Bill C-5 explained in plain English
An Act to enact the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act
Federal Parliament bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
Short answer
The bill establishes two acts to remove trade barriers, streamline project approvals, and align federal laws with national interest objectives.
At a glance
Official Parliament of Canada snapshot for 45th Parliament, 1st Session. MP vote breakdowns appear when the House of Commons publishes a recorded division export for that bill. Senate and House stage details include official debate/sitting links when LEGISinfo publishes them.
AI-generated from official bill text; automatically checked and spot-reviewed.
The bill establishes two acts to remove trade barriers, streamline project approvals, and align federal laws with national interest objectives.
The bill enacts two key acts: the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act and the Building Canada Act. These acts aim to remove federal barriers to trade and labor mobility, establish mutual recognition of standards, and authorize national interest projects. The Free Trade Act supersedes conflicting federal laws, while the Building Canada Act streamlines approvals for projects deemed in the national interest. Key provisions include defining national interest projects, requiring consultations with provinces and Indigenous groups, and establishing a Minister-led process for authorizing projects. The Building Canada Act also provides liability protections for approved projects and allows for national security reviews. The bill amends several laws, including the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, Impact Assessment Act, and Environmental Protection Act, to align with these objectives.
- Enacts the Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act to remove federal barriers to trade and labor mobility, establish mutual recognition of standards, and authorize national interest projects.
- Enacts the Building Canada Act to streamline approvals for projects deemed in the national interest, provide liability protections, and allow for national security reviews.
- Amends several laws, including the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, Impact Assessment Act, and Environmental Protection Act, to align with the objectives of the new acts.
- Requires consultations with provinces, Indigenous groups, and regulatory bodies for national interest projects.
- Establishes a Minister-led process for authorizing projects and publishing decisions.
- Overrides conflicting federal laws under the Free Trade Act to prioritize trade and labor mobility objectives.
- Federal and provincial governments
- Indigenous groups
- Regulatory bodies
- Project proponents
- The public (through public disclosure requirements)
- National security agencies
- The bill does not specify the exact criteria for determining which projects qualify as 'national interest projects'.
- The exact scope of the Free Trade Act's supremacy over conflicting laws is not detailed in the text.
- The bill does not provide specific details on how national security reviews will be conducted.
- The exact procedures for amending Schedule 2 of the Building Canada Act are not fully outlined.
Changes to nuclear safety regulations to support national interest projects.
Projects authorized under the Building Canada Act are exempt from standard impact assessment requirements.
Environmental regulations are adjusted to support national interest projects.
Decisions on projects are made public through statutory instruments.
National interest projects may override emergency measures if necessary.
Projects must undergo conflict of interest checks before approval.
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. Coverage is limited to the official text extracted for this bill version.
Official textParliamentary Process
The Senate's first reading of Bill C-5 on June 25, 2025, initiated the legislative process, followed by committee review and subsequent readings before the bill was passed and received royal assent.
This record documents the Senate's first reading of Bill C-5 on June 25, 2025. It outlines the bill's legislative journey through the Senate, including key procedural steps: second reading (June 25), committee consideration (June 17-19), report stage (June 20), and third reading (June 26). A motion adopted on June 12, 2025, authorized the Senate to resolve into Committees of the Whole for three sittings (June 16-18) to review the bill's content. These committees had time limits for meetings and witness appearances, including scheduled appearances by ministers and officials. The first reading is a procedural step that does not enact law; further stages are required for final passage.
Not legal advice.
The Senate debated several bills, including Bill S-2 (amending the Indian Act) and defense-related legislation, with a motion to refer Bill S-2 to a committee being agreed to.
The Senate debate focused on several bills and motions. Bill S-2, which aims to amend the Indian Act to improve the treatment of Indigenous peoples, was discussed in detail. Senators debated its provisions, including the removal of discriminatory terms and the establishment of a new framework for Indigenous governance. A motion to refer Bill S-2 to a committee for further study was agreed to. Other bills, including Bill C-6 (National Defence and Security Act) and Bill C-7 (National Defence and Security Act), were mentioned in the context of defense funding and security measures. The debate included procedural motions and discussions about the legislative process.
Not legal advice.
The Senate examined defense funding challenges and Indigenous rights reforms, with officials noting unmet spending targets and senators emphasizing reconciliation efforts.
The Senate debated defense funding and Indigenous rights legislation. For defense bills (C-6 and C-7), officials highlighted challenges in allocating $44 billion for National Defence, including meeting NATO's 2% GDP spending target and concerns about a lack of detailed spending plans. For Indigenous rights bill S-2, senators discussed correcting historical inequities by allowing voluntary deregistration from the Indian Register and ensuring enfranchised individuals can still be registered.
Not legal advice.
The Senate examined defense funding challenges and Indigenous rights reforms, with officials noting unmet spending targets and senators emphasizing reconciliation efforts.
The Senate debated defense funding and Indigenous rights legislation. For defense bills (C-6 and C-7), officials highlighted challenges in allocating $44 billion for National Defence, including meeting NATO's 2% GDP spending target and concerns about a lack of detailed spending plans. For Indigenous rights bill S-2, senators discussed correcting historical inequities by allowing voluntary deregistration from the Indian Register and ensuring enfranchised individuals can still be registered.
Not legal advice.
The Senate processed Bill C-5 through second reading, committee consideration, and third reading stages between June 12 and June 26, 2025, before it received royal assent.
This record details the Senate's processing of Bill C-5 during its second reading stage. The bill, which enacts two new acts related to trade and infrastructure, was passed by the Senate after a series of procedural steps. Key events include: 1. Second Reading: The Senate agreed to the bill's second reading on June 16, 2025 (Vote 13), with additional second reading sessions on June 25, 2025. 2. Committee Consideration: The Senate adopted a motion on June 12, 2025, to resolve into Committees of the Whole for three days (June 16-18) to review the bill. Each committee session could last up to four hours, with optional suspensions. 3. Witness Testimonies: Scheduled appearances included Minister Chrystia Freeland (June 16) and Minister Dominic LeBlanc (June 17) to discuss the bill's content. 4. Subsequent Stages: The bill proceeded to report stage (June 20) and third reading (June 26), culminating in royal assent on June 26, 2025. This record outlines procedural steps, not the legal content of the bill itself.
Not legal advice.
The Senate debated several bills, including Bill S-2 (amending the Indian Act) and defense-related legislation, with a motion to refer Bill S-2 to a committee being agreed to.
The Senate debate focused on several bills and motions. Bill S-2, which aims to amend the Indian Act to improve the treatment of Indigenous peoples, was discussed in detail. Senators debated its provisions, including the removal of discriminatory terms and the establishment of a new framework for Indigenous governance. A motion to refer Bill S-2 to a committee for further study was agreed to. Other bills, including Bill C-6 (National Defence and Security Act) and Bill C-7 (National Defence and Security Act), were mentioned in the context of defense funding and security measures. The debate included procedural motions and discussions about the legislative process.
Not legal advice.
The Senate examined defense funding challenges and Indigenous rights reforms, with officials noting unmet spending targets and senators emphasizing reconciliation efforts.
The Senate debated defense funding and Indigenous rights legislation. For defense bills (C-6 and C-7), officials highlighted challenges in allocating $44 billion for National Defence, including meeting NATO's 2% GDP spending target and concerns about a lack of detailed spending plans. For Indigenous rights bill S-2, senators discussed correcting historical inequities by allowing voluntary deregistration from the Indian Register and ensuring enfranchised individuals can still be registered.
Not legal advice.
The Senate examined defense funding challenges and Indigenous rights reforms, with officials noting unmet spending targets and senators emphasizing reconciliation efforts.
The Senate debated defense funding and Indigenous rights legislation. For defense bills (C-6 and C-7), officials highlighted challenges in allocating $44 billion for National Defence, including meeting NATO's 2% GDP spending target and concerns about a lack of detailed spending plans. For Indigenous rights bill S-2, senators discussed correcting historical inequities by allowing voluntary deregistration from the Indian Register and ensuring enfranchised individuals can still be registered.
Not legal advice.
The Senate completed third reading of Bill C-5 on June 26, 2025, after prior stages including committee review and report stage.
This record documents the Senate's third reading of Bill C-5, which received royal assent on June 26, 2025. The bill's journey through the Senate included second reading on June 16, committee consideration from June 17-19, and report stage on June 20. The third reading was completed on June 26, with the Senate agreeing to the bill's final parts. A motion adopted on June 12, 2025, established committees of the whole for June 16-18 to review the bill's content, with specific witnesses scheduled for June 16 and 17.
Not legal advice.
This Senate debate record includes multiple speech chunks with metadata about speakers and topics, but does not contain legal outcomes or full bill texts.
The debate record contains multiple chunks of speech from the Canadian Senate. Each chunk includes metadata such as speaker name, role, party, and time stamps, along with the actual speech content. The topics discussed appear to involve procedural matters related to legislative business, with speakers referencing specific bills or motions. No legal conclusions or full bill texts are provided.
Not legal advice.
The Senate debated and adopted a motion to proceed with Bill C-5, which seeks to modernize federal trust management practices, while also mentioning other bills and expressing gratitude to parliamentary staff.
The Senate debate focused on the progress of Bill C-5, which aims to modernize the federal government's approach to trust management. Senators discussed the importance of transparency and accountability in government operations, with particular emphasis on ensuring Indigenous communities are meaningfully consulted in trust-related decisions. There was also discussion about the economic implications of trust management for Canadians. The motion to proceed with Bill C-5 was adopted, and other bills like Bill C-6 were mentioned. The session concluded with expressions of thanks to parliamentary teams for their work during the year.
Not legal advice.
House of Commons members criticized Bill C-5 for its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and inadequate environmental safeguards during a debate that included concerns from multiple parties.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-5, multiple members raised concerns about the bill's rushed passage and procedural shortcomings. Key criticisms included: (1) the bill was passed without adequate consultation with Indigenous communities and the public, (2) it failed to incorporate the precautionary principle for environmental protection, and (3) its legal framework for regulating carbon emissions was deemed insufficient. Opposition members from the Green Party, NDP, and some Conservatives highlighted these issues, while a Conservative member acknowledged the need for further study but defended the bill's intent. No official vote or amendment was recorded in this discussion.
Not legal advice.
House of Commons members criticized Bill C-5 for its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and inadequate environmental safeguards during a debate that included concerns from multiple parties.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-5, multiple members raised concerns about the bill's rushed passage and procedural shortcomings. Key criticisms included: (1) the bill was passed without adequate consultation with Indigenous communities and the public, (2) it failed to incorporate the precautionary principle for environmental protection, and (3) its legal framework for regulating carbon emissions was deemed insufficient. Opposition members from the Green Party, NDP, and some Conservatives highlighted these issues, while a Conservative member acknowledged the need for further study but defended the bill's intent. No official vote or amendment was recorded in this discussion.
Not legal advice.
House of Commons members criticized Bill C-5 for its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and inadequate environmental safeguards during a debate that included concerns from multiple parties.
During a House of Commons debate on Bill C-5, multiple members raised concerns about the bill's rushed passage and procedural shortcomings. Key criticisms included: (1) the bill was passed without adequate consultation with Indigenous communities and the public, (2) it failed to incorporate the precautionary principle for environmental protection, and (3) its legal framework for regulating carbon emissions was deemed insufficient. Opposition members from the Green Party, NDP, and some Conservatives highlighted these issues, while a Conservative member acknowledged the need for further study but defended the bill's intent. No official vote or amendment was recorded in this discussion.
Not legal advice.
Bill C-5 completed its House of Commons first reading on June 25, 2025, followed by committee review and third reading, with the Senate establishing special committees to examine the bill's content prior to its final passage.
This record documents the procedural steps for Bill C-5 in the House of Commons. The bill was introduced on June 6, 2025, and completed its first reading on June 25, 2025. It proceeded to second reading on the same day, followed by committee consideration from June 17-19, 2025. The report stage was completed on June 20, 2025, and the bill passed third reading on June 26, 2025. The Senate adopted a motion to establish committees of the whole to review the bill's content before it reached the Senate, with specific time limits and witness appearances scheduled for June 16-18, 2025. The bill received royal assent on June 26, 2025.
Not legal advice.
The House of Commons debated Bill C-4, with the Liberal Party promoting tax relief for homebuyers and the Conservative Party criticizing the carbon tax's impact on jobs and seniors, while the Bloc Québécois raised concerns about First Nations communities.
The House of Commons debated Bill C-4, which aims to make life more affordable for Canadians. Key discussion points included: 1. Tax Relief for Homebuyers: The Liberal Party proposed tax relief for first-time homebuyers, with Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) emphasizing the measure would help families with housing costs. 2. Carbon Tax Impact: Critics, including the Bloc Québécois and Conservative Party, raised concerns about the carbon tax's effect on First Nations communities, specifically the Chippewas of Georgina Island, and its potential to harm small businesses. 3. Affordability for Seniors: Anna Roberts (Conservative) criticized the bill for not addressing seniors' affordability issues, noting seniors are the fastest-growing demographic by 2030. 4. Economic Concerns: The CPC highlighted the 7% unemployment rate and argued the industrial carbon tax would hurt manufacturing and jobs. 5. Government Response: The Liberal Party defended the bill as a comprehensive approach to affordability, while opponents called for more targeted support for vulnerable groups.
Not legal advice.
Bill C-5's second reading in the House of Commons was completed on June 17, 2025, following Senate procedures to review the bill's content through committees.
This record describes procedural steps in the legislative process for Bill C-5. The bill received royal assent on June 26, 2025, completing its journey through Parliament. During the House of Commons' second reading on June 17, 2025, the bill was agreed to (Vote 13). The Senate had previously adopted a motion (on June 12, 2025) to resolve into Committees of the Whole for three days (June 16-18, 2025) to review the bill's content. Each committee session was limited to four hours, with possible suspensions. Key witnesses, including ministers, were scheduled for specific days. The motion also included provisions about adjusting the effective date of certain bill elements if adopted after June 27, 2025.
Not legal advice.
Senators debated procedural aspects of bills and emphasized the importance of parliamentary processes in ensuring legislative transparency and accountability.
The Senate debate focused on the procedural status of bills and the role of the House of Commons. Senators discussed the importance of legislative processes, the need for transparency, and the significance of parliamentary procedures in maintaining democratic accountability.
Not legal advice.
The Senate debated Bill C-5, focusing on economic policy, Indigenous consultation, and transparency, while also referencing related legislative matters.
The Senate debate on Bill C-5 (An Act to amend the Income Tax Act and other Acts) included discussions about the government's approach to economic policy, Indigenous consultation, and trust in the legislative process. Senators raised concerns about the need for transparency in government decisions and the importance of involving Indigenous communities in policy development. The debate also touched on broader economic issues, including the use of special warrants for infrastructure spending. A separate debate on Bill C-6 (An Act to amend the Income Tax Act) was mentioned, but no specific details about its content were provided. The Speaker of the Senate closed the session with a reminder of the importance of parliamentary procedures.
Not legal advice.
The debate over Bill C-5 highlighted concerns about its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and potential legal and environmental risks, with critics calling for procedural reforms and amendments.
The discussion revolves around Bill C-5, which has faced criticism for its rushed passage through Parliament with limited time for committee review. Key points include: 1. Procedural Concerns: Elizabeth May (Green Party) criticized the bill as an 'abomination' for bypassing proper parliamentary procedures, arguing it lacks democratic legitimacy and adequate consultation. She noted the bill's structure (part 2 as a separate bill) should have been handled separately, with amendments and hearings required. 2. Legal and Environmental Risks: Critics warned of potential legal challenges and protests due to insufficient consultation, which could lead to blockades and disputes over project approvals. Environmental lawyers and journalists were cited as highlighting the bill's negative impact on informed decision-making. 3. Support for Nation-Building: Heather McPherson (NDP) acknowledged the value of large infrastructure projects but emphasized the need for proper consultation to avoid legal and operational issues. She also pointed to interprovincial barriers and federal jurisdiction over such matters. 4. Partisan Dynamics: Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) claimed NDP members in the House do not support the bill, while Heather countered that she supports big projects but the bill's approach is flawed. Garnett Genuis (NDP) and Hon. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal) were mentioned in the context of the debate but did not offer specific arguments. 5. Calls for Reform: The discussion underscored demands for amendments, transparency, and adherence to parliamentary norms, with critics comparing the bill's process to past legislation that faced similar scrutiny.
Not legal advice.
The debate over Bill C-5 highlighted concerns about its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and potential legal and environmental risks, with critics calling for procedural reforms and amendments.
The discussion revolves around Bill C-5, which has faced criticism for its rushed passage through Parliament with limited time for committee review. Key points include: 1. Procedural Concerns: Elizabeth May (Green Party) criticized the bill as an 'abomination' for bypassing proper parliamentary procedures, arguing it lacks democratic legitimacy and adequate consultation. She noted the bill's structure (part 2 as a separate bill) should have been handled separately, with amendments and hearings required. 2. Legal and Environmental Risks: Critics warned of potential legal challenges and protests due to insufficient consultation, which could lead to blockades and disputes over project approvals. Environmental lawyers and journalists were cited as highlighting the bill's negative impact on informed decision-making. 3. Support for Nation-Building: Heather McPherson (NDP) acknowledged the value of large infrastructure projects but emphasized the need for proper consultation to avoid legal and operational issues. She also pointed to interprovincial barriers and federal jurisdiction over such matters. 4. Partisan Dynamics: Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) claimed NDP members in the House do not support the bill, while Heather countered that she supports big projects but the bill's approach is flawed. Garnett Genuis (NDP) and Hon. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal) were mentioned in the context of the debate but did not offer specific arguments. 5. Calls for Reform: The discussion underscored demands for amendments, transparency, and adherence to parliamentary norms, with critics comparing the bill's process to past legislation that faced similar scrutiny.
Not legal advice.
The debate over Bill C-5 highlighted concerns about its rushed passage, lack of consultation, and potential legal and environmental risks, with critics calling for procedural reforms and amendments.
The discussion revolves around Bill C-5, which has faced criticism for its rushed passage through Parliament with limited time for committee review. Key points include: 1. Procedural Concerns: Elizabeth May (Green Party) criticized the bill as an 'abomination' for bypassing proper parliamentary procedures, arguing it lacks democratic legitimacy and adequate consultation. She noted the bill's structure (part 2 as a separate bill) should have been handled separately, with amendments and hearings required. 2. Legal and Environmental Risks: Critics warned of potential legal challenges and protests due to insufficient consultation, which could lead to blockades and disputes over project approvals. Environmental lawyers and journalists were cited as highlighting the bill's negative impact on informed decision-making. 3. Support for Nation-Building: Heather McPherson (NDP) acknowledged the value of large infrastructure projects but emphasized the need for proper consultation to avoid legal and operational issues. She also pointed to interprovincial barriers and federal jurisdiction over such matters. 4. Partisan Dynamics: Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal) claimed NDP members in the House do not support the bill, while Heather countered that she supports big projects but the bill's approach is flawed. Garnett Genuis (NDP) and Hon. Adam van Koeverden (Liberal) were mentioned in the context of the debate but did not offer specific arguments. 5. Calls for Reform: The discussion underscored demands for amendments, transparency, and adherence to parliamentary norms, with critics comparing the bill's process to past legislation that faced similar scrutiny.
Not legal advice.
Bill C-5's House of Commons committee consideration stage was completed on June 19, 2025, following its second reading and prior to its third reading and final approval.
This record details the procedural steps for Bill C-5 in the House of Commons. The bill, which became law after receiving royal assent on June 26, 2025, underwent committee consideration from June 17 to June 19, 2025. During this stage, the House reviewed the bill's content and prepared for its final approval. The Senate had previously passed a motion to establish special committees to examine the bill's provisions before it reached the Senate, with specific time limits and witness appearances scheduled.
Not legal advice.
The debate centered on immigration reforms, economic development through trade and energy policies, and housing affordability challenges, with both advocacy for government initiatives and calls for improved policy execution.
The debate focused on three main topics: (1) Immigration policy, with discussion of the Liberal government's immigration plan and fast-track processing for certain applicants; (2) Economic policy, including the 'one Canadian economy act' to remove barriers to internal trade and support for the energy sector; and (3) Housing affordability, with specific references to housing shortages in regions like Scugog and the Auditor General's report on unmet housing targets. The discussion emphasized government initiatives to address these issues but included scrutiny of past performance and policy implementation gaps.
Not legal advice.
Bill C-5 completed its House of Commons report stage on June 20, 2025, after Senate committees reviewed its content in advance as part of the legislative process.
This record details procedural steps for Bill C-5 during its passage through Parliament. The bill received royal assent on June 26, 2025, after completing its House of Commons report stage on June 20, 2025. Key procedural milestones include: second reading on June 16, 2025; committee consideration from June 17-19, 2025; and third reading on June 20, 2025. The Senate adopted a motion (June 12, 2025) to establish committees of the whole to review the bill's content before it reached the Senate, with specific time limits and witness appearances scheduled for June 16-18, 2025.
Not legal advice.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debate at report stage yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Bill C-5 completed its House of Commons third reading stage on June 20, 2025, with procedural steps including committee reviews in the Senate and subsequent royal assent on June 26, 2025.
This record documents the procedural steps for Bill C-5 in the House of Commons. The bill completed its third reading stage on June 20, 2025, with two parts passed by vote (Vote 33 for part 1 and short title, Vote 34 for part 2 and schedule). The bill received royal assent on June 26, 2025. The record also notes a Senate motion from June 12, 2025, which established committees of the whole to review the bill's content before it reached the Senate. These committees were scheduled for June 16-18, 2025, with specific time limits and witness appearances. The official text is chunked and incomplete, so some details may be missing.
Not legal advice.
The debate on Bill C-5 centered on its provisions for interprovincial infrastructure cooperation, with critics emphasizing the need for enforceable accountability mechanisms and concerns about Indigenous rights, while supporters framed it as a step toward a unified Canadian economy.
During the debate on Bill C-5, members of the House of Commons discussed its provisions and implications. The bill aims to establish a framework for interprovincial cooperation on major infrastructure projects, including a Major Projects Office. Key points raised include: (1) Concerns from the Green Party about the bill lacking binding criteria and accountability mechanisms, with calls for a system with reviewable mechanisms by a federal court. (2) A Liberal member defended the bill as fulfilling a campaign promise to build a 'one Canadian economy' and emphasized its role in interprovincial collaboration. (3) The Greens criticized the bill for potentially undermining constitutional rights, particularly regarding Indigenous territories, and suggested the EU's electricity grid model as a potential benchmark. (4) Opposition members highlighted the bill's discretionary nature, noting the Major Projects Office's lack of enforceable mechanisms. The debate focused on balancing economic integration with accountability, Indigenous rights, and the need for precise legislative drafting.
Not legal advice.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Royal assent yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Debates of the Senate yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Sponsor’s speech yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Response speech yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
We don't have a plain-language summary for Response speech yet. The official source linked below is the full record.
Debate and sitting links point to official parliamentary sources when LEGISinfo publishes them. Any plain-language discussion summaries should be generated from those official texts and reviewed before public display.
Vote Summary
Representative Voting Breakdown
Vote badges include text labels so the table stays readable for everyone, even without color cues alone.
| Representative | Role | Riding | Party | Vote | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dominic LeBlancSponsor MP | MP | Beauséjour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lac-Saint-Jean | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Shefford | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Jean | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Kingsway | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saanich—Gulf Islands | Green Party | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Joliette—Manawan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Courtenay—Alberni | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Strathcona | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mirabel | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver East | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg Centre | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nunavut | NDP | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel—Alnôbak | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montcalm | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurentides—Labelle | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Côte-Nord—Kawawachikamach—Nitassinan | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Pointe-de-l'Île | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Jonquière | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Drummond | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rimouski—La Matapédia | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beaches—East York | Liberal | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Repentigny | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-du-Nord | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Témiscamingue | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Berthier—Maskinongé | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beloeil—Chambly | Bloc Québécois | Yes | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Island—Powell River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bourassa | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Simcoe North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington North—Milton West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York South—Weston—Etobicoke | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cumberland—Colchester | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brossard—Saint-Lambert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Willowdale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Skyview | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elgin—St. Thomas—London South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Qu'Appelle | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Alfred-Pellan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa West—Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dorval—Lachine—LaSalle | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | King—Vaughan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vimy | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mount Royal | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peace River—Westlock | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oxford | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Waterloo | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Winnipeg South Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
MP | MP | Huron—Bruce | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Côte-du-Sud—Rivière-du-Loup—Kataskomiq—Témiscouata | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mont-Saint-Bruno—L'Acadie | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Southwest | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Northwest | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ponoka—Didsbury | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Airdrie—Cochrane | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Mission—Matsqui—Abbotsford | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Sackville—Bedford—Preston | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portage—Lisgar | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yukon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carleton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Red Deer | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Marc-Aurèle-Fortin | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Long Range Mountains | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Trois-Rivières | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yorkton—Melville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Richmond Centre—Marpole | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Mississauga—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Algonquin—Renfrew—Pembroke | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Spadina—Harbourfront | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Catharines | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Annapolis | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Essex | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bay of Quinte | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Grande Prairie | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | University—Rosedale | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | LaSalle—Émard—Verdun | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Newfoundland | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Elmwood—Transcona | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cambridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Confederation | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon—University | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary McKnight | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Okanagan Lake West—South Kelowna | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Riding Mountain | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Flamborough—Glanbrook—Brant North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Parkland | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dartmouth—Cole Harbour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Chatham-Kent—Leamington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Bow River | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Signal Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fredericton—Oromocto | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Guelph | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherbrooke | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Skeena—Bulkley Valley | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Peterborough | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Laurent | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Stormont—Dundas—Glengarry | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond—Arthabaska | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kenora—Kiiwetinoong | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Honoré-Mercier | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Surrey—White Rock | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laval—Les Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Maurice—Champlain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Montmorency—Charlevoix | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kapuskasing—Timmins—Mushkegowuk | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Guildwood—Rouge Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. Boniface—St. Vital | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Moncton—Dieppe | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prescott—Russell—Cumberland | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brandon—Souris | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hull—Aylmer | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Fraserview—South Burnaby | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Madawaska—Restigouche | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fleetwood—Port Kells | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Malpeque | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Vancouver Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Markham—Stouffville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Erin Mills | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Malton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York—Durham | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lévis—Lotbinière | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | La Prairie—Atateken | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Southeast | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Breton—Canso—Antigonish | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Westminster—Burnaby—Maillardville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke—Lakeshore | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Bowmanville—Oshawa North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauce | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary East | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Scarborough—Agincourt | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Québec Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cowichan—Malahat—Langford | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kanata | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ajax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | South Shore—St. Margarets | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Delta | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury East—Manitoulin—Nickel Belt | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | St. John's East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Louis-Hébert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Foothills | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Barrie South—Innisfil | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Perth—Wellington | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—St. Croix | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terra Nova—The Peninsulas | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | North Vancouver—Capilano | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pickering—Brooklin | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Humber River—Black Creek | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—Danforth | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Davenport | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burlington | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Windsor—Tecumseh—Lakeshore | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton West | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cardigan | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Griesbach | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saskatoon South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kings—Hants | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Milton East—Halton Hills South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London—Fanshawe | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Dufferin—Caledon | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fort McMurray—Cold Lake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brantford—Brant South—Six Nations | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Toronto—St. Paul's | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Haldimand—Norfolk | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Middlesex—London | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Rivière-des-Mille-Îles | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton Mountain | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brome—Missisquoi | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mégantic—L'Érable—Lotbinière | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thérèse-De Blainville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Rainy River | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Compton—Stanstead | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Orléans | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hochelaga—Rosemont-Est | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sarnia—Lambton—Bkejwanong | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Papineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nepean | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kingston and the Islands | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chilliwack—Hope | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Riverbend | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener South—Hespeler | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ahuntsic-Cartierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thornhill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Wellington—Halton Hills North | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough—Woburn | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaughan—Woodbridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Wascana | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Unionville | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Nose Hill | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Miramichi—Grand Lake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sydney—Glace Bay | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Leduc—Wetaskiwin | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa—Vanier—Gloucester | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Châteauguay—Les Jardins-de-Napierville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Saint-Hubert | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hamilton East—Stoney Creek | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond East—Steveston | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Crowfoot | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Thunder Bay—Superior North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Avalon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nipissing—Timiskaming | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga East—Cooksville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | London Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vaudreuil | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Labrador | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northumberland—Clarke | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lethbridge | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Outremont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Prince Albert | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kildonan—St. Paul | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Northwest Territories | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Churchill—Keewatinook Aski | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Mississauga—Streetsville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oshawa | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Tobique—Mactaquac | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Chicoutimi—Le Fjord | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Fundy Royal | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Columbia—Kootenay—Southern Rockies | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Egmont | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Don Valley West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | York Centre | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Battlefords—Lloydminster—Meadow Lake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton North—Caledon | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Whitby | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough Centre—Don Valley East | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pierrefonds—Dollard | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Newmarket—Aurora | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Parry Sound—Muskoka | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vernon—Lake Country—Monashee | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lanark—Frontenac | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Charlottetown | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Central Nova | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Acadie—Bathurst | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton—Chinguacousy Park | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Halifax | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Lakeland | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Scarborough North | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Hastings—Lennox and Addington—Tyendinaga | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Heritage | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Oakville West | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Brampton South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Pontiac—Kitigan Zibi | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Beauport—Limoilou | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Calgary Midnapore | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kelowna | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Souris—Moose Mountain | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Gatineau | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Surrey Newton | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Abbotsford—South Langley | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Langley Township—Fraser Heights | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Granville | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cloverdale—Langley City | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Nanaimo—Ladysmith | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Terrebonne | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
MP | MP | Provencher | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. |
| MP | Burnaby North—Seymour | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Winnipeg South | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sault Ste. Marie—Algoma | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Markham—Thornhill | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Kitchener—Conestoga | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Gateway | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Les Pays-d'en-Haut | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cariboo—Prince George | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Cape Spear | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Niagara Falls—Niagara-on-the-Lake | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Eglinton—Lawrence | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Richmond Hill South | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Sudbury | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Burnaby Central | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Vancouver Quadra | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Regina—Lewvan | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Saint John—Kennebecasis | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Victoria | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Yellowhead | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Ottawa Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Etobicoke Centre | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Edmonton Manning | Conservative | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Port Moody—Coquitlam | Liberal | No | Recorded without an additional note. | |
| MP | Laurier—Sainte-Marie | Liberal | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. | |
| MP | Simcoe—Grey | Conservative | Paired | Paired during this recorded vote. |
Official sources
This plain-English summary is based on official legislative sources and public records. It is intended for civic education and is not legal advice.
How this data is sourced