Skip to main content
Back to Bills
OntarioDid not become law (session ended)43rd Parliament, 1st Session

Bill 120 explained in plain English

Liability for Climate-Related Harms Act, 2023

Ontario legislature bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.

At a glance

Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature
Legislature / Parliament
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Session
43rd Parliament, 1st Session
Bill number
Bill 120
Full title
Liability for Climate-Related Harms Act, 2023
Current status
Did not become law (session ended)
Latest event
Ordered for Second Reading
Last updated
Jun 1, 2023

Official Legislative Assembly of Ontario snapshot for 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. Representative vote breakdowns appear when the Assembly publishes an Ayes and Nays page for the bill.

Chamber
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Current Stage
Ordered for Second Reading
Latest Activity
Jun 1, 2023
Plain-language explanation
In plain English (our explanation)

Our plain-language take, written for civic education.

Source: By PoliticalData.ca

AI-assisted, reviewed before publishing
Short Version

Bill 120 would make fossil fuel producers strictly liable for climate-related harms in Ontario if their greenhouse gas emissions are at a globally detectable level.

What It Means

Bill 120, called the Liability for Climate-Related Harms Act, 2023, is a private members' bill that proposes to create a new legal rule in Ontario. The bill would make fossil fuel producers (companies engaged in exploring for, extracting, or selling coal, oil, and gas) strictly liable—meaning responsible without needing to prove fault—for harms caused by climate change in Ontario, but only if the producer's greenhouse gas emissions can be detected at a global level. The bill defines "climate-related harms" broadly to include economic losses, property damage, insurance costs, injury or illness, ocean acidification, sea level rise impacts, costs of monitoring climate effects, emergency response costs, infrastructure improvement costs, and public education campaign costs. To determine if a producer is liable, the bill says courts should consider both the emissions from producing the fossil fuels and the emissions from using those fuels. The bill also changes how courts evaluate evidence about whether a specific weather event was caused by climate change—if evidence shows climate change doubled the likelihood of that type of event, that is considered sufficient proof under the standard civil test (balance of probabilities) that climate change caused or worsened the event. The bill would come into force on the day it receives Royal Assent. Regulations would be needed to define what counts as "globally detectable" emissions and how to measure a producer's emissions level.

Uncertainties Or Limits
  • This draft was normalized from a partial local-model response and must be reviewed before publication.

Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.

Official text

Process Snapshot

Step 1
First reading
Jun 1, 2023
Step 2
Second reading
Date not listed
Step 3
Committee review
Not reached yet
Step 4
Third reading
Not reached yet
Step 5
Royal assent
Not reached yet

Vote Summary

No published recorded division

This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.

Sponsor
Peter Tabuns
New Democratic Party of Ontario | Toronto—Danforth
Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature

No published representative vote breakdown

This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.

Official sources

Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.

How this data is sourced