Bill S-202 explained in plain English
An Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act (credit card acceptance fees)
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 41st Parliament, 2nd Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill S-202 amends the Payment Card Networks Act to cap credit card acceptance fees for merchants, designates Visa and Mastercard networks, and empowers the Minister of Finance to set and enforce these limits.
This bill proposes to amend the Payment Card Networks Act to establish limits on the fees that merchants pay when accepting credit card payments. It specifically designates the Visa and MasterCard networks in Canada. The Minister of Finance would be responsible for setting these fee limits, with the ability to change them, and for ensuring that the payment card networks comply with these limits. The Minister can also take legal action if compliance is not met.
- Amends the Payment Card Networks Act to define 'credit card acceptance fees'.
- Amends the Payment Card Networks Act to define 'designated payment card network'.
- Amends the Payment Card Networks Act to define 'interchange fee'.
- Amends the Payment Card Networks Act to designate the payment card networks operated in Canada by Visa Canada Corporation and MasterCard International Incorporated as designated payment card networks.
- Establishes a tariff of credit card acceptance fees for transactions made through a designated payment card network, with different rates for charities, government institutions, and other users.
- Specifies that the established tariff applies from the first day of the calendar year following the coming into force of this section.
- Grants the Minister of Finance the power to amend the tariff of credit card acceptance fees by order.
- States that an amended tariff applies from the first day of a calendar year following the year the initial tariff begins to apply.
- Limits the credit card acceptance fees a merchant can be charged to the amounts set out in the tariff.
- Makes the Minister responsible for supervising designated payment card networks to ensure compliance with the credit card acceptance fee tariff.
- Requires the Minister to conduct examinations and inquiries at least annually to ensure compliance with the tariff.
- Gives the Minister the right to access records and require information from entities participating in designated payment card networks.
- Allows the Minister to apply to a superior court for an order to compel compliance if an entity fails to comply with the tariff, and grants the court the power to make further orders.
- Merchants accepting credit card payments.
- Participants in designated payment card networks (Visa Canada Corporation and MasterCard International Incorporated).
- Charities.
- Government institutions.
- The Minister of Finance.
- The public who use credit cards for purchases.
- Merchants have the right to have credit card acceptance fees capped at specific percentages based on their category (charity, government, other).
- Designated payment card networks and their participants have an obligation to comply with the established credit card acceptance fee tariff.
- The Minister of Finance has the right to supervise compliance and to amend the fee tariff.
- The Minister of Finance has the power to access records and require information from network participants.
- The Minister of Finance has the right to apply to a court for compliance orders.
- Entities participating in designated payment card networks have an obligation to provide requested information and explanations to the Minister.
- The tariff of credit card acceptance fees established by the bill will apply from the first day of the calendar year immediately following the coming into force of section 10 (Section 10(2)).
- Any amended tariff will apply from the first day of a calendar year following the year the initial tariff takes effect (Section 11(2)).
- The bill does not specify an overall commencement date for the Act or the commencement of Section 10 itself.
- Establishes limits on 'credit card acceptance fees' that merchants incur, potentially reducing costs for merchants.
- Sets specific fee rates: 0% for charities, 0.3% for government institutions, and 0.5% for other users, based on the transaction value.
- The Minister of Finance has the power to change these fee limits, which could alter the financial impact on merchants and payment card networks over time.
- If an entity participating in a designated payment card network fails to comply with the credit card acceptance fee tariff, the Minister of Finance may apply to a superior court for a compliance order.
- The court may issue an order directing the entity to comply and may make any further order it deems appropriate.
- The bill does not specify the overall date on which the Act or its provisions will come into force, only when the tariff applies relative to its coming into force.
- While the Minister can request information and explanations, the bill states this is 'to the extent that the entity is reasonably able to do so', implying a limit on the obligation to provide information.
- The definition of 'interchange fee' is provided, but the overall 'credit card acceptance fees' also include 'any other fees related to the transmission or processing of the payment transaction', the scope of which is not further detailed beyond these two components.
- The specific 'superior court' that the Minister may apply to for compliance orders is not identified.
Adds definitions for 'credit card acceptance fees', 'designated payment card network', and 'interchange fee'. It also designates Visa and MasterCard networks in Canada and establishes a tariff for credit card acceptance fees, grants the Minister of Finance the power to amend this tariff, and outlines supervision and enforcement mechanisms.
Source: Sections 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textParliamentary Process
Bill S-202, concerning credit card acceptance fees, completed its first reading in the Senate on October 17, 2013, and has since progressed through various stages including second reading, committee review, and report stage.
This artifact describes the procedural steps for Bill S-202 in the Senate. It shows that the bill received its first reading on October 17, 2013. It also lists subsequent stages, including second reading speeches, committee deliberations, and report stage, indicating the bill's progression through the Senate. The current status is reported as being at the report stage in the Senate.
The Senate introduced Bill S-202 for first reading and discussed other legislative matters and Senate business on October 17, 2013.
On October 17, 2013, the Senate held its first reading of Bill S-202, an Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act concerning credit card acceptance fees. The sitting also included the introduction of several other bills, discussions on the new leadership in the Senate, tributes to individuals, and debates on topics such as World Food Day, the Nobel Prize in Literature, and the RCMP's handling of access to information requests. Additionally, notices of motions were given to suspend Senators Brazeau, Wallin, and Duffy. The Senate adjourned until October 22, 2013.
Bill S-202 concerning credit card acceptance fees completed its second reading in the Senate on October 25, 2013, and has since progressed through committee and is now at the report stage.
This artifact summarizes the procedural steps for Bill S-202 in the Senate. It notes that the bill completed its second reading stage on October 25, 2013, and lists the dates of major speeches and committee discussions that followed. The bill's current status is at the report stage in the Senate, with the latest activity being a debate on the committee's report on May 6, 2015.
During the Senate's second reading debate on Bill S-202 concerning credit card fees, Senator Ringuette emphasized the need for regulation to reduce excessive fees, citing international examples, before the debate was adjourned.
On October 25, 2013, the Senate commenced its sitting with various procedural items before moving to the second reading debate of Bill S-202, An Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act (credit card acceptance fees). Senator Pierrette Ringuette introduced the bill, noting it was the sixth time she had introduced similar legislation aimed at lowering credit card fees for merchants and consumers. She highlighted that excessive fees collected by card issuers exceed $5.5 billion annually and that major card companies had recently increased fees. Senator Ringuette referenced decisions by the Competition Tribunal and regulations in other countries, such as Australia and the European Union, which have capped merchant fees, arguing for a similar approach in Canada to save consumers and businesses billions annually. The debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned. The sitting also included discussions on other matters, including motions to suspend senators, official languages policy, rail safety, and questions of privilege related to senators' residence requirements and expenses.
On October 25, 2013, the Senate engaged in debates primarily concerning procedural matters related to suspending senators, with only a brief mention of Bill S-202 at its second reading stage.
This document contains the transcript of Senate debates from October 25, 2013. While the bill "An Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act (credit card acceptance fees)" is mentioned as being at its second reading stage, the bulk of the debate does not focus on this bill. Instead, it primarily discusses procedural matters related to motions to suspend senators Patrick Brazeau, Pamela Wallin, and Michael Duffy, including debates on amendments and deferred votes. There are also discussions on other unrelated topics such as the 20th anniversary of the 1993 federal election, official languages, rail safety, and a tabled document concerning Senator Brazeau's residence requirements.
The Senate debated Bill S-202 on credit card acceptance fees, adjourned the debate, and also held tributes and other procedural business.
On December 4, 2013, the Senate debated Bill S-202, An Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act (credit card acceptance fees). The debate was adjourned, meaning it will continue at a later date. The sitting also included tributes to Senator Donald H. Oliver, who was retiring, and a discussion of other legislative and committee matters. Notably, a motion to instruct a committee to hear a witness regarding Senator Duffy's expenses was negatived.
In a Senate sitting on March 4, 2014, debate on Bill S-202 concerning credit card acceptance fees continued but was ultimately adjourned due to procedural reasons, including the absence of a designated critic.
This is a record of a Senate sitting on March 4, 2014. During this sitting, the Senate discussed various matters including international agreements, national events, and tabled reports. Specifically for Bill S-202, "An Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act (credit card acceptance fees)," the debate at the second reading stage continued. However, due to the lack of a designated critic for the bill and discussions around its progression, further debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned.
During a Senate sitting on March 25, 2014, Bill S-202 concerning credit card acceptance fees was debated at second reading, passed that stage, and referred to committee, alongside other legislative and committee business.
On March 25, 2014, the Senate convened for a sitting that included various procedural actions and debates. A significant item was the second reading of Bill S-202, an Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act concerning credit card acceptance fees. During the debate on Bill S-202, Senator Ghislain Maltais spoke in favour of the bill's intent to protect merchants from rising credit card fees, while also suggesting that the bill's current proposals might not strike a fair balance. The bill was ultimately read a second time and referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce for further study. The sitting also included other legislative matters, tabling of reports, notices of motions, and debates on topics such as the Supreme Court appointment of justices, missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls, climate change strategy, and the role of the Senate in protecting minorities. The sitting concluded with the Senate adjourning to the next day.
In the Senate, debate on Bill S-202, concerning credit card acceptance fees, concluded with the bill passing second reading and being sent to committee, with a senator expressing concerns that the bill was a "band-aid solution" and did not adequately balance consumer and merchant needs.
This record details a Senate debate on Bill S-202, an Act to amend the Payment Card Networks Act concerning credit card acceptance fees. A senator spoke in favour of the bill, emphasizing its aim to protect merchants from rising fees charged by credit card companies and to ensure Canadians are aware of the true costs associated with using credit cards. The senator noted that while the government supports consumer protection, they believe the current bill's proposals do not strike a fair balance between the needs of consumers and merchants and is a "band-aid solution." The senator highlighted that discussions with stakeholders, including consumer associations, merchants, and credit card issuers, are ongoing to find a balanced approach. The bill was subsequently read a second time and referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce for further study.
The Senate completed its committee review of Bill S-202 on April 21, 2015, before moving to the report stage.
This artifact indicates that the Senate completed its "Consideration in committee" stage for Bill S-202 on April 21, 2015. This stage involves examining the bill in detail, often with proposed amendments. Following this, the bill proceeded to the report stage.
On April 21, 2015, the Senate received a committee report recommending that Bill S-202, concerning credit card acceptance fees, not proceed further due to existing voluntary industry codes and proposals, and also debated other legislative and non-legislative matters.
On April 21, 2015, the Senate was sitting and heard reports and debates on various matters. A key procedural event was the presentation of the Ninth Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce regarding Bill S-202. The committee recommended that the bill, concerning credit card acceptance fees, not be proceeded with further. The report cited the existence of a voluntary Code of Conduct for the Credit and Debit Card Industry and recent voluntary proposals from Visa and MasterCard to reduce fees as reasons for not proceeding with government intervention at that time. The Senate also debated other bills, including the Victims Bill of Rights Act (Bill C-32), the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (Bill C-2), and the Red Tape Reduction Bill (Bill C-21), as well as discussing issues like World Intellectual Property Day, the anniversary of the Battle of Vimy Ridge, the Kitsilano Coast Guard Base, and tax evasion.
On May 6, 2015, the Senate debated the report stage of Bill S-202, concerning credit card acceptance fees, following earlier readings and committee deliberations.
The Senate was at the report stage for Bill S-202, which deals with credit card acceptance fees. The latest activity on May 6, 2015, was a debate during the consideration of the committee's report. The bill had previously passed its first reading on October 17, 2013, and its second reading on October 25, 2013, with several speeches given and multiple committee meetings held between May 2014 and April 2015.
During the Senate's report stage sitting on May 6, 2015, the debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned, while other significant matters, including discussions on the Budget 2015, other bills, and various inquiries, were addressed.
On May 6, 2015, the Senate met for its report stage consideration of Bill S-202, concerning credit card acceptance fees. While the specific debate on Bill S-202 was adjourned, the Senate's sitting included discussions on various other matters. These included tributes to fallen journalists, updates on Senate committee work, a discussion on the country of Lesotho and the work of an NGO called Help Lesotho, congratulations to Senator Denise Batters for a mental health award, the welcoming of Dr. Mahmoud Eboo, the tabling and referral of a user fee proposal, and notices of upcoming motions. Significant time was also dedicated to debates on Budget 2015, focusing on education and economic proposals, particularly regarding First Nations funding and tax policies. Additionally, the Senate debated Bill C-247 concerning a single point of contact for reporting deaths, Bill C-591 about preventing criminals from benefiting from their crimes through survivor benefits, and an inquiry on the protection of Atlantic salmon. The sitting concluded with the adjournment of debate on several items, including Bill S-202.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for First reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Second reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Consideration in committee yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Third reading yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced