Bill 242 explained in plain English
Safer Municipalities Act, 2024
Ontario legislature bill summary, status, timeline, sponsor, votes, and official sources.
At a glance
Official Legislative Assembly of Ontario snapshot for 43rd Parliament, 1st Session. Representative vote breakdowns appear when the Assembly publishes an Ayes and Nays page for the bill.
Our plain-language take, written for civic education.
Source: By PoliticalData.ca
Bill 242 creates a new law to prohibit consuming illegal substances in public places in Ontario and amends the Trespass to Property Act to establish aggravating factors for sentencing.
Bill 242, called the Safer Municipalities Act, 2024, does two main things: **1. Creates a new law called the Restricting Public Consumption of Illegal Substances Act, 2024** This law prohibits people from consuming illegal substances (as defined by federal drug laws) in public places. A "public place" means any place the general public is invited or permitted to go, including temporary structures like tents used as dwellings in public places if that use is not permitted by law. The law includes some exemptions. People are allowed to consume illegal substances without breaking this law if they are: - Using the substance at an authorized supervised consumption site (a site federally approved for drug consumption) - Legally permitted to possess the substance under Ontario or Canadian law - Covered by a prescribed exemption made through regulations People who seek emergency services cannot be charged with an offence under this law based on evidence obtained from seeking help. The same protection applies to anyone who stays at a scene to help with an emergency or receive emergency services. Police officers or certain prescribed provincial offences officers can: - Direct a person consuming an illegal substance in public to stop or leave - Direct the person to provide their full name, date of birth, and address (for the purpose of starting a proceeding) - Arrest without a warrant anyone they believe on reasonable grounds has broken the law - Seize and destroy any illegal substances they find If someone fails to follow an officer's direction, that is an offence. Anyone convicted under this law can be fined up to $10,000, imprisoned for up to six months, or both. The Minister (Solicitor General or assigned Executive Council member) can designate analysts to examine seized substances. The Lieutenant Governor in Council can make regulations to clarify what counts as a public place and to govern how directions are given and seizures are made. **2. Amends the Trespass to Property Act** The current Trespass to Property Act makes it an offence to trespass on property and sets a penalty of up to $10,000 on conviction. Bill 242 adds two aggravating factors that courts must consider when deciding on a penalty: 1. The defendant was told to leave by the occupier or someone authorized by the occupier, and the defendant was on the premises more than 24 hours after that notice (or a longer period if the occupier specified one), even if the defendant left and came back. 2. At the time of sentencing, the court believes the defendant is likely to trespass again in the future. Bill 242 also makes a small correction to the French version of the Trespass to Property Act.
- This draft was normalized from a partial local-model response and must be reviewed before publication.
A new provincial law is created that prohibits consuming illegal substances in public places, with exemptions for supervised consumption sites, legally authorized possession, and prescribed exemptions. Officers gain powers to direct people to stop or leave, identify themselves, and seize substances. Violations are offences subject to fines up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment up to 6 months.
Source: Schedule 1, section 2 and section 9
Section 2 is amended to add two aggravating factors that courts must consider when determining a penalty for trespass: (1) the defendant was ordered to leave and was on the premises more than 24 hours after the notice (or a specified longer period) even if they left in the interval, and (2) at sentencing, the court finds the defendant is likely to trespass in the future.
Source: Schedule 2, section 2
Technical correction made to the French version of the definition of 'occupier' and subsection 9(3), updating terminology and ensuring consistency.
Source: Schedule 2, sections 1 and 3
Generated using AI from official bill text. Not legal advice. It is written by PoliticalData.ca for civic education, automatically checked and spot-reviewed before publishing.
Official textProcess Snapshot
Vote Summary
This bill is still active. We only show vote counts after the legislature publishes a recorded division.
No published representative vote breakdown
This bill is still moving through the process. When a recorded division is published, representative positions can be listed here.
Official sources
Status, sponsor, votes, and timeline on this page are drawn from these official legislative sources and public records. Each summary above is attributed to its own source.
How this data is sourced