Skip to main content
Back to Bills
OntarioDid Not Pass40th Parliament, 1st Session

Bill 88 explained in plain English

Pesticides Amendment Act (Licence for Cosmetic Purposes), 2012

Ontario legislature bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.

At a glance

Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature
Legislature / Parliament
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Session
40th Parliament, 1st Session
Bill number
Bill 88
Full title
Pesticides Amendment Act (Licence for Cosmetic Purposes), 2012
Current status
Did Not Pass
Latest event
Lost on division
Last updated
May 31, 2012

Official Legislative Assembly of Ontario snapshot for 40th Parliament, 1st Session. Representative vote breakdowns appear when the Assembly publishes an Ayes and Nays page for the bill.

Chamber
Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Current Stage
Lost on division
Latest Activity
May 31, 2012
Plain-language explanation
In plain English (our explanation)

Our plain-language take, written for civic education.

Source: By PoliticalData.ca

AI-assisted, reviewed before publishing
Short Version

Bill 88 amends the Pesticides Act to require a licence for the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes.

What It Means

This bill, known as the Pesticides Amendment Act (Licence for Cosmetic Purposes), 2012, amends the Pesticides Act. It introduces a requirement for a licence to use pesticides for cosmetic purposes on land. Specifically, it repeals and replaces a section of the Pesticides Act to state that no one can use or permit the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes unless they have a licence of a prescribed class and follow its terms. The bill also makes a related change to another section of the Act to include this new licensing requirement. The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.

What This Bill Does
  • Requires a licence for the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes on land.
  • Amends the Pesticides Act to add this licensing requirement.
  • Specifies that pesticides for cosmetic purposes can only be used under and in accordance with a licence of a prescribed class.
  • Adds a reference to the new licensing requirement in another section of the Pesticides Act.
Who Is Affected
  • Individuals or entities who use or cause or permit the use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes on land in Ontario.
  • The Ministry responsible for administering the Pesticides Act (licensing, regulation).
Rights, Duties, Or Obligations
  • Obligation: Persons must obtain a licence of a prescribed class to use pesticides for cosmetic purposes.
  • Obligation: Persons must use pesticides for cosmetic purposes in accordance with their licence.
Important Dates
  • The Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.
Uncertainties Or Limits
  • The specific class or classes of licences required are not detailed in the bill text, but are referred to as 'prescribed class'.
  • The bill does not specify the details of the 'prescribed' pesticides for cosmetic purposes.
  • The bill does not outline the process for obtaining a licence or the associated fees.
Laws Or Regulations Affected
Pesticides Act
amends

Introduces a licensing requirement for using pesticides for cosmetic purposes on land. It repeals and replaces subsection 7.1 (1) to state that such use is prohibited unless done under and in accordance with a licence of a prescribed class.

Source: Section 1 of the Bill, which amends Section 7.1 (1) of the Pesticides Act.

Pesticides Act
amends

Adds a reference to the new licensing requirement for cosmetic pesticide use, ensuring it is captured by existing provisions related to sections 5 or 6 of the Act.

Source: Section 2 of the Bill, which amends Subsection 11 (1) of the Pesticides Act.

Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.

Official text

Process Snapshot

Step 1
First reading
May 9, 2012
Step 2
Second reading
May 31, 2012
Step 3
Committee review
Not reached yet
Step 4
Third reading
Not reached yet
Step 5
Royal assent
Not reached yet

Vote Summary

No published recorded division

This bill does not have a published recorded division in the current official sources, so representative-by-representative vote counts are not shown.

Sponsor
Ted Chudleigh
Sponsor party or district not listed
Jurisdiction
Ontario Legislature

No published representative vote breakdown

The current official sources do not publish a recorded division breakdown for this bill, so there is no representative-by-representative table to show.

Official sources

Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.

How this data is sourced