsman to report to the Minister and the Standing Committee regarding unresolved issues.
- Requires the Minister to review the operation of the new sections five years after they come into force and every five years thereafter.
- Introduces penalties for knowingly providing false or misleading information to the Ombudsman, or refusing to provide requested information.
- Residents in rural areas who receive or may be affected by changes to postal services
- Canada Post Corporation
- The Canada Post Ombudsman
- The Minister responsible for Canada Post
- The Standing Committee of the House of Commons that considers postal matters
- Members of the public who interact with Canada Post services
- Canada Post has an obligation to provide mail delivery service to specific rural mailboxes.
- Canada Post is obligated to notify and consult with rural residents before changing postal services.
- Individuals have the right to complain to the Ombudsman about administrative difficulties.
- The Ombudsman has the right to request and receive information from Canada Post.
- Canada Post is obligated to post notices describing the Ombudsman's functions.
- Rural mail delivery re-establishment is based on service status as of September 1, 2005.
- Canada Post must give notice to rural residents at least six months before a proposed change.
- Canada Post must consult with rural residents at least four months before a proposed change.
- The new sections related to rural postal services (sections 5.1 and 5.2) apply six months after the Act comes into force.
- The Ombudsman must submit an annual report before April 1 each year.
- The Minister must undertake a review of the operation of sections 5.1, 5.2, and Part I.1 five years after the Act comes into force and every five years thereafter.
- The Minister must table a review report within one year of undertaking the review.
- The Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council, subject to appropriation of funds by Parliament.
- The bill requires Parliament to appropriate moneys for the purposes of the Act before it can come into force.
- The Ombudsman will receive remuneration, benefits, and reimbursement of expenses as ordered by the Governor in Council.
- Providing false or misleading information to the Ombudsman is an offence punishable on summary conviction.
- Refusing or failing to provide information requested by the Ombudsman is an offence punishable on summary conviction.
- The specific day the Act comes into force will be determined by order of the Governor in Council, subject to parliamentary appropriation.
- The bill does not specify the number of persons who may be nominated for the Ombudsman position by the Standing Committee.
- The bill does not specify the exact remuneration, benefits, or expenses for the Ombudsman, leaving this to the Governor in Council.
- The bill does not specify the exact composition or designation of the 'Standing Committee' referred to for Ombudsman nominations, other than it normally considers postal matters.
This bill directly amends the Canada Post Corporation Act by adding new sections related to rural postal services and establishing the office of the Canada Post Ombudsman.
Source: Section 1, Section 2, Section 3
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-219, concerning amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act regarding rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman, completed its first reading in the Senate on June 1, 2010.
This record shows that Bill S-219 received its first reading in the Senate on June 1, 2010. This is the initial formal introduction of the bill in the Senate. The bill was later referred to a committee on March 1, 2011, and had its second reading on June 3, 2010, with related speeches occurring in the Senate.
On June 1, 2010, the Senate held its first reading of Bill S-219 concerning Canada Post, tabled several reports, debated bills on First Nations water safety and climate change, and discussed the Senate's digital presence.
This document records the proceedings of the Senate on June 1, 2010. During this sitting, several reports were tabled, including those related to the Canadian Forces Pension Plan, the Commission of Inquiry into the Mulroney-Schreiber Dealings, and anti-terrorism measures. A key procedural event was the first reading of Bill S-219, An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act (rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman). Other proceedings included notices of motions regarding committee meetings and a condemnation of attacks in Pakistan. The Senate also engaged in Question Period on various topics, including foreign affairs, the economy, and government spending on security for the G8 and G20 summits. Debates occurred on Bills S-11 (Safe Drinking Water for First Nations) and C-311 (Climate Change Accountability), both of which had their second reading adjourned. There was also a debate on the Senate's online presence and website.
Bill S-219 completed its second reading in the Senate and was then referred to a committee for further study.
This artifact details the procedural steps for Bill S-219 in the Senate. The bill proceeded through its second reading stage, which involves speeches from senators. Following this stage, the bill was referred to a committee for further consideration. The current status indicates it is under committee consideration in the Senate.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219 concerning Canada Post, the debate was adjourned.
On June 3, 2010, the Senate held its second reading debate on Bill S-219, an act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act concerning rural postal services and the establishment of a Canada Post Ombudsman. The debate was adjourned, meaning it was not concluded on this day and will be continued at a later time. The rest of the sitting involved various other proceedings including tabling of reports, questions from senators, and debates on other bills and motions.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, Senator Peterson spoke about the challenges facing rural postal services and advocated for amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act, after which the debate was adjourned.
On June 3, 2010, in the Senate, the debate on Bill S-219, an Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, was adjourned. The bill aims to address rural postal services and establish a Canada Post Ombudsman. Senator Robert W. Peterson spoke in favour of the bill, highlighting the challenges faced by rural Canadians, including the closure of post offices and mailboxes, and expressed concern about the potential privatization of Canada Post. He emphasized the importance of mail service as a vital link for rural communities and urged support for amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act.
During a Senate sitting on September 29, 2010, the debate on Bill S-219, concerning amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act, was continued and subsequently adjourned.
On September 29, 2010, the Senate of Canada convened for a sitting that included routine proceedings, question period, and orders of the day. During the 'Orders of the Day' section, Bill S-219, an Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, was listed for debate at second reading. The debate on Bill S-219 was continued, and Senator Consiglio Di Nino requested an adjournment to complete his research, with the debate being adjourned in his name.
In a Senate debate on Bill S-219 concerning rural postal services and a Canada Post ombudsman, a senator argued for the bill's importance in maintaining and improving services for rural Canadians.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, an Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, Senator Elizabeth Hubley spoke in support of the bill. She highlighted concerns about the decline of rural postal services, including office closures and cancelled roadside delivery, arguing that these changes negatively impact rural communities and their economic development. Senator Hubley emphasized the bill's provision for a minimum six-month consultation period before changes to services are made, and its aim to restore services to 2005 levels. She also noted the bill's proposal to establish a Canada Post ombudsman to investigate administrative issues and review policies for fairness. The debate was adjourned following Senator Hubley's remarks.
On December 7, 2010, the Senate held tributes for a former senator, dealt with routine proceedings and committee reports, questioned the government on Nortel employee benefits, and continued debates on multiple bills, including Bill S-219 regarding the Canada Post Corporation Act.
This artifact is a record of Senate proceedings on December 7, 2010. The Senate began by paying tribute to the late former Senator Norman K. Atkins. Routine proceedings included tabling reports and presenting committee reports. Several bills were introduced at first reading. Question period included a question about long-term disability benefits for Nortel employees and delayed answers to oral questions regarding the Canadian Polar Commission and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency. The Senate then proceeded to Orders of the Day, which included debates on various bills. Notably, Bill S-219, concerning the Canada Post Corporation Act, had its second reading debate continued and was adjourned. The debate for Bill S-216 concerning long-term disability benefits was deferred to a later date. The Senate also debated Bill S-10 regarding controlled drugs and substances, and Bill S-204 concerning the protection of children, with a motion in amendment to Bill S-10 being negatived. Debates on Bill C-36 (Canada Consumer Product Safety Act), Bill S-220 (Official Languages Act), Bill C-232 (Supreme Court Act), and a motion to establish a National Day of Remembrance and Action on Mass Atrocities were also conducted or continued.
In the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219 concerning rural postal services and a Canada Post Ombudsman, Senator Callbeck spoke in support, emphasizing the need to protect and strengthen rural postal services, after which the debate was adjourned.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, which aims to protect and strengthen postal services in rural communities and establish a Canada Post Ombudsman, Senator Catherine S. Callbeck spoke in support of the bill. She highlighted the importance of post offices to rural communities, noted past closures of rural post offices and mailboxes, and emphasized the bill's proposed requirement for written notice and consultations before changes to postal services. She also supported the creation of an ombudsman to investigate complaints. The debate on Bill S-219 was adjourned and will continue at a later sitting. The rest of the sitting included various other proceedings such as Senators' Statements on diverse topics, tabling of committee reports, question period on various government services and policies, and debates on other bills.
On March 1, 2011, the Senate debated Bill S-219, an act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act concerning rural postal services and the establishment of an ombudsman, with senators discussing the bill's potential impacts and relationship to existing laws and practices.
This artifact is a record of proceedings in the Senate on March 1, 2011. It includes tributes to former Senator Marian L. Maloney, discussions on international events like the political uprising in Libya, and routine proceedings such as tabling of estimates and reports. The Senate also debated several bills, including those related to the Canada Post Corporation Act, criminal code amendments, immigration, and electoral reform. The specific item related to Bill S-219, An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, involved a second reading debate where the bill's provisions were discussed. The debate focused on rural postal services and the establishment of a Canada Post Ombudsman. One senator raised concerns about the bill potentially conflicting with existing legislation and creating financial implications for Canada Post, while another argued that the bill's provisions were already being addressed by existing government initiatives or were problematic.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, senators discussed proposed amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act concerning rural postal services and the creation of an ombudsman, raising concerns about legal conflicts, financial impacts, and the bill's necessity given existing measures.
This record details a Senate debate at the second reading stage for Bill S-219, which aims to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act. The debate primarily focused on the proposed changes regarding rural postal services and the establishment of a Canada Post Ombudsman. A key point of discussion was the potential conflict between the proposed bill and existing legislation like the Canada Labour Code and the Criminal Code regarding employee safety in rural delivery. Concerns were also raised about the financial implications for Canada Post and the effectiveness of a longer notification period for service changes. The debate also touched on the existing ombudsman services at Canada Post and the government's recent initiatives like the Canadian Postal Service Charter. Ultimately, a senator argued that since the bill's proposed measures were largely already in place or potentially in conflict with other laws, the bill should not be supported.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced