Skip to main content
Back to Bills
FederalDid not become law (session ended)40th Parliament, 3rd Session

Bill S-219 explained in plain English

An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act (rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman)

Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.

At a glance

Jurisdiction
Federal Parliament
Legislature / Parliament
Parliament of Canada
Session
40th Parliament, 3rd Session
Bill number
Bill S-219
Full title
An Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act (rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman)
Current status
Did not become law (session ended)
Latest event
At consideration in committee in the Senate
Last updated
Mar 1, 2011

Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.

Chamber
Parliament of Canada
Current Stage
At consideration in committee in the Senate
Latest Activity
Mar 1, 2011
Plain-language explanation
In plain English (our explanation)

Our plain-language take, written for civic education.

Source: By PoliticalData.ca

AI-assisted, reviewed before publishing
Short Version

This bill proposes to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act to re-establish rural postal delivery, require consultation on service changes, and create a Canada Post Ombudsman.

What It Means

This bill proposes changes to the Canada Post Corporation Act. It aims to re-establish mail delivery to rural mailboxes that were serviced as of September 1, 2005. It would also require Canada Post to notify and consult with residents in rural areas before making changes to mail delivery or other postal services. Additionally, the bill proposes establishing the position of a Canada Post Ombudsman to investigate complaints about administrative fairness, reasonableness, and promptness in dealings with Canada Post. The Ombudsman would have the power to review policies and practices, make reports, and recommend changes. The bill also outlines the appointment, term, removal, and responsibilities of the Ombudsman. Finally, it includes provisions for a mandatory review of the new sections five years after they come into force.

What This Bill Does
  • Requires Canada Post to provide mail delivery service to rural mailboxes that were serviced on September 1, 2005, with exceptions for undue health or safety risks or mutual agreement.
  • Mandates that Canada Post notify rural residents at least six months in advance and consult with them at least four months before implementing changes to mail delivery or other postal services.
  • Establishes the office of the Canada Post Ombudsman.
  • Grants the Ombudsman the function to investigate administrative difficulties concerning fairness, reasonableness, and promptness in dealings with Canada Post.
  • Empowers the Ombudsman to review Canada Post's policies and practices.
  • Requires the Ombudsman to report on unresolved difficulties or unaddressed policy issues.
  • Specifies the process for appointing the Ombudsman, including nomination by a Standing Committee and recommendation by the Minister.
  • Defines the term of office for the Ombudsman (five years) and conditions for removal or suspension.
  • Requires Canada Post to post notices about the Ombudsman's function and contact information.
  • Allows individuals to file complaints with the Ombudsman regarding administrative difficulties with Canada Post.
  • Mandates that Canada Post provide requested information to the Ombudsman during investigations.
  • Outlines procedures for the Ombudsman to report to the Minister and the Standing Committee regarding unresolved issues.
  • Requires the Minister to review the operation of the new sections five years after they come into force and every five years thereafter.
  • Introduces penalties for knowingly providing false or misleading information to the Ombudsman, or refusing to provide requested information.
Who Is Affected
  • Residents in rural areas who receive or may be affected by changes to postal services
  • Canada Post Corporation
  • The Canada Post Ombudsman
  • The Minister responsible for Canada Post
  • The Standing Committee of the House of Commons that considers postal matters
  • Members of the public who interact with Canada Post services
Rights, Duties, Or Obligations
  • Canada Post has an obligation to provide mail delivery service to specific rural mailboxes.
  • Canada Post is obligated to notify and consult with rural residents before changing postal services.
  • Individuals have the right to complain to the Ombudsman about administrative difficulties.
  • The Ombudsman has the right to request and receive information from Canada Post.
  • Canada Post is obligated to post notices describing the Ombudsman's functions.
Important Dates
  • Rural mail delivery re-establishment is based on service status as of September 1, 2005.
  • Canada Post must give notice to rural residents at least six months before a proposed change.
  • Canada Post must consult with rural residents at least four months before a proposed change.
  • The new sections related to rural postal services (sections 5.1 and 5.2) apply six months after the Act comes into force.
  • The Ombudsman must submit an annual report before April 1 each year.
  • The Minister must undertake a review of the operation of sections 5.1, 5.2, and Part I.1 five years after the Act comes into force and every five years thereafter.
  • The Minister must table a review report within one year of undertaking the review.
  • The Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council, subject to appropriation of funds by Parliament.
Financial Or Tax Impacts
  • The bill requires Parliament to appropriate moneys for the purposes of the Act before it can come into force.
  • The Ombudsman will receive remuneration, benefits, and reimbursement of expenses as ordered by the Governor in Council.
Enforcement Or Penalties
  • Providing false or misleading information to the Ombudsman is an offence punishable on summary conviction.
  • Refusing or failing to provide information requested by the Ombudsman is an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Uncertainties Or Limits
  • The specific day the Act comes into force will be determined by order of the Governor in Council, subject to parliamentary appropriation.
  • The bill does not specify the number of persons who may be nominated for the Ombudsman position by the Standing Committee.
  • The bill does not specify the exact remuneration, benefits, or expenses for the Ombudsman, leaving this to the Governor in Council.
  • The bill does not specify the exact composition or designation of the 'Standing Committee' referred to for Ombudsman nominations, other than it normally considers postal matters.
Laws Or Regulations Affected
Canada Post Corporation Act
amends

This bill directly amends the Canada Post Corporation Act by adding new sections related to rural postal services and establishing the office of the Canada Post Ombudsman.

Source: Section 1, Section 2, Section 3

Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.

Official text

Parliamentary Process

Step 1
First reading
Jun 1, 2010
Completed

Bill S-219, concerning amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act regarding rural postal services and the Canada Post Ombudsman, completed its first reading in the Senate on June 1, 2010.

Introduction and first reading, Jun 1, 2010
End of stage activity, Jun 1, 2010
Chamber sittings
Introduction and first reading - Jun 1, 2010

On June 1, 2010, the Senate held its first reading of Bill S-219 concerning Canada Post, tabled several reports, debated bills on First Nations water safety and climate change, and discussed the Senate's digital presence.

Step 2
Second reading
Mar 1, 2011
Completed

Bill S-219 completed its second reading in the Senate and was then referred to a committee for further study.

Second reading, Mar 1, 2011
Referral to committee, Mar 1, 2011
End of stage activity, Mar 1, 2011
Chamber sittings
Debate at second reading - Jun 3, 2010

During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219 concerning Canada Post, the debate was adjourned.

During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, Senator Peterson spoke about the challenges facing rural postal services and advocated for amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act, after which the debate was adjourned.

Debate at second reading - Sep 29, 2010

During a Senate sitting on September 29, 2010, the debate on Bill S-219, concerning amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act, was continued and subsequently adjourned.

Debate at second reading - Oct 26, 2010

In a Senate debate on Bill S-219 concerning rural postal services and a Canada Post ombudsman, a senator argued for the bill's importance in maintaining and improving services for rural Canadians.

Debate at second reading - Dec 7, 2010

On December 7, 2010, the Senate held tributes for a former senator, dealt with routine proceedings and committee reports, questioned the government on Nortel employee benefits, and continued debates on multiple bills, including Bill S-219 regarding the Canada Post Corporation Act.

Debate at second reading - Feb 3, 2011

In the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219 concerning rural postal services and a Canada Post Ombudsman, Senator Callbeck spoke in support, emphasizing the need to protect and strengthen rural postal services, after which the debate was adjourned.

Debate at second reading - Mar 1, 2011

On March 1, 2011, the Senate debated Bill S-219, an act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act concerning rural postal services and the establishment of an ombudsman, with senators discussing the bill's potential impacts and relationship to existing laws and practices.

During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-219, senators discussed proposed amendments to the Canada Post Corporation Act concerning rural postal services and the creation of an ombudsman, raising concerns about legal conflicts, financial impacts, and the bill's necessity given existing measures.

Step 3
Consideration in committee
Date not listed
No activity

We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 4
Report stage
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 5
Third reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 1
First reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 2
Second reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 3
Consideration in committee
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 4
Report stage
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Step 5
Third reading
Not reached yet
Not reached

We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.

Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.

Vote Summary

No published recorded division

This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.

Sponsor
Robert W. Peterson
Senator | Details not listed in current Senate roster
Jurisdiction
Federal Parliament

No published representative vote breakdown

This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.

Official sources

Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.

How this data is sourced