Skip to main content
Back to Bills
OntarioDid not become law (session ended)40th Parliament, 1st Session

Bill 68 explained in plain English

Regulated Health Professions Amendment Act (Treating Spouses), 2012

Ontario legislature bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.

At a glance

Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature
Legislature / Parliament
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Session
40th Parliament, 1st Session
Bill number
Bill 68
Full title
Regulated Health Professions Amendment Act (Treating Spouses), 2012
Current status
Did not become law (session ended)
Latest event
Carried
Last updated
Apr 18, 2012

Official Legislative Assembly of Ontario snapshot for 40th Parliament, 1st Session. Representative vote breakdowns appear when the Assembly publishes an Ayes and Nays page for the bill.

Chamber
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Current Stage
Carried
Latest Activity
Apr 18, 2012
Plain-language explanation
In plain English (our explanation)

Our plain-language take, written for civic education.

Source: By PoliticalData.ca

AI-assisted, reviewed before publishing
Short Version

Bill 68 amends the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 to allow disciplinary panels to not reprimand or revoke a health professional's registration if the patient was their spouse at the time of the alleged misconduct.

What It Means

This bill, known as the Regulated Health Professions Amendment Act (Treating Spouses), 2012, amends the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991. It introduces an exception to disciplinary actions for health professionals who have sexually abused a patient, specifically when the patient was the professional's spouse at the time. The bill also provides a definition for 'spouse' in this context.

What This Bill Does
  • Amends section 51 of Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991.
  • Introduces an exception to the requirement for disciplinary panels to reprimand a health professional or revoke their registration in cases of sexual abuse of a patient.
  • Specifies that this exception applies if the patient was the member's spouse at the relevant time.
  • Provides a definition for 'spouse' within the context of this exception, including common-law relationships.
Who Is Affected
  • Regulated health professionals in Ontario.
  • Disciplinary panels of health profession regulatory bodies.
  • Patients who are spouses of regulated health professionals.
Rights, Duties, Or Obligations
  • Disciplinary panels are no longer required to reprimand a health professional or revoke their registration if the patient was their spouse at the time of the alleged sexual abuse.
Important Dates
  • The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.
Enforcement Or Penalties
  • The bill modifies existing disciplinary procedures, potentially affecting the mandatory reprimand or revocation of a health professional's registration.
Uncertainties Or Limits
  • The bill does not specify what actions disciplinary panels may take if they choose not to reprimand or revoke registration under the new exception.
  • The definition of 'spouse' includes individuals in a conjugal relationship outside of marriage, but the specifics of 'living together' are not detailed.
  • The bill does not alter the finding of professional misconduct itself, only the mandatory disciplinary actions that follow.
Laws Or Regulations Affected
Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991
amends

Adds new subsections to section 51 of Schedule 2, creating an exception for spouses regarding mandatory disciplinary actions in cases of patient sexual abuse.

Source: Section 51 of Schedule 2

Health Professions Procedural Code (Schedule to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991)
amends

Modifies provisions related to finding professional misconduct and the consequences thereof when the patient is the member's spouse.

Source: Section 51 of Schedule 2

Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.

Official text

Process Snapshot

Step 1
First reading
Apr 18, 2012
Step 2
Second reading
Not reached yet
Step 3
Committee review
Not reached yet
Step 4
Third reading
Not reached yet
Step 5
Royal assent
Not reached yet

Vote Summary

No published recorded division

This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.

Sponsor
Steve Clark
Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario | Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes
Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature

No published representative vote breakdown

This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.

Official sources

Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.

How this data is sourced